Add support for SDM632 mss, it is very similar to MSM8953 mss only
difference SDM632 is using mss-supply as pm domain.

Signed-off-by: Barnabás Czémán <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c 
b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
index 86edd826ede8..e63432184767 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
@@ -271,6 +271,7 @@ enum {
        MSS_MSM8998,
        MSS_SC7180,
        MSS_SC7280,
+       MSS_SDM632,
        MSS_SDM660,
        MSS_SDM845,
 };
@@ -760,6 +761,7 @@ static int q6v5proc_reset(struct q6v5 *qproc)
                   qproc->version == MSS_MSM8953 ||
                   qproc->version == MSS_MSM8996 ||
                   qproc->version == MSS_MSM8998 ||
+                  qproc->version == MSS_SDM632 ||
                   qproc->version == MSS_SDM660) {
 
                /* Override the ACC value if required */
@@ -770,7 +772,9 @@ static int q6v5proc_reset(struct q6v5 *qproc)
                        writel(QDSP6SS_ACC_OVERRIDE_VAL_9607,
                               qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_STRAP_ACC);
                else if (qproc->version != MSS_MSM8909 &&
-                        qproc->version != MSS_MSM8953)
+                        qproc->version != MSS_MSM8953 &&
+                        qproc->version != MSS_SDM632)
+                       /* Override the ACC value if required */
                        writel(QDSP6SS_ACC_OVERRIDE_VAL,
                               qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_STRAP_ACC);
 
@@ -830,7 +834,8 @@ static int q6v5proc_reset(struct q6v5 *qproc)
                        /* Turn on L1, L2, ETB and JU memories 1 at a time */
                        if (qproc->version == MSS_MSM8940 ||
                            qproc->version == MSS_MSM8953 ||
-                           qproc->version == MSS_MSM8996) {
+                           qproc->version == MSS_MSM8996 ||
+                           qproc->version == MSS_SDM632) {
                                mem_pwr_ctl = QDSP6SS_MEM_PWR_CTL;
                                i = 19;
                                reverse = 0;
@@ -2303,6 +2308,43 @@ static const struct rproc_hexagon_res sc7280_mss = {
        .version = MSS_SC7280,
 };
 
+static const struct rproc_hexagon_res sdm632_mss = {
+       .hexagon_mba_image = "mba.mbn",
+       .proxy_supply = (struct qcom_mss_reg_res[]) {
+               {
+                       .supply = "pll",
+                       .uA = 100000,
+               },
+               {}
+       },
+       .proxy_clk_names = (char*[]){
+               "xo",
+               NULL
+       },
+       .active_clk_names = (char*[]){
+               "iface",
+               "bus",
+               "mem",
+               NULL
+       },
+       .proxy_pd_names = (char*[]) {
+               "cx",
+               "mx",
+               "mss",
+               NULL
+       },
+       .need_mem_protection = false,
+       .need_pas_mem_setup = true,
+       .has_alt_reset = false,
+       .has_mba_logs = false,
+       .has_spare_reg = false,
+       .has_qaccept_regs = false,
+       .has_ext_bhs_reg = false,
+       .has_ext_cntl_regs = false,
+       .has_vq6 = false,
+       .version = MSS_SDM632,
+};
+
 static const struct rproc_hexagon_res sdm660_mss = {
        .hexagon_mba_image = "mba.mbn",
        .proxy_clk_names = (char*[]){
@@ -2896,6 +2938,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id q6v5_of_match[] = {
        { .compatible = "qcom,msm8998-mss-pil", .data = &msm8998_mss},
        { .compatible = "qcom,sc7180-mss-pil", .data = &sc7180_mss},
        { .compatible = "qcom,sc7280-mss-pil", .data = &sc7280_mss},
+       { .compatible = "qcom,sdm632-mss-pil", .data = &sdm632_mss},
        { .compatible = "qcom,sdm660-mss-pil", .data = &sdm660_mss},
        { .compatible = "qcom,sdm845-mss-pil", .data = &sdm845_mss},
        { },

-- 
2.53.0


Reply via email to