On Fri, Mar 27, 2026 at 09:38:20PM +0100, Barnabás Czémán wrote: > On 2026-03-27 21:33, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2026 at 09:11:42PM +0100, Barnabás Czémán wrote: > > > SDM632 pm domains are different from MSM8953 because MSM8953 > > > is defining pm8953_s1 as regulator but SDM632 is defining it > > > as pm domain. > > > > > > This patch series correcting the pm domains defined in rpmpd > > > driver and splitting the MSS resources for the both SoC to match > > > the reality. > > > > > > These changes was discussed in a previous threads: > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ > > > > Was 4.9 never expected to work on MSM8953? Or did it require firmware > > changes? > There is no official 4.9 kernel for MSM8953 devices, all of them are using > 3.18. > There are unofficial 4.9 ports for those devices but all of them defining s1 > as > a regulator so the regulators were changed back like it was on 3.18.
Ack, thanks. I was looking at the msm-4.4 tree from the sdm660 branches, which has msm8953.dtsi. Thanks for the confirmation. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Barnabás Czémán <[email protected]> > > > --- -- With best wishes Dmitry
