Linux-Misc Digest #561, Volume #18 Sun, 10 Jan 99 22:13:11 EST
Contents:
Re: Consumer Poll Says Microsoft Is Good For Consumers (jedi)
sendmail vs. postfix (xcitor)
Re: 2038 and Linux (Johan Kullstam)
Re: CONCLUSIVE PROOF: Jesus *is* King of the Jews ! ! ! ("Kevin Nguyen")
Re: LINUS Can Suck My Hairy Cock .. or Newbie Needs Linux Help ... (Tim Trainor)
Re: LINUS Can Suck My Hairy Cock .. or Newbie Needs Linux Help ... (Ken Witherow)
Re: ZIP Plus (Kyle Dansie)
Re: NOSPAM in addresses.. (Zoltan Kocsi)
samba printing mystery ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
samba printing mystery ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (jedi)
Crossposted-To:
alt.destroy.microsoft,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,gnu.misc.discuss,uk.comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Consumer Poll Says Microsoft Is Good For Consumers
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 18:11:57 -0800
On 10 Jan 1999 15:52:07 -0500, Johan Kullstam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mayor Of R'lyeh) writes:
>> Windows is priced in line with other commercial OSs.
>
>redhat linux goes for $50 from the redhat people. that is a
>*commercial* (although not proprietary) OS.
Actually, that version sells at retail for $30.
--
Herding Humans ~ Herding Cats
Neither will do a thing unless they really want to, or |||
is coerced to the point where it will scratch your eyes out / | \
as soon as your grip slips.
In search of sane PPP docs? Try http://penguin.lvcm.com
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (xcitor)
Subject: sendmail vs. postfix
Date: 11 Jan 1999 00:26:40 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'll be installing a new Linux system at home very soon (it'll be
RedHat 5.2 on a Pentium 133 system). This will be my primary
workstation for the near future. I am using this machine now, but I
will be bringing my SCSI disks online as my primary storage, and
retiring the IDE disks I use now. I'm hoping the P133 can buy me maybe
another year - it seems to be fast enough. It is my hope that my new
SCSI-only system (Adaptec 2940UW) and fast disks will speed things up
a bit. When DSL comes to my area, this machine will probably be my
firewall.
Anyway, I'm trying to decide between sendmail and postfix. Since I'll
be doing a rebuild from the ground up, this would be a good
opportunity to bring a new MTA/MDA online. Any thoughts, positive or
negative?? Any war stories to share?
TIA
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux - the choice of a GNU generation.
1024/A883405D 1998/06/16 xcitor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Key fingerprint = E6 30 57 68 E9 3E 4B 79 5E B7 DE EF F8 DF 90 8F
Public Key Block at:
http://pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xA883405D
------------------------------
Subject: Re: 2038 and Linux
From: Johan Kullstam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 10 Jan 1999 21:17:53 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christopher B. Browne) writes:
> There are several 64 bit architectures, but none that provide competitive
> implementations as exist for IA-32. Intel is the sole source for IA-64
> (if it ever gets released :-)), Digital/Compaq is the sole source for
> Alpha, SGI for MIPS, Motorola/IBM for PPC, Sun for SPARC, and so forth.
> There may be more than one seller, but the 64 bit architectures only have
> single 'design sources.'
not true. the last place i worked at had a vhdl license for an
embedded mips processor. it was only 32 bit but still. mips are very
straightforward (which is why i really like them). clones would be a
snap if anyone wanted to do them.
--
Johan Kullstam [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Don't Fear the Penguin!
------------------------------
From: "Kevin Nguyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
rec.music.hip-hop,rec.models.rc.air,rec.woodworking,rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang,rec.sport.soccer,rec.travel.europe,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.software.year-2000,alt.prophecies.nostradamus,alt.prophecies.cayce
Subject: Re: CONCLUSIVE PROOF: Jesus *is* King of the Jews ! ! !
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 18:14:08 -0800
Sounds good. Why don't you Jews and Christians step outside and kick the
shit outta each other. After you're done, come back and tell me who won. I
care, I really do.
Tim wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>AND I AM NOT A JEW YOU JEWS TOLD ME I HAVE NO RIGHT TO JESUS OR HIS
>WRITINGS BECAUSE I AM A GENTILE
>
>1. THE JEWS KILLED JESUS THATS WHY YOU SAY HE IS DEAD
> AND KNOW THAT HE IS DEAD
>
>2. SO YOU KEEP YOUR BIBLE OUT OF MY FACE SINCE YOU JEWS CLAIM
> TO BE THE SOUL OWNER OF THE BIBLE
>
>Anonymous wrote:
>>
>> Here's absolutely irrefutable, scientifically-verifiable evidence that
>> plainly demonstrates Jesus the Nazarene called the Christ to be the
>> One and Only Messiah of the Hebrew Old Testament(TaNaKh). I discovered
>> these facts through very careful, exhaustive research and deduction by
>> comparing extant secular-historical evidences with the testimony which
>> was so faithfully recorded in the ancient Hebrew Canon, which necessarily
>> includes BOTH Old and New Covenant Scriptures.
>> Thanks again for reading,
>> Enjoy! :)
>>
------------------------------
From: Tim Trainor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.linux,alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: LINUS Can Suck My Hairy Cock .. or Newbie Needs Linux Help ...
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 02:23:33 +0000
Omni=B2 wrote:
> =
> I did that
> and it all checks out at boot
> but what is the damm command to connect to the net!!!!
> as I didnt set it for auto connect , thats not what i want
> i like to connect when I want to - its a control thing
> like in win98 I just click an icon
> do I have to type 100 or so characters with foward slashs every so ofte=
n
> just to log on?
Just activate the interface in netcfg. Or, a veteran C programmer like
yourself should have no trouble writing a short shell script to run chat
and pppd, right? Of course it's a control thing, that's why Linux is so
'hard', because YOU are expected to control the system. Also, your
username should be 8 chars or less, so you shouldn't have to type that
many chars.
> =
> >And of course the first time you sat in front of a M$ loaded machine y=
ou
> >just digged in and type "copy con" to get a new file, right ? The comm=
and
> >is so intuitive that a retarded movie star on crack could figure it ou=
t,
> >right ?
> =
> I guess I'm quick to forget
> I remember peter norton was a big help
> wish he'd write a linux primer
If you could cd /usr/doc (Hey! isn't that the same as DOS?!!), you would
find many, many files explaining damn near EVERYTHING. If you could get
that pesky ppp link working, you would find megabytes more all over the
Net.
> =
> >Did M$ make since the first 50 times you used it ? Is "dir" a more obv=
ious
> >command than "ls" ? Give it a little time and you'll find yourself doi=
ng
> =
> actually I smiled when dir (enter) worked
> kinda felt at home
> and yes dir is more obvious
> however "list" would be better
Isn't "ls" even better than "list"?
> =
> >actual compuring instead of pointing and clicking. And of course the m=
ain
> >benefit is that you'll finally get rid of the pathetic Blue Screen, th=
e
> =
> funnily enough , after 9 years of using windows I dont get that blue sc=
reen
> anymore
So, obviously you *did* get it at one point or another. funnily enough,
the more I used windows, the more often I got BSOD. =
> =
> >obnoxious "please install IE 4 to proceed", the "please reboot your sy=
stem
> =
> I dont use IE , I prefer doing all my tasks manually
> telnetting to the the appropiate port
> believe it or not
> I dont use a mouse in win except to log on :)
BS. I don't believe this for a moment. What fun is it reading
unformatted html? FTP doesn't work over telnet, either, so really, what
is left? telnetting to sendmail and attempting to forge your address? Or
NOT using telnet, and reading/posting news with Outlook Express? =
> =
> >to get this new mouse driver working"....the list goes on and on.
> =
> uhm PnP doesnt require a reboot for a mouse
> (sorry to get technichal)
Every driver I've ever installed in Windows needed a reboot afterwards.
> =
> >LOL. Now here's a statement worth arguing about, but since you're so h=
ot in
> >programming, try recompiling the NT kernel to leave out support for PC=
MCIA
> >cards. It can be a little tricky, but since you're such a programmer i=
t
> >shouldn't be a problem.
> =
> would you like some help in that dept?
> its not as hard as you think
> once your used to it
> I guess the same arguement goes for unix
So you are implying you've done this? More BS. Where did you get the
source? The same argument DOES go for Linux, because every distribution
ships with the source. I would also dare say that the average Linux
user DOES recompile the kernel occasionally (modules such as pcmcia are
easily left out at build time), furthermore, I would also say the the
average windows user has no idea what the kernel even is, nevermind
compiling anything.
Grow up and stop pretending , and please DO use that spell-checker.
------------------------------
From: Ken Witherow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.linux,alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: LINUS Can Suck My Hairy Cock .. or Newbie Needs Linux Help ...
Date: 11 Jan 1999 00:35:05 GMT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Tell me ohe OS that will treat a file (in this case, a device driver) like a
> directory?
Linux. Use the loopback devices (very handy when you're making a custom
cdrom and you want to check that the image is good before you burn it)
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 19:29:48 -0700
From: Kyle Dansie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ZIP Plus
You just need to load the IMM driver for the Zip Plus.
The HOWTO tells about this.
Cheers,
Kyle Dansie
--
========================================================
Linux Rules Iomega Zip Drive Mini - HOWTO
-
http://njtcom.com/dansie/zip-drive.html
or
http://metalab.unc.edu/mdw/HOWTO/mini/ZIP-Drive.html
========================================================
------------------------------
From: Zoltan Kocsi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: NOSPAM in addresses..
Date: 10 Jan 1999 02:05:37 +1100
Michael Powe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Zoltan> Yup, immediatelly after you downloaded it. Connection time
> Zoltan> costs money, you know. Spam also wastes disk space at the
> Zoltan> ISP, bandwidth, resources on my machines, it wastes my
> Zoltan> time and so on, I do not like downloading 1M junk with
> Zoltan> Windows binaries to read 20K mail. I don't have a 24/7
> Zoltan> 10M link for flat monthly fee yet so I - pathetic or not -
> Zoltan> do not like huge messages which I pay for before
> Zoltan> discarding them unread.
>
> I have never received a single binary "junk mail" file. Ever. I've
> been on the 'net for five years. You'll excuse me if I'm somewhat
> dubious about your claim that they're a constant problem. Of course,
I have to admit that it is not a 'constant problem'. However, I *did*
receive Windows binaries which were supposed to do some graphics whizbang
to drag me into the great opportunity of my life. Not too often, I admit,
about twice, but even one is more than enough. Especially that I have no
Windows to see them with... MS Word files are a little more frequent,
HTML junk is not uncommon at all and >10K ASCII mail is quite everyday
stuff.
Regardless, the amount of junk I received while I was using my real address
on USENET went beyond my limit. The amount I receive now does not exceed
the timeframe allowed to try to find their real source and complain at
their ISPs.
> you should use a responsible ISP that filters mail and you should do
> what you can to help them do it.
Well, why should *I* change ISP, pay for all the associated cost and
in general have all the hassle ? I thought that it was the spammer who
was the bad guy and should be punished, not me.
> All the means are available to you
> to take care of your own problem. It's your choice not to use them.
> That decision has nothing to do with the spammers.
Yes, one of the means is to use a fake address on USENET. My choice is
to use this method. This choice has something to do with spammers for
if there was no spam, I wouldn't a use fake address. I used my real
address when the net wasn't for telemarketing but for interchanging
information. I do remember when usenet spamming was not tolerated by
the net community - now email spamming is something 'we must live with'.
I do not want to get it.
> My opinion remains unchanged. These activities do nothing to reduce
> the spam levels nor to end the activities of spammers. I look forward
They *did* reduce *my* spam levels and on this side of the cable that's
what counts. In addition, if I do not receive that amount of rubbish
every day, then it's not wasting the Net.
Mail filtering does not do anything to reduce spam levels, nor does
it end the activities of spammers. However, by providing a real address
where you then delete the mail unread immediatelly after it reached
your machine is a very clear case of deliberately wasting Net resources.
I try to approach my spam problem from the angle of "if it doesn't
exist, I can't see it". You seem to look at it the "if I can't see it,
it doesn't exist" way.
They send you mail but you discard it. They don't send it to me.
Which one is better ? My opinion is unchanged too ...
> to the day that news servers are configured to require a correct
> return address, just as mail servers now are.
Well, if they are, they are not compliant to the RFCs ...
(AFAIK)
> Don't worry. I don't reply to munged addresses.
I'm not worried at all :-)
Zoltan
--
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
| ** To reach me write to zoltan in the domain of bendor com au ** |
+--------------------------------+---------------------------------+
| Zoltan Kocsi | I don't believe in miracles |
| Bendor Research Pty. Ltd. | but I rely on them. |
+--------------------------------+---------------------------------+
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: samba printing mystery
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 00:47:49 GMT
Weirdness happening here. I set up samba today to print from my kids windows
machine to my linux box. Everything seems to work fine. The printer is shown
on windows and I installed the drivers. I print a test page and it seems to
work fine and spools to linux but nothing prints. The file just sits there in
/var/spool/samba. How do I get it to go from there to the linux spooler?
Should my smb.conf be pointing to my regular linux spooler? I've tried
everything. My testparm output seems ok. Load smb config files from
/etc/smb.conf Processing section "[homes]" Processing section "[printers]"
Loaded services file OK. I'm at a loss. I've included everything I can to try
to get some help with this.
smb.conf
;*******************section global*****************
[global]
workgroup = WORKGROUP
server string = Samba Server
load printers = yes
printcap name = /etc/printcap
log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
max log size = 50
security = SHARE
socket options = TCP_NODELAY
dns proxy = no
guest account = dylan
null passwords = yes
;*******************section homes*****************
[homes]
comment = Home Directories
browseable = no
writable = yes
;*******************section printers*****************
[printers]
comment = All Printers
path = /var/spool/samba
browseable = yes
guest ok = yes
writable = no
printable = yes
public = yes
printcap
#
# Please don't edit this file directly unless you know what you are doing!
# Be warned that the control-panel printtool requires a very strict format!
# Look at the printcap(5) man page for more info.
#
# This file can be edited with the printtool in the control-panel.
##PRINTTOOL3## LOCAL stcolor 360x360 letter {} EpsonStylusColor Default {}
lp:\
:sd=/var/spool/lpd/lp:\
:mx#0:\
:sh:\
:lp=/dev/lp0:\
:if=/var/spool/lpd/lp/filter:
hrmmm what else.. Host file and resolve.conf I guess.
127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain
10.0.0.1 phlegmish
10.0.0.2 kent
10.0.0.3 dylan
resolve.conf
search 10.0.0.1 csolve
nameserver 207.61.168.3
nameserver 198.235.216.1
I may as well include the full output from testparm while I'm at it.
Load smb config files from /etc/smb.conf
Processing section "[homes]"
Processing section "[printers]"
Loaded services file OK.
Press enter to see a dump of your service definitions
# Global parameters
debuglevel = 2
syslog = 1
syslog only = No
protocol = NT1
security = SHARE
max disk size = 0
lpq cache time = 10
announce as = NT
encrypt passwords = No
update encrypted = No
getwd cache = Yes
read prediction = No
read bmpx = Yes
read raw = Yes
write raw = Yes
use rhosts = No
load printers = Yes
null passwords = Yes
strip dot = No
interfaces =
bind interfaces only = No
networkstation user login = No
password server =
socket options = TCP_NODELAY
netbios name =
netbios aliases =
smbrun = /usr/bin/smbrun
log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
config file =
smb passwd file = /etc/smbpasswd
hosts equiv =
preload =
server string = Samba Server
printcap name = /etc/printcap
lock dir = /var/lock/samba
root directory = /
default service =
message command =
dfree command =
passwd program = /usr/bin/smbpasswd
passwd chat = *old*password* %o\n *new*password* %n\n *new*password* %n\n
*changed*
passwd chat debug = No
valid chars =
workgroup = WORKGROUP
username map =
character set =
logon script =
logon path = \\%N\%U\profile
logon drive =
logon home = \\%N\%U
remote announce =
remote browse sync =
socket address = 0.0.0.0
homedir map =
announce version = 4.2
max log size = 50
mangled stack = 50
max mux = 50
max xmit = 65535
max packet = 65535
name resolve order = lmhosts host wins bcast
packet size = 65535
password level = 0
username level = 0
keepalive = 0
deadtime = 0
time offset = 0
read size = 16384
shared mem size = 102400
coding system =
client code page = 850
os level = 0
max ttl = 14400
max wins ttl = 259200
min wins ttl = 21600
lm announce = Auto
lm interval = 60
dns proxy = No
wins support = No
wins proxy = No
wins server =
preferred master = No
local master = Yes
domain master = No
domain logons = No
browse list = Yes
unix realname = No
NIS homedir = No
unix password sync = No
time server = No
ole locking compatibility = Yes
printer driver file = /etc/printers.def
# Default service parameters
comment =
copy =
include =
exec =
postexec =
root preexec =
root postexec =
alternate permissions = No
revalidate = No
default case = lower
case sensitive = No
preserve case = No
short preserve case = No
mangle case = No
mangling char = ~
browseable = Yes
available = Yes
path =
username =
guest account = dylan
invalid users =
valid users =
admin users =
read list =
write list =
volume =
force user =
force group =
read only = Yes
max connections = 0
min print space = 0
create mask = 0744
force create mode = 00
directory mask = 0755
force directory mode = 00
set directory = No
status = Yes
hide dot files = Yes
delete veto files = No
veto files =
hide files =
veto oplock files =
guest only = No
guest ok = No
print ok = No
postscript = No
map system = No
map hidden = No
map archive = Yes
locking = Yes
strict locking = No
share modes = Yes
oplocks = Yes
only user = No
wide links = Yes
follow symlinks = Yes
sync always = No
strict sync = No
mangled names = Yes
fake oplocks = No
printing = bsd
print command = lpr -r -P%p %s
lpq command = lpq -P%p
lprm command = lprm -P%p %j
lppause command =
lpresume command =
queuepause command =
queueresume command =
printer =
printer driver = NULL
printer driver location =
hosts allow =
hosts deny =
dont descend =
magic script =
magic output =
mangled map =
delete readonly = No
dos filetimes = No
dos filetime resolution = No
fake directory create times = No
[homes]
comment = Home Directories
browseable = No
read only = No
[printers]
comment = All Printers
path = /var/spool/samba
guest ok = Yes
print ok = Yes
[lp]
path = /var/spool/samba
read only = No
guest ok = Yes
print ok = Yes
share modes = No
oplocks = No
printer = lp
[IPC$]
comment = IPC Service (Samba Server)
path = /tmp
status = No
guest ok = Yes
Thanks for any help.
Dave
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: samba printing mystery
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 00:47:49 GMT
Weirdness happening here. I set up samba today to print from my kids windows
machine to my linux box. Everything seems to work fine. The printer is shown
on windows and I installed the drivers. I print a test page and it seems to
work fine and spools to linux but nothing prints. The file just sits there in
/var/spool/samba. How do I get it to go from there to the linux spooler?
Should my smb.conf be pointing to my regular linux spooler? I've tried
everything. My testparm output seems ok. Load smb config files from
/etc/smb.conf Processing section "[homes]" Processing section "[printers]"
Loaded services file OK. I'm at a loss. I've included everything I can to try
to get some help with this.
smb.conf
;*******************section global*****************
[global]
workgroup = WORKGROUP
server string = Samba Server
load printers = yes
printcap name = /etc/printcap
log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
max log size = 50
security = SHARE
socket options = TCP_NODELAY
dns proxy = no
guest account = dylan
null passwords = yes
;*******************section homes*****************
[homes]
comment = Home Directories
browseable = no
writable = yes
;*******************section printers*****************
[printers]
comment = All Printers
path = /var/spool/samba
browseable = yes
guest ok = yes
writable = no
printable = yes
public = yes
printcap
#
# Please don't edit this file directly unless you know what you are doing!
# Be warned that the control-panel printtool requires a very strict format!
# Look at the printcap(5) man page for more info.
#
# This file can be edited with the printtool in the control-panel.
##PRINTTOOL3## LOCAL stcolor 360x360 letter {} EpsonStylusColor Default {}
lp:\
:sd=/var/spool/lpd/lp:\
:mx#0:\
:sh:\
:lp=/dev/lp0:\
:if=/var/spool/lpd/lp/filter:
hrmmm what else.. Host file and resolve.conf I guess.
127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain
10.0.0.1 phlegmish
10.0.0.2 kent
10.0.0.3 dylan
resolve.conf
search 10.0.0.1 csolve
nameserver 207.61.168.3
nameserver 198.235.216.1
I may as well include the full output from testparm while I'm at it.
Load smb config files from /etc/smb.conf
Processing section "[homes]"
Processing section "[printers]"
Loaded services file OK.
Press enter to see a dump of your service definitions
# Global parameters
debuglevel = 2
syslog = 1
syslog only = No
protocol = NT1
security = SHARE
max disk size = 0
lpq cache time = 10
announce as = NT
encrypt passwords = No
update encrypted = No
getwd cache = Yes
read prediction = No
read bmpx = Yes
read raw = Yes
write raw = Yes
use rhosts = No
load printers = Yes
null passwords = Yes
strip dot = No
interfaces =
bind interfaces only = No
networkstation user login = No
password server =
socket options = TCP_NODELAY
netbios name =
netbios aliases =
smbrun = /usr/bin/smbrun
log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
config file =
smb passwd file = /etc/smbpasswd
hosts equiv =
preload =
server string = Samba Server
printcap name = /etc/printcap
lock dir = /var/lock/samba
root directory = /
default service =
message command =
dfree command =
passwd program = /usr/bin/smbpasswd
passwd chat = *old*password* %o\n *new*password* %n\n *new*password* %n\n
*changed*
passwd chat debug = No
valid chars =
workgroup = WORKGROUP
username map =
character set =
logon script =
logon path = \\%N\%U\profile
logon drive =
logon home = \\%N\%U
remote announce =
remote browse sync =
socket address = 0.0.0.0
homedir map =
announce version = 4.2
max log size = 50
mangled stack = 50
max mux = 50
max xmit = 65535
max packet = 65535
name resolve order = lmhosts host wins bcast
packet size = 65535
password level = 0
username level = 0
keepalive = 0
deadtime = 0
time offset = 0
read size = 16384
shared mem size = 102400
coding system =
client code page = 850
os level = 0
max ttl = 14400
max wins ttl = 259200
min wins ttl = 21600
lm announce = Auto
lm interval = 60
dns proxy = No
wins support = No
wins proxy = No
wins server =
preferred master = No
local master = Yes
domain master = No
domain logons = No
browse list = Yes
unix realname = No
NIS homedir = No
unix password sync = No
time server = No
ole locking compatibility = Yes
printer driver file = /etc/printers.def
# Default service parameters
comment =
copy =
include =
exec =
postexec =
root preexec =
root postexec =
alternate permissions = No
revalidate = No
default case = lower
case sensitive = No
preserve case = No
short preserve case = No
mangle case = No
mangling char = ~
browseable = Yes
available = Yes
path =
username =
guest account = dylan
invalid users =
valid users =
admin users =
read list =
write list =
volume =
force user =
force group =
read only = Yes
max connections = 0
min print space = 0
create mask = 0744
force create mode = 00
directory mask = 0755
force directory mode = 00
set directory = No
status = Yes
hide dot files = Yes
delete veto files = No
veto files =
hide files =
veto oplock files =
guest only = No
guest ok = No
print ok = No
postscript = No
map system = No
map hidden = No
map archive = Yes
locking = Yes
strict locking = No
share modes = Yes
oplocks = Yes
only user = No
wide links = Yes
follow symlinks = Yes
sync always = No
strict sync = No
mangled names = Yes
fake oplocks = No
printing = bsd
print command = lpr -r -P%p %s
lpq command = lpq -P%p
lprm command = lprm -P%p %j
lppause command =
lpresume command =
queuepause command =
queueresume command =
printer =
printer driver = NULL
printer driver location =
hosts allow =
hosts deny =
dont descend =
magic script =
magic output =
mangled map =
delete readonly = No
dos filetimes = No
dos filetime resolution = No
fake directory create times = No
[homes]
comment = Home Directories
browseable = No
read only = No
[printers]
comment = All Printers
path = /var/spool/samba
guest ok = Yes
print ok = Yes
[lp]
path = /var/spool/samba
read only = No
guest ok = Yes
print ok = Yes
share modes = No
oplocks = No
printer = lp
[IPC$]
comment = IPC Service (Samba Server)
path = /tmp
status = No
guest ok = Yes
Thanks for any help.
Dave
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.misc) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Misc Digest
******************************
