Linux-Misc Digest #440, Volume #19 Sat, 13 Mar 99 17:13:07 EST
Contents:
Re: VERY easy CHMOD question ("David Z. Maze")
Re: [Fwd: Send me to Linux] (joseph_a_philbrook__iii)
at shutdown I get: try_to_unuse: entry ..... signal=1 (Miernik)
Mysterious bug (Gamma Rat)
Re: MAKE command (LB)
Re: VERY easy CHMOD question ("Keith Montgomery")
Re: VERY easy CHMOD question (Unclebob)
Where is Netscape Conference for Linux? (Miernik)
Re: NT-Backup-Tapes under Linux (Bill Cattell)
Re: Looking for ODBC Database (William Burrow)
Max user process limit higher then 256? (Ken Williams)
Re: Looking for ODBC Database (Art Green)
Enlightment/libpng problems (kenneth allen keller jr)
DHCP and Internet ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Looking for ODBC Database ("Carl Hilinski")
Re: CD autorun (Gerald Willmann)
Re: Launching Red Hat Control Panel (Gerald Willmann)
Re: Samba problem need help (Peter Marbaise)
problems setting up enlightenment? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: SuSE 6.0 feelings please. ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: making a CD image using dd (problems) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "David Z. Maze" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: linux.redhat.misc,redhat.config
Subject: Re: VERY easy CHMOD question
Date: 13 Mar 1999 14:20:24 -0500
Katherine Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
KD> I made the script, put it in my /etc/ppp directory. [/etc/ppp/ppp-on]
KD> I made a link to it in /usr/sbin since it is in my path.
KD>
KD> I change to /etc/ppp and I type: ./ppp-on it tells me:
KD>
KD> bash: ./ppp-on: No such file or directory
KD>
KD> The file is there. The mode is 700, and I am root.
KD> If I type: sh ./ppp-on it at least runs the script, but that's not my
KD> goal here.
What is the first line of the script? ('head ppp-on' will give you
the first 10 lines of it, which can often be useful.) It should look
something like:
#!/bin/sh
where /bin/sh is the program that should be used to run the script.
If the line is missing, adding it might help. If it's there, check
that the file named exists, is executable, etc. For a Bourne shell
script, this should either be /bin/sh or /bin/bash, depending on the
shell features you use. It often is something like /usr/bin/perl for
a Perl script, for example.
--
David Maze [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://donut.mit.edu/dmaze/
"Hey, Doug, do you mind if I push the Emergency Booth Self-Destruct Button?"
"Oh, sure, Dave, whatever...you _do_ know what that does, right?"
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (joseph_a_philbrook__iii)
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Send me to Linux]
Date: 13 Mar 1999 19:20:44 GMT
Article 346059 of comp.os.linux.misc:
On 9 Mar 1999 19:13:41 GMT [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rulecoyote) did say:
>> Yes
>> We all forget that we were newbies in almost everything and as soon as
>> we learn a little we think we are experts. The person who posts a question
>> doesn't waste your time with his age experience or schooling . He doesn't
>> tell you about his time limitations or that there is a war going on in
>> the street. He just asks a question . If it is beneath you dont answer it.
>>
>> oldcoyote
Thanks for mentioning that oldcoyote...
I don't consider myself a complete newbie, but in some ways I still am.
I don't mind the idea that I should be willing to just look it up when I
need to know something either... BUT:
In my years of unix experiance I'm just a low leval user with zero formal
training. And no off premises access to my unix account so it was hard to
learn the right lessons... (in fact it's only reciently that I've had access
to the limited number of usenet groups that my Employer allows on their
unix. It took me a while to get used to trying to figure out things from
what was there in the output of a "man $commandname|less" But I did.
Between the lack of formal training and little time with any documentation
I learned to do many things in non-standard ways... So sometimes I'm missing
a key piece of info that most learners know by heart before they get near
ready to try the things I [want/need] to do. And sometimes I've found ways
to do things that it seams few ever bothered to try. <the later usualy means
they learned to do it another [better?] way>
THEN I HEARD OF LINUX... And I thought, hey how could it fail.
I mean it IS a unix port. So I got me a linux kit/book and a book on shell
programing... only to find that I really needed a more up to date version of
slackware. So now I got slack 3.5 on CD. I'm trying to get my system
working properly without the advantage of having an expert willing to
come over and set it up well enough to do me till I learn enough to do it
myself. I quickly found a few newsgroups <like this one> where sometimes I
get help understanding the stuff I couldn't figure out from the docs/books.
And oh yeah, the docs... <words fail me...>
I guess I was spoiled by the man database at work. Where sometimes I find an
example or even two to help me figure out what the vaguge syntax or syopsis
description told the expert... But when I man something in linux I almost
never find an actual example of what the command line should actualy look
like. Worse luck, somebody decided that most of the [better?] docs should be in
a newer fancier format. But I've yet to successfully get info working so
I have no idea if it's any better there...
Sometimes when I'm trying to understand docs that seam written to be a
reference for experts with little a newbie can actualy understand in them,
I get frustrated, and ask something here... Well Sometimes I even get answers.
To those who didn't find my questions benmeath them I say:
THANK YOU one and all!
But it can be frustrating when someone knows it's easy for them to do
something a different way than what I'm trying to learn to do to just figures
I'm just wasting bandwidth. And blows me off.
As it happens I am working under one constraint that I admit to being a
matter of choice. I won't accept any "gui required" solutions. At least not
now. I don't like gui's And find it frustrating that the only way anybody
thinks anything can be user friendly is to use a gui. But you see I find
gui's incompatable with how I think. Also I'm trying to learn how things
work, and have a better chance when I can "TRY" to figure out a script
full of CLI's than trying to follow the workings of a gui.
This does make it hard to find anybody who knows the answer I need to my
questions who isn't such an expert that they don't have time to help me
learn how...
But I have faith that if I hang out here long enough, I'll find enough
tidbits of info on how things work that someday I'll think I'm an expert
too... when that happens, If I start blowing the newbies off because they
don't know better than to bug me with what will seam to me to be stupid
questions... If I do that, will somebody please remind me of how frustraited
my lack of expert knowledge felt <now> And if that doesn't get me to at
least be kind hearted enough to offer a little bit of help now and then,
please take me out back and shoot me! Because when I get to feeling to self
important to be nice to those who are less knowledgeable, then I'll no
longer have any thing worth living for...
--- ___
<O> <-> Joe (theWordy) Philbrook
^
\___/ < [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
------------------------------
From: Miernik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: at shutdown I get: try_to_unuse: entry ..... signal=1
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 19:50:13 +0000
And in about thirty copies...
everything works, but what is that?
--
_________________________________________
Miernik / / mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
/ / tel.(pager): +48 642 222 864
________________/___/ http://www.miernik.nask.com/miernik/
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gamma Rat)
Subject: Mysterious bug
Date: 13 Mar 1999 18:19:25 GMT
Reply-To: see my .sig below
Greetings.
I have a C program that I compiled with GCC under Slackware Linux with
version 5 of the C library. When I try to run it, it says
"maze: Can't open display:"
But when I run it in the debugger (gdb), it runs and exits normally.
When I run it under Redhat 5.2, it works!
I have noticed this same problem with one other program I compiled
on Slackware, but no other programs I compiled on this same system
exhibited this problem.
Any ideas as to what's wrong? Any fixes? Any workarounds?
Thanks.
Ken.
--
The penguins are not what they seem ...
These are my opinions. Others will believe what they wish to believe.
It's not my job to re-educate the net. Demands for citations will be ignored.
(And isn't it ironic how people demand air-tight proofs only for views that
don't agree with theirs?)
My REAL email address is ksinner
at ticon
dot net
--
The penguins are not what they seem ...
These are my opinions. Others will believe what they wish to believe.
It's not my job to re-educate the net. Demands for citations will be ignored.
(And isn't it ironic how people demand air-tight proofs only for views that
don't agree with theirs?)
My REAL email address is ksinner
at ticon
dot net
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 10:28:46 -0600
From: LB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MAKE command
angel13 wrote:
> Hi
> Sorry I am very new to Linux and I have a problem installing
> software. I am using RedHat 5.2 and when I try to install software it
> require the use of MAKE command. But when I try to execute MAKE it
> give a invaild command. What should I do or is there another command I
> can use? Please forgive me and refer me to the right newsgroup if I am
> in the wrong one.
>
> Thank
'make' is a kind of scripting language peolpe use to compile large
projects. It reads a file, usually called 'Makefile', to know what to
do. I don't know what error you got, so I don't know how to help you.
If it gave you a 'bash: make not found' error, then make is not in your
$PATH or not on your machine. If it couldn't find the Makefile, it will
say 'make: No Targets. Stop.'
BTW, you are typing it in all lowercase, right?
Lorne
------------------------------
From: "Keith Montgomery" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: linux.redhat.misc
Subject: Re: VERY easy CHMOD question
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 13:22:29 -0500
I have this nagging suspicion that you built your link in reverse.
Cat your script to be sure that it is still there, and check your spelling
carefully.
(I know, nobody could make that kind of an error, but ...)
If that doesn't work, try adding a few echo statements to your script.
Since you are using bash, try letting auto-completion confirm that you are
using a filename that exists.
Good Luck.
Katherine Davis wrote in message ...
>. . . at least I think it is a CHMOD question.
>
>I am working with PPP (NO! Don't quit reading, the question really doesn't
>involve PPP =) and am trying to run a script that dials and connects, etc.
>
>I made the script, put it in my /etc/ppp directory. [/etc/ppp/ppp-on]
>I made a link to it in /usr/sbin since it is in my path.
>
>When I type: ppp-on it tells me:
>
>bash: /usr/sbin/ppp-on: No such file or directory
>
>I change to /etc/ppp and I type: ./ppp-on it tells me:
>
>bash: ./ppp-on: No such file or directory
>
>The file is there. The mode is 700, and I am root.
>
>I thought I remembered there being a special mode for scripts, but I'm not
>sure.
>I changed it to -rws --- --- but that returned the same error.
>
>If I type: sh ./ppp-on it at least runs the script, but that's not my
>goal here.
>
>What do I have to do to let this script be run from the command line
without
>putting the shell in front of it?
>
>TIA!
>-Kat Davis
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: Unclebob <unclebob@this-ain't-it.net>
Crossposted-To: linux.redhat.misc,redhat.config
Subject: Re: VERY easy CHMOD question
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 12:24:22 -0600
Katherine Davis wrote:
> . . . at least I think it is a CHMOD question.
> I am working with PPP (NO! Don't quit reading, the question really doesn't
> involve PPP =) and am trying to run a script that dials and connects, etc.
> I made the script, put it in my /etc/ppp directory. [/etc/ppp/ppp-on]
> I made a link to it in /usr/sbin since it is in my path.
> When I type: ppp-on it tells me:
> bash: /usr/sbin/ppp-on: No such file or directory
> I change to /etc/ppp and I type: ./ppp-on it tells me:
> bash: ./ppp-on: No such file or directory
> The file is there. The mode is 700, and I am root.
> I thought I remembered there being a special mode for scripts, but I'm not sure.
> I changed it to -rws --- --- but that returned the same error.
> If I type: sh ./ppp-on it at least runs the script, but that's not my
> goal here.
> What do I have to do to let this script be run from the command line without
> putting the shell in front of it?
> TIA!
> -Kat Davis
Kat;
Perhaps you forgot to change the line in ppp-on that points to your
dialer_script= ppp-on-dialer and you don't have it in your ppp directory?
If so, you may want to change it to point to your file?
ub
------------------------------
From: Miernik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Where is Netscape Conference for Linux?
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 19:53:33 +0000
I've installed Netscape Communicator 4.5, and in the Communicator menu, the
Conference position is dimmed.
How can I run Netscape Conference under Linux, is there one, has someone run
it?
If not, who can reccomend me a good conference program for Linux, is there a
VocalTec version for Linux?
--
www.miernik.nask.com/miernik/ _/ _/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] _/_/ _/_/_/ _/ _/
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/ _/ _/
GSM: (+48) 603 201 700 _/ _/_/ _/_/ _/ _/ _/_/ _/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/
page:(+48) 64 2222 864 _/ _/ _/_/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/
ICQ UIN: 4004001 _/ _/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/
_/ _/ _/_/ _/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/ _/
------------------------------
From: Bill Cattell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: NT-Backup-Tapes under Linux
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 19:39:18 GMT
Kai Schnabel wrote:
>
> Hi,
> is there a solution to read NT-3.51 Backup-Tapes under Linux?
>
> One soulution would be to read them under NT.51 and write them again
> with tar for NT (this wors pretty good) but ... I would have to retape
> all old Backup-Tapes and then rewrite them (costs me a lot of time I
> don't have)... I don't need those tapes every day but, one never
> knows...
>
> Any other solutions? Read the tapes with dd and then convert ist with a
> NT_BACKUP-to-tar tool? Does such a programme exits?
>
> I want to update our department server from NT 3.51 to Linux and the old
> Backups are the only thing which let me hesitate.....
>
> Kai
> --
> Kai P. Schnabel ([EMAIL PROTECTED])| Reformstudiengang Medizin,
> http://www.charite.de/rv/reform/ | Humboldt Universitaet zu
> Berlin
> Tel.: +49 30 450-76112 FAX: -76912 | *Linux for IQs higher than
> 95*
I remember hearing about a set GNU utils that run under NT 4.0. You
might look for them and see is 1) they run under 3.51 (they probably do)
and 2) they have a 'tar' with them.
Bill
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (William Burrow)
Subject: Re: Looking for ODBC Database
Date: 13 Mar 1999 19:58:08 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 13 Mar 1999 12:59:13 -0600,
PostNet News <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I am looking for an ODBC database to run on linux. Are there any free ones
>available?
ODBC seems to be a Windows thing. Oracle might export via ODBC protocols,
maybe some of the others do as well. ODBC clients on Unix are virtually
non-existent, as far as I can tell.
More info on the topic is appreciated.
--
William Burrow -- New Brunswick, Canada o
Copyright 1999 William Burrow ~ /\
~ ()>()
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ken Williams)
Subject: Max user process limit higher then 256?
Date: Sat, 06 Mar 1999 20:44:47 GMT
Under kernel 2.0.35, how do I allow more then 256 user processes for a given
user?
In the login.defs, theres a ULIMIT value of
ULIMIT 2097152
Whats the format of 2097152? What the hell is that?
Apache can't sometimes execute a CGI script cause theres too many other CGI
scripts current running. I need to increase whatever is need to let apache
run what it wants too. All CGI's are run as nobody.
Anyone?
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Art Green)
Subject: Re: Looking for ODBC Database
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 15:47:42 -0500
On 13 Mar 1999 19:58:08 GMT, William Burrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Sat, 13 Mar 1999 12:59:13 -0600,
>PostNet News <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>I am looking for an ODBC database to run on linux. Are there any free ones
>>available?
>
>ODBC seems to be a Windows thing. Oracle might export via ODBC protocols,
>maybe some of the others do as well. ODBC clients on Unix are virtually
>non-existent, as far as I can tell.
>
1. ODBC is NOT a "Windows thing". The "O" stands for "open".
2. ODBC is not a database, it is a connectivity package. The "C" stands for
"connectivity".
If you want UNIX (not Linux, it isn't supported yet) ODBC drivers for common
databases, check out http://www.intersolv.com.
If you want a half decent Linux SQL database, you might try ProgreSQL or MySQL.
Art
------------------------------
From: kenneth allen keller jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Enlightment/libpng problems
Date: 13 Mar 1999 21:07:12 GMT
I'm currently trying to install enlighment .15 onmy system and the
install-all file works fine until I get to a check of the version of
libpng. It says that it needs a later version then 1.0.1, but on the same
line says I have ver. 1.0.2 which came with the Enlightment package I
downloaded... So I downloaded libgnp 1.0.1 and have no idea how to
install it. Basically I need help, what can I do to get it to
reconize 1.0.2? Barring that what do I need to get it to reconize 1.0.1?
Thanks,
Ken
--
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: DHCP and Internet
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 18:35:10 GMT
Hello !!!
I need a tutorial (or a good HOWTO) on DHCP and Internet. I
want to do following. I run a network of 7 computers all running
(standard) Windows 95 or 98 and one NT 4.0. Now I want to setup dhcpcd so
that clients (Windows 95, 98, NT) would logon to Linux and Linux would
assigned them a dynamicly IP address. The second thing I want to make is
that they would have access to Internet over linux which gateway it would be
router. But for my knowledge
I think that the router is the hardest nut to crack. Because I think that
our router won't relay dynamicly IP address. We have 3COM OfficeConnet.
Can you confirm this?
Please help me!
Bye.
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: "Carl Hilinski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Looking for ODBC Database
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 16:38:08 -0500
Postgres has ODBC drivers for Windows9x that really work.
I believe mySQL does also. Although there's a free Linux version of Sybase
out there, you have to pay for the ODBC stuff. The Postgres/Mysql are free.
ch
Art Green wrote in message ...
>On 13 Mar 1999 19:58:08 GMT, William Burrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>On Sat, 13 Mar 1999 12:59:13 -0600,
>>PostNet News <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>I am looking for an ODBC database to run on linux. Are there any free
ones
>>>available?
>>
>>ODBC seems to be a Windows thing. Oracle might export via ODBC protocols,
>>maybe some of the others do as well. ODBC clients on Unix are virtually
>>non-existent, as far as I can tell.
>>
>1. ODBC is NOT a "Windows thing". The "O" stands for "open".
>2. ODBC is not a database, it is a connectivity package. The "C" stands
for
>"connectivity".
>
>If you want UNIX (not Linux, it isn't supported yet) ODBC drivers for
common
>databases, check out http://www.intersolv.com.
>
>If you want a half decent Linux SQL database, you might try ProgreSQL or
MySQL.
>
>Art
>
------------------------------
From: Gerald Willmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: CD autorun
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 13:21:09 -0800
> Penna wrote:
> >
> > We are making a CD ROM for use with linux machines, with some HTML pages on.
> > Is there any way to 'autorun' the CD when it is inserted?
do HTML pages autorun on M$ OSs or Mac? Under linux they won't and neither
will any executable w/o prior modifications (automounter plus some daemon
waiting to execute your program) which no linux user in his/her right mind
would be willing to make. Why don't you simply put the stuff on the web?
Gerald
------------------------------
From: Gerald Willmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Launching Red Hat Control Panel
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 13:09:04 -0800
have you tried simply typing controlpanel or control-panel, at least
that's what my ageing memory suggests - haven't used it in quite a while.
Wait a second, let's look at root's .xinitrc: control-panel &
GErald
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 21:58:23 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter Marbaise)
Subject: Re: Samba problem need help
Hallo john!
Am 13 Mar 99 schrieb john xu an All
zum Thema "Samba problem need help":
jx> From: john xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
jx> All:
jx> The samba server on my linux machine works fine. All of win95
jx> client
jx> can see shared drive and user account from window explore.
jx> However,
jx> I have some trouble to make Win NT client to get in. The linux
WinNT with service pack 3, yes --> they use encrypted passwords. Read
encrypt.txt and follow instructions. I'm running samba with a mixed environment
of W95,98 and NT and no problems with encrypted passwords.
ciao Peter
eMail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FidoNet : 2:2452/110.20
WWW : http://www.fido.de/~pema/
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.x,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: problems setting up enlightenment?
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 21:45:04 GMT
Hi, i am trying to setup enlightenment on my computer and am running onto one
litle problem. I compile everything just fine but when i try to run it (ie
have it in my .xinitrc file) i get an error that it can't find/open some
fnlib file, but i have looked for this file and it is on my box but
enlightenment can't seem to find/use it. Any light that anyone out there can
shead on my problem would be greatly appriciated.
-gaiko
Gaikokujin Kyofusho
Student Extraordinare & UN*X Guru Wannbe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SuSE 6.0 feelings please.
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 18:23:14 +0000
Jacek M. Holeczek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> Can one intall SuSE 6.0 ( or 5.3 ) on the UMSDOS filesystem ( I mean the
> whole Linux on a dos/windows partition in a subdirectory c:\linux\... ).
> Thanks in advance,
> Jacek.
>
Yup. It's selected as 'demo install' during the install setup. It is slower,
though
Alternatively you can use the live-file system, where you have a small (50-
100 MB) partition, and run the rest from a special CD. *VERY* useful for
demonstrating.
--
____________________________________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (expires 22/03)| THERE IS NO TERIYAKI, ONLY ZUUL!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | - Akane's cooking,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | The Varaiyah Cycle
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: making a CD image using dd (problems)
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 22:02:44 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
fernando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> man mkisofs could help you
well i tried using mkhybrid and that gave me the same error that dd did, the
errors always occur at the end of the cd recording if that helps.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Hi, i am trying to make a copy of a CD onto my computer so i can give it to
my
> > freind later to burn and i was trying:
> >
> > dd if=/dev/hdc of=/cdimg.img
> >
> > and that *seemed* to work fine for one CD but the other three don't seem to
> > like that too well, here is the error i get:
> >
> > [root@localhost /]# dd if=/dev/hdc of=/dvfat/ssf2a.img
> > hdc: media changed
> > hdc : bad access: block=960012, count=8
> > end_request: I/O error, dev 16:00, sector 960012
> > hdc : bad access: block=960016, count=4
> > end_request: I/O error, dev 16:00, sector 960016
> > dd: /dev/hdc: Input/output error
> > 960012+0 records in
> > 960012+0 records out
> > [root@localhost /]#
> >
> > it copies something to an image and i can mount that image but i am not sure
> > if the copies are complete (ie i don't want to give them to my freind and
> > find that they don't work).
> >
> > any help as to what is wrong (what i am doing wrong?) would be greatly
> > appricated!
> >
> > -Gaiko
> >
> > Gaikokujin Kyofusho
> > Student Extraordinare & UN*X Guru Wannbe
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> > http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
>
> --
> --------------------------------------------
> This are my personal opinions
> Real email: sanabriaf at yahoo dot com
>
Gaikokujin Kyofusho
Student Extraordinare & UN*X Guru Wannbe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.misc) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Misc Digest
******************************
