Linux-Misc Digest #714, Volume #19                Sat, 3 Apr 99 00:13:09 EST

Contents:
  Re: Writing CGI Scripts in C and Serving with Apache (Lou Poppler)
  Adding a new disk ("Paul Davies")
  Re: Different IP in one network (Lew Pitcher)
  Benchmark questions (Andy Robertson)
  Linux loading problems...help (Edward Jones)
  Re: Proposal: "Linux 2000 Platform" ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: O/s Sw (Ewan Dunbar)
  Re: newsreader for linux (Christopher Michael Jones)
  Re: Redhat 5.2 on Compaq Proliant 2000 not recongize SCSI contoller (Larry Benoit)
  Trouble getting ftape to work properly with DJ-20 (QIC-80) floppy tape  ("Daniel J. 
Wright")
  Re: Proposal: "Linux 2000 Platform" (Jeremy Crabtree)
  Re: Don't wanna run 'diald', so what else??? (David M. Cook)
  Re: cpio+linux+hpux (Volkov Oleg)
  Re: Delphi on Linux the Lazarus project (Bob Tennent)
  Re: startx monitor shutdown ("Jon Upham")
  Re: How do I ??? 56k modem / kppp (Andrew Comech)
  Re: Need to find the 'no' program. (Matt Kuznicki)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Lou Poppler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Writing CGI Scripts in C and Serving with Apache
Date: 3 Apr 1999 03:42:51 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Tue, 30 Mar 1999 20:05:02 -0600,
Rita Schiavone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: It works fine from the command line.  It's only when I use it as a CGI
: program that it stops unexpectedly.

Do you realize that a CGI program cannot write a web page to the client,
and then expect to read something back via HTTP ?  That is, when you
click the "SAVE" button, a new independent HTTP request of some sort
is sent to the Apache server, which will start a fresh copy of whatever
CGI program is mentioned in the URL.  This is radically different from
running a single program at the command line which writes to the TTY
and then waits to read a reply.  Maybe you could post some code here ?

: L J Bayuk wrote in message ...
:>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:>>Hi all,
:>>
:>>I am using the Apache Web Server and Linux.  I'm trying to write a CGI
:>>program in C that does the following:
:>>
:>>1.  Reads in a file of records (e.g., the cron tab file).
:>>2.  Displays the file to the screen in an HTML form with a couple of
:>>checkboxes per record, so the user can select records to delete, activate,
:>>etc.
:>>3.  Has a SAVE button that writes user changes back to a file.
:>>
:>>1 and 2 work fine.  It's the 3rd item I'm having problems with.  The SAVE
:>>button is pushed and it goes off to execute the CGI program but halts in
: the
:>>middle of the program (no errors it just stops before completing the
:>>program).  If I try to open a file using the standard fopen() routine, the
:>>program dies at that point.  If I use strcmp() to compare two strings, it
:>>dies there.  I have tried putting fflush(stdout) before it, after it, lots
:>>of places, and it still doesn't work.
:>>
:>>Could some C CGI guru out there please provide me some pointers as to what
: I
:>>am doing wrong or what I need to do to correct this problem.
:>>
:>>Any help will be greatly appreciated.
:>
:>Well, I'm no guru of anything, but it doesn't look like a CGI problem
:>to me. If the program dies when you call strcmp() or fopen() I would
:>guess something overran memory and/or the stack or some such thing.



-- 
  Lou Poppler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  |   Would you try to solve your Y2K
   http://www.msen.com/~lwp/       |   problems by giving more money to
                                       a company whose main product is
                                       named Xxxxxxx95 and Xxxxxxx98 ?

------------------------------

From: "Paul Davies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Adding a new disk
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 1999 01:02:52 +0100

I've been running RedHat 5.2. for a few months now and need to add a new
hard disk so I can run more applications (e.g  Oracle which required 600MB).

Does anyone know if this can be done in Linux?

I guess I need to split the existing /usr directory across the old and the
new disk. How do I do this?

Can anyone give me a set of procedures I need to go through when adding the
disk drive?

Any help much appreciated!

Paul



------------------------------

From: Lew Pitcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.setup,hk.comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Different IP in one network
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 21:39:36 -0500

Jack Cheng wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I have a network system using RH5.2 and running fine. The IP is 192.168.16.1
> 
> Because I want ot learn more about linux, so I hooked up one more linux box
> in my existing lan (of course running as a SERVER and IP is 192.168.18.1),
> so i can change anything in the new linux box for my testing.
> 
> I cannot ping the 192.168.16.1 from the new linux box (192.168.18.1), is
> possible set two different IP in one lan system?
> 
> Best Regard
> Jack Cheng

If you have defined your 'subnet mask' to be more than 16bits (i.e.
255.255.0.0),
you'll have to stick a router between the two Linux boxes. You see, they
look to
be on different subnets, and would ignore each other if they were. 

Rather than add more hardware to your lan, either
a) change the IP address on the new Linux box to a 192.168.16.x address
   (like your first Linux box has), or
b) change the subnet masks on *both* Linux boxes to be 255.255.0.0
   (in order to put both machines on the same subnet).

Of course, option (b) above may have detrimental effects on your
existing LAN.


-- 

Lew Pitcher        |  If everyone has an angle, why
JOAT-in-training   |  are most of them so obtuse?

------------------------------

From: Andy Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Benchmark questions
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 1999 18:00:42 -0600
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I was reading over the bogomips howto today, and the numbers really
surprised me.

Consistently, socket-7 or super-socket-7 systems are twice as fast as
comparable
slot-2 systems.  For example, a Pentium MMX 233 is as fast as a
Pentium-2 466.
A AMD K6-2 440 is twice as fast as a Pentium-2 450.  Why is this?  The
AMD K6-2 440
beat out all single processor Linux systems, including Alphas! (for
32bit math).  It
was almost as fast as a Cray J90!

(FYI, I have actually seen this, our Pentium MMX 233's are about 33 %
faster than our
Celeron 333's), and they Celerons are noticibly slower.

Why?
    andy
-- 
Let us read and let us dance.  Two things which will never
bring any harm to this world.  Voltaire

------------------------------

From: Edward Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Linux loading problems...help
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 1999 18:29:52 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I have been trying to load RedHat 5.2 and it keeps rebooting my system
in the middle of copying the files to the hard drive. It started out by
rebooting during formating and installation of ext2 filesystem. The hard
drive formats and works fine in DOS, I would ask RedHat but they
misprinted my reg # on the case so I'm waiting for the mess to get
fixed. The hard drive is a Fujitsu mpc3043at  4.3Gig. If anyone has any
ideas I would appreciate it.

Thank You
Ed Jones


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject: Re: Proposal: "Linux 2000 Platform"
Date: 2 Apr 1999 23:57:46 GMT

In comp.os.linux.development.system Christopher B. Browne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:

: Unfortunately, the flaming of Red Hat by those of the Slackware
: Religion acts as an anodyne, distracting people from the possibility
: that there might be ideas out there that are better than either
: system's approach.

: The fixation on RPM, with occasional vague mention of dpkg, betrays a
: generally vast ignorance of the various packaging methods that in use.
: Almost certainly Ports and the Debian tools represent something closer
: to the "state of the art" than does RPM.  

        I think that whatever package manager you are using should be smart
enough to figure out what distro you are using. This is a major
project...but it would be a great benefit to all concerned. Create a
specification for the software creators to follow in specifying where they
want it installed. The package will have a database of distros that will say
where they will allow things to be installed, and if there is a conflict, it
will then create symlinks in the place the package wants pointing at the
place where the distro wants the package installed. If the software creators
want to do some extra work, they might be a option for different sets of
configuration files for each distro. Another option will be to check for
dependancies...some programs have none, others a great number of them.

        Now, I am not totally familar with Ports, or the Debian package
managemetn system, since, alas, I used to run SLS, and now Slackware, with a
year long flirtation with Red Hat.

        I've been using Linux since kernel v0.12, and have see all sorts of
package systems, they are great for many people...but there will always be
us who like to compile things and install them ourselves. Yes, we may be
twisted...<grin>...but the heart of Linux has always been flexablity. And I
think it would be a shame to loose that flexablity. 

ttyl
     Farrell


---
Farrell J. McGovern                          Sysadmin/Security for Unix Systems
Using Linux since kernel ver. 0.12                  Specialist in Linux Systems
 

------------------------------

From: Ewan Dunbar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: O/s Sw
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 1999 23:04:48 -0500

"Amanda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> First I want to start to learn and install it and later I will
> proceed for lisence

Linux is *free*. There is NO shareware version. You don't need to buy a
licence. It is *absolutely free* -- check out www.gnu.org for more info on
its licence. In essence, the GPL says that it's copyrighted, but you're 
allowed to:
        a) copy it
        b) modify it (the source code has to be provided with a GPL app)
        c) distribute it at any price, from 0 monetary units, to -240093
                monetary units, to 2308942789 monetary units, to a goat
                and twelve stalks of corn

================================================
Ewan Dunbar
================================================
Visit Preston Manning: Action Hero at
http://earl.thedunbars.com/pmah/index.html
================================================




------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christopher Michael Jones)
Subject: Re: newsreader for linux
Date: 3 Apr 1999 02:16:30 GMT

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Daniel Franzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi !
> > 
> > Are there any stable newsreader for linux ? I don't want to use
> > communicator anymore , it crashes to often.
> > 
> > Thanks in advance

> I use tin, a simple newsreader in text-mode.  You can get it for example at
> http://www.linuxhq.com/lsm/

I use tin to, although I don't have a lot of experience with some
of the newer newsreaders, I'll have to check them out.

--

============================================================
Chris Jones

My Web Page - "http://www.cs.uoregon.edu/~cjones/web/"


------------------------------

From: Larry Benoit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.admin,comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: Redhat 5.2 on Compaq Proliant 2000 not recongize SCSI contoller
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 1999 23:12:23 -0500

Fox Mulder wrote:

> Sorry for cross posting but I have working on it for too long time.
>
> I have got a Compaq Proliant 2000 server with EISA channel and plugged with
> a Compaq NCR chips SCSI controller.  By some reason the setup program seems
> unable to found the SCSI controller automatically (Both the internal and
> EISA add-on).
>
> I believe there will is necessary to put in some parameter during the
> install and I have tried "base_address=9000 irq=15" etc but still not able
> to make it work.
>
> Please can you help
>
> Regards

The integrated Compaq 32bit SCSI controller does not show up on the Redhat
supported hardware list.  I think
this is unique chipset, custom made for Compaq. Also, you don't specify the
NCR chipset -- while many NCR chipsets are supported under Tier 1/2 , some are
not.  Have you verified that Redhat supports the specific chipset
on your card?


------------------------------

From: "Daniel J. Wright" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Trouble getting ftape to work properly with DJ-20 (QIC-80) floppy tape 
Date: Sat, 03 Apr 1999 04:17:53 +0000

I'm having trouble getting ftape to work properly with my tape drive. 
I'm
using the ftape version that comes with the 2.2.5 kernel distribution.

My tape drive is working properly in NT, so I'm certain that its a
configuration problem and not a hardware problem.  Whenever I try to do
a ftformat ( from the ftape tools distribution ), I get the following
entries in my /var/log/messages file:

Apr  2 22:20:09 meteu kernel: [000] ftape-init.c (ftape_init) -
installing QIC-117 floppy tape hardware drive ... .
Apr  2 22:20:09 meteu kernel: [001] ftape-init.c (ftape_init) -
ftape_init @ 0xc02277dc.
Apr  2 22:20:09 meteu kernel: [002]   ftape-buffer.c (add_one_buffer) -
buffer nr #1 @ c0096d60, dma area @ c02f8000.
Apr  2 22:20:09 meteu kernel: [003]   ftape-buffer.c (add_one_buffer) -
buffer nr #2 @ c0096e00, dma area @ c02f0000.
Apr  2 22:20:09 meteu kernel: [004]   ftape-buffer.c (add_one_buffer) -
buffer nr #3 @ c0096ea0, dma area @ c0088000.
Apr  2 22:20:09 meteu kernel: [005]   ftape-calibr.c (time_inb) - inb()
duration: 1372 nsec.
Apr  2 22:20:09 meteu kernel: [006]  ftape-calibr.c (ftape_calibrate) -
TC for `ftape_udelay()' = 1111 nsec (at 5119 counts).
Apr  2 22:20:09 meteu kernel: [007]  ftape-calibr.c (ftape_calibrate) -
TC for `fdc_wait()' = 2820 nsec (at 2559 counts).
Apr  2 22:20:09 meteu kernel: zftape for ftape v3.04d 25/11/97 for Linux
2.2.5
Apr  2 22:20:09 meteu kernel: [008]  zftape-init.c (zft_init) - zft_init
@ 0xc0227b14.
Apr  2 22:20:09 meteu kernel: [009]  zftape-init.c (zft_init) -
installing zftape VFS interface for ftape driver ....
Apr  2 22:32:09 meteu kernel: [010]     fdc-io.c (fdc_config) - fdc
base: 0x3f0, irq: 6, dma: 2.
Apr  2 22:32:09 meteu kernel: [011]     fdc-io.c (fdc_probe) - Type
82077AA FDC found.
Apr  2 22:32:10 meteu kernel: [012]    ftape-ctl.c
(ftape_get_drive_status) - error status set.
Apr  2 22:32:11 meteu kernel: [013]     ftape-io.c (ftape_report_error)
- errorcode: 26.
Apr  2 22:32:11 meteu kernel: [014]    ftape-ctl.c
(ftape_get_drive_status) - status: new cartridge.
Apr  2 22:32:12 meteu kernel: [015]    ftape-ctl.c (ftape_log_vendor_id)
- tape drive type: Colorado DJ-10/DJ-20.
Apr  2 22:32:12 meteu kernel: [016]    ftape-ctl.c (ftape_init_drive) -
post QIC-117B drive @ 500 Kbps.
Apr  2 22:32:12 meteu kernel: [017]     ftape-ctl.c
(ftape_calibrate_data_rate) - Highest FDC supported data rate: 1000
Kbps.
Apr  2 22:32:14 meteu kernel: [018]    ftape-ctl.c (ftape_init_drive) -
307 ft. QIC-80 tape.
Apr  2 22:46:36 meteu kernel: [019]        ftape-read.c
(ftape_decode_header_segment) - wrong signature in header segment.
Apr  2 22:46:36 meteu kernel: [020]      zftape-read.c
(zft_read_header_segments) - ftape_read_header_segment(zft_hseg_buf)
failed: -5.
Apr  2 22:46:38 meteu kernel: [021]   ftape-ctl.c (ftape_disable) - ==
Non-fatal errors this run: ==.
Apr  2 22:46:38 meteu kernel: [022]   ftape-ctl.c (ftape_disable) - fdc
isr statistics:
Apr  2 22:46:38 meteu kernel:  id_am_errors     :   0
Apr  2 22:46:38 meteu kernel:  id_crc_errors    :   0
Apr  2 22:46:38 meteu kernel:  data_am_errors   : 230
Apr  2 22:46:38 meteu kernel:  data_crc_errors  :   0
Apr  2 22:46:38 meteu kernel:  overrun_errors   :   0
Apr  2 22:46:38 meteu kernel:  no_data_errors   :   1
Apr  2 22:46:38 meteu kernel:  retries          : 223.
Apr  2 22:46:38 meteu kernel: [023]   ftape-ctl.c (ftape_disable) - ecc
statistics:
Apr  2 22:46:38 meteu kernel:  crc_errors       :  32
Apr  2 22:46:38 meteu kernel:  crc_failures     :   0
Apr  2 22:46:38 meteu kernel:  ecc_failures     :   0
Apr  2 22:46:38 meteu kernel:  sectors corrected:   0.
Apr  2 22:46:38 meteu kernel: [024]   ftape-ctl.c (ftape_disable) -
Warning: 3472 media defects!.
Apr  2 22:46:38 meteu kernel: [025]   ftape-ctl.c (ftape_disable) - tape
motion statistics:
Apr  2 22:46:38 meteu kernel: repositions       : 224.


I am certain that there is no problem with the tape or with the drive. 
I've tried ftformat, ftmt erase, mt erase, and doing a backup with tar. 
They all give the same problem.
The lines that stick out the most to me are lines 13 and 19.  Does
anybody know what ftape error code 26 is, or what "wrong signature in
header segment" means?  I've searched all over the ftape web page
looking for info on this, and there just doesn't seem to be any.

Thanks for any help in advance.


-- 

 Daniel J. Wright                       Ahoo Ehdonhon Edeh Hdahne
 HTTP://DWRIGHT.HOME.ML.ORG             "Bringer of Fireworks" 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]                      ===  || >>>---|>--->> || =====
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]                         Wagion Lodge 6, Order of the Arrow

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeremy Crabtree)
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject: Re: Proposal: "Linux 2000 Platform"
Date: 3 Apr 1999 00:35:24 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Christopher B. Browne allegedly wrote:
>On 1 Apr 1999 21:34:22 -0500, Alexander Viro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>posted: 
>>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>>>I suggest dpkg instead, it's a bit more, shall we say, 'advanced'.
>>
>>Seconded, with possible ports integration.
>
>Unfortunately, the flaming of Red Hat by those of the Slackware
>Religion acts as an anodyne, distracting people from the possibility
>that there might be ideas out there that are better than either
>system's approach.

When did I flame anyone? 

>The fixation on RPM, with occasional vague mention of dpkg, betrays a
>generally vast ignorance of the various packaging methods that in use.
>Almost certainly Ports and the Debian tools represent something closer
>to the "state of the art" than does RPM.  
>
>Anyone for stow?  Depot?  NSBD?

I dunno...the whole lot of package tools would have to be evaluated
before any one could be selected.

(Which is why the summary selection of RPM without ANY consultation
 bugs me a bit.)

>Note that RPM would be a whole lot more usable if there was something
>functionally equivalent to Debian's APT and dselect tools...

Or even pkgtool's character-mode interface.

(Glint is okay, but the CLI RPM stinks)

(WHOA!...pkgtool is a...sh SCRIPT!?...cool...)

>>>(I use Slackware, and I don't use ANY package managers ;)
>>
>>>> . GNU make, C/C++ compiler and development libraries
>>
>>>Well, DUH! ;)
>
>I disagree, slightly.  POSIX make is a more unambiguously requirable
>option.

HERETIC!...okay, point taken, but gmake, gcc (egcs) and the like
would be the most likely ones to use.

>>>> . XFree86 installed to /usr/X11R6/lib (or /usr/X11)
>>
>>Optional. Install libs if you are so inclined, but server and
>>applications do not belong to required part.
>>
>>>Or both, thanks to the wonders of sym-links.
>>
>>      Exactly.
>
>Absolutely.

So, we're all in agreement here? <G>

(FWIW, I did exactly this when installing XF86 3.3.3.1 on my
 system...symlinks are wonderful things)

>>>>Optional components:
>>>> . Web browser (Netscape or Mozilla variation?)
>>
>>Or lynx, or any other browser. What's the difference for 3-rd party
>>applications?
>
>If trying to establish a standard, shouldn't the product picked be
>require to conform to some standards?  :-).

So...Arena is the one, then? ;)
Or, am I confused?

-- 
"Being myself a remarkably stupid fellow, I have had to unteach myself 
 the difficulties, and now beg to present to my fellow fools the parts
 that are not hard" --Silvanus P. Thompson, from "Calculus Made Easy."

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David M. Cook)
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.networking,linux.redhat.misc
Subject: Re: Don't wanna run 'diald', so what else???
Date: Sat, 03 Apr 1999 04:48:58 GMT

On Thu, 01 Apr 1999 09:28:39 -0700, Jon Slater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>I don't like 'diald'.  It works fine.  But I want something a little
>more interactive.

Diald provides a way for anyone to interact with it via a named pipe.  I
forget the name of pipe, something like /etc/daild/diald.something.  You can
echo stuff to that file to control the connection (if you set permissions on
it correctly.)  

Dave Cook

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Volkov Oleg)
Subject: Re: cpio+linux+hpux
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 1999 16:58:44 GMT

On Wed, 31 Mar 1999 00:06:06 +0200, "BEA-Conseil"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>Hello,
>
>I just installed Red-hat 5.2 on an I386 platform, with an Adaptec AHA2940
>and a HP 4mm DAT.
>The device is recognized by the system, the hardware seems to be ok. (device
>= st0)
>The question is :
>somebody gave me a DAP where data where backed up from an HP3000 runing
>under HPUX (MPEX version ???) The command used for the backup was cpio.
>Now, I would like to restore the data from the tape and into Linux.
>What is the syntax ?
>I tried cpio -i </dev/st0 but i had the message '...end of tape...'
>
>Does anybody experienced this procedure and is able to help me.
>Thank you very much for your help.
>
>Bruno ETIENNE
>
>

HP3000 run MPE(XL) not HP-UX. This hardware can be easy converted to
 HP9000 (by running service tape) that run HP-UX. As I remember MPE 
has no CPIO , just STORE/RESTORE. Latest MPE has built in POSIX
tree commands (UNIX on top of another OS!!) that may include cpio . 
In this case you should ask parameters (block size) of cpio command.

I was successfuly read tar tapes done on HP-UX and never tried 
cpio from MPE !!! HP claims that this commands only POSIX compliant.

--
Oleg Volkov
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

------------------------------

From: r d t@c s.q u e e n s u.c a (Bob Tennent)
Subject: Re: Delphi on Linux the Lazarus project
Date: 3 Apr 1999 04:08:00 GMT

On Fri, 02 Apr 1999 20:49:49 -0600, Cliff Baeseman wrote:
 >http://www.pcpros.net/~vbman/
 >
 >This is to announce the Lazarus Project. Open source Delphi like rad
 >development
 >environment for Linux..
 >
 >Come Join the team ;)
 >
Do you guys know about xwpe?

Bob T.

------------------------------

From: "Jon Upham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: 
alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.x,linux.redhat.misc
Subject: Re: startx monitor shutdown
Date: 02 Apr 1999 20:26:02 PST

Yes!  This is my experience--the monitor shuts down no matter the
configuration.  Is there some reason I may need to update my rom on my
diamond stealth 64 S3 trio?  I'll go to that site now...

Jon Upham--remove dashes in reply my address for the anti-spam version...
Frank v Waveren wrote in message ...
>Are you by any chance using a diamonad stealth video card?
>
>Try getting a flash rom upgrade (www.diamondmm.com).
>
>
>In article <ePpiC4te#[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "Mark Buckland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I've tried multiple sensible configurations in Xonfigurator and I have
reid
>> tweaking XF86Config file by hand, but my monitor still shuts down when
>> running startx.
>>
>> Just for the record..
>>
>> HorizSyn 31.5
>> VertRefresh 60
>>
>> and using the at Modeline 640 480
>>
>> Is this the end of my linux experience?
>>
>> -Mark.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thomas Griffing wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>>
>>>This is usually caused by the video card producing signals to which
>>>the monitor cannot sync. I usually start by running Xconfigurator
>>>(Red Hat distribution) and selecting several resolutions, starting
>>>with 640x480 and monitor sync rates that are conservative. Get
>>>something working, then try a higher resolution.
>>>
>>>If you have selected multiple resolutions, you can switch from one
>>>to the next by pressing <Ctrl><Alt><+> (where the "+" is the grey
>>>key on the right of the keypad).
>>>
>>>If you want to run it at a resolution higher than the max listed,
>>>you'll have to tweak the XF86Config file by hand. (I run mine at
>>>1600x1280).
>>
>>
>>
>
>--
>
> Frank v Waveren
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ICQ# 10074100



------------------------------

Date: Fri, 02 Apr 1999 13:08:57 -0500
From: Andrew Comech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: How do I ??? 56k modem / kppp

"G. Franklin McCullough" wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 01 Apr 1999 19:37:51 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dan Brown)
> wrote:
> >On 31 Mar 1999 13:19:11 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >(Andrew Comech) wrote:
> >>this is kind of not possible to get different connection speeds under
> >>different OSes. Most likely you are not using a proper INIT string.
> >>Can you look up your INIT string in windon'ts? Or, even better,
> >
> >       I ran into the same problem, and the init string was the
> >culprit.  In Win95, the init string is hidden in the registry.  It's
> >in:
> >       HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\
> >       Services\Class\Modem\0000
> >

Oh yeah! tell me about different OSes compatibility...
OK, let us _assume_ Windows initializes the modem in some obscure way,
which is kept kinda hidden in all those modem drivers supplied for 
Windows. There is the following AT command which I found in the list of 
commands for Zoltrix and Aopen modems, and i guess it is rather
standard:

          AT&V     Display Current Configuration and Stored Profile

That is, you start Terminal (is it Windows' for minicom?) and after the 
modem has been initialized you look up its current configuration (all 
those S-registers: S??=??...).

>The INIT strings found in
>HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\Class\Modem\0000
>is the same as the strings found when you log a connection under
>windows.  My Courier V Everything gets much slower connection speeds
>(with the same string) under Linux (by about half)  I have posted
>several notes in different newsgroups and so far no one can tell me
>why or how this is happening!

After the modem has been configured and starts dialing, this is _up to a
modem
and the remote computer_ to negotiate the connection speed. Make sure
that
AT&V reports _the same_ current configuration under Windows and Linux
and
try a few connections, to get some statistics. 

Please keep me informed about what happens!

Cheese,
Andrew

http://www.math.sunysb.edu/~comech/tools/CheapBox.html#modem

------------------------------

From: Matt Kuznicki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Need to find the 'no' program.
Date: Sat, 03 Apr 1999 00:53:43 -0500

Jason Bell wrote:
> 
> This accomplishes the job of spitting out 'no' t the console, but it does not
> solve my problem of compiling.
> 
> Thank you for the idea though.
> 
> --Jason Bell

Jason,

Just dump the line

        yes no

into a shell script (you may want to put a #!/bin/sh on the line before
it, but since Linux seems quite happy w/o it).  Call the shell script
'no'.  Put it somewhere along your path, do a 'chmod u+x', or whatever
permissions you want to give it, & that should do it for you.

                                                        Matt

-- 
Matt Kuznicki -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://129.1.213.25, taking its own sweet time!

------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.misc) via:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Misc Digest
******************************

Reply via email to