Linux-Misc Digest #943, Volume #19 Sun, 25 Apr 99 03:13:10 EDT
Contents:
Re: Linux Book Recommendations please?? ("Thomas H. Smith")
Re: SOS: Switching Ethernet Card IRQ Settings? (George Durbridge)
kernel: Sound: Recording overrun (Andreas Steffan)
Is NT really 3.7 times faster than Linux ? (Jacek Radajewski)
Re: Kernel compilation fails couldn't connect to display ("David Z. Maze")
Re: Telnet Login as ROOT (Rod Roark)
xfree cant find server binary??????????????? (mike)
Re: Help choosing distribution (jik-)
Dialup Problems ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Linux <--> Win95 networking: urgent guru-level help needed (Bob Jones)
Re: PPP null modem (request gory details) (Scott Lanning)
Re: what will linux do for me? (brian moore)
Re: How to do secure X11: NT Workstation SP4 (SecureCRT v2.4, Exceed v6.1), Redhat
Linux 5.9.7 [Starbuck]: SSHD v1.2.26 (Karl J. Runge)
HELP!!!!! problem install linux 5.2 ("Yu-Jang Tswei")
Re: 'Doze 98 vs. UNIX multitasking ("Csaba Raduly")
Re: Login prompt....grrrrrr. (Benoit Goudreault-Emond)
Re: HELP!!!!! problem install linux 5.2 ("Jason Kellington")
Re: Telnet Login as ROOT (Ben Hopkins)
Re: what will linux do for me? (Richard Steiner)
Re: Beginner question : Installing applications with RED HAT RPM (Richard Steiner)
Re: PPP null modem (request gory details) (Scott Lanning)
vfat filesystem Debian Linux (Charles Pouliot)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Thomas H. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: aus.computers.linux,alt.os.linux
Subject: Re: Linux Book Recommendations please??
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 1999 20:38:36 GMT
'Using Linux' by Bill Ball (Not to be confused with Using Linux by other
Writers)
Nigel R Lau wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hi,
>Can anyone recommend to me any good linux books for a
newbie/internediate????
>I've heard Running Linux is good but last Edition was 1996 i think 2nd Ed.
>I'm using Slackware btw, dont intend to use Red Hat or the like.. TIA
>
>Nige
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (George Durbridge)
Crossposted-To: aus.computers.linux
Subject: Re: SOS: Switching Ethernet Card IRQ Settings?
Date: 25 Apr 1999 02:53:02 GMT
You can pass the module a parameter, telling it that the ethercard is
using a particular irq, other than IRQ3. Look in the Ethernet and Modules
HOWTOs, under your model ethercard. But first you have to set up the
ethercard to use that irq, using jumpers or software. Software usually
comes from the ethercard manufacturer, and usually runs under DOS.
dagger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: I have a Pentium 90 with 32mb ram and a 510mb hd, and I have only one comm
: port, and the ethernet card is using the same irq setting as the serial
: port (of which i need a mouse to use x-windows with :)
: I have been told that it is possible to change the IRQ setting of the
: Ethernet card by passing the kernel something macabre at startup, can
: anyone please give me details of how to do this?
: Many thanks in advance,
: --
: dagger
: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: (Too much blood in my caffeine system...)
--
/* George Durbridge Melbourne, Victoria, Australia */
/* tel (03) 9280 3390 fax (03) 9280 3288 */
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andreas Steffan)
Subject: kernel: Sound: Recording overrun
Date: 24 Apr 1999 19:20:49 GMT
Hi
When I record from /dev/dsp using sox like this:
sox -t ossdsp /dev/dsp -r 44100 -s -w -c 2 foo.wav
The kernel complains
kernel: Sound: Recording overrun
and foo.wav is screwed.
Is this is a scheduling-/buffering problem ?
Any suggestions how to approach this problem ?
--
Regards, Andreas
PS: Linux-2.2.6, SB-16 PNP (VibraX), P5-166
PPS: Please remove dont.spam.me from my adress when replying via
mail.
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
|Andreas Steffan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|Hamburg, Germany Phone: 040/60671180 |
| Fax: 040/60679767 |
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for PGP-public-key.
------------------------------
From: Jacek Radajewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Is NT really 3.7 times faster than Linux ?
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 20:34:08 +1000
I quickly browsed this group, and didn't find any threads which talk
about this report.... Personally I think that Bill is getting desperate.
http://www.mindcraft.com/whitepapers/nts4rhlinux.html.
Jacek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.sci.usq.edu.au/staff/jacek
------------------------------
From: "David Z. Maze" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Kernel compilation fails couldn't connect to display
Date: 24 Apr 1999 23:46:39 -0400
tjenkner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
TJ> Hello, i got the following error when compiling the kernel (linux
TJ> S.U.S.E 5.3):
TJ>
TJ> _X11TransSocketINETConnect: Can't connect: errno = 101
TJ> application-specific initialization failed: couldn't connect to display
TJ> "linuxtjpc:0"
(etc.)
Umm, compiling the kernel doesn't require X. It requires a C
compiler, an assembler, a 16-bit assembler (as86) on x86 platforms,
make, and a handful of other tools, but not X.
Perhaps you're trying to run 'make xconfig', and that's failing? Do
you have appropriate bits to use the (remote) display? (See the
Remote-X-Apps mini-HOWTO for more information on this.) Also try
'make config', 'make oldconfig', and 'make menuconfig' instead of
xconfig; all are probably more reliable, in the general case.
menuconfig offers the UI closest to what xconfig gives you.
--
David Maze [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://donut.mit.edu/dmaze/
"Hey, Doug, do you mind if I push the Emergency Booth Self-Destruct Button?"
"Oh, sure, Dave, whatever...you _do_ know what that does, right?"
------------------------------
From: Rod Roark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Telnet Login as ROOT
Date: 25 Apr 1999 03:13:01 GMT
Brian Schell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm looking at moving our server off-site, and need to be able to telnet
>in as root. I realize you can't do this as root, so I tried to give a user
>account root permissions. I'm not having much luck here... Any specific
>suggestions?
Telnet in as your normal self and then type "su -".
-- Rod
======================================================================
Sunset Systems Preconfigured Linux Computers
http://www.sunsetsystems.com/ and Custom Software
======================================================================
------------------------------
From: mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.x,comp.os.linux.setup,aus.computers.linux
Subject: xfree cant find server binary???????????????
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 1999 17:07:38 GMT
Hi
Thanks ahead for considering this message
I can run xfconfig and sax on SUSE 6.0 with XF86 3.3.3.1, However when I
run startx I get the message below.
"The file XF86_xxxx (binary of X-Server) doesn't seem to be a binary
file.
Please check it or / and install a new X-Server-binary.
I'm aborting now."
I don't understand what the message is telling me. Also, please tell me
the process and commands that would correct this.
OS SuSE 6.0
XF86 version 3.3.3.1
graphics card matrox millenium g200
I don't think it is card specific. I swapped out cards, a different
manufacture, same message.
Thanks
Mike
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 03:07:25 -0700
From: jik- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Help choosing distribution
David M. Cook wrote:
>
> On Sat, 17 Apr 1999 17:04:04 -0400, Nathan Ranger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >For me, however, a 15 year UNIX veteran, Slakware Rulez. RedHat and
> >Debian do to much for me. *I* want to write those rc.local files. *I*
> >can do *MY OWN* kill -9s and kill -1s!!!
>
> How does Redhat or Debian prevent you from doing this?
Well, why install all the extra crap if you don't want to use it?
Besides, both RedHat and Debian use that idiotic SysV style (or
whatever) rc setup with those insideous start/stop scripts which are 10
times slower then simple runlevel files like Slackware has.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Dialup Problems
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 1999 00:47:22 GMT
Hello, it's the Linux Newbie again, I'm having serious problems trying to
dial up to the internet... I CAN get on the 'net with root but once I try it
with any other account it's a no-go! Even if I connect using netcfg then
switch accounts (without disconecting), it won't work! Claims it dosn't know
anythig, but I can go right back to the root account and surf the 'net...
this is pissing me off...
Any help would be greatly apreciated!
-Sergio Najera
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: Bob Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.networking
Subject: Re: Linux <--> Win95 networking: urgent guru-level help needed
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 1999 22:18:18 -0700
A small idea; why not use modems? Does your friend have a modem on her
laptop? She could use PPP and log in to your machine; that would work,
and even if the file transfer wasn't exactly quick, it wouldn't take
that long on a dedicated connection.
Do-Hoon Kwon wrote:
> Hello, fellow Linuxers.
> I need a guru-level (tm) networking help urgently. Here is the
> situation.
> My friend has a notebook running Win95 with nothing fancy. It
> has a parallel port available. She wants to install something
> with the installation file size of about 20MB stored on a
> Zip disk.
> I have a Win98/Linux-2.2.6 dual boot machine with a SCSI Zip
> drive, but I cannot use Win98 and its "direct cable connection" or
> whatever they call it to do the job because my numerial analysis
> code on Linux has been running for 2 days and it's expected to
> take 2 more days to finish. In short, I cannot afford to shut
> down the machine!
> My Linux have the parallel port and the PC style parallel
> printer support as modules. I hope there's a way to do the
> file transfer using the parallel port.
> What should I do?
>
> Do-Hoon Kwon
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Scott Lanning)
Subject: Re: PPP null modem (request gory details)
Date: 25 Apr 1999 05:23:37 GMT
Woohoo!! :)
Thanks in part to you guys' help, I now have a LAN! I'm
so elated! :)
First part of the problem was not knowing which IP address to
use, and you told me that. However,
pppd -detach crtscts lock 10.0.0.1:10.0.0.2 /dev/ttyS1 38400 &
didn't work.. I entered this on one machine, then entered the
equivalent (w/o IP address) on the other, and that would kill
the pppd on the 1st machine... Before smashing my monitor, I
happened to remember that /dev/cua? used to be the call-in
(or call-out, I forget) device. So, considering that I have
Slack '96, I tried /dev/cua1, and it worked! Now my synapses
are firing away like mad. I can telnet (no need for ssh!),
ftp, run X across machines... Man, this is gonna be fun!
Thanks again for the help,
Scott
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (brian moore)
Subject: Re: what will linux do for me?
Date: 25 Apr 1999 01:25:10 GMT
On 24 Apr 1999 04:32:20 GMT,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> within the next month i'm going to be building a new pc/server and will be
> running a dual OS with both Win95/98 and Linux. i hear a lot about linux
> and that it is a good OS but what i don't hear is exactly what it would
> run.
Programs written for Linux or Unix.
> will it run my office97/2000? or will i need windows to do that?
You will need Windows to run that. Or you could use equivalent (or
better) programs under Linux.
> i'm currently studying networking and will be setting a small one up in my
> home. anything you tell me would be nice. thanks.
I run a small network at home with a couple linux boxes and a couple
Suns. They all work and share data fine. One of the Linux boxes has
the modem that gives them all net access.
If I had a Windows machine, it could share the same modem, read files
remotely on the Linux machines, and print on the Linux machine that has
a printer... but someone else would have to install it to do that, since
I'd shoot myself if I had a Windows machine. :)
--
Brian Moore | "The Zen nature of a spammer resembles
Sysadmin, C/Perl Hacker | a cockroach, except that the cockroach
Usenet Vandal | is higher up on the evolutionary chain."
Netscum, Bane of Elves. Peter Olson, Delphi Postmaster
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl J. Runge)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: How to do secure X11: NT Workstation SP4 (SecureCRT v2.4, Exceed v6.1),
Redhat Linux 5.9.7 [Starbuck]: SSHD v1.2.26
Crossposted-To:
comp.security.ssh,linux.redhat.misc,comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.x
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 1999 01:25:18 GMT
In article <01be883d$ab0dbf20$24921e18@test>,
"tester" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Topic sums up the configuration..
> I SSH (3DES encryption) into the Linux box with SecureCRT 2.4b1, and export
> DISPLAY to my NT Workstation.
>
> Now do I make X11 *secure*?
Along with the other suggestions given to you by this group, you may
want to couple into your scheme the X SECURITY extension. I have been
using it for a few months (thru a ssh connection) and it is not too bad.
It help to restrict a person who has stolen your .Xauthority to do much
with it.
Another option in this spirit is to use VNC or XMX as a "helper server".
I.e. redirect ssh X to that server, not your base one. Not perfect, but
can be used to limit certain activities.
Regards,
Karl
--
============================================================================
Karl J. Runge -- Linux: it's the Real thing -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- http://www.crl.com/~runge
111111111^2 = 12345678987654321
------------------------------
From: "Yu-Jang Tswei" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: HELP!!!!! problem install linux 5.2
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 1999 01:17:54 -0700
I got Dell XPS R450 with win 98 installed. Try to install Linux 5.2 failed.
First I use "fips" (come with Linux CD) partitioned my hard drive into 3
parts:
(1). original win 98
(2). linux swap
(3). linux native
then I reboot the system from DVD and
1. use fdisk assign name to Linux swap and Linux native
2. continue install the linux 5.2 from DVD into Linux Native
everything went through ok, at the end of installation, I choose boot from
Master Boot Area,
and setup Linux as default (tried both Linux and Win98) boot up.
then I try to reboot the system, it get through the routine (keyboard,
mouse, floppy drive and DVD)
then I got blank screen with only one letter 'L' on upper left corner, then
the system halt..
Anybody got idea what's going on here?
------------------------------
From: "Csaba Raduly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.unix.misc
Subject: Re: 'Doze 98 vs. UNIX multitasking
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 12:20:31 +0100
Reply-To: "Csaba Raduly" <csaba dot raduly strudel sophos dot com>
Jean-Luc Lachance wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
Funny what discussion a one bit error or one burnt led segment can
generate.
Accually, my first language in french -- as if you did not notice from
my name
:) -- and in french, we write CQFD ( Ce qu'il fallait d�montrer).
So, it should have been QED...
Guus Z. wrote:
>
> Robert Huff wrote:
>
> > Matthias Warkus wrote:
> >
> > > > QFD = quod fuit (?) demonstrandum = what needs to be proven
> > > > QED = quod erat demonstrandum = what had to be proven ( but it
is proven
> > > > now )
> > > > Would please the native latin speakers stand up and correct me ?
> > >
[snip]
That's why some people complain about worsening signal/noise ratio on
newsgroups.
Csaba
--
Speed can kill ! Use Windows !
csaba dot raduly strudel sophos dot com
check out: www.sophos.com
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Benoit Goudreault-Emond)
Subject: Re: Login prompt....grrrrrr.
Date: 23 Apr 1999 04:34:25 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In article <pORT2.23$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Martin R.
Soderstrom wrote:
> Hi, all.
>
> Before I go and break something on my system, can someone answer this simple
> question:
>
> My login prompt is now "Hostname login:" . I would like to change this to
> text I choose instead of Hostname...how and where would I do this? For
> example, I'd like the prompt to be:
>
> Earth login: _
>
> Hope someone can help. It's driving me batty.
/etc/issue and /etc/issue.net. Warning: distributions are known to reset
this after every reboot, so you may have to check your startup scripts to
make sure they don't reset to what you DON'T want.
If you want to print nifty stuff (like date, time, tty, users, etc...),
check out the getty(8) manpage under the section ``ISSUE ESCAPES''.
--
Benoit Goudreault-Emond
CoFounder, KMS Group ; Student, B. Comp. Eng, Concordia University
``Being too close to a fireball can worry a man --- to death.''
-- Zeb Carter in "The Number of the Beast" by Robert A. Heinlein
Note: the "From:" address is not correct to protect myself against spam.
My actual e-mail address is: ``bgoudem AT axess DOT com''
------------------------------
From: "Jason Kellington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: HELP!!!!! problem install linux 5.2
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 1999 06:13:47 GMT
If you're using al larger hard drive (ie more than 1024 sectors) your
problem is probably that your linux boot partition located after sector
1024. This won't work. Your linux boot partition needs to be somewhere on
sects 0-1024.
J
Yu-Jang Tswei wrote in message <7fu8f2$upl$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I got Dell XPS R450 with win 98 installed. Try to install Linux 5.2 failed.
>First I use "fips" (come with Linux CD) partitioned my hard drive into 3
>parts:
>(1). original win 98
>(2). linux swap
>(3). linux native
>
>then I reboot the system from DVD and
>1. use fdisk assign name to Linux swap and Linux native
>2. continue install the linux 5.2 from DVD into Linux Native
>everything went through ok, at the end of installation, I choose boot from
>Master Boot Area,
>and setup Linux as default (tried both Linux and Win98) boot up.
>
>then I try to reboot the system, it get through the routine (keyboard,
>mouse, floppy drive and DVD)
>then I got blank screen with only one letter 'L' on upper left corner, then
>the system halt..
>
>Anybody got idea what's going on here?
>
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: Ben Hopkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Telnet Login as ROOT
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 1999 05:49:09 +0000
Joseph Reynolds wrote:
>
> Brian:
>
> Be Sure to use ssh! Anything less is a crime.
What about running a special login that uses a list of pre-determined
list of one time passwords? I have heard about this, but never ran into
any specific info.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Steiner)
Subject: Re: what will linux do for me?
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 1999 00:55:27 -0500
Here in comp.os.linux.misc, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake unto us, saying:
>within the next month i'm going to be building a new pc/server and will be
>running a dual OS with both Win95/98 and Linux. i hear a lot about linux
>and that it is a good OS but what i don't hear is exactly what it would
>run. will it run my office97/2000? or will i need windows to do that?
Linux is not Windows, and it will not run Windows software. There is a
project called Wine (http://www.winehq.org) which is working on getting
Windows software to work under Linux, but it is still in alpha.
There's a lot of software for Linux, but usually not the software titles
you're used to seeing in Windows. To get some idea, check here:
http://www.freshmeat.net
>i'm currently studying networking and will be setting a small one up in
>my home. anything you tell me would be nice. thanks.
Linux is essentially a flavor of Unix, for all practical purposes, and
as such is very good at networking.
--
-Rich Steiner >>>---> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>---> Bloomington, MN
OS/2 + Linux (Slackware+RedHat+SuSE) + FreeBSD + Solaris + BeOS +
WinNT4 + Win95 + PC/GEOS + MacOS + Executor = PC Hobbyist Heaven!
Can I run STACKER on my VISA?
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Steiner)
Subject: Re: Beginner question : Installing applications with RED HAT RPM
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 1999 00:34:53 -0500
Here in comp.os.linux.misc, "Radar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake unto us, saying:
>Ok, So I just got my first Linux. (Red Hat 5.2). Got the OS installed
>no problem. No I wanted to install Corel Wordperfect that comes on one
>of the CD'S. I used RPM, and went throught the install process. It
>appears that everything installed properly, but now what do I do. I
>don't know how to launch Wordperfect. After running the RPM process,
>what is next? I have looked in Xwindows for icons, nothing. I have looked
>all over my partition for what looks like a wp exe. (Even though I found
>all the WP install stuff).
First of all, executables are indicated using file attributes in Linux,
not with an .exe extension. :-)
I don't know where WordPerfect installs its files, but you can use the
rpm utility itself to find them. This command will list all of the rpm
packages you have installed (sorted and piped to more to allow for easy
reading of the long listing):
rpm -qa | sort | more
Use that command to find the system-recognized name of the WordPerfect
package. Then, do the following command using that package name:
rpm -qc packagename | more
to obtain a list of all of the files in that package.
Chances are very good that the executable you seek is living in a "bin"
directory of some kind (bin stands for binary, and generally refers to
things that you execute), probably /usr/bin, /usr/local/bin, or some
directory under /opt.
--
-Rich Steiner >>>---> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>---> Bloomington, MN
OS/2 + Linux (Slackware+RedHat+SuSE) + FreeBSD + Solaris + BeOS +
WinNT4 + Win95 + PC/GEOS + MacOS + Executor = PC Hobbyist Heaven!
The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Scott Lanning)
Subject: Re: PPP null modem (request gory details)
Date: 25 Apr 1999 02:40:31 GMT
Bill Unruh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: pppd /dev/ttyS1 115200 crtscts
: on each should do.
:
: However at least one of the machines MUST know what the IP
: addresses are. So on one of them also put
: 192.168.0.1:192.168.0.2
: as well on the line.
: You might as well also put
: noauth on the line for each of them, as it seems silly to request
: authentication in a case like this.
I dunno. I don't trust myself sometimes.. :)
: You might also want to put the lines
: 192.168.0.1 machine1
: 192.168.1.2 machine2
: into /etc/hosts and setup the machines with their names int eh
: networking stuff.
Thanks for the suggestions.
: A far far faster way is to get soem cheap ethernet cards for them
: and set up a small network between them. ( a factor of 100 faster
: at transfering files that way)
Hmm, that's an interesting idea. I've never done it before, but
that's as good a reason as any to learn!
Okay, when I get home tonight I'll try these (inc. Mr. Burrow's)
suggestions and tell how it goes.
------------------------------
From: Charles Pouliot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: vfat filesystem Debian Linux
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 1999 04:09:04 GMT
I'm under the impression from what I've been able to find on the internet that
the vfat filesystem is supposed to work for floppies, however, when I try to
mount floppies that have even been formatted on Windows NT (FAT of course), I
get an error message 'bad superblock' and some details. Is vfat supposed to
work with floppy disk or just hard disk partitions? FAT 32 only? Or FAT 16?
FAT12? I'm running Debian Linux with kernel 2.0.34.
--
Charles Pouliot
Computing & Information Science Major
Saint Vincent College
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.misc) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Misc Digest
******************************
