Linux-Misc Digest #683, Volume #20 Fri, 18 Jun 99 11:13:12 EDT
Contents:
Re: cp,scp etc. corrupt large files (Michael Hanke)
Re: Signal 11 -> GCC on Redhat 6.0... ~< (Vincent CATROS)
Re: HP LaserJet 5L + Linux + Samba + Sleep Mode (Rob Clark)
Re: Linux systems- Poor security (Jim Henderson)
Re: Linux uid limits! (Stephan2)
CD-ROM & Modem problems with 2.2.x Kernel (Paul Miller)
jed-users mailing list (announce) (Viorel Anghel)
Re: Redhat 6.0 are there any know problems with Toshiba Tecras 8k???
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Linux uid limits! (Johan Kullstam)
Re: ppp (Sybren Stuvel)
Re: Could Microsoft Cheat On The New Mindcraft Benchmark? (Jonathan Guthrie)
Netscape Composer Crashes with RH 6.0 (Keith Thigpen)
Internet Monitoring ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Strange warn messages under SuSE Linux 6.1 and Kernel 2.2.7
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: TAO: the ultimate OS (Christopher B. Browne)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Michael Hanke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: cp,scp etc. corrupt large files
Date: 18 Jun 1999 13:28:48 +0200
Michael Hanke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Michael Hanke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > We have _two_ machines with the same configuration which exhibit
> > similiar problems.
>
> ...and on both the copy from a large file (600MB) differs from the
> original. Every time at another bit. Is this the same hardware problems
> on both machines ?
After exchanging hardware parts with another machine it turned out
that the Intel Pentium II MMX 450Mhz CPUs (two of them) were
malfunctioning.
So at last it was no linux problem.
b
--
___________________________
Michael
1:20pm up 115 days, 1:18, 20 users, load average: 1.48, 1.62, 1.51
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Vincent CATROS)
Crossposted-To:
redhat.hardware.arch.intel,linux.redhat.misc,alt.linux,alt.os.linux,redhat.general
Subject: Re: Signal 11 -> GCC on Redhat 6.0... ~<
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 12:31:06 GMT
On Thu, 17 Jun 1999 08:03:17 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Tansley)
wrote:
>Chris Kloiber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>: > > >I keep getting a sig11 when trying to make bzImage for my 2.2.9 kernel.
>: > > >Never completes the compile :(. I remember compiling kernels fine in
>: > > >Redhat 5.2..
>: > > >
>: > > >I have a P-60 cpu.
>: > >
>: > > hi
>: > > i see this error when my cpufan has an error or memory chip has an
>: > > error
>: > > mmb
>:
>: Sig 11 usually indicates bad RAM.
>:
>
>I was getting this error, and I assumed it was due to bad ram. But on a
>hunch one day, I upped my CPU voltage from 2.2V to 2.3V. Now the kernel
>compiles first time everytime. Give it a go.
>
>--
>Dave
I had exactly the same problem last week with my new PC, I was
thinking that the Ram was bad but it was the CPU voltage.
2.2V -> 2.3V was the solution.
But for a detailed description of many causes for sig11, take a look
at :
http://www.bitwizard.nl/sig11/
Vincent.
------------------------------
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.networking,comp.periphs.printers,comp.sys.hp.hardware
Subject: Re: HP LaserJet 5L + Linux + Samba + Sleep Mode
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rob Clark)
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 11:55:01 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Casey McGinty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Ok, heres a quick question:
>
>I have a HP LaserJet 5L connected to a Linux server running Samba. I
>have 2 other Win98 machines that I have printing to the LaserJet 5L.
>The slight problem I am having is that if I send a print job to the
>laserJet when it is in sleep mode, the printer stops, and all three
>display lights come on. To fix this I have to unplug the printer and
>then plug it back in. The printer comes back to life and then will
>spit out the pages i was trying to print, only they are filled with
>junk.
According to my 5L manual, all three lights means a hardware error that
requires calling HP support. This doesn't sound like a Samba-related
problem: what happens if you print directly from the Linux machine?
Rob Clark, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.o2.net/~gromitkc/winmodem.html
------------------------------
From: Jim Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux systems- Poor security
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 08:44:42 -0600
Tim Philip Williams wrote:
> But NT *seems* to be more secure out-of-the-box than Linux. This was my
> point. Although I don't doubt that Linux can be set-up to be
> bullet-proof, most Linux systems around are probably running the
> distribution default configurations.
NT, secure? That's a good one. <G> Check out http://www.l0pht.com and
http://www.nmrc.org for information on the 'security' of Windows NT. A
big part of the problem is that NT 4.0 uses a strong password hash (MD5,
I think) and supports mixed case, but supports old authentication
methods that are uppercase only and are easier to break - and NT can be
tricked (under certain conditions - esp. the *default* setup prior to
any service pack being applied) into divulging the password in plain
text on the wire.
> > If your IT stuff judges NT to be more secure than UN*X/FeeBSD/Linux,
> > get a better job. They don't know what they are talking about.
>
> I think they judge the default configuration to be more secure.
Based on my knowledge of NT's security, I would agree with the other guy
here - they don't know what they're talking about if they think NT is
secure. I'll grant that NT security is better than Win95/98/DOS, but
that's about as far as I'll go unless you're willing to remove the
network card and all rewritable media drives (floppy/cdrw/etc) from the
system and use NTFS. But making these changes really limits the
functionality of the system, IMO.
Jim
--
Jim Henderson
Novell Support Connection SysOp - http://support.novell.com/forums
Homepage at http://www.bigfoot.com/~jhenderson (email instructions
located here)
Please note that as an NSC SysOp, I do not provide support for Novell
products on a personal basis - if you need help with a Novell product,
please post a reply in the public newsgroup or visit the Novell support
forums at the URL above.
------------------------------
From: Stephan2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Linux uid limits!
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 12:02:04 +0000
"Roberto P.Martins Jr." wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've been wondering how many user accounts a single linux box could
> support. And taking a look at /usr/include/pwd.h, the header file with
> functions and data structures to handle and create user accounts, I
> found that uid is defined as unsigned int. Is it true? If true, I could
> have "only" 65535 users! How very big sites, offering web space and
> email like Geocities and Xoom, handle million user accounts?
>
> --
> Roberto P.Martins Jr.
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Lab/9636
> ICQ #12393737
An unsigned int can represent numbers up to 4294836225.
Bye
------------------------------
From: Paul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: CD-ROM & Modem problems with 2.2.x Kernel
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 08:13:20 -0500
This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format.
==============ms7556419D01600CC743319EB6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I have two problems since upgrading to the 2.2.x kernels.
I am using Debian 2.1 with Linux Kernel 2.2.9
1. On one machine I have an Atlas 24x CD-ROM drive. The problem here is
that Linux does not detect when I insert an audio CD. I have to attempt
to mount the drive before I can play the CD with a software based CD
Player. I have also recieved the following errors when attempting to use
a CD player.
CD audio: ioctl error on /dev/hdc: cmd=CDROMREADTOCHDR errno=5
CD audio: ioctl error on /dev/hdc: cmd=CDROMEJECT errno=95
2. On a second machine, I have a NewComm 33.6Kbs Fax Modem. This is an
ISA plug an play modem for which I have set up the isapnp package and
setserial correctly for. The problem is that the first attempt to dial
the modem I get a NO CARRIER signal or chat will just sit there until I
send it a SIGTERM. The second attempt always dials correctly. I do get
the same problem under Minicom.
I never got these problems with the 2.0.x kernels. They did not show up
until I upgraded. So if anyone knows what might be causing these I would
greatly appreciateany suggestions.
Thanx in advance,
--
Paul Miller
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
==============ms7556419D01600CC743319EB6
Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s"
Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature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==
==============ms7556419D01600CC743319EB6==
------------------------------
From: Viorel Anghel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: jed-users mailing list (announce)
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 11:53:26 GMT
For the fans of the jed editor, check out
http://www.pub.ro/~vang/jed/
jed-users mailing list information
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Redhat 6.0 are there any know problems with Toshiba Tecras 8k???
Date: 18 Jun 1999 13:13:00 GMT
Sergio Diaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'll reinstall it again, but I'm affraid the same would happen.
> Maybe it has something to do with the display no? The first time
> the machine locked and now it dies....
While I can't offer any advice on your particular make/model of machine, I
will tell you is that you do _not_ need to keep reinstalling the
OS. From your description, you are using the graphical login (runlevel 5).
A better idea (especially when having display troubles) is to set the
machine up for console login (runlevel 3). That way not only can you confirm
that it is indeed X that is the problem, but you can reboot your machine
easily into a useable state.
That being said, you can avoid re-installing your current setup by
booting into single user mode (by, e.g., typing 'linux single' at the LILO
prompt), and changing the runlevel in /etc/inittab to 3 (look for the
line 'id:#:initdefalut:', where # is your current default runlevel). Then,
when you reboot, you will be in console mode and able to tweak your
X configuration and get it working *without* reinstalling the whole damn
OS.
Good luck.
--
====================================
Joshua Baker-LePain
Department of Biomedical Engineering
Duke University
------------------------------
From: Johan Kullstam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Linux uid limits!
Date: 18 Jun 1999 10:02:46 -0400
"Roberto P.Martins Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi!
>
> I've been wondering how many user accounts a single linux box could
> support. And taking a look at /usr/include/pwd.h, the header file with
> functions and data structures to handle and create user accounts, I
> found that uid is defined as unsigned int. Is it true? If true, I could
> have "only" 65535 users! How very big sites, offering web space and
> email like Geocities and Xoom, handle million user accounts?
by having a 32 bit int perhaps?
--
johan kullstam
------------------------------
From: Sybren Stuvel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ppp
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 14:40:17 +0000
Hi Patrick
Maybe I'm talking nonsense here, but try to replace cua0 by ttyS0.
By the way: do you really use cua0 for your modem? Usually there's a
mouse connected to that port.
Greetz,
Sybren Stuvel
Patrick wrote:
> i dial to my isp by minicom and quit without resetting modem
> after typing "pppd -detach /dev/cua0 115200 &"
> the pppd process quits after a few seconds
> the error message in /var/adm/messages are:
>
> Jun 17 23:29:32 love pppd[188]: pppd 2.2.0 started by root, uid
> 0
> Jun 17 23:29:32 love pppd[188]: Using interface ppp0
> Jun 17 23:29:32 love pppd[188]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/cua0
> Jun 17 23:29:32 love pppd[188]: Serial line is looped back.
> Jun 17 23:29:32 love pppd[188]: Connection terminated.
> Jun 17 23:29:32 love pppd[188]: Exit.
>
> --
------------------------------
From: Jonathan Guthrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix
Subject: Re: Could Microsoft Cheat On The New Mindcraft Benchmark?
Date: 18 Jun 1999 12:56:31 GMT
In comp.os.linux.networking Stuart Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Moritz Moeller-Herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> Well, this is not a theory but has been proven in court. Several articles
>> detailed this. Your own company, Microsoft admitted that this code exists!
>> inded!
> Yes, because they couldn't be sure that DR-DOS would support Windows. And I
> believe the code was removed in the final release...
If all they're wanting to do is a CYA maneuver, why encrypt the code?
Why test for stuff that Windows itself doesn't need? You say that you
think it was removed, well, if the AARD code was so darned innocent, why
remove it? It was disableable, you know? Usually, you don't make ANY
significant changes between the final beta version and the release
version. I've been in situations where a customer wouldn't even let me
change the version number to remove the beta indicator.
No matter where you stand on this issue, I think you can agree that
reasonable people might conclude that Microsoft certainly acted guilty, in
this case, whether or they were guilty of any untoward behavior or not.
--
Jonathan Guthrie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Brokersys +281-895-8101 http://www.brokersys.com/
12703 Veterans Memorial #106, Houston, TX 77014, USA
------------------------------
From: Keith Thigpen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.x
Subject: Netscape Composer Crashes with RH 6.0
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 09:42:10 -0500
I've been trying to use Netscape Composer (both the standard issue 4.5.1
and the newer 4.6.1 rpm) on Redhat 6.0. It crashes like crazy with a bus
error any time I try to add a link to an existing html page. This
happens both as root and as a regular user.
Has anyone seen this one before?
--
=================================================================
Keith Thigpen Lockheed Martin Corporation
Telephone 256.722.4432 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Internet Monitoring
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 13:04:23 GMT
anyone know of an internet monitoring package for Linux... using Little
Brother on NT now and I'm tired of rebooting it every other week and
losing my stats.....
thanx..
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Strange warn messages under SuSE Linux 6.1 and Kernel 2.2.7
Date: 18 Jun 1999 13:29:19 GMT
Easiest solution:
alias xxxxx off
If you want to know what the devices are:
less /usr/src/linux/Documentation/devices.txt
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christopher B. Browne)
Crossposted-To: alt.folklore.computers,alt.usenet.kooks
Subject: Re: TAO: the ultimate OS
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 13:30:23 GMT
On Fri, 18 Jun 1999 05:12:50 GMT, David Rifkind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted:
>On Fri, 18 Jun 1999 01:19:42 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christopher
>Browne) wrote:
>>On 11 Jun 1999 18:10:25 -0400, Alexander Viro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>In article <7jrqn1$m4l$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>>>Peter T. Breuer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>Indeed. This one's not the crank. It's "Viro".
>>> ^^^^^^^
>>>I beg your pardon?
>>
>>They both have surnames that start with the letter "V."
>>
>>On Usenet, that's quite enough to establish identity...
>
>You mean...that means...there are only 26 people on Usenet? And I'm
>Dennis Ritchie?
You've discovered the secret... Now we have to kill you...
--
Rules of the Evil Overlord #95: I will not tell my Legions of Terror
"And he *must* be taken alive!" The command will be: "And try to take
him alive if it is reasonably practical."
<http://www.hex.net/~cbbrowne/lsf.html> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.misc) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Misc Digest
******************************
