Linux-Misc Digest #59, Volume #21 Sat, 17 Jul 99 05:13:12 EDT
Contents:
Re: Apache and .htaccess file (Jon Nathan)
Re: CIA assassinations (Michel Catudal)
Re: Red Hat 6.0 & LaTeX (Rodger Donaldson)
Re: Shortcomings of Linux? ("Bob")
Re: newbie: 'ls' scrolls past top of screen (Frederic L. W. Meunier)
i am going insane (Michael Browne II)
Re: Does Linux support 'sar'? (Dave Brown)
Re: Bad Modem or bad connections? (Michel Catudal)
Re: Red Hat is Crap!! (Christopher Browne)
Re: newbie: 'ls' scrolls past top of screen (Gus Hartmann)
Re: newbie: 'ls' scrolls past top of screen ("R.K.Aa")
Re: Help with Quake2 on RH6 (Randy)
newbie: 'ls' scrolls past top of screen (Andrew de los Reyes)
dds-1 tape drive question (Robert Hunter)
Re: Synchronizing cmos clock with timeserver? (mike)
LDP -> info ("Noah Roberts (jik-)")
Re: Adding users via WEB ("Noah Roberts (jik-)")
XWindows Problem - HELP !!! ("a1")
Re: i am going insane (Keith McGaughran)
XServer not starting (Joseph White)
Re: Shortcomings of Linux? (Erik de Castro Lopo)
Re: open systems?!? Re: Why does Apple not cooperate with Be? (Odd H. Sandvik)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 21:52:09 -0400
From: Jon Nathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Apache and .htaccess file
make sure the user directory is mode 701.
.htaccess has nothing to do with it.
--
Jon Nathan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.rupture.net/~jon/
On Wed, 14 Jul 1999, Jim Thomas wrote:
> I am new to Linux and Apache and am setting up a Apache Web server. I
> am using Red Hat v6.0. I have the server running but am not able to
> access any files in my personal directory. The error I get is: You
> don't have permission to access /~jimt on this server.
>
> I understand from doing some reading that there are ".htaccess" files
> that are required to provide access to directories other than the
> server root of /home/httpd/html. I can not find any real information
> on .htaccess files. What is their content? How are they implemented?
> Are there any samples of these files I can copy from?
>
> Any help would be greatly appreciated!
>
> Jim Thomas
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: Michel Catudal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.os.linux.advocacy,gnu.misc.discuss
Subject: Re: CIA assassinations
Date: 16 Jul 1999 22:29:02 -0500
MK wrote:
>
> On 16 Jul 1999 06:19:03 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Kulisz)
> wrote:
> >>Anyway, net access continues to get faster, cheaper, and better supported. I
> >>have no complaints.
>
> >Others do, but obviously they don't matter.
>
> Then try Europe, moron, where net access is pay-per-time, an hour
> of net access costs European three times as much per hour of work
> than it costs American,
Europeans pay thru the teeths for telephone. Here internet
cost $17.95 a month or $15 a month if we pay a year in advance
with no extra hidden charges or taxes. The ration of x3 is wrong.
Basically the Europeans pay the penalty of not living in the
best country in the world.
There are those taxes HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!
--
use OS/2 for a crash proof work environment
use Linux for safe and quick internet access
use Winblows to test the latest viruses
http://www.netonecom.net/~bbcat/
We have software, food, music, news, search,
history, electronics and genealogy pages.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rodger Donaldson)
Subject: Re: Red Hat 6.0 & LaTeX
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 1999 15:22:26 +1159
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 15 Jul 1999 00:21:54 +0100, Anthony W. Youngman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The point is - I can't replace my programs because they are commercial
>binaries.
That's the price of using closed-source commercial software.
--
Rodger Donaldson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Democracy is the worst form of government. Except, of course, for all
those other forms of government mankind has tried."
------------------------------
From: "Bob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.sys.amiga.misc,comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Shortcomings of Linux?
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 1999 15:36:00 +1200
> > For the last few years Microsoft has been trying to push
> > their own ideas and strategies through IETF as official
> > standards (e.g. DHCP, a Microsoft-invented extension to
> > BootP). Basically Microsoft develops something on their own,
> > pushes it as a (hopefully, from their point of view, very
> > complex) standard, that is difficult to implement, and then
> > gets a head start from the work they have already done by
> > being the first company with a working implementation.
> > Everyone else has to catch up.
Microsoft invented DHCP? I hadn't heard that one, I had always thought it
was based on an RFC. But then again a lot of that rant seemed to be full of
shit.
------------------------------
From: Frederic L. W. Meunier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: newbie: 'ls' scrolls past top of screen
Date: 17 Jul 1999 04:05:04 GMT
Andrew de los Reyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>...when I type 'ls -l', the output scrolls past the screen. sometimes just 'ls' will
>solve the problem, but other times it still scrolls past. Is there any
>way to get it to pause between screens or some other solution (I am
>reminded of DOS' "dir /p").
Try ls -l | more or just use shift+page up/page down. Or better, type mc
and use Midnight Commander! If you want ls -l, switch using alt+t. Oh, I
can't remember the last time I typed ls.
--
Frederic L. W. Meunier = Niteroi, RJ - Brazil = Tel: +55-21-620-7173
Contact: fredlwm@{olympiquedemarseille.org,urbi.com.br} = IRC: _19751127
[root@marseille /tmp]# f{l,r}ames;java*;HTML_mail;SPAM > /dev/null
------------------------------
From: Michael Browne II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,redhat.general
Subject: i am going insane
Date: 17 Jul 1999 03:31:04 GMT
I'm writing this post in a state of extreme desperation. I have been
trying to install Red Hat Linux 6.0 for the past five days. Since I
recieved my cd from Linux System Labs on monday, I have spent countless
hours ready various guides and how-to's and annoying several newsgroups.
In this inappropriatly long post, I will attempt to give a complete
overview of my situation in the utter hope that someone can help me. Why
you would want to this, I can't say, though be assured that you would have
my neverending gratitude.
My computer is a brand-new Gateway Pentium 3. As you would surely guess,
the hard drive came completely dedicated to one big FAT32 partition. In
order to prepare for Linux, I used fips to divide it into two partitions.
I then used fdisk to delete the new (empty) partition. Therefore, my hard
drive currently has one FAT32 partition (in which Win 89 resides), and the
rest is free space.
The Linux installation program boots just fine (from the cd). However, the
fatal problem arises when I select my install type (workstation, server,
or custom). As soon as I select it, a drive error message appears that
says it can't find a device to write to.
One last thing maybe I should mention, though I'm not certain it has any
relevance to this situation, is the following. My hard drive is an EIDE
drive, specifically a WDC AC31 3500D. My hard drive controller is a
Promise Technology Inc. Ultra66 IDE Controller. The odd thing is that the
controller is listed as a SCSI controller in the Windows device manager.
This doesn't seem to make any sense to me, but i don't know if this has
anything to do with my Linux problem or not. I just thought I should
include this information in case, by some strange chance, it has some
importance.
I feel bad about wasting people's time with this awfully long post post,
but I'm not in a very sane state at the moment and this request is my last
stab in the darkness. If you have any ideas please, please help me.
They always said that installing Linux wouldn't be easy, but God, I never
dreamt it would be like this.........................
deepest thanks for your patience (if u have any - u probably shouldn't),
Michael
================== Posted via SearchLinux ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dave Brown)
Subject: Re: Does Linux support 'sar'?
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 17 Jul 99 03:53:02 GMT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: Is there a 'sar' like program on Linux?
: 'sar' is System Activity Report
: It gets system information such as
: swap, memory, paging, queues, cpu usage, etc.
I saw an announcement a while back that Sun was releasing
source code of sar for use by Linux... didn't indicate
how or when.
--
Dave Brown Austin, TX
------------------------------
From: Michel Catudal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: Bad Modem or bad connections?
Date: 16 Jul 1999 22:42:06 -0500
Ramin Sina wrote:
>
> Hi all, this may be a stupid question, but how can I tell if a modem is
> gone bad and needs replacement?
> I have an internal v90 US Robatics modem which I had been successfully
> using to connect my SuSE 5.2 machine to my ISP. Now when I use ezppp to
> dial in, I get connected ( I hear the usuall modem noise and I get the
> written indication that connection was made) but
>
> 1) it takes netscape a very long time to launch now
> 2) pppd dies after a few of minutes.
>
> My ISP provides no support for linux users, but claims that nothing they
> have changed in their modems that could possibly slow down the
> connection. Does this necessarily mean that my modem needs replacement
> , or is it possible that my configuration files are corrupted? What is
> the best way to test the modem?
>
> Thanks,
> Ramin
Stop using this ezppp shit and use what came with SuSE which is
wvdial. It works very well unlike this other ?&?%%?%?
--
use OS/2 for a crash proof work environment
use Linux for safe and quick internet access
use Winblows to test the latest viruses
http://www.netonecom.net/~bbcat/
We have software, food, music, news, search,
history, electronics and genealogy pages.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christopher Browne)
Subject: Re: Red Hat is Crap!!
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 1999 03:59:19 GMT
On Fri, 16 Jul 1999 10:40:17 -0600, John Thompson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>blah wrote:
>> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
>
>> Get Slackware or Debian, they are the only pure distributions!
>>
>> Anyone who has used both Red Hat and either of these distributions
>> knows this!
>
>This was from somebody using Windows to post...
<sarcasm/Put him in his place.../
>My take is that you may as well try several distributions.
>Go with whichever one you want. If you don't like RedHat,
>fine, don't use it. You have a choice.
>
>And what's all this about "pure distributions?" I suspect
>this is only a concern if you're using linux for religious
>reasons.
Indeed. (Spelling corrections here and there might suggest I'm
"religious" about spelling...)
There are a hundred-some distinct Linux distributions. (You don't
believe me? Die, infidel... or go look at
<http://kernelnotes.org/dist-index.html> or at the Distributions
section of Linux Weekly News <http://lwn.net/>...)
--
The Three Laws of Thermodynamics:
1) You can't win, only lose or break even.
2) You can only break even at absolute zero.
3) You can't get to absolute zero.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/lsf.html>
------------------------------
From: Gus Hartmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: newbie: 'ls' scrolls past top of screen
Date: 17 Jul 1999 04:36:29 GMT
Andrew de los Reyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i just installed Linux and here's what keeps annoying me: when I type
> 'ls -l', the output scrolls past the screen. sometimes just 'ls' will
> solve the problem, but other times it still scrolls past. Is there any
> way to get it to pause between screens or some other solution (I am
> reminded of DOS' "dir /p").
When a command produces to much output, it can be piped into a
pager that will display it one screen at a time. This can be done with
the GNU pager (less), or the traditional BSD pager (more). For example:
ls -l | less
or
ls -la | more
Some programs will want to use the contents of the environment
variable PAGER; it is useful to set this in your shell.
--
Gus
===========================================================================
http://www.upl.cs.wisc.edu/~hartmann/ | PGP Key ID: pub 1024/DCC499F5
___________________________________________________________________________
Close your eyes and press escape three times.
------------------------------
From: "R.K.Aa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: newbie: 'ls' scrolls past top of screen
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 1999 06:09:31 +0200
Andrew de los Reyes wrote:
>
> i just installed Linux and here's what keeps annoying me: when I type
> 'ls -l', the output scrolls past the screen. sometimes just 'ls' will
> solve the problem, but other times it still scrolls past. Is there any
> way to get it to pause between screens or some other solution (I am
> reminded of DOS' "dir /p").
ls -la |more
pipe things to "more" to make it fill only a screenful
If you want to read a text-file you can simply "more" it: "more
filename.txt"
K.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Randy)
Subject: Re: Help with Quake2 on RH6
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 1999 04:15:58 GMT
Thanks Paul this indead the problem i got it running sort of . Well it
runs in gl but no mouse so far and launching from a terminal in kde
works fine but when i quit the game it goes to a text only screen that
will not allow input so i Cntrl - Alt -F1 but this only gets me to the
login screen and it seems the only way i can get the Kde back is to
reboot.
Thanks Again Randy
On Thu, 15 Jul 1999 15:15:09 -0400, Paul Olofsson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Randy wrote:
>>
>> Installed Q2 as pre the how to and when i try to run it says-
>>
>> Cannot exec default .cfg
>> cannot exec config .cfg
>>
>> recursive shutdown
>> error cannot load pics/colormap.pcx
>>
>> The command i used was /quake2 +set vid_ref softx
>> Well i cannot find the default.cfg and the pics is nowhere to be found
>> .Have i screwed up something or what ?
>> I have had linux all of about 3 weeks now and really don't know what
>> the hell i am doing yet ;-(
>> Randy
>
>Maybe you are missing the file pak0.pak in your baseq2 dir. The file colormap.pcx is
>packed into pak0.pak. Since this is file is about 180 mb it doesn't come with the
>q2-packages for linux. You can get it from a windoze-version of q2.
>
>Good luck!
>
>Paul
------------------------------
From: Andrew de los Reyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: newbie: 'ls' scrolls past top of screen
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 1999 03:42:29 GMT
i just installed Linux and here's what keeps annoying me: when I type
'ls -l', the output scrolls past the screen. sometimes just 'ls' will
solve the problem, but other times it still scrolls past. Is there any
way to get it to pause between screens or some other solution (I am
reminded of DOS' "dir /p").
Thanks in advance,
Andrew de los Reyes
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: Robert Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: dds-1 tape drive question
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 22:24:22 -0700
greetings,
i am trying to get to the bottom of an issue i am having with my tape
drive.
i am using 90 meter HP dds-1 tapes with an HP 35470A scsi tape drive.
i am runing redhat 6, and rpm dump-0.4b4-7.
i should be getting 2 GB per tape, natively (no compression), but am
only getting around 750 MB.
'mt' says that my tape DENSITY is 61000BPI, but this yields the
capacity i mentioned above.
i have not tried messing with LENGTH and BLOCKSIZE parameters.
i really appreciate any suggestions about how i can get closer to the
rated capacity of these tapes.
tia,
rh
=================
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=================
------------------------------
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.networking
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mike)
Subject: Re: Synchronizing cmos clock with timeserver?
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 02:04:27 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> /usr/bin/rdate -s wrzx03.rz.uni-wuerzburg.de
>
>I'm using RedHat 5.1 on a server right now, and wonder how, if I run
>this 'rdate' command when the server dials into its ISP to grab mail,
>can I get the Windoze boxes on the network to set their time from the
>Linux server?
>
>In the past, I've used a Windoze utility called D4 but it's overkill
>for what I need (I think).
>
>Can I get Linux to broadcast the time on an SNTP port or something?
>
>Thanks,
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
If I remember correctly, Hummingbird may have a time syncher something called
Nettime, you can sych your Pc with that of the UNIX box.
------------------------------
Subject: LDP -> info
From: "Noah Roberts (jik-)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 16 Jul 1999 22:30:25 -0700
The LDP books (least wise the one I need right now) are in Latex. I
want to create info files out of them to browse from XEmacs. Anyone
know how to convert to the correct format or know were I can get texi
or info versions?
w3 sucks as a browser, and I am really getting fond of the XEmacs info
browser. Any help would be really cool.
------------------------------
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.apps,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Adding users via WEB
From: "Noah Roberts (jik-)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 16 Jul 1999 22:06:43 -0700
Darren F. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I want to set up a POP server and allow a user to fill in a Web-based
> form to create his/her own POP account on my Linux box.
You need a very carefully programmed CGI.
> I can not find any information on doing something like this, or even how
> to give a user both telnet and adduser capabilities.
BAD idea. Thats too much power for a simple user.
> So, any information and/or direction would be greatly appreciated.
> Thanks
>
> ------------------ Posted via SearchLinux ------------------
> http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: "a1" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: XWindows Problem - HELP !!!
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 1999 03:33:16 -0400
I have Red Hat 5.1 I cannot get the OS to see my Mouse for nothing.
I have a serial mouse. I went into XF86Config and made sure that the
necessary entries reflected that fact.
Other problem. I cannot get the resolution to be 1024 x 800 . It always
defaults to 320 x 200.
This is a pain I really need help. Can you imagine I run XWindows, but when
I do I cannot see properly and its "hands off the mouse"
Help Please I need to navigate and See.
a1
------------------------------
From: Keith McGaughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,redhat.general
Subject: Re: i am going insane
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 1999 17:37:03 +1000
Michael Browne II wrote:
>
> One last thing maybe I should mention, though I'm not certain it has any
> relevance to this situation, is the following. My hard drive is an EIDE
> drive, specifically a WDC AC31 3500D. My hard drive controller is a
> Promise Technology Inc. Ultra66 IDE Controller. The odd thing is that the
> controller is listed as a SCSI controller in the Windows device manager.
> This doesn't seem to make any sense to me, but i don't know if this has
> anything to do with my Linux problem or not. I just thought I should
> include this information in case, by some strange chance, it has some
> importance.
>
as far as I know Ultra 66 is not yet supported by linux you will have to set
the drive back to 33 there are utilities to do this I don't how or where as i
only have a 33 but a search of http://deja.com should find lots of posts
with the full answers
I hope this points you in the right direction
Keith McGaughran
------------------------------
From: Joseph White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: XServer not starting
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 1999 02:22:18 -0600
Hi All,
I'm running Mandrake 6.0. I copied some extra True Type
fonts to the /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/ttfonts , and that
was all I did. Now when I re-boot, Mandrake fails to load X.
Here is the error I'm getting:
FontTransSocket UnixConnect:Can't connect errno=111
Failed to set default font path UNIX/:-1
Fatal Server error
Could not open default Font "fixed"
Any Ideas greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Joe
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.nmia.com/~jwhite
------------------------------
From: Erik de Castro Lopo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.sys.amiga.misc,comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Shortcomings of Linux?
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 1999 18:21:19 +1000
Bob wrote:
>
> > > For the last few years Microsoft has been trying to push
> > > their own ideas and strategies through IETF as official
> > > standards (e.g. DHCP, a Microsoft-invented extension to
> > > BootP). Basically Microsoft develops something on their own,
> > > pushes it as a (hopefully, from their point of view, very
> > > complex) standard, that is difficult to implement, and then
> > > gets a head start from the work they have already done by
> > > being the first company with a working implementation.
> > > Everyone else has to catch up.
>
> Microsoft invented DHCP? I hadn't heard that one, I had always thought it
> was based on an RFC. But then again a lot of that rant seemed to be full of
> shit.
Microsoft DHCP != DHCP
Erik
--
+-------------------------------------------------+
Erik de Castro Lopo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+-------------------------------------------------+
"We reject kings, presidents, and voting. We believe in rough
consensus and running code." -- Dave Clark (IETF 1992)
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Odd H. Sandvik)
Crossposted-To: comp.sys.mac.programmer.misc,comp.sys.be.misc,comp.unix.misc
Subject: Re: open systems?!? Re: Why does Apple not cooperate with Be?
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 1999 18:00:16 +0200
In article <hHWh3.484$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bill Woody says...
> Odd H. Sandvik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > There are many reasons to hate Steve Jobs. Personally I hate
> > him for killing CHRP and BeOS PPC.
> Killing CHRP and clones makes sense because at this stage
> of the game Apple makes it's money selling hardware. There
> just wasn't a viable business model to allowing other
> hardware manufacturers to eat Apple's lunch without
> expanding the market.
Exactly. Apple couldn't compete, so they pulled the
plug rather than do the hard thing, get their hardware
up to snuff.
> And not supporting the BeOS PPC--well, think about it:
> what Be wanted was for Apple to actively help Be bring
> it's OS up on the theory it will help Apple sell more
> hardware.
Yup.
> Apple, on the other hand, just pulled all of
> it's engineers off MkLinux--which arguably sells more
> hardware than Be would. (MkLinux is Unix on the Mac
> hardware--a favorite with universities.)
Do you have a source for this ?
> Why should Apple
> move those engineers over to Be to help them, when it's
> already pulling engineers to work on the MacOS X
> software?
Well, this is an old discussion that I'm a bit tired
of, but what the hell. ;-) Apple wouldn't need to send any
engineers over to Be. All they had to do is to give Be
the information that the MacOS are getting for adapting
MacOS to new Apple hw.
> Besides, it's not like Be couldn't download and
> examine the LinuxPPC code to figure out how to access
> the various drivers on newer Macs such as the iMac
> and the Blue and White G3s. Besides, you've got
> to wander how the LinuxPPC people figured the
> hardware out in the first place. I mean, how can a
> bunch of unfunded hackers on their spare time figure
> out what a bunch of professionals working for Be
> couldn't?
This is also an old dicsussion. Suffice to say, Be could
certainly figure out the G3s if they wanted to. But with-
out Apple's approval, they chose not to. Also, the G3s
are not that different from earlier G2 models from Apple.
In other words, it's a political decision on Be's part.
> Nah; Steve Jobs didn't kill BeOS PPC. Be just
> decided it wasn't worth supporting, given the lack
> of engineering support they were getting from Apple.
Sure, but it was an effect of Apple refusing to
support Be, so I blame Apple. Had Apple given Be
the technical documentation they wanted, I'm sure
BeOS PPC wouldn't be in jeopardy now.
> - Bill Woody
> The PandaWave
>
> (Who isn't supprised Apple didn't want to do Be's
> homework.)
They wouldn't have to.
--
Odd H. Sandvik
Email: hensandv(AT)online.no ( note: (AT) = @ )
*Adress in "From:" field is for the SPAM bots.*
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.misc) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Misc Digest
******************************
