Linux-Misc Digest #59, Volume #25 Thu, 6 Jul 00 21:13:01 EDT
Contents:
Re: linux swap partition? (moonie;))
Re: Getting Redhat on 12 MB (Craig Hagerman)
Re: Problem with CD drives driving me mad! (Dances With Crows)
Re: Wrong major/minor number (Edward A. Falk)
Writing to CD-RW ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Newbie: Help with setting up server (Mark Hymers)
Re: Compiling GnuCash 1.4.1 (A Guy Called Tyketto)
Re: Help:Problem Installing RH6.2 from Harddisk ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: files I don't understand (Tom Hoffmann)
Re: lilo and vga=... (Florian E.J. Fruth)
Re: how to modify gnome-terminal settings (John D Prokopek)
Re: Newbie: Help with setting up server (Akira Yamanita)
Re: how to modify gnome-terminal settings (-~=Darek M=~-)
Re: Getting Redhat on 12 MB (Tom Eastep)
Re: old "Imakefile" (Duane)
Re: Writing to CD-RW (Joachim Feise)
module dependency problem ("Tom Connor")
Re: Writing to CD-RW ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
porting linux html code (Class Account)
Re: help with GNOME/1.2 Upgrade? ("Dj. Harris")
Re: porting linux html code (Rod Smith)
convert .jpg & .gif to HP PCL5 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Getting Redhat on 12 MB ("Jack Thomas")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: moonie;) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: linux swap partition?
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 18:05:05 -0400
On Wed, 28 Jun 2000, Keith wrote:
>Hi, I'm thinking of installing linux and I had a question about the linux
>swap partition. Is it absolutely necessary to have a 2nd linux partition on
>your hard drive just for virtual memory. I have 128MB of RAM in my PC--what
>would happen if I installed linux without this swap partition. If it matters
>any, I've pretty much narrowed down my linux choices to either CorelLinux or
>Mandrake (suggestions?). BTW, I can only install linux using that "linux
>ext2 file format," right? I think I read somewhere that linux can recognize
>the FAT or FAT32 file format--is this true?--Does this mean that I can also
>install linux to a partition using FAT32? Help would be appreciated. Thanks.
>
>--
>*************************************
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>http://pages.prodigy.net/mrkeith
>AIM: mrthekeith
>ICQ: 66068365
I have 128Mb in my system and still have swap, I wouldn't reccomend running a
system with out it. If you do fill up RAM and the system needs more, you crash
unless you have swap. I use 256MB swap (far more than I need) but rarely use
more than about 10MB. I would also reccomend using ext2 partitions for Linux
because windows can't read/destroy them. I have used RedHat 4.2, 5.2, and
Mandrake 5.3, 6.2, and now 7.02 and reccomend Mandrake highly, especially for
newbies. Yes Linux can mount/read/write FAT32, and FAT16 (and many other
filesystems, including NTFS)
--
moonie ;)
Registered Linux User #175104
------------------------------
From: Craig Hagerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
at.linux,comp.os.linux.embedded,comp.os.linux.hardware,linux.redhat.install,redhat.kernel.general,redhat.networking.general
Subject: Re: Getting Redhat on 12 MB
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2000 15:12:18 -0700
I am currently running RH 6.2 on a Dell Inspiron with a 12 GB drive.
the fat heffer wrote:
> HI
> Does anyone know whether its possible to get redhat on to a 12mb disk
> I have heard you can recompile the kernal or something
> Thanks
--
Craig Hagerman
Xsides Inc.
821 Second Ave.
Seattle, WA 98104-1504
206-336-1600
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dances With Crows)
Subject: Re: Problem with CD drives driving me mad!
Date: 06 Jul 2000 18:14:38 EDT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000 22:38:19 -0000, Ioan Jones
<<8k2u3p$t3s$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> shouted forth into the ether:
>Hi group, I am having a problem with fstab and the mounting of my CD-ROM and
>CD-RW drives. Could someone be kind enough to tell me what I would need to
>entere into the fstab file in order for me to mount these devices? They are
>both on the Secondary channel, the CD-ROM is the master and the CD-RW is the
>slave. I am using Mandrake 7.0. There is nothing wrong with the hardware
>because I installed the OS for a start and have not made any changes to
>anything. Even the default configuration of fstab did not allow me to mount
>the CD-ROMs.
# mkdir /cdrom /cdrw
fstab lines are:
/dev/hdc /cdrom iso9660 ro,noauto,user 0 0
/dev/hdd /cdrw iso9660 ro,noauto,user 0 0
if you're using them as IDE devices. If Mandrake is being "smart" and has
configured your system so that you can use your CD-RW to write as well as
read, both of the devices on IDE controller 1 will be seen as SCSI
devices. Then, you'd have the following in /etc/fstab:
/dev/scd0 /cdrom iso9660 ro,noauto,user 0 0
/dev/scd1 /cdrw iso9660 ro,noauto,user 0 0
http://linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/CD-Writing-HOWTO.html for info on getting that
CD-RW up and running.
--
Matt G / Dances With Crows /\ "Man could not stare too long at the face
\----[this space for rent]-----/ \ of the Computer or her children and still
\There is no Darkness in Eternity \ remain as Man." --David Zindell "So did
But only Light too dim for us to see\ they become Gods, or Usenetters?" --/me
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Edward A. Falk)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Wrong major/minor number
Date: 6 Jul 2000 22:16:04 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Steve Emmett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>when I execute
>
>mount /dev/fd0 /mnt/floppy
>
>i received the error
>
>mount: /dev/fd0 has wrong major or minor number.
>
>I'm assuming I've munged the floppy device and have to use MAKEDEV to
>reconstruct it. The question is how do I go about doing just that?
Try rebuilding your kernel, and make the floppy driver compiled-in
instead of a module. That's how I fixed a similar problem.
Let us know if it works.
--
-ed falk, [EMAIL PROTECTED] See *********************#*************#*
http://www.rahul.net/falk/whatToDo.html #**************F******!******!*!!****
and read 12 Simple Things You Can Do ******!***************************#**
to Save the Internet **#******#*********!**WW*W**WW****
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux
Subject: Writing to CD-RW
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2000 22:11:29 GMT
Hi,
Is Linux capable of writing to rewritable CDs (CD-RW) ? I could only
find tools for burning CD-R's.
Thanks
Wroot
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Hymers)
Subject: Re: Newbie: Help with setting up server
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2000 22:25:54 GMT
One final point. If I am accessing the internet via a dial-up
connection, do I need to register a domain name or can I use a made up
one?
------------------------------
From: A Guy Called Tyketto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Compiling GnuCash 1.4.1
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.apps
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2000 22:35:25 GMT
=====BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE=====
Hash: SHA1
In comp.os.linux.development.apps Shawn Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 02 Jul 2000, Robert L. Cochran Jr. wrote:
>>I am trying to compile gnucash-1.4.1 from a tarball downloaded from
>http://www.gnucash.org on a RedHat 6.2 system running the 2.2.16-3 kernel. (I've
>upgraded the kernel twice since installing this system from the RedHat Deluxe boxed
>set.)
> What happened to me was I cd'd to untarred dir of gnucash, ran ./configure,
> then make failed, cd'd to src dir of untarred dir of gnucash, and all went well.
But, I think the original poster's problem, is the same one that
I am having. When running configure, the script has to run all the way
through, to *CREATE* the Makefiles, and it's failing even before that.
Without a autoconf'ed generated Makefile, compilation can't be done. I
have the same problem - /usr/include/gtk-xmhtml/gtk-xmhtml exists, but
configure complains about it. About to check the gnucash-devel
archives.. if nothing there, try posting to the mailing list. they
should have something for it..
BL.
- --
Brad Littlejohn | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unix Systems Administrator, | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web + NewsMaster, BOFH.. Smeghead! :) | http://www.wizard.com/~tyketto
PGP: 1024D/E319F0BF 6980 AAD6 7329 E9E6 D569 F620 C819 199A E319 F0BF
=====BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE=====
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1e (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE5ZQn0yBkZmuMZ8L8RApJFAJ9fqDoR9ciXtjgYmJkm7KVtgHM/LwCeIOZF
obfJLq5p+MA1HtYJkR9iTCY=
=TVet
=====END PGP SIGNATURE=====
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Help:Problem Installing RH6.2 from Harddisk
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2000 19:27:13 -0600
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Homer Jay wrote:
>
>> > I spend much time downloading the entire
>> > RPMS and base directory of RedHat6.2.
>> > I am sure the directory structure is correct
>> > as what RedHat demands. The boot disk
>> > does work, and I encountered the problem
>> > when the setup program was gonna reading
>> > the package informations, it got a signal 11
>> > and aborted. It does not give any more
>> > information. I would like to know what
>> > can this problem be caused by.
>>
>> The sig11 can indicate bad ram or, far less often, a bad motherboard.
>> You can download memtest86 to thoroughly test your RAM. If it is good
>> then something else is happening. If the motherboard is bad I would
>> guess you'd get other problems as well and I hear that this is very
>> rarely the cause anyway. I suggest two things:
>> 1) Verify all the files are the correct size. FTP was not designed
>> to download multiple files. Strangely, we _all_ use it for that
>> anyway. (You'd think we'd have come up with a better way, but nooooo.)
>> 2) Check you ram with memtest86.
>> You will want to write a shell script or download a utiltiy to check
>> the file sizes for you. Doing this yourself would just take way too
>> long. You might also try turning off your cache memory. I.e., from
>> GCC-HOWTO:
>>
>> In short, it's the pickiest RAM tester
>> commonly available. If you can't duplicate the bug --- if it doesn't
>> stop in the same place when you restart the compilation --- it's
>> almost certainly a problem with your hardware (CPU, memory,
>> motherboard or cache).
>>
>> You could try pulling some of your memory to see if it works then,
>> but the memtest86 should detect any problems and make that unecessary
>> (unless a prolem _is_ found). You might try checking redhat's
>> bugzilla archive. I located a problem with installation that way
>> once. I hope it works out for you.
>>
>> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
>> Before you buy.
>
> Aren't there better answers to these questions? Many users have installed
> other OS's w/o a bad ram problem. I know those systems are kluding, but to
> tell someone that the OS isn't smart enough to come up with a workaround
> ins't a very good solution to his problem.
In addition, I can install and/or upgrade something without incident. I can
take an upgrade or downgrade or reinstall a prior version released by the
_SAME_ people and get these errors. Weeks later I'm treated to info that
a bad disk image was released and the new one works. Sometimes just
trying enough times works, with never receiving any memory- or mobo-
related errors.
So, simple answers are sometimes simplistic instead.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Hoffmann)
Subject: Re: files I don't understand
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2000 22:52:25 GMT
On Thu, 06 Jul 2000 02:01:03 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'm using 'bash.' Every time I make a new file with 'emacs' a second
>file appears with the same name, only with an extra character on the
>end... '~' What are these files for, and why do they keep appearing?
>EX: I make something called 'work' using emacs, and something pops up
>called 'work~' after I'm done. Any clues?
The files suffixed with the ~ are backup files. Files pre- and
post-pended with # (i.e., #filename#) are autosave files.
------------------------------
From: Florian E.J. Fruth <fejf@gmx*/dev/null*.de>
Subject: Re: lilo and vga=...
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 00:54:51 +0200
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
> | 640x480 800x600 1024x768 1280x1024
> ----+-------------------------------------
> 256 | 0x301 0x303 0x305 0x307
> 32k | 0x310 0x313 0x316 0x319
> 64k | 0x311 0x314 0x317 0x31A
> 16M | 0x312 0x315 0x318 0x31B
thx a lot
fejf
--
the backup of my harddisk only takes the half time it
did yesterday. i started to pipe it to /dev/null
------------------------------
From: John D Prokopek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: how to modify gnome-terminal settings
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2000 19:05:07 -0400
thanks
"David .." wrote:
>
> John D Prokopek wrote:
> >
> > everytime I first open a gnome-terminal during a session I have to
> > manually change the color settings. How can I have the settings saved?
> > Is there a file I can edit?
> >
> > I am running RH6.2
>
> Read: /etc/DIR_COLORS
>
> --
> Registered with the Linux Counter. http://counter.li.org
> ID # 123538
--
John D. Prokopek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"The bus came by
and I got on
thats when it all began ...."
------------------------------
From: Akira Yamanita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Newbie: Help with setting up server
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2000 23:14:12 GMT
Mark Hymers wrote:
>
> One final point. If I am accessing the internet via a dial-up
> connection, do I need to register a domain name or can I use a made up
> one?
You can use a made-up one. Just choose one that doesn't (and
preferably, can't) exist. Then make sure it's in /etc/hosts
so that it points to itself.
127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost
Or whatever you choose to use.
------------------------------
Subject: Re: how to modify gnome-terminal settings
From: -~=Darek M=~- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2000 16:28:28 -0700
I believe he meants the background and foreground
colors. /etc/DIR_COLORS is for distinguishing between
directories, executable files, etc. I dont believe thats what he
meant, but I could be wrong.
===========================================================
Got questions? Get answers over the phone at Keen.com.
Up to 100 minutes free!
http://www.keen.com
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Eastep)
Crossposted-To:
at.linux,comp.os.linux.embedded,comp.os.linux.hardware,linux.redhat.install,redhat.kernel.general,redhat.networking.general
Subject: Re: Getting Redhat on 12 MB
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 16:37:23 -0700
Craig Hagerman wrote:
>I am currently running RH 6.2 on a Dell Inspiron with a 12 GB drive.
>
Simon pointed out to me in a private email that he has a 12 _MB_ drive.
-Tom
--
Tom Eastep \ Eastep's First Principle of Computing:
ICQ #60745924 \ "Any sane computer will tell you how it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ works if you ask it the proper questions"
Shoreline, Washington USA \___________________________________________
------------------------------
From: Duane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: old "Imakefile"
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2000 15:55:21 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Markus Kossmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> did eloquently scribble:
> > Bill wrote:
> >>
> >> I have an old application that includes an "Imakefile" instead of the newer
> >> "Makefile." GNU's "make" won't build it, and I was wondering how to build
> >> it.
> > run a "xmkmf" in that directory . That will produce a Makefile.
> > You will need to install the X11 development stuff to get xmkmf working.
>
> It depends if the program is an X application...
> Or are imake and xmkmf interchangable?
Almost. xmkmf is a script that invokes imake. It really doesn't matter
whether it is an X application, although xmkmf will generally stick the
standard X libs into the library link list whether needed or not (it
doesn't hurt anything though). I think it would be unusual to invoke
imake directly.
--
My real email is akamail.com@dclark (or something like that).
------------------------------
From: Joachim Feise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux
Subject: Re: Writing to CD-RW
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2000 16:57:51 -0700
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sure. All of the tools use cdrecord as low-level program to actually write to
CD-R or CD-RW. I use it all the time with CD-RW.
-Joe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is Linux capable of writing to rewritable CDs (CD-RW) ? I could only
> find tools for burning CD-R's.
>
> Thanks
>
> Wroot
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.
------------------------------
From: "Tom Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: module dependency problem
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 20:02:54 -0400
I installed Red Hat Linux a few weeks ago. I did not install NIS. A couple
of days ago I used 'Update Agent' in Gnome. Since, I have not been able to
connect with dial up.
The error messages I get are:
finding module dependencies depmod: Can't open
/lib/modules/2.2.15-5.0/modules.dep for writing.
Starting NFS: lockdsvd: function not implemented Failed
Binding to the NIS domain Failed
I would appreciate anyone who can get me started understanding what happened
and how to fix it.
Thanks, and regards,
Tom
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux
Subject: Re: Writing to CD-RW
Date: 7 Jul 2000 00:10:06 GMT
Yes. cdwrite does both.
Chris
In alt.os.linux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: Hi,
: Is Linux capable of writing to rewritable CDs (CD-RW) ? I could only
: find tools for burning CD-R's.
: Thanks
: Wroot
: Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
: Before you buy.
------------------------------
From: Class Account <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: porting linux html code
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 17:11:36 -0700
hi,
i have a box that runs on a Motorola processor. I wanna
add html feature to it so that i can do web browsing on the box
from a pc attached to the same LAN together with
the box.
Since linux has html source code, I just wanna port the code
directly (without writing my own version of the code) into
my OS code.
I would think there should be no problem of doing this since both
linux html server code and my OS code are written in C.
Can anyone think of any limitations of porting the linux code
to my OS code?
thanks
------------------------------
From: "Dj. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: help with GNOME/1.2 Upgrade?
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2000 00:13:54 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Chris Stump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I am currently running Red Hat 6.2 with GNOME/Enlightenment. I have 2
> petty problems.
>
> First of all, I would like to add applets to my panel that launch
> applications which run in an X-term. So, I go to add a new launcher to
> my panel, enter the name, comment, command, and then I select the "run
> in terminal" option. I thought this would just pop-up a new X-term at
> the specified program's prompt. However, when I press the launcher it
> just pops up a white-colored X-term for a second and then there is
> nothing. What is going on? Why doesn't this work? Like I said, this is
> petty, but like so many others, I just hate it when things don't work
> the way they should--and I get the urge to fix 'em :)
>
> Problem #2 is that whenever I pop a CD in my CD-ROM, GNOME adds an icon
> to my desktop for both my CD & ZIP drives...this just drives me crazy. I
> would like to create permanent icons on the desktop for these drives and
> be able to click on them whenever I want to look at a mounted disk. I
> can create the perm. icons, but then whenever I insert a CD, GNOME just
> makes an annoying duplicate of the icon I created. No matter how many
> times I delete these GNOME-made icons, they just keep coming back. So,
> I am wondering what I have to do to stop this...is there a specific
> script that controls the auto-create icons in GNOME? What adjustments do
> I need to make to my system to stop this icon-madness? Again, I know its
> petty, but it does annoy me =)
>
> Finally, is there a way to upgrade to GNOME 1.2 without doing a whole
> new GNOME install?
I just installed over my old with out any problem (from the HelixCode website). I'm
running SuSe 6.4
>
> Thanks in advance to all those who reply.
>
>
------------------------------
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rod Smith)
Subject: Re: porting linux html code
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2000 00:23:31 GMT
[Posted and mailed]
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Class Account <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> hi,
>
> i have a box that runs on a Motorola processor. I wanna
> add html feature to it so that i can do web browsing on the box
> from a pc attached to the same LAN together with
> the box.
>
> Since linux has html source code, I just wanna port the code
> directly (without writing my own version of the code) into
> my OS code.
>
> I would think there should be no problem of doing this since both
> linux html server code and my OS code are written in C.
>
> Can anyone think of any limitations of porting the linux code
> to my OS code?
It's not clear what you want to do. It sounds to me like you want to do
one of two things:
1) Take web pages (.html documents) from a Linux box and serve them
from some other OS that runs on a Motorola processor. If so, you
don't need to modify the .html documents at all. (They are NOT
programs, just document files.) You DO need a web server on the
Motorola box, but without knowing what OS that box is running,
there's no way to give you advice on what sort of server to get for
it.
2) Port Apache or some other web server to your unnamed OS running on
the unnamed Motorola CPU. This might be anywhere from unnecessary
(already done) to a major problem. Again, we can't really offer much
in the way of help without more details. I also suspect that there
might be some better newsgroup (or maybe an Apache mailing list) that
might be a better place to get help than comp.os.linux.misc.
--
Rod Smith, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.rodsbooks.com
Author of books on Linux networking & multi-OS configuration
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: convert .jpg & .gif to HP PCL5
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2000 00:21:11 GMT
anybody know a program to convert .jpg & .gif to PCL5 ?
I have a C program reading text files & inserting PCL5 code.
When I find a filename of .jpg or .gif, I want to call a program
to convert to PCL5, then read the output & merge into my text file
& PCL5 output file. I would be willing to pay a reasonable amount
for such a program. Thanks Owen Townsend, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Jack Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Jack Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
at.linux,comp.os.linux.embedded,comp.os.linux.hardware,linux.redhat.install,redhat.networking.general
Subject: Re: Getting Redhat on 12 MB
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 17:55:34 -0700
I have seen several, very small distributions of Linux available on the
Internet.
If you go to http://www.linux.org you will find a link that say's
"Distributions".
Click on that link, and it will give you a Web page that has a section that
say's "Distribution Information", with a few links under it.
Click on those links and you will find MANY different distributions of
Linux.
While it is true there is MUCH HYPE over Red Hat Linux being a good, (IT IS
a very good distribution don't misunderstand me) if your going for small &
efficient, an "OFF THE SHELF" distribution probably won't work for you.
If your really pressed for space (12 MB is pressed for space, but more than
enough for a Linux install), and your looking to do an EMBEDDED system, then
you would probably be better off just creating a custom installation for
your project, with only the things you really need.
If you need assistance you're welcome to email me, or post to the newsgroup
as well.
It's only my opinion, and I welcome any comments or suggestions from anyone,
but I hope it helps at least.
- Jack Thomas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Tom Eastep" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Craig Hagerman wrote:
> >I am currently running RH 6.2 on a Dell Inspiron with a 12 GB drive.
> >
>
> Simon pointed out to me in a private email that he has a 12 _MB_ drive.
>
> -Tom
> --
> Tom Eastep \ Eastep's First Principle of Computing:
> ICQ #60745924 \ "Any sane computer will tell you how it
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ works if you ask it the proper questions"
> Shoreline, Washington USA \___________________________________________
>
>
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.misc) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Misc Digest
******************************
