Linux-Misc Digest #311, Volume #21 Fri, 6 Aug 99 15:13:07 EDT
Contents:
Re: fips or Partition Magic? (Per Ola Tennebo)
EQL serial line load balancing (root)
THANKS! (Pearce)
Re: shakiness with ATI Xpert 98 8M (Eric Wyles)
Re: Would anyone be interested in... (Patrick LeBlanc)
where to get package recode ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
re: Sound Problem (Claude)
HELP! hylafax:SEND FAILED: Busy signal detected (fo5y021)
Re: HPLJ4 Postscript printing resolution 300 vs 600dpi (Leonard Evens)
Need X-Windows help (resolution size) ("Jason Nugent")
Re: SAMBA, Linux, Win98 (Ben Short)
Re: Linux and NT on one system....help!!! (Leonard Evens)
Re: users can't mount cdrom (Leonard Evens)
Any LINUX Users Groups in Detroit area??? ("Gilbert Groehn")
Re: /lib/modules/2.2.5-15/misc/sgalaxy.o error ("R.K.Aa")
Re: HELP! hylafax:SEND FAILED: Busy signal detected ("Dan Cave")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Per Ola Tennebo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: fips or Partition Magic?
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 1999 21:42:50 +0100
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've tried Partition Magic, and it worked fine. Great also
for resizing your partitions when you realize you need more
space for some of them.
FIPS didn't like my disk (10.2 Gb Quantum Fireball).
- Per
------------------------------
From: root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: EQL serial line load balancing
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 1999 17:53:46 GMT
Hi ... Does anyone have a working set of eql utilities , it all looks
sooo out of date in the current
releases ... I require eql_enslave.c for kernel 2.2.x
cheers
craig
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Pearce)
Subject: THANKS!
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 1999 17:22:18 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just a quick note to everyone for their suggestions and advice. I got
the ISO burned, now I get to have fun and give Winblows the boot!!!!
------------------------------
From: Eric Wyles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: shakiness with ATI Xpert 98 8M
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 1999 07:29:17 -0800
I knew someone that had this problem and it turned out to be
interference getting to the monitor.
I know this sounds crazy, but he took a piece of carboard
and wrapped it with aluminum foil and put it between the
monitor (or the tower, I can't remember) and the
interference (had to hunt for the best place).
The foil acted as a shield and stopped the shaking.
I know it sounds kinda goofy, but it just might work.
PEACE
* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Patrick LeBlanc)
Subject: Re: Would anyone be interested in...
Date: 6 Aug 1999 17:54:22 GMT
: Isn't that what Mandrake is?
Well, not exactly. There are a few differences. 1) The recompiled RPMS
are the actual Red Hat packages, not Mandrake tweaked ones. 2) They're
compiled with gcc 2.95 (I upgraded yesterday), not pgcc-1.1.3. I don't
really trust pgcc, especially if they actually used the pgcc-specific
optimizations (-O3+). Gcc's c++ works bad enough as it is. :)
Patrick
:
: --
: Secretary, Williamsport Area Computer Club <http://www.sunlink.net/wacc>
: Member, Susquehanna Valley Amateur Astronomers
:<http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Hangar/2999/svaa.html>
: Personal Home Page: http://woodstock.csrlink.net/~jshaffer
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: where to get package recode
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 1999 16:57:44 GMT
Dear All,
I would like to use the commands dos2unix and unix2dos and what I
understand is that I will need to install the package recode. I am using
RedHat 5.1. I searched the RedHat packages on the nearest full mirror
ftp site, but I could not find it. Can anyone direct me where I can get
it? TIA
Kind regards,
Steven
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: Claude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: re: Sound Problem
Crossposted-To: linux.dev.sound,alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.setup
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 1999 18:06:36 GMT
go to etc/conf.modules and look for the wright options that define
your sound card and look if their is a wrong input about the irq,io,dma,mpu_io.
------------------------------
From: fo5y021 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: HELP! hylafax:SEND FAILED: Busy signal detected
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 1999 17:50:35 +0000
hello,
I'm wrinting again because I got no answer in my former poll.
I installed hylafax together with tkhylafax on a Debian 2.1 system.
I run the setup-scripts(faxmodem, faxsetup)
When trying to send a fax the modem take off but doesn't dial.
Has anyone got a glue ?
Following is the end of the log-output on the console
.
.
.
Aug 6 16:57:31 control FaxSend[1848]: MODEM Supports 0 ms/scanline
Aug 6 16:57:31 control FaxSend[1848]: MODEM Supports 5 ms/scanline
Aug 6 16:57:31 control FaxSend[1848]: MODEM Supports 10 ms, 5
ms/scanline
Aug 6 16:57:31 control FaxSend[1848]: MODEM Supports 10 ms/scanline
Aug 6 16:57:31 control FaxSend[1848]: MODEM Supports 20 ms, 10
ms/scanline
Aug 6 16:57:31 control FaxSend[1848]: MODEM Supports 20 ms/scanline
Aug 6 16:57:31 control FaxSend[1848]: MODEM Supports 40 ms, 20
ms/scanline
Aug 6 16:57:31 control FaxSend[1848]: MODEM Supports 40 ms/scanline
Aug 6 16:57:31 control FaxSend[1848]: <-- [9:AT+FCQ=?\r]
Aug 6 16:57:31 control FaxSend[1848]: --> [1:0]
Aug 6 16:57:31 control FaxSend[1848]: --> [2:OK]
Aug 6 16:57:31 control FaxSend[1848]: MODEM Supports no copy quality
checking
Aug 6 16:57:31 control FaxSend[1848]: <-- [9:AT+FAP=?\r]
Aug 6 16:57:31 control FaxSend[1848]: --> [5:ERROR]
Aug 6 16:57:31 control FaxSend[1848]: <-- [10:AT+FSPL=?\r]
Aug 6 16:57:31 control FaxSend[1848]: --> [3:0,1]
Aug 6 16:57:31 control FaxSend[1848]: --> [2:OK]
Aug 6 16:57:31 control FaxSend[1848]: <-- [12:AT+FCLASS=2\r]
Aug 6 16:57:32 control FaxSend[1848]: --> [2:OK]
Aug 6 16:57:32 control FaxSend[1848]: <-- [10:AT+FTBC=0\r]
Aug 6 16:57:32 control FaxSend[1848]: --> [2:OK]
Aug 6 16:57:32 control FaxSend[1848]: <-- [10:AT+FBOR=0\r]
Aug 6 16:57:32 control FaxSend[1848]: --> [2:OK]
Aug 6 16:57:32 control FaxSend[1848]: <-- [13:AT+FPHCTO=30\r]
Aug 6 16:57:32 control FaxSend[1848]: --> [2:OK]
Aug 6 16:57:32 control FaxSend[1848]: <--
[24:AT+FDCC=1,5,2,2,1,0,0,0\r]
Aug 6 16:57:33 control FaxSend[1848]: --> [2:OK]
Aug 6 16:57:33 control FaxSend[1848]: MODEM ROCKWELL
AC/V34/V1.200-V34_DS
Aug 6 16:57:33 control FaxSend[1848]: <-- [5:ATM0\r]
Aug 6 16:57:33 control FaxSend[1848]: --> [2:OK]
Aug 6 16:57:33 control FaxSend[1848]: STATE CHANGE: BASE -> RUNNING
Aug 6 16:57:33 control FaxSend[1848]: MODEM input buffering disabled
Aug 6 16:57:33 control FaxSend[1848]: SEND FAX: JOB 39 DEST 43253231
COMMID 00000023
Aug 6 16:58:26 control FaxSend[1848]: SEND FAILED: Busy signal detected
==============================end=========================
thank you, frank.
------------------------------
From: Leonard Evens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.x
Subject: Re: HPLJ4 Postscript printing resolution 300 vs 600dpi
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 1999 10:33:28 -0500
Christopher Wong wrote:
>
> I am not too happy with the quality of Postscript output generated by
> Linux apps. I am sending output to a HP LaserJet 4M+, a 600dpi
> Postscript printer. Many apps generate Postscript output: Netscape,
> Applixware, dvips, KDE stuff (kmail, kfm) etc. Unfortunately, the output
> from the printer is underwhelming. It looks like the printer is
> receiving Postscript and printing at 300dpi. The printer's resolution
> enhancement is helping somewhat, but the output is still quite inferior
> to Windows with HP's Postscript drivers.
>
> Not being familiar with Postscript, this behavior puzzles me. After all,
> we are talking about scalable Postscript fonts here. A look at some of
> the Postscript generated indicates that I am using the printer's own
> fonts rather than downloaded stuff. Why am I getting low res output from
> a 600 dpi printer? Can I coax these apps -- many of them GUI-based -- to
> use a higher resolution?
>
> Chris
I am a bit confused about your description of the printer.
Is the printer a postscript printer? If so,
run printtool and check the filter set up. You should
have it set as a postscript printer and choose the
resolution to be 600X600. I have an HP 5MP, and it works
fine.
If it is not a postscript printer, and you are using Ghostscript
to print postscript, then you can still select 600X600
resolution in the printer filter for HP laser 4/5/6 series.
Perhaps you also have to do something with ghostscript.
--
Leonard Evens [EMAIL PROTECTED] 847-491-5537
Dept. of Mathematics, Northwestern Univ., Evanston, IL 60208
------------------------------
From: "Jason Nugent" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Need X-Windows help (resolution size)
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 1999 10:00:19 -0600
Well, I've had about 4days of experience after installing LINUX on my P300
at home (now a dual boot w/ Win98)
I've put about four hours into just trying to get X-Windows working. We're
talking about Redhat 6.0 and Gnome/KDE
Here's the problem....
X-Windows starts all big and blocky like the resolution is set really low
(640x480). I cant get to any of the menus or window-controls...so I cant
seem to find the control panel to switch resolutions. Someone suggested
CTRL-ALT- plus/minus to change resolutions, but that doesnt do anything. A
friend showed me how to use VI to edit my XF86config file, but I must not be
doing it right because it still looks messed up. I cant believe I've put
this much time into just trying to simply change my resolution. My video
card is a Diamond Viper 770 (detected during setup)....During setup I chose
the following for video choices.....
8bit 1024X768 24bit-800x600 32bit 640x480
Can anyone lay down some really simple instructions for me.....
Many Thanks....--jason
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ben Short)
Crossposted-To:
linux.redhat.misc,linux.redhat.install,linux.redhat,alt.uu.comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: SAMBA, Linux, Win98
Date: Sat, 7 Aug 1999 02:05:25 +1000
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
> I have a Win98SE machine connected to Linux and everything is working
> except for the SAMBA setup. I followed the SMB-HOWTO but in VMWare the
> only system I see in 'Network Neighborhood' is the Win98SE system. The
> NIC is set to 192.168.2.1 and the Win98SE system is set to the IP
> address of 192.168.2.2.
>
> Here's what I've done so far...
>
> In the /etc/smb.conf file I've changed 'workgroup = Federation'
> also changed 'server string = Linux Samba Server'
> also uncommented 'hosts allow = 192.168.1. 192.168.2. 127.'
> also changed 'security = share'
> and finally added:
> [cdrom]
> comment = Plextor UltraPlex
> public = yes
> writable = no
> path = /mnt/cdrom
>
> Running 'testparm' gave me an OK and I have also manually started
> /usr/sbin/smbd and /usr/sbin/nmbd. Can someone please tell me if what
> I've done is correct so far and how to completely get my Linux PC
> displayed in 'Network Neighborhood'?
>
It hekos to have under the [global] options
workgroup = your_workgroup
thats what I have found the problem to be most of the time
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Ben Short http://www.shortboy.dhs.org
Shortboy Productions mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Remove n0spam to email me*
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
------------------------------
From: Leonard Evens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux and NT on one system....help!!!
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 1999 10:08:31 -0500
Leonard Evens wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > I had Windows NT installed on my system. I installed Redhat linux 6.0
> > on the same system. But lilo gave me an error message during the
> > installation process when I tried to include the NT partition in the
> > boot sequence. So I omitted it for now. How can I setup the computer
> > now so I can boot both systems. I have linux running now and it's
> > working great of course. But I need to run NT sometimes. What should I
> > do?
> >
> > Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> > Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
>
> You got several replies but in total they were a bit incoherent,
> so let me try to go over some relevant points. I hope I
> don't confuse you more.
>
> 1. Lilo can boot NT, but it has to be done in exactly the right
> way or you have to be lucky. I don't know why you got an error
> message during installation. See below for details.
>
> 2. If you put lilo in the master boot record, which is the default
> choice, there is a good chance you made it impossible to boot
> NT. I've seen machines with NT/Linux with lilo in the MBR which
> worked fine---and one of the responses to your question had a
> lilo.conf file doing exactly that---but every time I've tried
> it, NT had indigestion. I would not put lilo in the MBR if
> I were running NT. If you in fact did that, however, all is
> not lost. Somewhere on the NT boot floppy or NT CD you should
> find the NT fdisk. If you can put it on a bootable floppy,
> even a DOS floppy, then executing the command
> fdisk/mbr
> from the floppy should restore the master boot record. After
> this NT should boot by default, but you won't be able to boot
> Linux from the disk. If you made a boot floppy for Linux,
> you can boot Linux using that and proceed.
>
> 3. Once you have restored the MBR and can boot NT, you can
> arrange to have the NT boot loader boot both NT and Linux.
> This is described in the Linux+NT mini HOWTO.
>
> 4. If this is all on one disk, the following is simpler I
> believe. First, boot using your boot floppy, and configure
> lilo.conf so that the first line
> boot=...
> puts lilo in the first sector of the root partition or
> if separate the boot partition. Here's an example of what
> lilo.conf might look like
>
> boot=/dev/hda2
> map=/boot/map
> install=/boot/boot.b
> prompt
> timeout=50
> image=/boot/vmlinuz-2.2.5-15
> label=linux
> root=/dev/hda2
> read-only
There are editing errors below. `sd' should be `hd'.
I was copying from a system with SCSI drives.
> other=/dev/sda1
^^
> label=nt
> table=/dev/sda
^^
>
> Run lilo.
> But lilo still won't be able to boot
> because the first partition is the active partition. (When the BIOS
> starts booting it looks in the MBR to see which partition
> is active and goes there. So it will never get where lilo
> is.) You can change this by running fdisk and toggling the
> statuses of the partitions so the first partition
> is no longer active and
> the partition where you put lilo is active. I
> don't remember if you can do this while Linux
> is running from one of those partitions. If not proceed
> as below.
> Use your Linux boot floppy and rescue mode floppy
> (if you've created them). Note it could take a very long
> time to boot from the boot floppy. Alternately just boot
> the Linux installation floppy, do a custom install and get to the
> part where you can partition by running fdisk. Either
> way run fdisk and just toggle the active partition as
> described above. Now you should be able to boot both
> Linux and NT.
>
> --
>
> Leonard Evens [EMAIL PROTECTED] 847-491-5537
> Dept. of Mathematics, Northwestern Univ., Evanston, IL 60208
--
Leonard Evens [EMAIL PROTECTED] 847-491-5537
Dept. of Mathematics, Northwestern Univ., Evanston, IL 60208
------------------------------
From: Leonard Evens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.networking
Subject: Re: users can't mount cdrom
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 1999 10:10:32 -0500
Jeff Greer wrote:
>
> Thanks for the help, but it still won't work. I need to join a
> LUG or have someone telnet into my machine.
> -------------------------------------------------
> Heres some command line info:
>
> doug > mount -r /dev/cdrom /mnt/cdrom
> mount: must be superuser to use mount
This was his problem. Using the full command in this
form does not consult /etc/fstab where the user information
is kept. But
mount /mnt/cdrom
or
mount /dev/cdrom
works.
> doug > ls /X
> doug > ls -l /bin/mount
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 37672 Oct 6 1998 /bin/mount
> doug > ls -ld /dev/sda1
> brwxr-xr-x 1 root disk 8, 1 May 5 1998 /dev/sda1
>
> doug > umount /dev/cdrom
> bash: /jeff/.bashrc: Permission denied
> [mntent]: line 0 in /etc/fstab is bad
> umount: /dev/scd0 is not in the fstab (and you are not root)
>
> -----------------------------------------------
> my fstab file:
>
> /dev/hda1 / ext2
> exec,dev,suid,rw,usrquota 1 1
> /dev/sda1 /mnt/E ext2
> defaults 0 0
> /dev/fd0 /mnt/floppy ext2
> noauto,rw,suid,user,exec 0 0
> /dev/scd0 /mnt/cdrom auto
> noauto,ro,user,exec, suid,unhide 0 0
> none /proc proc
> defaults 0 0
>
> -----------------------------------------------
> Leonard Evens wrote:
> >
> > Jeff Greer wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> >
> > You seemed to have got involved in a flame war which as far as
> > I can see is entirely beside the point. I don't know exactly
>
> I thought a flame war involved a lot of insults and pointless
> argument. I'm trying to start a productive argument.
>
> >
> > Have you rebooted---although that shouldn't make any difference?
> >
>
> I'm not going to reboot. My linux box is an important server for
> my
> lan.
>
> > It is not unusual with any OS to find that something which by all
> > rights should work doesn't. I find this happens much more often
> > with Windows, and there it is usually impossible to find out why.
> >
>
> This is a problem in linux because there is not a good set of
> standards in the desktop arena.
> --
> Jeff Greer
> B.S. computer science, University of MO - Rolla
> --------------------------------------------------
> Windows NT has crashed,
> I am the Blue Screen of Death,
> No one hears your screams...
--
Leonard Evens [EMAIL PROTECTED] 847-491-5537
Dept. of Mathematics, Northwestern Univ., Evanston, IL 60208
------------------------------
From: "Gilbert Groehn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Any LINUX Users Groups in Detroit area???
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 1999 14:29:20 -0400
I am wondering if there are any LINUX users groups in the DETROIT,
Michigan (or east side Grosse Pointe area)???
I would be most interested in getting in touch with such a group if it
exists.
Thanks
Gil Groehn
email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "R.K.Aa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: /lib/modules/2.2.5-15/misc/sgalaxy.o error
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 1999 20:43:44 +0200
"Brian E. Seppanen" wrote:
>
> I'm installing redhat on an old P90 Packard Bell machine, that has a
> soundcard based on the aztech chipset, which works fine with Windows. I
> believe windows recognizes the card as a galaxy card. I copied all of the
> information from the windows setup. I ran redhat's soundconfig, and plugged
> in the values. Now I get the following error
> /lib/modules/2.2.5-15/misc/sgalaxy.o error
> invalid paramater mpu_io.
>
> I'm passing the value of io=0x330 to mpu_io, but for some reason it doesn't
> accept that argument. Why? Soundconfig specifically requests the io for
> the MPU, so why would it request it if the module won't accept that
> argument?
>
> Any ideas? I'd appreciate any assistance on getting this to work.
I asked the same question in a RedHat mailing list. I still haven't
gotten it to work and the settings should be hardware set now. So I
still suspect that driver is broken, but here's the reply i got:
From: "Jose M. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 06/28/99 21:57
Subject: Re: Aztech Sound Galaxy Washington 16 driver broken?
You have to be careful here...
To begin with these cards have two "modes" of operation.
1) At boot time the OS (or using the supplied config.sys DOS driver)
sets
the operating parameters for the card. That is everything about it is
unconfigured until this is done...
2) The EEPROM settings are enabled. This must be set to "remember" the
configuration from boot to boot. In this case the onboard EEPROM retains
the
intended card settings. In most cases this is NOT the default for these
cards, and must be set by physical jumpers on the board.
Once done, you can run the DOS configuration software to set the I/O,
Emulation, etc., modes of the board. They will thereafter apply even
thru
powerdowns...
You need to set the latter for Linux.
---
Now if you are passing the MPU parameter to the board via the board's
driver, NOT the MPU401 module, the card MUST have the MPU port enabled
in
EEPROM.
If you are trying to set the I/O using the MPU401 MODULE, this may or
may
not work, because it might be looking for an actual MPU UART...
(originally
a 6502, or 6809 "configured" to handle I/O)
If it doesn't work one way try the other.
I have been able to get these boards to work, just fine under Linux, but
it's been a year or so since I've used one.
-JMS
--
Step by step guide to TrueType fonts under RedHat6:
http://home.powertech.no/rkaa/Linux_and_tv.html#ttf
To E-mail, delete "spam"
------------------------------
From: "Dan Cave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: HELP! hylafax:SEND FAILED: Busy signal detected
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 1999 17:09:37 +0100
Frank.
Perhaps, the number that hylafax has dialed, is engaged??
Do you have two modems possibly plugged into one phone line?
Dan.
fo5y021 wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>hello,
>
>I'm wrinting again because I got no answer in my former poll.
>
>I installed hylafax together with tkhylafax on a Debian 2.1 system.
>I run the setup-scripts(faxmodem, faxsetup)
>
>When trying to send a fax the modem take off but doesn't dial.
>Has anyone got a glue ?
>Following is the end of the log-output on the console
>
>.
>.
>.
>Aug 6 16:57:31 control FaxSend[1848]: MODEM Supports 0 ms/scanline
>Aug 6 16:57:31 control FaxSend[1848]: MODEM Supports 5 ms/scanline
>Aug 6 16:57:31 control FaxSend[1848]: MODEM Supports 10 ms, 5
>ms/scanline
>Aug 6 16:57:31 control FaxSend[1848]: MODEM Supports 10 ms/scanline
>Aug 6 16:57:31 control FaxSend[1848]: MODEM Supports 20 ms, 10
>ms/scanline
>Aug 6 16:57:31 control FaxSend[1848]: MODEM Supports 20 ms/scanline
>Aug 6 16:57:31 control FaxSend[1848]: MODEM Supports 40 ms, 20
>ms/scanline
>Aug 6 16:57:31 control FaxSend[1848]: MODEM Supports 40 ms/scanline
>Aug 6 16:57:31 control FaxSend[1848]: <-- [9:AT+FCQ=?\r]
>Aug 6 16:57:31 control FaxSend[1848]: --> [1:0]
>Aug 6 16:57:31 control FaxSend[1848]: --> [2:OK]
>Aug 6 16:57:31 control FaxSend[1848]: MODEM Supports no copy quality
>checking
>Aug 6 16:57:31 control FaxSend[1848]: <-- [9:AT+FAP=?\r]
>Aug 6 16:57:31 control FaxSend[1848]: --> [5:ERROR]
>Aug 6 16:57:31 control FaxSend[1848]: <-- [10:AT+FSPL=?\r]
>Aug 6 16:57:31 control FaxSend[1848]: --> [3:0,1]
>Aug 6 16:57:31 control FaxSend[1848]: --> [2:OK]
>Aug 6 16:57:31 control FaxSend[1848]: <-- [12:AT+FCLASS=2\r]
>Aug 6 16:57:32 control FaxSend[1848]: --> [2:OK]
>Aug 6 16:57:32 control FaxSend[1848]: <-- [10:AT+FTBC=0\r]
>Aug 6 16:57:32 control FaxSend[1848]: --> [2:OK]
>Aug 6 16:57:32 control FaxSend[1848]: <-- [10:AT+FBOR=0\r]
>Aug 6 16:57:32 control FaxSend[1848]: --> [2:OK]
>Aug 6 16:57:32 control FaxSend[1848]: <-- [13:AT+FPHCTO=30\r]
>Aug 6 16:57:32 control FaxSend[1848]: --> [2:OK]
>Aug 6 16:57:32 control FaxSend[1848]: <--
>[24:AT+FDCC=1,5,2,2,1,0,0,0\r]
>Aug 6 16:57:33 control FaxSend[1848]: --> [2:OK]
>Aug 6 16:57:33 control FaxSend[1848]: MODEM ROCKWELL
>AC/V34/V1.200-V34_DS
>Aug 6 16:57:33 control FaxSend[1848]: <-- [5:ATM0\r]
>Aug 6 16:57:33 control FaxSend[1848]: --> [2:OK]
>Aug 6 16:57:33 control FaxSend[1848]: STATE CHANGE: BASE -> RUNNING
>Aug 6 16:57:33 control FaxSend[1848]: MODEM input buffering disabled
>Aug 6 16:57:33 control FaxSend[1848]: SEND FAX: JOB 39 DEST 43253231
>COMMID 00000023
>Aug 6 16:58:26 control FaxSend[1848]: SEND FAILED: Busy signal detected
>
>------------------------------end-------------------------
>
>thank you, frank.
>
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.misc) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Misc Digest
******************************
