Linux-Misc Digest #604, Volume #21 Mon, 30 Aug 99 19:13:13 EDT
Contents:
linux for A500, anybody can't help me??? ("Punz")
linux x A500? anybody can't help me??? ("Punz")
Re: termcap & color question ("T.E.Dickey")
QuickCam VC + parallel port ? (William Park)
Re: why not C++? (Assad Khan)
This is probably a simple one :) (Vincent Padua)
Re: The Microsoft/Linux Conspiracy (R.E.Ballard)
midi for ES1868 (SB driver) (Guilhem Tardy)
Re: why not C++? ("Mary Mest")
Re: Using Disk Druid to partition a 1.2 GB drive (Dave Brown)
Re: This is probably a simple one :) (brian moore)
Re: why not C++? (Don Waugaman)
Ethernet/PCMCIA problems ("Jesus Arango")
Re: why not C++? (Kaz Kylheku)
Netscape crashes on RH6.0 with javascript (Ganesh)
NFS Daemon Failed to load: nfssvc not Implemented (root)
Realplayer G2 for RH6.0 (Ganesh)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Punz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: linux for A500, anybody can't help me???
Date: 30 Aug 1999 19:57:24 GMT
Hi, I have Amiga500, 2MBRAM,no hd, and Suse6 in my pc.
What I have to do(if it's possible) to installing linux (minimum system) in
A500?
tnx in advance
------------------------------
From: "Punz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.m68k
Subject: linux x A500? anybody can't help me???
Date: 30 Aug 1999 19:57:25 GMT
Hi, I have Amiga500, 2MBRAM,no hd, and Suse6.
What I have to do(if it's possible) for installing linux (minimum system)
in A500?
tnx in advance
------------------------------
From: "T.E.Dickey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: termcap & color question
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 12:33:25 GMT
Paul Kimoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In article <7qcomj$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Justin B Willoughby wrote:
>> I want to have mutt use colors in my xterm like it does on the console. I
>> am now using the larger bsd termcap. What should the TERM variable be set
>> to under an xterm to get mutt to show colors like on the console? Of
>> course my `ls` does display colors with the default TERM=xterm under an xterm.
> Usually mutt is built against slang, rather than ncurses. If that's the
that's a matter of debat (the slang users are much louder, true, but mostly
because they don't know how to configure their terminals ;-)
> case, you may have to set the COLORTERM environment variable. (I usually
> set it to $TERM; I'm not sure whether the exact value matters.)
--
Thomas E. Dickey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey
------------------------------
From: William Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: QuickCam VC + parallel port ?
Date: 30 Aug 1999 20:45:10 GMT
Has anyone successfully setup Connectix QuickCam VC (parallel port) on
Linux? If yes, then can you give me few pointers on how to setup the
parallel port, and what program you used? Even though it works okey
on Win95, I'm trying to run it (or any cam) on Linux.
I tried 'gqcam-0.4' which needs 'videodev.o' and 'bw-qcam.o' modules.
But, after killing 'lpd' and removing 'lp.o' module,
modprobe -a videodev
modprobe -a bw-qcam
gives
/lib/modules/2.2.6/misc/bw-qcam.o: init_module: Device or resource busy
I also tried 'cqcam-0.90pre7', but it fails to find the camera.
Yours truly,
William Park
------------------------------
From: Assad Khan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.apps,comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject: Re: why not C++?
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 18:44:27 -0400
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In 1991 when Linus created Linux, ANSI C++ was in the works. Remember, before
the ANSI standard there were tons of different versions of C, and C++. ALso, if
you program in a language for so long, and write something good, why change to
a language you just used? I doubt Linus knows C++ or has the time (he compiled
himself without SMP :P). The last reason is that C is way more popular than
C++, so the # of developers who contribute to Linux may not know C++. Heh, even
C++ was writtin in C :P
Cocheese wrote:
> Dear Linux Community;
>
> There has been a puzzling question on my mind for some time. First, I
>
> admit i am no Linux Guru so this may be off the wall.
>
> *Why Is linux done primarily in the C programming language rather than
>
> C++?*
>
> Again I admit it would take a little extra work and put a minor set
>
> back in the evolution for a month or 2, but if C++ is so much faster,
>
> easier, and stable- WHY NOT?
>
> I have been a RH 6.0 user since the first week it was first released
>
> and since then i have loved it. I am struggling with it a bit but as i
>
> continue to learn this from an "other leading brand OS" and a full time
>
> programmer for a large company.
>
> There are many differences Between the two programming languages and
>
> there are huge advantages to C++.
>
> The downside is "linux has always been a C based Program so it will always
>
> be."
>
> *** BUT THEN AGAIN - ISN'T LINUX ALL ABOUT CHANGE? ***
>
> -Sincerely
>
> cocheese
>
> ------------------ Posted via CNET Linux Help ------------------
> http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: Vincent Padua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.questions
Subject: This is probably a simple one :)
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 19:21:28 GMT
Hello,
I'm not looking for the specific answer, however, I'm curious about
what's broken here and then i'll hunt it down how to fix it. :) I'm
trying to learn!
Okay, I've got RH 6.0 on my box. I telnet into a bsdi box (4.0.1) and
then try to open an xterm from there and i get this error:
_X11TransSocketINETConnect: Can't get address for foo.bar.com
xterm Xt error: Can't open display: foo.bar.com:0.0
So i thought maybe it was the xhost stuff, so I completely disabled
anyform of authentication:
xhost +
However, I still get the same error. Can someone lend me an explanation
of what is broken here? Also, here's another whacky one. After I have
telneted intot he bsdi box and try to vi a file on that box, everything
looks good. however, when I try a vim filename, I get crap like this:
^[[35m#include ^[[31m<sys/param.h>
^[[35m#include ^[[31m<sys/types.h>
^[[35m#include ^[[31m<sys/conf.h>
^[[35m#include ^[[31m<sys/proc.h>
^[[35m#include ^[[31m<sys/user.h>
^[[35m#include ^[[31m<sys/malloc.h>
^[[35m#include ^[[31m<sys/systm.h>
^[[35m#include ^[[31m<sys/ioctl.h>
^[[35m#include ^[[31m<sys/reboot.h>
Any hints on what is happening here? Oh yeah, this occurs in either
tcsh or bash shell's ^shrug^
All help is appreciated,
-J
------------------------------
From: R.E.Ballard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: The Microsoft/Linux Conspiracy
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 21:54:33 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Collin W. Hitchcock) wrote:
>
> Cameron L. Spitzer wrote:
> > Take a good long look at the patch Microsoft publishes for Apache.
> > It's a trojan horse. If you install it your security is
> > compromised. Does anyone believe this compromise is an *accident*?
>
> Microsoft published the actual code that implements one of their
> proprietary protocols? This is great news! So it's buggy -- at least
> now we can figure out where the bugs are and have the ability to fix
> them.
Actually, no. The proprietary code executes on the client machine
(Which MUST be MS-Windows), but the front-page server can "dish out"
the proprietary code.
> Christopher Browne wrote:
> > DCOM is an obvious "force" that must be resisted.
And let's not forget ActiveX!
> Or coopted, a la Samba. I should think a Linux port of something
> proprietary like this would make it easier to reverse engineer on both
> the technical and legal fronts. You can sniff the protocols by adding
> code to the Linux side of the DCOM/Linux interface. Microsoft can't
> make legal trouble because you're allowed to modify Linux.
Microsoft only made a small portion of DCOM (the portion that is
similar to CORBA) available to the IETF. The critical pieces
needed for a server were almost implemented by Software AG. The
client side requires the OLE/COM paradigm.
As for SAMBA, the UNIX version still doesn't have the necessary hooks
for Access Control Lists. Even dynamic group generation would be an
improvement. Of course, in the Linux/UNIX environment, the servers can
be more intelligent and the SAMBA facility is only needed by those who
update the file (readers can access documents via HTTP, which does have
ACLs).
> Even if DCOM can't be coopted, it's good to have it running on Linux.
Remember, the key strategic value of DCOM was to derail the CORBA
effort. By coming up with DCOM and putting it into IE 4.0, such that
it became an operating system "extension", the more standardized CORBA
required either a substantial download (Navigator 4.x) or a siginificant
purchase.
Blocking CORBA was intended to prevent the proliferation of CORBA
clients which could easily be implemented in either Windows or Linux.
Microsoft has been attempting to do the same with XML. XML provides
structured mark-up capabilities for a number of different object types,
but Microsoft has repeatedly tried to force in-line inclusion of
proprietary OLE/COM objects into the XML datastream. Furthermore,
Microsoft has tried to have document formats such as MS-WORD, Excel,
MS-Word-Drawings, and VBGraph objects recognised as "official" standard
object formats. Essentially, Microsoft was trying to hard-wire ActiveX
directly into XML. Under the proposed Microsoft standard, a user would
be forced to accept the ActiveX control without taking any action.
> If a significant number of people move to Linux from Windows because
> DCOM is available, this is a good thing --
This would be true if what was being offered was a fully implemented
client (GUI interface). Unfortunately, all that is really being offered
is a minimally functional server.
> Even Linux apps which don't
> use DCOM are bolstered by the larger user base. Trying to wean Linux
> DCOM users to open protocols is a lot easier than trying to convince
> Windows users to switch to Linux.
Right now, Linux has a great deal of momentum and is gaining even more.
Linux is doing with CORBA (GNOME, KDE) what Microsoft does with DCOM.
Linux is also creating a market for dual-platform applications such
as WordPerfect.
> A fox caught in a snare will knaw off its own leg to escape.
> Microsoft is the fox. The Linux community set the snare.
> The two of you are complaining that the fox got away.
Actually, Microsoft is the frustrated trapper confronted with a smart
fox (the Linux community) that seems to have figured out how to
spring the trap without getting caught and then walk off with the
bait.
What Microsoft is beginning to realize is that the Linux community
isn't like so many of their previous victims, who can be sucked in
by greed and then forced to comply under threat of bankruptcy or
institutionalization.
> Divide and conquer.
There are some areas where Microsoft is making some inroads. Applix,
WordPerfect, and StarOffice have mutual agreements that give them access
to Microsoft Office file formats. Microsoft is adopting XML, which may
open the Office Suite and information publishing even more.
I don't see Microsoft trying to survive exclusively by it's control
of the Operating System. Microsoft now owns principle interests in
satellite systems, cable-tv, web-tv, numerous web sites, and numerous
service functions. Greyhound doesn't drive busses anymore (they sold
the lines to Trailways). Goodyear doesn't make rubber tires anymore
(they use polyester). The carriage company that makes the bodies
for several automobiles was once a famous coach and horse-drawn
carriage maker.
Microsoft may get out of the Operating System business altogether,
they may compete and cooperate in a competitive market, or they may
let SCO do the operating systems and then write the software for them.
Microsoft CAN'T come up with anything like UNIX (a violation of it's
agreements with SCO), and it would be foolish to assume that it will
continue to hold it's monopoly over Linux and the UNIX variants.
Microsoft will have to cooperate, augment, and support Linux, UNIX,
and the related OS family. Windows 2000 will not be as profitable
as it's predecessors because the OEMs won't be willing to pay as much
and will expect even better quality. If Microsoft attempts to
resort to it's traditional strong-arm techniques, it's likely that
the big guns, like IBM, DELL, Compaq, HP, and Gateway will simply
throw their weight behind Linux. It's very likely that Apple will
be putting OS/X (with it's BSD kernel) into the iMacs.
UNIX was a key factor in the success of the Internet. Linux on the
desktop will have a similar impact.
> Collin
>
--
Rex Ballard - Open Source Advocate, Internet
Architect, MIS Director
http://www.open4success.com
Linux - 44 million and growing at 3%/week!
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: Guilhem Tardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: midi for ES1868 (SB driver)
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 17:55:42 -0400
Hi!
I am trying to install the sound driver of 2.2.11 on a Thinkpad 760EL,
which has a ES1868 sound chip. Therefore, I set up the SB drivers (as
module), but my documentation (delivered with RD 6.0) is not in sync
with the software and I can't get the midi driver to work.
It should be uart401.o (found in /lib/modules/2.2.11/misc), but the OS
can't find it at boot time.
Therefore, when I run sndconfig, the second part of testing doesn't work
and I get annoyed by the "FAILED" label at boot time ("can't find midi
module").
Any idea?
Guilhem.
------------------------------
From: "Mary Mest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.apps,comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject: Re: why not C++?
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 18:11:45 -0400
Reply-To: "Mary Mest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Schuerig) wrote:
> >> For a man that had the opportunity to clean up the C syntax and make it
> >> more readable yet managed the impressive task of making it even more of
an
> >> dogs dinner than it already was, he really should have learnt his
lesson by
> >> now.
> >
> >You can bet that similarity to C was instrumental in the widespread
> >adoption of C++. If it were not to offer some kind of compatibility to
>
> I've no doubt it was.
>
> >existing C code, it wouldn't be nearly as widely used as it actually is.
> >There's a similar effect with Java.
>
> My point was that he's added even more pointless and obscure things to C++
> such as reference variables. What the hells the point of those when you
> already have pointers? Also overloading the << and >> to produce a less
> powerfull (for most things) I/O system than *printf and *scanf and to
> produce confusing statements like "cout << 2 << 3".
The purpose of overloading the << and >> operators was certainly not to
compete
with the printf and scanf family. If you're only using them to throw things
to cout or cin,
than you're certainly in no position to critique C++. The actual purpose of
those
operators is to allow any class the ability to define its own methods of
streaming itself
out. The fact that stdout(cout) and stdin(cin) are streams, and that int,
long, char* and
what not all have these operators defined was an afterthought that fit
nicely into the paradigm.
If you're not familiar with the concept of streams, well, then this
conversation is moot.
> In general IMO
> operator overloading produces impossible to follow code and the syntax for
> declaring an overloaded operator is a joke as are other things such as
> class inheritance. Also why give constructor functions the same name as
the
> class and make destructors have a tilda in front?
>Even worse the copy
> function is the same as the constructor except it takes an argument!
You can have a thousand constructors, each with arguments, that are not the
copy constructor. The difference is that the copy constructor takes a
reference to
a pre-constructed object. It's an object oriented language... at runtime,
you decide
how to construct yourself. Thats not a tough concept to grasp, is it?
> Whats wrong with constructor() , destructor() and copy() for chrissake??
So, you would rather have this, then:
MyClass* myInst = new constructor();
constructor? what constructor? who's constructor? This is where a
compiler tells
you that you're nuts... in any language.
> I could go on but whats the point. C++ is a dogs dinner like I said
before.
>
> >How long does someone have to be in industry so that you don't consider
> >them an "academic" in your derogatory sense? No, sorry, but the design
> >of C++ has above all been driven by practical concerns.
>
> Bullshit. The only practical part was building it on top of C. The rest of
> it was made up by stroustrop , probably with very little input from anyone
> who might have to use the language for real.
The plain fact that C++ is an ANSI language should tell you that many many
people have worked to make it what it has come to be.
>
> >About time to reconsider your preconceptions.
>
> I think not. Just because C++ is used by lots of people doesn't make it a
> good language syntactically anymore than billions of people buying Big
Macs
> makes the burger upmarket cuisine. Sure C++ has power but so what? So does
> assembler.
Lets not compare C++'s readibility with that of assembler. The only point
to be made,
and it is a valid point, is that, the deeper you go, or rather, the closer
you get to writing
true machine code, the more powerful your application will be. With that
said, it's almost
impossible to write an app in assembler that is worth a damn, considering
that it'll take you
so long to write/debug/test, that you could never even dream of meeting any
real-world
business deadlines, which is certainly not the case with C++.
Bottom line is this: C++ isn't a toy, its a tool, and sometimes tools are
complex and hard to
operate. If you have issues with the syntax, stick with Torbo Pascal. I
personally am glad
that C++ is the way it is.. if it were easy, everyone would be doing it, and
that makes for a
bloated marketplace for techies. We all know what that mean.
regards,
Kevin
>
> NJR
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dave Brown)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.setup,linux.redhat.misc
Subject: Re: Using Disk Druid to partition a 1.2 GB drive
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 30 Aug 99 22:41:02 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Darin Johnson wrote:
>Doug Marker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> swap (as big as the most RAM you will install)
>
>There are problems with this "rule of thumb". First, there is a
>maximum usable swap size. You can make a partition bigger, but it
>won't necessarily all be used. I think the limit is 128M.
>
>Second, it's just a wierd rule (and it got started long before Linux,
>so there's no reason to assume that if it once was sensible that it
>still is). It doesn't make sense logically. Ie, if you have 1M
>memory, you'd want lots of swap space, but if you had 512M memory, you
>could probably get by with no swap at all.
>...
Darin, I agree with much you say, although I think, in general,
128M is excessive for single-user systems. I'd recommend
32M or 64M. It's easy to add a swap-space; it's a PITA to reduce
the size of one, (and you could end up with a chunk of space in the
middle of other partitions, not really usable.)
I tried once to fill up swap space to see what the Linux kernel would
do; (on AIX, it will start killing processes). I loaded everything
I could think of: X, WP, netscape, gimp, xv, image-magic, acroread,
ghostview, big graphics files and .pdf's, etc. I never did get swap
space full... (64MB of real memory, 72MB of swap). Multiple instances
of programs often don't increase memory use very much.
--
Dave Brown Austin, TX
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (brian moore)
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.questions
Subject: Re: This is probably a simple one :)
Date: 30 Aug 1999 22:40:56 GMT
On Mon, 30 Aug 1999 19:21:28 GMT,
Vincent Padua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm not looking for the specific answer, however, I'm curious about
> what's broken here and then i'll hunt it down how to fix it. :) I'm
> trying to learn!
>
> Okay, I've got RH 6.0 on my box. I telnet into a bsdi box (4.0.1) and
> then try to open an xterm from there and i get this error:
>
> _X11TransSocketINETConnect: Can't get address for foo.bar.com
> xterm Xt error: Can't open display: foo.bar.com:0.0
>
> So i thought maybe it was the xhost stuff, so I completely disabled
> anyform of authentication:
note the error. "Can't get address for foo.bar.com".
Perhaps you should fix your name service?
> However, I still get the same error. Can someone lend me an explanation
> of what is broken here? Also, here's another whacky one. After I have
> telneted intot he bsdi box and try to vi a file on that box, everything
> looks good. however, when I try a vim filename, I get crap like this:
>
> ^[[35m#include ^[[31m<sys/param.h>
> ^[[35m#include ^[[31m<sys/types.h>
> ^[[35m#include ^[[31m<sys/conf.h>
> ^[[35m#include ^[[31m<sys/proc.h>
> ^[[35m#include ^[[31m<sys/user.h>
> ^[[35m#include ^[[31m<sys/malloc.h>
> ^[[35m#include ^[[31m<sys/systm.h>
> ^[[35m#include ^[[31m<sys/ioctl.h>
> ^[[35m#include ^[[31m<sys/reboot.h>
>
> Any hints on what is happening here? Oh yeah, this occurs in either
> tcsh or bash shell's ^shrug^
Use a proper termcap.
--
Brian Moore | Of course vi is God's editor.
Sysadmin, C/Perl Hacker | If He used Emacs, He'd still be waiting
Usenet Vandal | for it to load on the seventh day.
Netscum, Bane of Elves.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Don Waugaman)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.apps,comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject: Re: why not C++?
Date: 30 Aug 1999 13:16:37 -0700
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
NF Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Don Waugaman) wrote:
[ snipped - null references not allowed, and I moved the question below
to before the program for the sake of readability ]
>Which part of the this program is not strictly
>conforming?
>#include <cstdio>
>char *GetAddress (char &c)
>{
> return &c;
>}
>int main (void)
>{
> char *p = NULL;
> printf ("%p\n", GetAddress (*p));
^^ deref'ing a NULL pointer
> return 0;
>}
This program dereferences a NULL pointer where I've noted above. It is
legal by the standard for the compiler to pass the address from p through
to create the reference parameter c because p cannot be NULL in a
strictly conforming program - dereferencing a NULL pointer is undefined
behavior and illegal in a strictly conforming program.
--
- Don Waugaman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) O- _|_ Will pun
Web Page: http://www.cs.arizona.edu/people/dpw/ | for food
In the Sonoran Desert, where we say: "It's a dry heat..." | <><
I feel a lot more like I do now than I did a while ago.
------------------------------
From: "Jesus Arango" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.periphs.pcmcia,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.setup,fj.net.media.ethernet
Subject: Ethernet/PCMCIA problems
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 18:39:05 -0700
Hi,
I'm having trouble getting my ethernet pcmcia card to work under linux. I
wonder if any one can help me diagnose the problem.
The card is a 3com 3CCFE575B-DT Fast Etherlink XL
Linux Kernel: 2.2.5-15
pcmci-cs version 3.0.14
The system reports no problems but the card does not work. Card works on
other systems and under win98 in the same system. I set up the IRQ to 9,
which is the same value I used under win98.
All drivers are loading, the network.opts is properly configured and the
network script is properly executing. The machines gives two high beeps as
if everything was ok.
ifconfig command shows all configuration is OK, but it shows some rather
high numbers in the overruns and carrier fields. For example:
overruns: 130, carrier:30
Thanks for any help
Jesus
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kaz Kylheku)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.apps,comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject: Re: why not C++?
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 22:30:40 GMT
On Mon, 30 Aug 1999 18:11:45 -0400, Mary Mest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>The actual purpose of those operators is to allow any class the ability to
>define its own methods of streaming itself out.
This is not possible. The << and >> operators take a stream object on the left.
This means that they must be the members of a stream class, or non-members. We
are talking about C++ right?
A non-brain-damaged design for C++ streams would put the stream objects
on the right, so that one could design object methods that accept the
stream, not the stream accepting the objects.
Of course, you can still do this, if you want, so the syntax becomes
my_object >> cout;
which is preferrable.
Then again, the ability itself is of little utility. I can't think of any use
for this other than debugging. If you want to know the state of object x,
just grab a lock, do cout << object, then unlock.
There is a use for object serialization (a.k.a. marshalling) but there
are interface compilers for that. You wouldn't want to implement RPC's
over streams. Or use flat text files as an object store.
>and stdin(cin) are streams, and that int, long, char* and what not all have
>these operators defined was an afterthought that fit nicely into the paradigm.
The afterthought was the overloading for arbitrary objects. That is why it's
awkward to do, with anti-object-oriented crap like non-member friend functions.
The original thought was to overload the stream for basic types,
since overloading the basic types isn't possible.
------------------------------
From: Ganesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.questions
Subject: Netscape crashes on RH6.0 with javascript
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 15:37:40 -0700
Whenever I access any webpage with javascript, netscape
crashes. Do I need to need any patch(either RH6.0 or JVM) ?
Thanks,
Ganesh
------------------------------
From: root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.setup,alt.os.linux
Subject: NFS Daemon Failed to load: nfssvc not Implemented
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 10:55:03 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
When upgrading my RedHat 6.0 to kernels 2.2.10 and 2.2.12, the
NFS Daemon does not load properly.
At boot, I get FAILED, and when trying to run /usr/sbin/rpc.nfsd
manually, I get;
nfssvc: Function not implemented
NFS runs properly under the default RH6.0 kernel 2.2.5-15 kernel.
Any suggestions on how to fix this?
This problem exists on 2 seperate machines. A PII 400, 512MB RAM w/
RAID 5 (AMI MegaRAID), and a Dual PII 333, 256MB RAM, IDE.
Thanx in advance!
___________________________
James C. Montz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Northwest Internet Services
http://www.ncn.net
------------------------------
From: Ganesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.questions
Subject: Realplayer G2 for RH6.0
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 15:39:51 -0700
Where can I download Realplayer G2 for RH6.0.
I found a shareware that required me to run it under X.
I usually run Gnome(with KDE enabled) as my desktop environment.
Thanks,
Ganesh
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.misc) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Misc Digest
******************************
