Linux-Misc Digest #720, Volume #23                Wed, 1 Mar 00 12:13:04 EST

Contents:
  Where to find smgl2html ? (Neil Cherry)
  Re: "httpd" problem! (Neil)
  httpd: cannot determine the IP address of........ (Paul G)
  Re: opening archives (Marc)
  / file system full ("Gary Iser")
  Re: Where to find smgl2html ? (Neil Cherry)
  Two screens at the same time (Rafael)
  Re: 128 RAM on FIC SD11 and Athlon 600MHz (Thomas Hommel)
  Re: Best text editor ("Richard M. Sugg")
  Solaris and GUI ? ("Miroslav Skoric")
  SMB and ip masquerading (Tom)
  Re: "httpd" problem! (Nathan Cuka)
  Re: How can I see a linux partition from windows? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Problems with Miro PCTV sound (EP)
  $1.95 CDs - unstable version?????? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: top (or other) for SMP? (Ruediger Otte)
  Re: configure pppd server on REDHAT 6.0 (Robert Lynch)
  Removing Lilo? ("jdn")
  Re: Solaris and GUI ? (Gerald Willmann)
  Re: copying from linux to win ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: system requirements? (Gerald Willmann)
  glibc upgrade (David M Klein)
  Re: httpd: cannot determine the IP address of........ ("Brian & Bridget")
  Re: Restrict ftp users to a specific directory (Josef Drexler)
  Re: What is MAGIC COOKIE and why cant I run apps as su? (Rick)
  Re: / file system full (Paul Kimoto)
  Re: opening archives (Paul Kimoto)
  Re: Error in loading shared libraries (Paul Kimoto)
  Re: Which distribution is better (Newbie question) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  IP alias and portfw ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Neil Cherry)
Subject: Where to find smgl2html ?
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2000 15:10:22 GMT

I'm looking for smgl2html (the entire package actually) for Linux.
I've searched using google and datahit and found no direct reference
to it's location. Any pointers?


-- 
Linux Home Automation           Neil Cherry             [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.home.net/ncherry                         (Text only)
http://meltingpot.fortunecity.com/lightsey/52           (Graphics)
http://linuxha.sourceforge.net/                         (SourceForge)

------------------------------

From: Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: "httpd" problem!
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2000 15:09:53 +0000

On Tue, 29 Feb 2000 19:31:24 GMT, NTK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>I can't get 'httpd' to run on my machine.  The following is what I get:

you need to edit httpd.conf and add the entries its asking for. Make sure you
start httpd with the script supplied by the apache installation.

------------------------------

From: Paul G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: httpd: cannot determine the IP address of........
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2000 15:09:24 +0000

I have Apache installed on my Redhat 5.1 box with which I am hoping to
try out some perl CGI programming.  I can browse the index page using
Netscape (from the same box) no problems.  However when I try to browse
from my Win98 box the browser cannot find the index page of the Linux
Mach. 
I have posted to this NG rather than a Win98 NG because of the following
error message on the Linux machine 

"httpd: cannot determine the IP address of the specified ServerName
(server).
hp = 0!: Connection timed out"

Would anyone have any pointers to why I cannot browse from the Win98
box?  I have the line 

89.0.0.17     myserver      apacheserver

in my etc/hosts file (exact syntax).

Any ideas very welcome.

Many thanks.
-- 
Paul G

------------------------------

From: Marc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: opening archives
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2000 09:21:25 -0600

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Marc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Can anyone help me? I've downloaded jdk118_v1- glibc-2.1.2.tar.bz.
> > The question I've got is, what opens it? I've tried to use gunzip, but
> > that doesn't recognize the "bz" file format.
> > I've also tried to use "bunzip" but that gives the message "not a bzip
> > file".
> > Thanks for any help anyone can give me.
> >
> man bzip2.

bzip2 also gives the message "not a bzip2 file"


------------------------------

From: "Gary Iser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: / file system full
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2000 08:22:10 -0700

RH6.1 on a x586
I installed an rpm today when I noticed a message "Need 1k from /
filesystem".  I Checked the / filesystem
with the df command and it shows / at 100% usage. I haven't been able to
find what is taking up the space. I
have removed approximately 4Meg of files from the root directory but it
still shows 100% full. I allocated 245 Meg for /
partition on install. I have separate partitions for /boot, /home, /var, and
/usr & /usr/local. I ran du -shk on each
directory using the full partition and get this:

4566        bin
107          dev
2275        etc
19268      lib
12            lost+found
3              mnt
1136        root
4049        sbin
3              tmp

I checked these numbers against a second RH6.1 box and the numbers above are
all smaller. The only difference I can find is in the /proc/kcore file on
the problem box is around 67M and 33M on the other. The 2 machines are
configured in very much the same (245 meg / partition size). I checked to
make sure there were no a.out or core files laying around.

I would greatly appreciate any help from one of you more experienced linux
users.

Thanks,
Gary

[EMAIL PROTECTED] & [EMAIL PROTECTED] (for home)




------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Neil Cherry)
Subject: Re: Where to find smgl2html ?
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2000 15:28:51 GMT

On Wed, 01 Mar 2000 15:10:22 GMT, Neil Cherry wrote:
>I'm looking for smgl2html (the entire package actually) for Linux.
>I've searched using google and datahit and found no direct reference
>to it's location. Any pointers?

After continueing my search I discover I spelled it wrong, I found
sgml-tools. Thanks.

-- 
Linux Home Automation           Neil Cherry             [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.home.net/ncherry                         (Text only)
http://meltingpot.fortunecity.com/lightsey/52           (Graphics)
http://linuxha.sourceforge.net/                         (SourceForge)

------------------------------

From: Rafael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Two screens at the same time
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2000 12:10:30 +0100
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Hi!
I have read all lot of docs, but I could not find info how
to setup two graphic cards in Linux. Does Linux Support displaying
desktops on two screens if you have instaled twp graphic cards.
I find it very useful in Windows98, but I realy want to have possibility

live without Microsoft. Please help me.

Rafael


------------------------------

From: Thomas Hommel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 128 RAM on FIC SD11 and Athlon 600MHz
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2000 16:36:59 +0100

Same old question, same old answer:
Just put append="mem=128M" into your /etc/lilo.conf and run lilo. Then
reboot...


Michael Yuan schrieb:
> 
> Hi I have a new Athlon 600Mhx with FIC Sd11 MB. I installed 128MB RAM on
> it and the MB boot screen can display the info correctly. But when I
> boot into RedHat 6.0 and run "top", it says that there is only 64MB
> available ... Does anyone have experience with that?
> 
> Thanks
> Michael

------------------------------

From: "Richard M. Sugg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Best text editor
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2000 15:37:15 GMT

Bob Zamites wrote:
> 
> =?iso-8859-1?Q?St=E9phane?= Melnitchouk wrote:
> >
> > What is the best text editor MS-Word like for X ?
> > Thanx
> >
> Well, for out and out versatility, I'd go with StarOffice 5.1. It allows
> you to edit documents in Linux, and then import them into MS-Word, or vice
> versa. Word Perfect is a good choice too, if you can retrain yourself to
> use it.
> 
> -popeye-
> 
> --
> Posted via CNET Help.com
> http://www.help.com/

I have the full version of wordperfect and love it.  I used staroffice
for a while, but it seemed to crash without warning.  if I could trust
it, it would actually be the better choice, since it has so much more
functionality than wordperfect.  However, corel has already said it's
porting it's entire office 2k suite to linux, not just the
wordprocessor.  I read from their site that they focused on the word
proc. first because it was the most important.  according to the press
release on their website, the office suite should be released in april. 
I'll be waiting in line to get it.

richard

------------------------------

From: "Miroslav Skoric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux
Subject: Solaris and GUI ?
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2000 16:41:21 +0100

Wonder if Solaris has a GUI (XFree, KDE, Gnome...)? If not, could a GUI be
post-installed into Solaris?



------------------------------

From: Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: SMB and ip masquerading
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2000 23:46:35 +0800

there are 3 linux machines, one is firewall
one is behind firewall and one is outside firewall
and there are few Windows PC behind firewall

linux A ------- linux B (firewall) --------- linux C
                                               |--------- 5 PCs
Windows98 installed

linux B is running IP masquerading
( /sbin/ipchains -A forward -s 192.168.0.0/24 -j MASQ )
all linux machines are running SAMBA
the Windows machines can see linux C, linux B in network neighbourhood
but Windows machines cannot see linux A
Both linux A and linux C have the same /etc/smb.conf
I have set the IP of linux A in lmhosts on Windows machines

linux A cannot access linux C using SMB, for example:
> smbclient -L wadlab
Added interface ip=202.185.10.215 bcast=203.185.30.239
nmask=255.255.255.240
timeout connecting to 192.168.0.2:139
Connection to wadlab failed
Btw, no logs are generated after typing this command

I am suspecting if it is due to the firewall
maybe it cannot handle SMB forwarding (or proxying).......
any idea? Thank you.



------------------------------

From: Nathan Cuka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: "httpd" problem!
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2000 09:47:11 -0600



NTK wrote:

> I can't get 'httpd' to run on my machine.  The following is what I get:
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> [root@LINUX /etc]# httpd &
> [1] 2876
> [root@LINUX /etc]# httpd: cannot determine local host name.
> Use the ServerName directive to set it manually.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------

As far as httpd goes, I had the same problem with my laptop.
I solved it by putting the following line into the
/etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf
file:

ServerName my-server-name-here

This solved the problem of starting up httpd.

As far as your hostname  goes, are you using the proper command
to get the hostname in your prompt?  What happens if you just
type `hostname` at a prompt?  AFAIK, if you have HOSTNAME set
to what you want it to be, then the machine should have that
specific name (at least to users on that machine...DNS entries
are a different story...)




--
==============================================
| Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| ZEFER Corporation.......http://www.zefer.com
|
| import com.standard.Disclaimer;
==============================================



------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: How can I see a linux partition from windows?
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2000 15:53:14 GMT

If you want access to the whole directory tree then the last option
sounds best. If you just need a few directories of files that you can
share between Win98 and Linux why not mount a small windows partition
under '/share/' and save files to that. Browsing 'E:' under windows
would give you access to this directory.

For example, if you had a series of html pages that you want to work
with under both operating systems but don't want to have to remember to
copy the latest version to the windows partition, just create the html
page in the /share/ directory and create a link to it in whichever
Linux directory you prefer to edit your html pages in.

So I link '/home/neil/html/index.html' to '/share/index.html' so that
whenever I use windows, the most up-to-date version of 'index.html' can
be found at 'E:\index.html.'

E-mail me if this doesn't make sense and I'll send you a step-by-step
guide.


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

------------------------------

From: EP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,free.comp.linux.misc,alt.os.linux
Subject: Problems with Miro PCTV sound
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2000 16:51:57 +0100

Hi

I run linux SuSE 6.3 with KDE environment. I have a Miro PCTV that I
want to make work under linux. I have succeded but not completely. The
tuner seems to work, amd I get the images. But I have a problem with the

sound. Indeed no sound comes out of the PCTV card. If I have understood
what I read, there is a chip on this card for the sound, something like
msp3400 (not completely sure). There is a module of the same name that
was created when I recompile my kernel. I do an insmod with it, it
loads, but when I do a lsmod, I see it is an unused module. So maybe
there are parameters to load or something like that I don't know.
Anyway, if someone knows what happens or already solved such problems, I

would be happy to get some help...

Thanks in advance! :)

EP


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: $1.95 CDs - unstable version??????
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2000 16:05:02 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi,

I obtained $1.95 CD and it seems that it is the unstable version of tha
t distribution?

Does these low priced CDs contain unstable version? I don't know if my
assumption is correct as I am a newbie and fiddling with Linux (never
went beyond installation :)  )

Please post your feedback. Thanks a bunch.

- Inon


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

------------------------------

From: Ruediger Otte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: top (or other) for SMP?
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 23:46:46 +0200
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

In article top (or other) for SMP?,
        David Topper writes:

> I can do a cat /proc/cpu and see my CPUs ... but top doesn't seem to
> report usage as such.  How can I monitor the load on each?  I remember
> top on an SMP Solaris box reporting stats for each CPU.
> 
> Are there some other utils I can use?

You heard about XOsview ? It gives graphical information about
System-Load, Usage of each CPU, Memory Usage etc. This package should come
with most Linux-Distributions.

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2000 08:14:34 -0800
From: Robert Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: configure pppd server on REDHAT 6.0

Francesco Loiacono wrote:
> 
> How to configure pppd server on REDHAT 6.0 ?
> I use modems on ttys or on terminal server.
> 
> --
> Posted via CNET Help.com
> http://www.help.com/

There's a great tutorial on doing just this at:

http://www.linuxgazette.com/issue36/ali.html

HTH. Bob L.
-- 
Robert Lynch-Berkeley CA [EMAIL PROTECTED]

------------------------------

From: "jdn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Removing Lilo?
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2000 16:18:46 GMT

I have a box which I want to triple-boot with DOS, Linux, and Solaris.

Originally, it had DOS.  Linux was then installed using all remaining
available disk space on the first disk (two 4 GB hard drives installed).
Solaris 8, for reasons unknown to man, requires space on first disk to
install.  So, Linux was removed.  However, Lilo was not removed properly, so
it always starts on boot.  Typing DOS at boot prompt does properly boot into
DOS, but I'd like to remove Lilo completely, so that it will boot straight
into DOS.  Then, I'll install Solaris.  Then, I'll install Linux and
configure it so it will  boot into any of the three (I know how to do this
with NT's boot loader, never tried it with Lilo, but I'll cross that bridge
when I get there).

Question is, how do I remove Lilo?  I read a HowTo page off of Linux.com,
but the options described there don't seem to work.  Running fdisk /mbr when
booted into RedHat Linux 6.1 (Gnome Workstation install) doesn't work.
Since Linux was uninstalled improperly (e.g. "operator error"), I don't have
a file in the requisite subdirectory of /boot to dd back.  Format /s from
DOS doesn't work.

Sorry if this is obvious, but I'm clueless on what to do here.  Any
suggestions would be greatly appreciated.  Since this newsgroup is busy, any
replies to my e-mail (kingcrim at earthlink dot net) are fine as well.

TIA

jdn



------------------------------

From: Gerald Willmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Solaris and GUI ?
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2000 08:15:57 -0800

On Wed, 1 Mar 2000, Miroslav Skoric wrote:

> Wonder if Solaris has a GUI (XFree, KDE, Gnome...)? If not, could a GUI be
> post-installed into Solaris?

solaris (I only know the sparc version but suppose x86 is similar) comes
with its own Xserver which I think (but am not sure) is from Xig. XFree86
is also available. KDE and Gnome should work I suppose but solaris comes
with CDE.
                   Gerald 
-- 


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: linux.redhat.misc,linux.redhat.install,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: copying from linux to win
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2000 16:09:34 GMT


> > Why didn't you just mount the Win-Partition and copy the files
there?


When I first crashed linux so badly that it wouldn't boot, I didn't
have a clue how to recover it and get to the point that would allow me
to copy a file across. I'll probably never need it now but I find it
hard to recommend against anyone else installing 'explore2fs' because
you can never have to many safety nets!!!


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

------------------------------

From: Gerald Willmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.windows.x.kde,linux.redhat.install
Subject: Re: system requirements?
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2000 08:22:11 -0800

On Wed, 1 Mar 2000, David Faure wrote:

> 
> > I have 32MB RAM, it seems this should be plenty for any rational OS/desktop
> > manager but perhaps this is not the case.  That's why I was looking for the
> > system requirements. If they are on the KDE site it is very well hidden. 
> 
> They are not, because in a project done by volunteers, nobody is going 
> to test KDE on the 1000 possible combinations of CPU / RAM / hdd...
> and update it with every release.

excuse me and the original poster, but having 32 megs of RAM is certainly
more common than 1/1000
 
> > Why not be honest and say that it is a memory hog? 
> 
> Because it's not.

why don't you give us output from top on your machine to judge for
ourselves.
                  Gerald

-- 


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David M Klein)
Subject: glibc upgrade
Date: 1 Mar 2000 16:31:27 GMT

I have an intel 486-66 machine with rehat 5.2.  I would like to upgrade 
my glibc-2.0.7-29 to glibc-2.1.2-*.  Where can I download the rpms for 
this.  Since I am a newbie is there anything more that I should consider 
besides a simple rpm -U.  Thanks in advance.

Dave

------------------------------

From: "Brian & Bridget" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: httpd: cannot determine the IP address of........
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2000 00:22:32 +0800

Err .. You'll need the lookup in your Win98 hosts file
 $WindozeDir\Drivers\Etc\hosts I think - do a search for the file).

Having it in your Linux /etc/hosts is good for anything originating from
theLinux machine, which your browser is not.

I think.

BT.

Paul G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> "httpd: cannot determine the IP address of the specified ServerName
> (server).
> hp = 0!: Connection timed out"
>
> Would anyone have any pointers to why I cannot browse from the Win98
> box?  I have the line
>
> 89.0.0.17     myserver      apacheserver
>
> in my etc/hosts file (exact syntax).
>
> Any ideas very welcome.
>
> Many thanks.
> --
> Paul G



------------------------------

From: Josef Drexler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.networking
Subject: Re: Restrict ftp users to a specific directory
Date: 1 Mar 2000 16:35:47 GMT

And Lo! It was upon the 29 Feb 2000 that Arief Y.W. said unto the world:
> Josef Drexler wrote in message
> <89gt9r$687$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>> It's not so easy to do with wu.ftpd because you'd have to
>> set up binaries for ls etc. in each user's home directory.
>>
>> However proFTPD has a built-in "ls" command, so that with
>> proFTPD you can just put "DocumentRoot ~" in the config 
>> file and then your users will be confined to their home 
>> directories.
> 
> And if the user can both read-write permission on his home, so he can
> delete a "built-in ls command" and any other stuff which confining him.
> What then an aftermath ?

With ProFTPD the ls command is built into the server executable file. 
Unless the user can write that file he can't delete the command.  And no
user should ever have write access to system executables, so this is not
a problem unless it's a clueless administrator.

And for other FTP daemons, if the user manages to delete the ls command,
he'll still be able to use FTP but just not list any files, which is a 
minor inconvenience.

-- 
   Josef Drexler                 |    http://publish.uwo.ca/~jdrexler/
=================================+========================================
 Please help Conserve Gravity    |  To email me, please change the country
 Stop flipping pancakes.         |  code to .ca - Death to Spammers!

------------------------------

From: Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux.mandrake,comp.os.linux.portable
Subject: Re: What is MAGIC COOKIE and why cant I run apps as su?
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2000 11:18:50 -0500

Bill Unruh wrote:
> 
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> >Thanks for all the help... I have used the xhost +localhost...
> 
> >Now.. can anyone tellme what bad things can happen using this command?
> 
> It allows anyone, local or remote, running on localhost to both listen
> in on anything you type or display in your X session, or to hijack your
> X session.

Thanks for the info and the previous file. Could you answer another
question? Is there a way to undo the permissions that were granted by
the file you suggested in the erlier message?

-- 
To reply by email remove NOSPAM from my address.

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Kimoto)
Subject: Re: / file system full
Date: 1 Mar 2000 11:38:37 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

In article <YCav4.10$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Gary Iser wrote:
> I installed an rpm today when I noticed a message "Need 1k from /
> filesystem".  I Checked the / filesystem
> with the df command and it shows / at 100% usage. I haven't been able to
> find what is taking up the space. I
> have removed approximately 4Meg of files from the root directory but it
> still shows 100% full. I allocated 245 Meg for /
> partition on install. I have separate partitions for /boot, /home, /var, and
> /usr & /usr/local. I ran du -shk on each
> directory using the full partition and get this:
>
> 4566        bin
> 107          dev
> 2275        etc
> 19268      lib
> 12            lost+found
> 3              mnt
> 1136        root
> 4049        sbin
> 3              tmp
>
> I checked these numbers against a second RH6.1 box and the numbers above are
> all smaller. The only difference I can find is in the /proc/kcore file on
> the problem box is around 67M and 33M on the other. The 2 machines are
> configured in very much the same (245 meg / partition size). I checked to
> make sure there were no a.out or core files laying around.

It may be that some process has "deleted" files open.  Such files do not
get released from disk until the process dies.  (I think that you can look
for such files by running "grep --text deleted /proc/*/maps".)

(/proc does not exist on your disk.  It lives in the imagination of the
kernel only.  /proc/kcore is the system in memory, so their different sizes
just tell you that you have more physical memory on one system than on the
other.)

-- 
Paul Kimoto             <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Kimoto)
Subject: Re: opening archives
Date: 1 Mar 2000 11:40:12 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Marc wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>> Marc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I've downloaded jdk118_v1- glibc-2.1.2.tar.bz.
>>> The question I've got is, what opens it? I've tried to use gunzip, but
>>> that doesn't recognize the "bz" file format.
>>> I've also tried to use "bunzip" but that gives the message "not a bzip
>>> file".

> bzip2 also gives the message "not a bzip2 file"

What does "file jdk118_v1-glibc-2.1.2.tar.bz" tell you?

-- 
Paul Kimoto             <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Kimoto)
Subject: Re: Error in loading shared libraries
Date: 1 Mar 2000 11:42:15 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Philipp Maier wrote:
> I have a problem installing KNapster under SuSE Linux 6.1. I have
> installed the rpm with YaST, but when I want to start the program, I get
> the error message:
>
> error in loading shared libraries
> libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file
> or directory        

This is the standard C++ library that goes with egcs-1.1.*, and also goes
by a name like "libstdc++2.9".  You might look for a package by that name.

-- 
Paul Kimoto             <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Which distribution is better (Newbie question)
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2000 16:41:59 GMT



> > What I would like to do is to learn Linux inside out, if possible.
>
> On the other hand, this IS Linux, so if you RTFM a lot, compile your
own
> programms from source, and invest time and effort to administer your
> setup then the name of the distribution is unrelevant. What you get on
> the starting CD is just the base of what YOU will build.

I found my first Linux distribution daunting due to the vast amount of
programs that it installed. This guide:

 http://linux.hjc.edu.sg/HOWTO/Linux-From-Scratch-HOWTO.html

advises how to create your own minimalistic Linux build from the freely
downloadable source code. I'm currently  doing this with the latest
stable releases of source code for the kernel and a few programs which
have newer, more stable versions available. Anything else that I need
can be installed from the original distribution cd I picked up.


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: IP alias and portfw
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2000 16:51:20 GMT

I'm trying to allow multiple pcAnywhere connections on my network.
I've got a RH 6.1 box with kernel 2.2.14 running, and I've aliased the
external interface on it, and then added some port forwarding.  Here's
a rundown of my startup script:

#add the aliases (eth0 is 200.200.200.3 taken care of by network config
script)
ifconfig eht0:0 200.200.200.4
ifconfig eth0:1 200.200.200.5

route add -host 200.200.200.4 dev eth0:0
route add -host 200.200.200.5 dev eth0:1

#configure masquerade / deny unsolicited incoming packets
ipchains -F
ipchains -P forward DENY
ipchains -A forward -s 10.1.1.0/24 -j MASQ
echo "1" /proc/net/ipv4/ip_forward

#allow in one of our software vendors
ipcahins -A forward -s 100.100.100.20 -j ACCEPT

#allow in me from home so I can telecomute :-)
ipchains -A forward -s 150.150.150.100 -J ACCEPT

#forward the pcAnywhere ports to internal boxes

#box 1 (eth0 -> 10.1.1.53)
ipmasqadm portfw -a -P tcp -L 200.200.200.3 5631 -R 10.1.1.53 5631
ipmasqadm portfw -a -P udp -L 200.200.200.3 5632 -R 10.1.1.53 5632

#box 2 (eth0:0 -> 10.1.1.72)
ipmasqadm portfw -a -P tcp -L 200.200.200.4 5631 -R 10.1.1.72 5631
ipmasqadm portfw -a -P tcp -L 200.200.200.4 5632 -R 10.1.1.72 5632

#box 3 (eth0:1 -> 10.1.1.145)
ipmasqadm portfw -a -P tcp -L 200.200.200.5 5631 -R 10.1.1.145 5631
ipmasqadm portfw -a -P tcp -L 200.200.200.5 5632 -R 10.1.1.145 5632

    If I pcAnywhere into 200.200.200.3 (eth0) I connect fine.  If I try
either of the aliased addresses, I get a timeout.  Internally, I can
connect to box 2 and 3 using their internal IP (10.1..), so I know the
service is running.  I have a sniffer program on another machine on the
internal segment, and see no traffic going to the internal pcAnywhere
host.  What am I missing?

Thanx for your help

Mark Hanson
Network Admin
Adams County School Dist. 50
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.misc) via:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Misc Digest
******************************

Reply via email to