Linux-Misc Digest #720, Volume #24 Mon, 5 Jun 00 17:13:04 EDT
Contents:
Re: How to turn off the build-in screenblanker of linux? (David Efflandt)
RH6.1 & 3COM etherlink 10MB 3c509b ("MGA")
network printing issue ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Linux based companies (Vikram V Asrani)
Re: FTP in GNOME file manager? [gmc 4.5.50, Helix GNOME 1.2.1] (D. D. Brierton)
Re: GNU Emacs as Default Editor in Helix GNOME 1.2 (D. D. Brierton)
Re: Installing Netscape 6 ("Jan Houtsma")
Re: Having trouble installing 2 network cards (Michael Martin)
Re: GNU Emacs as Default Editor in Helix GNOME 1.2 (D. D. Brierton)
Re: Troubles reading Real Time Clock (David Efflandt)
Re: how to start VNC during boot? ("Sascha Kicken")
Re: GNU Emacs as Default Editor in Helix GNOME 1.2 (Hannu Koivisto)
Re: GNU Emacs as Default Editor in Helix GNOME 1.2 (Hannu Koivisto)
Re: Strange problem with CVS (David Steuber)
Re: DSL under linux: Now working!!!! (David Steuber)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Efflandt)
Subject: Re: How to turn off the build-in screenblanker of linux?
Date: 5 Jun 2000 20:04:00 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 5 Jun 2000 11:43:38 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Appologies for barging in on this, but have the same problem and am still
>looking.
>I had a look at setterm since in my case , I do not have X installed
>
>What so I set so that it does not turn off the screen ?
>
>There is an option to set the timeout . What would indicate to it that I
>want it to leave the screen bloody well alone?
With a range of 0-60 minutes, did it ever occur to you that a setting of
zero would not make much sense and likely disables it? OK, so I am
guessing, but 0 often means false.
--
David Efflandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.de-srv.com/
http://www.autox.chicago.il.us/ http://www.berniesfloral.net/
http://hammer.prohosting.com/~cgi-wiz/ http://cgi-help.virtualave.net/
------------------------------
From: "MGA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RH6.1 & 3COM etherlink 10MB 3c509b
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2000 21:00:07 +0100
Please help!
I am trying to install my 3COM network card in Linux redhat 6.1 (It works
fine in Win98/Win2000), but for some reason it doesn't work. After reading
the documentation available in the "How to" and Red hat help I followed the
steps to load the modules in the kernel, with the IRQ 5 and IO=0x300 (as
found in the DOS utility program), and then I stop the network services and
fire them up again, but when it tryies to bring up the eth0 interface
(associated to this network card) it just come with [FAILED] , which is
****ing annoying (sorry, but I have been trying for hours ;-D).
I checked that the PNP feature in the NIC was disabled, and tried with
different IOs, but again [FAILED].
please...what can I do?...
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: network printing issue
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2000 20:01:20 GMT
Hi. I'm having a rather strange network printing problem. We have
several linux boxes configued to print over the network to an hp2100.
All work fine except one which queues the jobs by creating queue files
in /var/spool/lpd/hp2100 but never prints them. I found the following
each time in /var/log/messages:
Jun 5 12:29:59 animalcracker lpd[26427]: hp2100: lost connection
The weird thing is that all the configuration files for this machine and
the others which work seem to be the same. printcap and the files in
the spool directory are the same. Maybe there's a problem with the lpd
daemon? It seems to be running correctly. Thanks for any suggestions.
Jeffrey Barrett
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
------------------------------
From: Vikram V Asrani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Linux based companies
Date: 5 Jun 2000 20:14:26 GMT
Reply-To: Vikram.V.Asrani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[ This is a repost of the following article: ]
[ From: Vikram V Asrani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ]
[ Subject: Linux based companies ]
[ Newsgroups: alt.os.linux ]
[ Message-ID: <8hh1hj$4ko$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ]
Does any one know of any linux based companies / companies doing work with
the linux OS which are NOT located in California ?
Thanks in advance, Have a nice day,
--
Vikram.V.Asrani ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
Vikram.V.Asrani ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (D. D. Brierton)
Subject: Re: FTP in GNOME file manager? [gmc 4.5.50, Helix GNOME 1.2.1]
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2000 20:11:11 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 05 Jun 2000 12:36:57 -0500, Leonard Evens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The GNOME Users Guide and other GNOME documentation says that gmc, the GNOME
> > file manager, can be used for FTP transfers, and for brosing remote directories.
> > However, I cannot get this to work. If I type in at the location bar an address,
> > say ftp://ftp.redhat.com, and then hit return, the address just reverts back
> > instantly to what it was. FTP works otherwise, i.e. from within a terminal,
> > Netscape, or with gFTP. Does anyone know what might be the problem?
>
> I was able to connect to ftp://ftp.gnome.org, but it seems to be
> hanging on ftp://ftp.redhat.com.
ftp.redhat.com was just an example. What I meant was that I can't connect to any
FTP sites at all using gmc. In fact, as far as I can tell, it doesn't even try.
Any suggestions?
Darren
=====================================================================
D. D. Brierton, Centre for Cognitive Science, University of Edinburgh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.cogsci.ed.ac.uk/~ddb
=====================================================================
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (D. D. Brierton)
Crossposted-To: gnu.emacs.help,comp.emacs,alt.os.linux.mandrake,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: GNU Emacs as Default Editor in Helix GNOME 1.2
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2000 20:11:12 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 5 Jun 2000 18:56:35 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kai
=?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (D. D. Brierton) writes:
>
> > I also downloaded the rpm of gnuserver, but when I tried to install
> > it in warned me of conflicts with the installed Xemacs. I don't
> > actually use Xemacs, but I didn't force the install just to be on
> > the safe side. Did you find that this was perfectly harmless? (Does
> > Xemacs still work out of interest, just in case I ever decide to
> > change over?)
>
> IIRC, gnuserv/gnuclient comes with XEmacs, just like emacsclient comes
> with Emacs.
Right. However, to get gnuserv/gnuclient to work with GNU Emacs I presumably
have to install different versions to the ones that came with Xemacs, right? Its
not that that is a problem, I know where to find them etc., I was just wondering
to what extent that would break Xemacs ... (not that I actually use Xemacs, I'm
just being overcautious).
Best,
Darren
=====================================================================
D. D. Brierton, Centre for Cognitive Science, University of Edinburgh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.cogsci.ed.ac.uk/~ddb
=====================================================================
------------------------------
From: "Jan Houtsma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Installing Netscape 6
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2000 22:16:58 +0100
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "David .."
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Craig McCluskey wrote:
>>
>> Brad wrote:
>> >
>> > Am new to linux using Caldera 2.3 and have downloaded Netscape 6 and
>> > wish to install it but now idea how to install a tar.gz file.
>>
>> Where does one get Netscape 6? All I've seen for Linux is Netscape
>> 4.73.
>>
>> Craig
>
> http://www.netscape.com/download/previewrelease.html?cp=dowsea
>
Isn't that this crappy mozilla monster with all the debug stuff slowing it
down tremendously?
------------------------------
From: Michael Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Having trouble installing 2 network cards
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2000 15:18:01 -0500
Here are some HOWTOs that may help: (forgive me if you've already been
through them):
Ethernet-HOWTO (Duh! I'm sure you've been through this one!)
Firewall-HOWTO (don't miss this one!)
IP-Masquerade-HOWTO (very important!)
IPCHAINS-HOWTO (More firewall stuff)
Home-Network-mini-HOWTO
Probably the easiest (and safest, and most secure) way to get it all
working is to download and install the "pmfirewall" package on your
server. Run this as root, and it'll ask you all kinds of questions
about your network, then it'll install the proper ipchains rules
(hopefully, if you answered all the questions correctly).
Good luck!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I'm getting ready to set my Linux box as an internet gateway for a small
> network of about 5 Windows95 machines. The first step was to try to
> install a second network card into the machine and set up a "private"
> internal network. But I've run into trouble - I feel like I've ALMOST
> got it right, but have missed a few steps. Thanks to anyone who can
> show me where I went wrong!
>
> First, this is a Dell 180Mhz machine running Red Hat Linux 6.0. It has
> a DSL connection with a static IP address. It stands in isolation from
> a network of about 5 Windows95 PCs. I'd like to add it to the network
> so the other PCs can get on the internet through the Linux box.
>
> I've decided to use a 192.168.0.x network - the Linux box will be
> 192.168.0.1 , and the IP's for rest of the network will go
> incrementally from there.
>
> I added a second NIC to the Linux box, which seemed to be recognized
> when the machine rebooted. I used the "netcfg" program, which added a
> new line to my /etc/conf.modules file for the card.
> (the output from several relevant programs and files is below)
>
> Here are the problems:
>
> 1) After installing the second network card, I was no longer able to
> get on the internet from the Linux machine!
> > ping www.yahoo.com
> ping: unknown host: www.yahoo.com
> > ping 216.32.74.51
> PING 216.32.74.51 (216.32.74.51): 56 data bytes
> ping: sendto: Network is unreachable
> ping: wrote 216.32.74.51 64 chars, ret=-1
>
> I was able to fix this problem (with a tip I read somewhere) by running
> this command as root:
> > route add gateway default
>
> Then it worked.
> > ping www.yahoo.com
> PING www.yahoo.akadns.net (216.32.74.52): 56 data bytes
> 64 bytes from 216.32.74.52: icmp_seq=0 ttl=243 time=25.4 ms
> 64 bytes from 216.32.74.52: icmp_seq=1 ttl=243 time=24.3 ms
> ...
>
> But I'm not sure why I that problem occurred (unless it simply meant
> that Linux no longer knew how to reach the Internet due to the presence
> of multiple NICs), or how to solve this problem in a more permanent way
> other than typing in that line every time I reboot!
>
> 2) I am also unable to ping any of the machines on my "internal"
> network, and they cannot ping me. They CAN, however, ping each other.
> > ping 192.168.0.2
> PING 192.168.0.2 (192.168.0.2): 56 data bytes
> --- 192.168.0.2 ping statistics ---
> 10 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
>
> The other machines are all Windows95. They have their IP addresses
> manually specified (e.g. 192.168.0.1), subnet mask 255.255.255.0, have
> their Gateway set to 192.168.0.1 and their DNS also set to 192.168.0.1
> . And they can ping each other fine, but not the Linux server.
>
> Here's some of my settings:
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> /etc/conf.modules
> alias eth0 3c59x
> alias eth1 3c59x
> (these are two similar but not identical cards)
> (is there a problem since I'm NOT specifying IO/IRQ info?)
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> OUTPUT FROM ifconfig:
> lo Link encap:Local Loopback
> inet addr:127.0.0.1 Bcast:127.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0
> UP BROADCAST LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3584 Metric:1
> RX packets:160 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:160 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0
>
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:60:97:BE:1E:B2
> inet addr:64.40.68.250 Bcast:64.40.68.255
> Mask:255.255.255.252
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:2071 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:2482 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:4
> Interrupt:9 Base address:0xff00
>
> eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:A0:24:C6:2C:05
> inet addr:192.168.0.1 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:47 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0
> Interrupt:10 Base address:0xff80
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> OUTPUT FROM netstat -r:
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt
> Iface
> 64.40.68.248 * 255.255.255.252 U 1500 0 0
> eth0
> 192.168.0.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 1500 0 0
> eth1
> 127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 3584 0 0
> lo
>
> default * 0.0.0.0 U 1500 0 0
> eth0
> #### Note that the last line only appears after
> #### I manually run "route add default eth0"
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> /etc/sysconfig/network
> NETWORKING=yes
> FORWARD_IPV4=yes
> HOSTNAME=grbc.vor.org
> DOMAINNAME=vor.org
> # GATEWAY=
> GATEWAY=
> GATEWAYDEV=eth0
> NISDOMAIN=""
> IPX="no"
> IPXINTERNALNETNUM="0"
> IPXINTERNALNODENUM="0"
> IPXAUTOPRIMARY="on"
> IPXAUTOFRAME="on"
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0
> DEVICE="eth0"
> USERCTL=no
> ONBOOT="yes"
> BOOTPROTO="none"
> BROADCAST=64.40.68.255
> NETWORK=64.40.68.248
> NETMASK="255.255.255.252"
> IPADDR="64.40.68.250"
> IPXNETNUM_802_2=""
> IPXPRIMARY_802_2="no"
> IPXACTIVE_802_2="no"
> IPXNETNUM_802_3=""
> IPXPRIMARY_802_3="no"
> IPXACTIVE_802_3="no"
> IPXNETNUM_ETHERII=""
> IPXPRIMARY_ETHERII="no"
> IPXACTIVE_ETHERII="no"
> IPXNETNUM_SNAP=""
> IPXPRIMARY_SNAP="no"
> IPXACTIVE_SNAP="no"
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0
> DEVICE="eth1"
> USERCTL=yes
> ONBOOT="yes"
> BOOTPROTO="none"
> BROADCAST=192.168.0.255
> NETWORK=192.168.0.0
> NETMASK="255.255.255.0"
> IPADDR="192.168.0.1"
> IPXNETNUM_802_2=""
> IPXPRIMARY_802_2="no"
> IPXACTIVE_802_2="no"
> IPXNETNUM_802_3=""
> IPXPRIMARY_802_3="no"
> IPXACTIVE_802_3="no"
> IPXNETNUM_ETHERII=""
> IPXPRIMARY_ETHERII="no"
> IPXACTIVE_ETHERII="no"
> IPXNETNUM_SNAP=""
> IPXPRIMARY_SNAP="no"
> IPXACTIVE_SNAP="no"
>
> -------------------------------
>
> Again, thanks to anyone who can help!
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.
--
================================
Michael Martin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(713) 918-2631
================================
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (D. D. Brierton)
Crossposted-To: gnu.emacs.help,comp.emacs,alt.os.linux.mandrake,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: GNU Emacs as Default Editor in Helix GNOME 1.2
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2000 20:24:24 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 5 Jun 2000 18:56:35 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kai
=?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (D. D. Brierton) writes:
>
> > I also downloaded the rpm of gnuserver, but when I tried to install
> > it in warned me of conflicts with the installed Xemacs. I don't
> > actually use Xemacs, but I didn't force the install just to be on
> > the safe side. Did you find that this was perfectly harmless? (Does
> > Xemacs still work out of interest, just in case I ever decide to
> > change over?)
>
> IIRC, gnuserv/gnuclient comes with XEmacs, just like emacsclient comes
> with Emacs.
I've just noticed a different thread on gnu.emacs.help in which it is stated
that, unlike on NT, gnuclient doesn't automatically start Emacs and gnuserv if
they are not already running. Given that my only dissatisfaction with
emacsclient is that very thing, if the above is true then there is no point in
my trying to insall gnuclient/gnuserv (and thereby breaking Xemacs, if indeed it
will, and even though I don't use it).
So: does gnuclient automatically start GNU Emacs and gnuserv on linux if they
are not already running?
Thanks for all the help,
Darren
=====================================================================
D. D. Brierton, Centre for Cognitive Science, University of Edinburgh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.cogsci.ed.ac.uk/~ddb
=====================================================================
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Efflandt)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: Troubles reading Real Time Clock
Date: 5 Jun 2000 20:28:51 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 5 Jun 2000 10:35:11 +0200, Cristiano Marini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>My Linux 6.0 read incorrectly the real time clock when during startup calls
>hwclock
The CMOS clock calendar has nothing to do with the real time clock. The
real time clock (rtc) is a precise timer.
>In my system is arc=false and uts=false and I tried both hwclock &
>hwclock --directisa
--directisa is only for Alpha cpu and not for Intel like yours.
Instead you want to set your system 'date' properly and then run
'hwclock --systohc' (or 'setclock' in RedHat).
The easiest way to set your system time accurately before doing that is
with 'ntpdate -b timeserver' from the 'xntp' package.
>The system is a P2-333 w/ AMIBios
>
>Cristiano Marini
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
David Efflandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.de-srv.com/
http://www.autox.chicago.il.us/ http://www.berniesfloral.net/
http://hammer.prohosting.com/~cgi-wiz/ http://cgi-help.virtualave.net/
------------------------------
From: "Sascha Kicken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux.suse
Subject: Re: how to start VNC during boot?
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2000 20:29:44 GMT
"Sascha Kicken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> "Klaus Meier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> news:8hgl42$2vvje$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> And if you want to use VNC for X on a remote PC you will still need a
> running X on the Server since VNC transfers the contents of the Screen. If
> no X-Server shall run on the Linux-server you'll still need a XServer for
> the 'client' like KeaX or Exceed (if you are using a Windows machine as
> client).
Argh, I've "forgotten" the VNC X Server. If you want to use this one you
have launch it instead of the normal X server. Perhaps you should link
/var/X11R6/bin/X to Xvnc so it's started as "normal" X Server... but you'll
still have to alter /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xdm/Xservers to pass the
parameters...
greetings
Sascha
------------------------------
From: Hannu Koivisto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: gnu.emacs.help,comp.emacs,alt.os.linux.mandrake,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: GNU Emacs as Default Editor in Helix GNOME 1.2
Date: 05 Jun 2000 23:43:34 +0300
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D. D. Brierton) writes:
| Right. However, to get gnuserv/gnuclient to work with GNU Emacs I
| presumably have to install different versions to the ones that
| came with Xemacs, right? Its
Right.
| not that that is a problem, I know where to find them etc., I was
| just wondering to what extent that would break Xemacs ... (not
| that I actually use Xemacs, I'm
It doesn't break XEmacs if you don't blindly overwrite its
gnuserv/gnuclient/etc. with those from the gnuserv package for
Emacs. You mentioned that you installed gnuserv from rpm package
so in that case it's up to how that package has been made (I don't
know; I don't use mandrake which I assume you are using based on
the alt.os.linux.mandrake group). For example, in Debian GNU/Linux
gnuserv for Emacs can live just fine (ignoring one glitch that
doesn't matter to me in practice and that could be fixed if I just
bothered to report it as a bug) alongside XEmacs' gnuserv, because
XEmacs 21's gnuclient, for example, is actually called
gnuclient.xemacs21. If that rpm doesn't name those files that way,
perhaps you can rename XEmacs' versions before installing that
package or install it manually (i.e. not from that rpm but from its
original distribution tarball). Or something.
Followups limited to gnu.emacs.help. Also, please try to write a
little shorter lines.
--
Hannu
------------------------------
From: Hannu Koivisto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: gnu.emacs.help,comp.emacs,alt.os.linux.mandrake,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: GNU Emacs as Default Editor in Helix GNOME 1.2
Date: 05 Jun 2000 23:56:16 +0300
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D. D. Brierton) writes:
[Followups set, long lines reformatted.]
| they are not already running. Given that my only dissatisfaction
| with emacsclient is that very thing, if the above is true then
...
| So: does gnuclient automatically start GNU Emacs and gnuserv on
| linux if they are not already running?
No, but it's trivial to write a script that uses either gnuclient
or emacsclient when gnuserv or emacsserver is running (and thus
Emacs too) and starts Emacs plus gnuserv or emacsserver otherwise.
I even recall seeing such a script in some of the emacs newsgroups
recently.
--
Hannu
------------------------------
Crossposted-To: comp.windows.x.kde
Subject: Re: Strange problem with CVS
From: David Steuber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2000 20:59:58 GMT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Efflandt) writes:
' Do you have the ip_masq_ftp module loaded on your main box? I had trouble
' logging in with CVS from my laptop and it did not dawn on me what the
' problem was until I also had trouble using gftp. Now I added the
' following to my masq script and CVS works fine:
'
' /sbin/insmod ip_masq_ftp
'
' Otherwise if you are blocking ports with ipchains there may be a problem
' there.
Yes, I do. FTP works just fine from both machines. I do have to use
the passive command on the laptop because it uses a non-routable IP
address, but otherwise FTP works just fine.
The weird thing is, cvs will work for a while and then stall. I can
see that the last ack has been sent with tcpdump. I just stop
receiving updates.
As a temporary work around, I am now collecting the source files into
on directory on the routing computer and then updating from there.
This is far less pleasant to do. There are enough files in KDE that
brute force copying them all takes longer than I would like.
I guess I will have to learn how to mirror a CVS repository on that
machine.
Anyone care to give me a hint?
--
David Steuber | Hi! My name is David Steuber, and I am
NRA Member | a hoploholic.
All bits are significant. Some bits are more significant than others.
-- Charles Babbage Orwell
------------------------------
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.networking,alt.os.linux.suse
Subject: Re: DSL under linux: Now working!!!!
From: David Steuber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2000 20:59:59 GMT
"Cameron, Gary [WDLN2:2X82:EXCH]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
' Maybe it is time for a linux.adsl or linux.pppoe newsgroup???
Not yet. comp.dcom.xdsl has plenty of people who use linux as well as
some of those obscure operating systems from the west coast.
--
David Steuber | Hi! My name is David Steuber, and I am
NRA Member | a hoploholic.
All bits are significant. Some bits are more significant than others.
-- Charles Babbage Orwell
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.misc) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Misc Digest
******************************
