Linux-Misc Digest #163, Volume #24 Sun, 16 Apr 00 01:13:05 EDT
Contents:
Fake windows - Entertainment PLus (ajn)
Re: boot messages!!! (Paul Kimoto)
Re: Copying NTFS, ext2 partitions (Matthew Stevenson)
Re: mp3 problems (Will Joyner)
Re: mp3 problems (Will Joyner)
How to configure HP660C printer on Red Hat 6.1 (Garel)
How to adjust the full screen for Red Hat 6.1 (Garel)
Re: Microsoft ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: HOW to set dynamic library path in RH 6.1? (Paul Kimoto)
Re: gmake[3]: *** No rule to make target `page/SUBSYS.o'. Stop. (Paul Kimoto)
Newly compiled kernel ("Yanie")
Re: Which backup software to use? (Jonathan M Hill)
Re: How hard to upgrade? (G. Asch)
Re: Q: migrate OS/2 to Linux ? (G. Asch)
Re: How to configure HP660C printer on Red Hat 6.1 (Andras)
Re: do i need Partition Magic? (wayne rattz)
Re: How to adjust the full screen for Red Hat 6.1 (Andras)
Re: Linux Crashed and Can't Get Up (Bob)
Re: help with dual Win98 and Linux6.1 (Stuart Herd)
Re: Boot Linux / DOS (Stuart Herd)
Re: Win4Lin (Grahame M. Kelly)
Does append in LILO really append? (Andrew Purugganan)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: ajn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Fake windows - Entertainment PLus
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 13:19:21 +1000
You guys might find this as amusing as I do:
I've spent a few hours dressing a GNU/Linux box running KDE up so that
it looks very much like a certain popular OS - Windows 2000 to be
precise. Having gotten most of the niggly little problems worked out (ok
the windows key mysteriously stopped working, but a few miscellaneous
bugs just make a better forgery - this is windows we're trying to
emulate remember!) I just went and set it up in our Windows NT 4.0 lab
amoungst the genuine M$ machines. Appart from the fact that it's about
twice as fast and responsive as the real windows machines (maybe I
should add a few background processes to waste some CPU cycles and tell
linux to ignore half the RAM.... and a proggie to make it throw a BSOD
and reboot every so often) it fits in rather well... now to see if any
of the lusers notice the difference :)
ajn
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Kimoto)
Subject: Re: boot messages!!!
Date: 15 Apr 2000 23:26:11 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, asage wrote:
> I have compiled 2.3.99-pre3 without messages.
>
> But when it boots, the following messages appear:
>
> Checking
> filesystems
> OK
> Mounting local filesystems mount: fs type devpts not supported by
> kernel FAILED
Something wants CONFIG_DEVPTS_FS set in your kernel .config. See
Documentation/Configure.help to see what that's about.
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_always_defrag is missing -- cannot control IP
> defragmentation
It appears that this /proc (pseudo)file is no longer in 2.3.99-*. You
may need to update something to be ready for 2.3.*.
--
Paul Kimoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------
From: Matthew Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: nz.comp,comp.os.ms-windows.nt,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.misc
Subject: Re: Copying NTFS, ext2 partitions
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 15:13:15 +1200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Fri, 14 Apr 2000 06:38:57 GMT, Donald Gordon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I have a new HDD, and would like to copy the NTFS partition (it has NT4
> >inside) from my old HDD onto the new one, while increasing its size.
> >How can I do this? Or should I just give up and reinstall on the new
> >HDD?
>
> Not sure about this one: from a newer Linux, I think that you should be able
> to create an NTFS file system on the new disk and use "tar" to duplicate the
> files from one mounted partition to the other, kind of like this:
>
> tar cf - -C /oldNTpartition . | tar xpf - -C /newNTpartition .
>
> >Ditto for the Linux/ext2 partition. Will a plain cp -dpR from a boot
> >floppy work (i'm worried about hard links, mainly) or should I use
> >something else?
>
> No. Bad, bad idea: cp does not properly copy block devices, symbolic links,
> or file ownership.
try: cp -a /dev /tmp
that should work.
Matthew
--
Matthew Stevenson
University of Auckland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Will Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: mp3 problems
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2000 15:04:52 -0400
I will try what you said. I was running Win 98.
Buchan Milne wrote:
> Chances are it's you r disk access is not running optimally. Try hdparm in a
> console (after reading the man page) to fix it and use udma33
>
> If I remember, something like
> hdparm -m16 -d1 -X34
> should work, but be careful (ie read twice, run once)
>
> Are you running 98 ? 95 has the sameproblem as you linux, since it doesn't
> run UDMA33 drives properly.
>
> Will Joyner wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > I am running a 250 mhz Cyrix II processor with 64 megs of RAM. When I
> > run xmms or gqmpeg and begin to play a mp3 it runs fine. But as soon as
> > I startup netscape or any other application, it slows the mpeg down or
> > audible static is heard. I have tried switching the output module from
> > esound to OSS in xmms, but no avail. I have chosen to give each player
> > priority, which seems to work a little. Is there a way that I reduce
> > the amount of processing/ram that these applications use or is there
> > another way I can optimize my computer to run the fastest? I have
> > enabled all the stuff I know to make it run faster.
> >
> > In WINDOZE I didn't have this problem, so I am hoping that it is
> > something I can fix in Linux.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Will Joyner
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Will Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: mp3 problems
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2000 16:59:27 -0400
==============60C8AF3451B0977821FC7417
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Buchan Milne wrote:
> Chances are it's you r disk access is not running optimally. Try hdparm in a
> console (after reading the man page) to fix it and use udma33
>
> If I remember, something like
> hdparm -m16 -d1 -X34
> should work, but be careful (ie read twice, run once)
>
I tried this, but instead of helping my computer it hurt it. I was getting
around 10 or 11 when I did hdparm but when I typed that line, and I did type it
correctly...it dropped to 1-2 when I looked at hdparm. So next solution?
==============60C8AF3451B0977821FC7417
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
Buchan Milne wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE><i>Chances are it's you r disk access is not running
optimally. Try hdparm in a</i>
<br><i>console (after reading the man page) to fix it and use udma33</i>
<p><i>If I remember, something like</i>
<br><i>hdparm -m16 -d1 -X34</i>
<br><i>should work, but be careful (ie read twice, run once)</i>
<br> </blockquote>
I tried this, but instead of helping my computer it hurt it. I was
getting around 10 or 11 when I did hdparm but when I typed that line, and
I did type it correctly...it dropped to 1-2 when I looked at
hdparm. So next solution?</html>
==============60C8AF3451B0977821FC7417==
------------------------------
From: Garel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: How to configure HP660C printer on Red Hat 6.1
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 03:30:03 GMT
I use HP660C and it was not auto-detected. So I use control panel and
configure the printer. I set local and add plus using the /dev/lp0 and lp1
and lp2 but it still will not print. What is the cause of it.
--
Posted via CNET Help.com
http://www.help.com/
------------------------------
From: Garel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: How to adjust the full screen for Red Hat 6.1
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 03:30:03 GMT
After I installed the monitor which I had a Philip brillance 15 inch and
using 800x600 16 colour and after that I found the 1/4 side is blank on the
right side. What the cause and how to use the full screen?
Please help.
--
Posted via CNET Help.com
http://www.help.com/
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Microsoft
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 03:59:04 GMT
Jan Schaumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, you wanted it this way!
> Here we go:
> MS-FORTUNES:
[SNIP]
My favorite (Seen a long time ago. Probably someones .sig)
"The proper way to roll out Windows NT is out the door and into the trash."
--
Shawn D'Alimonte - [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Faster processors are nice, but they are not truly revolutionary. And
neither are colors." - Jim Collas, Amiga Inc.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Kimoto)
Subject: Re: HOW to set dynamic library path in RH 6.1?
Date: 15 Apr 2000 23:59:42 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, lu ming wrote:
> Is there a way to let program know where is the dynamic library path? I
> have a program require some dynamic library file, I do have this file,
> but the program also complain that it can't find it. Thanx very much for
> help!
There are three common methods:
(1) List the directory in /etc/ld.so.conf, then run /sbin/ldconfig.
(2) Put the directory in the environment variable LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
(3) Compile the executable with the "-rpath" flag.
--
Paul Kimoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Kimoto)
Subject: Re: gmake[3]: *** No rule to make target `page/SUBSYS.o'. Stop.
Date: 16 Apr 2000 00:07:09 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In article <8yLJ4.2883$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, RCS wrote:
> gmake[3]: *** No rule to make target `page/SUBSYS.o'. Stop.
>
> I suspect this have something to do with making a objectfile SUBSYS.o, but
> what
> does it mean to have "no rule to make target"?
The make(1) program uses a file (usually called "Makefile" or "makefile")
to get its "rules" for making "targets" (usually files) from (other) files.
It's possible that there is no Makefile (or it exists but is broken), but
I'd guess that make(1) is trying to apply an "implicit rule"--for example,
"page/SUBSYS.o should be made from page/SUBSYS.c"--but is failing to find
an applicable one. (In other words, there is no source-code file
corresponding to the needed object file.)
--
Paul Kimoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------
From: "Yanie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Newly compiled kernel
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 12:15:17 +0800
Hi,
I have encounter this problem with RedHat Linux 6.2. I recompiled the
kernel to give support to dual-processor. I'm not sure if this is the right
thing to do.
Anyway, I compiled to kernel, modify lilo, rebooted the machine.
Everything went fine, until a boot message appears saying Kernel Panic,
can't mount root (or something like that).
I can't get linuxconf to set /dev/sda1 (which is root disk for existing
kernel) as root disk for the new kernel. I ignored this, modified lilo.conf
manually (used vi) did lilo -C (I'm not too sure if this the right command
option, but I checked the manual page before doing that) for lilo to take
effect.
The kernel is the one that comes with the box (2.2.14-5.0).
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jonathan M Hill)
Crossposted-To: comp.unix.admin
Subject: Re: Which backup software to use?
Date: 16 Apr 2000 04:03:47 GMT
Hello;
I have read that dump is dependent the file system so that a unique
version of dump must be written for each file system. The version of
dump that came with my distribution will only support the Linux native
ext2 file system. I guess if your system has multiple file systems
you could use dump for the Linux native partition and then use something
else for the other file systems.
I have not heard any comments regarding 'pax' and would like to
know more about that package. I have also heard that GNU cpio supports
tar, cpio, and remote devices. has anyone tried this?
Jonathan Hill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
Subject: Re: How hard to upgrade?
Reply-To: G. Asch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: G. Asch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 15 Apr 2000 13:38:36 -0400
Leonard Evens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
LE> The Scotts wrote:
>> Not hard, but RH6.2 reset my pap-secrets file to old data (so
>> couldn't log in to ISP). And that's a problem not covered in the
>> RH documentation. Next time around I intend to incrementally
>> upgrade using rpm rather than the install disc.
you could,
a. clone the crucial partitions,
b. upgrade the cloned system,
c. correct misbehaved files from the original
d. get rid of the original after all tests clear
or some other strategy along this lines.
For the bare minimum I would keep a backup copy of /etc. But then, it's
better to have a backup routine anyway.
LE> Personally I think this is an overreaction. There are always
LE> minor problems like this that one has to deal with, but it is
LE> generally much easier to upgrade all at once than a package at a
LE> time. Also, upgrading individual pcakges could also change
LE> configurations in some cases.
>> Bob Scott
>>
>> > > Just wondering how hard it would be to upgrade different dist's
>> of Linux > ie red hat 6.1 - 6.2? How much downloading required?
>> difficult for a > newbie? > > Joe
--
_________________________________________________________
Gabriel Asch
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
!!! Note: to foil spammers,
if you reply by email, your message must either contain a
proper Reference header or you must quote !this line!
"in a sense, you are already dead"
J. L. Borges
________________________________________________________
------------------------------
Crossposted-To: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Q: migrate OS/2 to Linux ?
Reply-To: G. Asch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: G. Asch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 15 Apr 2000 13:48:08 -0400
Karel Jansens <jansens_at_ibm_dot_net> writes:
KJ> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Anthony) wrote:
KJ> Ah, but Warp's WPS is _not_ a GUI. It's an OOUI, an
KJ> Object-Oriented User Interface; the only one on the face of the
KJ> planet (and probably in the known universe as well). It's bloody
KJ> hard to explain without actually dragging you kicking and
KJ> screaming in front of a Warp computer, but imagine you had an
KJ> intelligent desktop that you could program with your mouse. Start
KJ> from there and work your way up.
KJ> There is (was?) a guy in Germany who is trying to make something
KJ> that resembles the WPS and will run in Linux. It's called DFM and
KJ> I think the homepage is at
KJ> http://dfm.linuxbox.com
Somewhere in an IBM white paper I saw mentionned an X version of the WPS.
( mayxe I was dreaming)
If such beast ever existed, it is sure the saddest thing that IBM
hasn't released it to linux.
--
_________________________________________________________
Gabriel Asch
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
!!! Note: to foil spammers,
if you reply by email, your message must either contain a
proper Reference header or you must quote !this line!
"in a sense, you are already dead"
J. L. Borges
________________________________________________________
------------------------------
From: Andras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How to configure HP660C printer on Red Hat 6.1
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 04:32:49 +0000
Garel wrote:
>
> I use HP660C and it was not auto-detected. So I use control panel and
> configure the printer. I set local and add plus using the /dev/lp0 and lp1
> and lp2 but it still will not print. What is the cause of it.
first thing first.
What if as a root you type:
echo "Hello World" > /dev/lp0
do you get any result?
if not, you have to play around with kernel modules for the parallel
port. if it's ok, then use the printtol (or whatever) from control
panel.
Andras
>
> --
> Posted via CNET Help.com
> http://www.help.com/
------------------------------
From: wayne rattz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: do i need Partition Magic?
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 04:30:15 GMT
Hello:Ok when you see two drives in windows its because you took your 20gb
hard drive and split it into two dos partitions so windows is seeing them
as two drives..Thats not what you want to do.What you do want to do is
make one dos partition for windows and then make another partition thats
for linux the ext2fs.The partition thats made for linux will not be seen
as a second drive as long as you dont format it for dos.If you format both
partitions with dos fdisk they will be seen as two drives in windows.Since
you have messed up your partition anyway heres what I would.First backup
all the windows data you want to save (hopefully you have a way to do this
such as a rewriter etc)Then make up your first partitions as your linux
partitions but dont format them.Then make your windows partition and
format it for dos.Install windows.Then go to linux and format its
partitions in linux.Install linux and you should be ok. For howto's and
links try my site http://www.geocities.com/wrattz/linux1.html
brandonkylecarter wrote:
>
> i have tried to install linux mandrake 7.0 to no avail. but when i was
> trying to setup the partition i messed up my windows partition. i
> physically have a 20.4 GB hard drive in my PC. now when i click on my
> computer to see my drives, it shows two hard disks plus all of the
normal
> stuff. one of the disks shows 10.5 GB and the other 17.5 GB!! now the
> contents of the 10.5 GB is the normal disk, appears as always. the 17.5
GB
> disk has funky stuff in it. i want my plain old 20.4 GB ONE DRIVE BY
> ITSELF!
>
> would partition magic solve this problem??
>
> thanks
>
> --
> Posted via CNET Help.com
> http://www.help.com/
--
Posted via CNET Help.com
http://www.help.com/
------------------------------
From: Andras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How to adjust the full screen for Red Hat 6.1
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 04:36:55 +0000
Garel wrote:
>
> After I installed the monitor which I had a Philip brillance 15 inch and
> using 800x600 16 colour and after that I found the 1/4 side is blank on the
> right side. What the cause and how to use the full screen?
Is the screen squeezed (you see everything on it, but with a funny
horizontal/vertical ratio) or is 1/4 of the screen image hidden?
In the first case you should play around with the adjustment buttons you
can find on your monitor
Andras
>
> Please help.
>
> --
> Posted via CNET Help.com
> http://www.help.com/
------------------------------
From: Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux Crashed and Can't Get Up
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 04:30:08 GMT
My question to the Linux users that gave all their answers, Why do you
have to be so rude when a guy asked for help? Attitude like that will not
help Linux. We all know Linux is better but answering with a "I know
better than you" attitude will turn a lot of people off to Linux. Yes,
Linux is better so lets act in a more professional manner. This is not the
Revenge of the Nerds.
William R. Ramby wrote:
>
> I agree with Robie. If you want to chase off newcomers and irreversibly
> doom Linux to a niche market, keep answering questions with insults like
> Peter gave out.
>
>
> Robie Basak wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 12 Apr 2000 15:32:39 GMT, Peter T. Breuer said:
> > >Raul Trujillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >: Now, when I tried rebooting, it tells me to press: CTRL+D for a
normal
> > >: start up or to give the root password for maintenance. Anyways I
type
> > >: the password and type 'fsck' and it responds with "Parallelizing
fsck
> > >: version 1.15 (18-Jul-1999). I also tried 'mke2fs /dev/hda1' but
tells
> > >
> > >man fsck.
> > >
> > >: me that 'hda1' is in use. Can someone tell me what I must do to
get
> it
> > >: back up and running?
> >
> > It might still be mounted read-write; you're lucky it was, otherwise
> > mke2fs will wipe it. Do:
> > mount -o ro,remount /dev/hda1 /mount_point
> > (I don't know what your mount_point is, you should (it's in /etc/fstab)
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >NAME
> > > fsck - check and repair a Linux file system
> > >
> > >SYNOPSIS
> > > fsck [ -sACVRTNP ] [ -t fstype ] [--] [ fsck-options ]
> > > filesys [ ... ]
> > >
> > >E.g. "fsck /dev/hda1"!
> > >
> > >Now what was the mote in your eye that prevented you doing or seeing
> > >that?
> >
> > Excellent point, unless he doesn't know about the man command.
> > Windows people (if he is one) won't be used to having an easy yet
> > comprehensive online help system.
> >
> > Robie.
> > --
>
>
> --
> Posted via CNET Help.com
> http://www.help.com/
--
Posted via CNET Help.com
http://www.help.com/
------------------------------
From: Stuart Herd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: The, Newsgroup
Subject: Re: help with dual Win98 and Linux6.1
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 04:49:24 GMT
When you installed Linux on "drive d" it wrote lilo (linux loader) into the mbr
(master boot record) This was to enable you to boot into either partition at
boot.
You should have gotten a "lilo" prompt, at which time if you hit <tab> you can
then type your selection (usually dos or linux - or hit enter for default -
again, usually linux)
When you re-install Windows98 it is going to overwrite the mbr again and only
boot into Windows ignoring the Linux install.
You can use your boot disk to boot into linux and run lilo from the command
prompt to get the boot loader (lilo) working again.
good luck
billy wrote:
> Stephen wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > "billy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > Hi:
> > > I have a AMD K6 II computer. I partitioned the hard drive(4 GB) into
> C:
> > > (2 GB) and D: (1.79 GB). Actually I installed Win98 on C drive and
> > Linux6.1
> > > on the D drive, but when I tried to reboot my PC, it only boot
> Linux6.1.
> > > So, I decided to Format Win98 (on C drive). Now I only have Linux6.1 on
> my
> > > system and C drive is empty.So , my question is how I should reinstall
> > > win98, which can dual boot with Linux6.1. please more specific with
> > > steps.....thank you very much....
> > >
> > > --
> > > Posted via CNET Help.com
> > > http://www.help.com/
> >
> > hmmm
> > you didn't have to format your c drive but just type
> > dos when lilo starts up!!!
> >
>
> what about if I reinstall Win98? does the win98 boot file overwrite
> Linux6.1`s. is it Ok if I do that?
>
> >
> >
>
> --
> Posted via CNET Help.com
> http://www.help.com/
------------------------------
From: Stuart Herd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: The, Newsgroup
Subject: Re: Boot Linux / DOS
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 04:53:32 GMT
<snip>
sorry, but you don't have to re-install just because you re-created the
mbr - it doesn't touch the windows install.
Stephen wrote:
> "Len Philpot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > On 15 Apr 2000 17:42:12 GMT, "benoit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >>after a failed linux installation, which MBR command to restore an
> > >>automatic DOS boot? and have Win xx automatically ?
>
> fdisk /mbr
> but then you have to reinstall windows
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Grahame M. Kelly)
Subject: Re: Win4Lin
Date: 16 Apr 2000 04:04:41 GMT
[Posted and mailed]
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Jim Tom Polk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am very impressed. I installed it on the 6th, and haven't rebooted
> into Windows since then. I've also used it to access some Windows
> applications that I like to use in developing websites.
>
Thanks Jim nice overview. One question I have is can you under Linux
redirect ports (ie: printing) as I wish to use Win4Lin to reverse
engineer some small apps and port to linux ?
(Reverse Engineering is legal in Australia).
Grahame.
--
SLUG (Sydney Linux User Group) www.slug.org.au
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrew Purugganan)
Subject: Does append in LILO really append?
Date: 16 Apr 2000 04:27:54 GMT
Am I supposed to see the entry appear at the LILO prompt? I really don't
see any 'append' taking place, and the dmesg seems to confirm that my
parms were ignored:
append = "sbpcd=0x230,1"
(this was the result of a modprobe, fyi)
I even ran LILO after I made the entry.
This is on Mandrake 6.1
--
jazz annandy AT dc DOT seflin DOT org
Registered linux user no. 164098
Doesn't it bother you, that we have to search for intelligent life
--- OUT THERE??
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.misc) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Misc Digest
******************************
