Linux-Misc Digest #209, Volume #24               Thu, 20 Apr 00 06:13:25 EDT

Contents:
  System Commander 2000 vs. Partition Magic (TBrown)
  Re: LINUX Internet resources? (Todd)
  Re: System.map ? ("James R. Bunch")
  Re: Login Failure in Console and via Telnet! (Arnt Karlsen)
  Scripting in Linux (Pavel)
  Digital Video w/Linux ("Dheera Venkatraman")
  Re: created file permissions on group (Andreas Kahari)
  Re: Ultra66 and Mandrake (Arnt Karlsen)
  Re: Question on StarOffice (Arnt Karlsen)
  HELP! Converting attachment code into a file!  (Matt Friedman)
  Re: created file permissions on group ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: HELP! Converting attachment code into a file! (Vilmos Soti)
  Re: Lost+found dir How to fix? ("John Niesz")
  Daylight Savings time, system time, hardware time.... (Yan Seiner)
  internet telephony (John Molitor)
  Re: Scripting in Linux (Andreas Kahari)
  Re: How Microsoft inhibits competition & innovation ("Erik Funkenbusch")
  RPM problem (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Beno=EEt?= Smith)
  Re: How Microsoft inhibits competition & innovation ("Erik Funkenbusch")
  Re: How Microsoft inhibits competition & innovation ("Erik Funkenbusch")
  Re: How Microsoft inhibits competition & innovation ("Erik Funkenbusch")
  Re: Q: migrate OS/2 to Linux ? (Karel Jansens)
  intel i810 graphics card
  Re: IPChains (Tim Haynes)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: TBrown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: System Commander 2000 vs. Partition Magic
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 20:30:07 GMT

I would like to dual boot between W2k and Linux.  Does anyone know which 
would be better, SC2k or Partition Magic?

Tony

--
Posted via CNET Help.com
http://www.help.com/

------------------------------

From: Todd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: LINUX Internet resources?
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 20:30:21 GMT

Also, try CNET's Linux Center's MetaSearch engine:

http://linux.cnet.com/

you can narrow down searches by News, Software, Documentation, and 
Security, and within these subheadings, searches comprise a ton of sites, 
i.e. CNET News.com, LWN Headlines, LWN Archive, Linux PR, Linux Today, 
slashdot, CNET Downloads, SourceForge, Tucows, freshmeat, LinuxApps, man 
pages,  Linux.com, Linux Gazette, Linux Journal, BugTraq, Hacker News 
Network, CERT, Rootshell, L0pht, and more.

It's really quite good.


Andreas Kahari wrote:
> 
> 
> For GNU/Linux searching: http://www.google.com/linux
> 
> Other general GNU/Linux links:
> 
> http://linux.com/
> http://www.linux.org/
> http://www.linuxdoc.org/
> http://stommel.tamu.edu/~baum/linux-meta.html
> http://www.linuxhq.com/
> 
> 
> Was there some kind of special info you wanted?
> 
> /A
> 
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>   Kristine Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >      Can anyone recommend their favorite sites for LINUX resources on
> > the Internet?  I've been using www.dogpile.com for searches but I've
> not
> > been overly impressed with them, at least looking for LINUX resources.
> >
> > K-R.
> >
> >
> 
> --
> # Andreas Khri, <URL:http://hello.to/andkaha/>.
> # All junk email is reported to the appropriate authorities.
> 
> 
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.


--
Posted via CNET Help.com
http://www.help.com/

------------------------------

From: "James R. Bunch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: System.map ?
Date: 19 Apr 2000 20:39:57 GMT

Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

: I also am confused about this (and thanks to all who have already
: posted). Perhaps someone could explain what the System.map file *is* ?
: I can't find any mention of it (much less an explanation) in the howto
: or various documents I have found on the web including:

FWIW, lsof refuses to run if /boot/System.map does not match the current
kernel.  It (lsof) is the only user program I know of that demands it.

-- 
=============================
James R. Bunch         "A Byte is a terrible thing to waste ... 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]     ... a MByte 1048576 times worse"

PGP Key available via finger
PGP Key fingerprint =  B5 31 10 77 BF B0 FD B2  10 54 CB E6 13 7C 26 58
==============================

------------------------------

From: Arnt Karlsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Login Failure in Console and via Telnet!
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 20:40:51 GMT

Dominik wrote:
> 
> I'm running RH6.0 and I tried to login via telnet with root and regular
> users and it gives me "login failure". The same goes for console logins
> aswell. I reset the machine and still the same situation. It almost seems
> as though it spits out the error too quickly.
> 
> HERE'S THE OTHER HALF: I can login fine with POP-3, SMTP, and FTP with
> regular users but not with ROOT or OPERATOR.
> 
> This is a bizzare situationa and I would appreciate any help or
> suggestions on this matter.

..it is also a secure one.  Root access thru ether of these popular
ports of entry for crackers, gives them God's rights to install M$
Windows98, on your box... ;-)

-- 
..mvh/wKRf Arnt... root is God in a unix/linux box...  ;-)

 scenario, n.:
        An imagined sequence of events that provides the context in
        which a business decision is made.  Scenarios always come in
        sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case.

------------------------------

From: Pavel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Scripting in Linux
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 13:31:29 -0700

Hallo.I have one problem. I dont know how to make my script
running after I (user) logout from the system.Thanks.Pavel


* Sent from AltaVista http://www.altavista.com Where you can also find related Web 
Pages, Images, Audios, Videos, News, and Shopping.  Smart is Beautiful

------------------------------

From: "Dheera Venkatraman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Digital Video w/Linux
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 20:43:51 GMT

Hi,
Can I use my C.U.C. US camera with Linux? It's a video camera that plugs
into the USB port. I only have Windows drivers, but I would like it to work
with linux also.

Thanks,
Dheera Venkatraman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



------------------------------

From: Andreas Kahari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: created file permissions on group
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 20:42:45 GMT

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
  "J.R. Farrar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm definitly a beginner to linux, so please bear with me if this is
silly.
>
> I have 3 users in a group called "yusers" and that is their primary
group.
> when one of the users creates a file in a commonly accessable folder
the
> file only gets read permission for the group. How can I make it so
that the
> file has read and write permissions for the group. I know that I can
change
> the permissions after the file is created with 'chmod g+w filename',
but I
> would like that to happen when the file is created.
>
> Thanks!
> J.R.
>
>

Read the manual page for the 'umask' command. It's kinda' hard to
understand (if you're a newbie), but I think "umask 002" will do what
you want (set it back to whatever it was when you're done).

/A

--
# Andreas K�h�ri, <URL:http://hello.to/andkaha/>.
# All junk email is reported to the appropriate authorities.


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

------------------------------

From: Arnt Karlsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Ultra66 and Mandrake
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 20:51:26 GMT

Hawk82 wrote:
> 
> Hey all!
> I have Mandrake 7.02 w/ kernel version 2.2.14-15mdk (I think?).
> I have a UDMA 66 drive connected to a Promise UDMA 66 controller.
> Primary Master setup for the UDMA 66 drive.
> 
> I have Linux installed on an older UDMA 33 drive.
> 
> I need Linux to see the Promise card, but I don't really want to compile a
> new version of the kernel to work with the Promise card.
> 
> I have Windows installed on the UDMA 66 drive and I need my info on the
> drive.
> 
> Is there any way to have Linux see the drive to boot from in LILO?

..'man lilo', 'man /etc/fstab', 'man mount', and for disk tweaks, 'man
hdparm'.

-- 
..mvh/wKRf Arnt  ;-)

 scenario, n.:
        An imagined sequence of events that provides the context in
        which a business decision is made.  Scenarios always come in
        sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case.

------------------------------

From: Arnt Karlsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Question on StarOffice
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 21:06:16 GMT

Kevin Vandersloot wrote:
> 
> John Roberts wrote:
> 
> > When (and if ) I install StarOffice, will it displace KDE as my default
> > X-server GUI?  Or will it sit on the desktop as an icon?
> > TIA
> >
> >
> 
> It will not take over KDE. You can however run it in a full screen mode
> that will hide your KDE panel and desktop. But that's only an optiion. You
> can run it like any other application inside of KDE.

..works fine from Gnome w Enlightenment too.

-- 
..mvh/wKRf Arnt  ;-)

 scenario, n.:
        An imagined sequence of events that provides the context in
        which a business decision is made.  Scenarios always come in
        sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case.

------------------------------

From: Matt Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: HELP! Converting attachment code into a file! 
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 17:17:45 -0400

I have a major problem here. I have an MS-word file attached to an
e-mail that I desperately have to open [like, yesterday].  The problem
is that it isn't ATTACHED, but appears as text within the e-mail message
in KMail. Now there's definitely enough code there to account for the
file, but how do I convert it into something that StarOffice will be
able to read? [Just FYI, due to a problem, I can't fish in the
.../kmail/tmp directory.]

This is pretty desperate...

MF


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: created file permissions on group
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 21:19:22 GMT

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
  "J.R. Farrar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm definitly a beginner to linux, so please bear with me if this is
silly.
>
> I have 3 users in a group called "yusers" and that is their primary
group.
> when one of the users creates a file in a commonly accessable folder
the
> file only gets read permission for the group. How can I make it so
that the
> file has read and write permissions for the group. I know that I can
change
> the permissions after the file is created with 'chmod g+w filename',
but I
> would like that to happen when the file is created.
>
> Thanks!
> J.R.
>
>

The other reply should work, but has the drawback (if I understand umask
correctly...) that all files created by these users will be writable by
all other users in that group.  This may not be what you want.

Another thing you can do is set the group id sticky bit on the directory
you want group members to have write priveleges in.  This will cause all
files created in the directory to have the same group ownership as the
directory.

For example:

mkdir grp_junk
chgrp mygrp grp_junk
chmod g+w grp_junk
chmod g+s grp_junk

Now grp_junk is writable by the group mygrp and all files created in
grp_junk will also be writable by mygrp.

Again, the advantage of this is that the group members can still have
personal files which are only group readable (or whatever you set umask
to be) while still having an area where the files are group writable by
default.
Hope this helps
Eric


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

------------------------------

Subject: Re: HELP! Converting attachment code into a file!
From: Vilmos Soti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 21:42:04 GMT

Matt Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I have a major problem here. I have an MS-word file attached to an
> e-mail that I desperately have to open [like, yesterday].  The problem
> is that it isn't ATTACHED, but appears as text within the e-mail message
> in KMail. Now there's definitely enough code there to account for the
> file, but how do I convert it into something that StarOffice will be
> able to read? [Just FYI, due to a problem, I can't fish in the
> .../kmail/tmp directory.]

Try metamail on the file.
I use "inc" for incorporating each mail into separate files, and all
I have to do is to run metamail on the email file.

Vilmos


------------------------------

From: "John Niesz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,linux.redhat.misc
Subject: Re: Lost+found dir How to fix?
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 17:24:04 -0400

>     usually you can scrap anything *found* in the lost+found dir.  its
> kinda sorta a tmp directory.  ya know?

NO WAY!  that is total bullshit!  I did that about a year ago, and had all
sorts of problems, mostly with the OS saying files that I knew were there
werent there.  The only solution I found after deleting all those "scraps"
was to reformat after removing the faulty hardware.  my advice, DO NOT
delete those files, try to figure out where they belong.

John



------------------------------

From: Yan Seiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Daylight Savings time, system time, hardware time....
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 16:58:52 -0400
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I am sure that this has been rehashed a bunch of times, but I can't seem
to get it through my thick  skull...

I have a RedHat 6.0 system, 2.2.13 kernel.  I need to configure the darn
thing to keep the right time.  I can't seem to correctly configure the
hardware clock so that it correctly deals with DST.

I tried setting it to UTC using RedHat's tools, but it had no effect. 
The time zone information must be correct, since the calendar displays
EDT, but the hardware clock and the system clock are now exactly
backwards.....  The hardware clock is one hour ahead of the system
clock.

[root@aphrodite /root]# date; hwclock
Wed Apr 19 13:48:25 EDT 2000
Wed Apr 19 14:48:26 2000  -0.940635 seconds

What files do I need to change (by hand, not through possibly broken GUI
tools) to make this right?

Thanks,

--Yan
-- 

Think different
        ride a recumbent
                use Linux.

------------------------------

From: John Molitor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: internet telephony
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 16:18:38 -0500

hello,

Are there any Linux versions of the internet
phone services such as net2phone and dialpad?

Thanks,

John Molitor


------------------------------

From: Andreas Kahari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Scripting in Linux
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 21:53:42 GMT

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
  Pavel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hallo.I have one problem. I dont know how to make my script
> running after I (user) logout from the system.Thanks.Pavel
>
> * Sent from AltaVista http://www.altavista.com Where you can also find
related Web Pages, Images, Audios, Videos, News, and Shopping.  Smart is
Beautiful
>


Start it in the following way:

nohup ./myscript &

where "./myscript" is your script.

/A

--
# Andreas K�h�ri, <URL:http://hello.to/andkaha/>.
# All junk email is reported to the appropriate authorities.


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

------------------------------

From: "Erik Funkenbusch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: 
comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.lang.java.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: How Microsoft inhibits competition & innovation
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 17:12:01 -0500

Andrew Carpenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
> >
> > Andrew Carpenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > btolder wrote:
> > > > > "(...) any random surface pattern of relatively light and dark
areas
> > > > > separated by edges (...)" is the relevant part of the sentence. As
far
> > > > > as I can see this means a surface that is not of uniform colour
and
> > > > > texture, on which the "new" Microsoft optical mouse wouldn't work
> > > > > either.
> > > >
> > > > The microsoft mouse works on a sheet of perfectly clean glass or a
mirror
> > > > without problem. I use it on a glass tabletop with my laptop without
issue.
> > >
> > > So how do you think the Microsoft mouse works out where it is, if not
by
> > > boundary detection?
> >
> > Clearly it doesn't work with edges, which implies a line.  Since a glass
> > surface has no lines in it.
>
> 'Edge' does not necessary imply 'line' as in straight line, of course.
> If you magnify the surface of glass far enough, you'll see a pitted
> surface. (Trivia: I understand this is how insects climb glass; they
> don't "stick" to it, but actually hang on to the surface imperfections.)
> If you can get an image of that surface such that shows its texture,
> then any image with a high enough contrast would do the job. (Go to any
> paint program, and try the 'EDGE detect' filter.) If you found a surface
> that did *not* have enough contrast to find those 'edges', then you
> probably wouldn't easily be able to follow movement across that surface.
> Given current imaging technology, I doubt you'd be able to find a
> surface that didn't!

Nice comeback, but the original statement is *SEPERATED* by edges, which
does imply a line in order to have seperation.  pits do not seperate
anything.





------------------------------

From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Beno=EEt?= Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RPM problem
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 00:03:08 -0100

Greetings,

I recently tried to install some RPM packages, but I only received the
irritating "failed dependancies" message followed by a list of
supposedly missing libraries. Then I was surprised by seeing that most
of the concerned libraries ARE present in my system (in the directories:
/lib, /usr/lib, /usr/X11R6/lib) !!!
Could someone give me an explanation for this ? I am using the Slackware
7.0. distro.

Thanks in advance for any answer.
-- 

Beno�t Smith
Just A Rhyme Without A Reason

------------------------------

From: "Erik Funkenbusch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: 
comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.lang.java.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: How Microsoft inhibits competition & innovation
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 17:12:52 -0500

Mark Bratcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
> >
> > Andrew Carpenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > btolder wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > "(...) any random surface pattern of relatively light and dark
areas
> > > > > separated by edges (...)" is the relevant part of the sentence. As
far
> > > > > as I can see this means a surface that is not of uniform colour
and
> > > > > texture, on which the "new" Microsoft optical mouse wouldn't work
> > > > > either.
> > > >
> > > > The microsoft mouse works on a sheet of perfectly clean glass or a
> > mirror
> > > > without problem. I use it on a glass tabletop with my laptop without
> > issue.
> > >
> > > So how do you think the Microsoft mouse works out where it is, if not
by
> > > boundary detection?
> >
> > Clearly it doesn't work with edges, which implies a line.  Since a glass
> > surface has no lines in it.
>
> PMFJI, but Andrew's correct. There must be some discernable optical
> differences as the mouse passes over the surface or it would be
> physically impossible to detect the motion, unless the mouse also
> employs a gyroscope. I agree with Andrew that they are detecting
> microscopic irregularities in the surface. I don't mean to downgrade the
> innovation, it certainly is a cool trick.

Of course it does.  That's not my argument.  My argument is that the
Microsoft mouse does not meet the requirements of the patent text quoted at
the top of this message.




------------------------------

From: "Erik Funkenbusch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: 
comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.lang.java.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: How Microsoft inhibits competition & innovation
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 17:13:33 -0500

D'Arcy Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:BXjL4.20807$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > The microsoft mouse works on a sheet of perfectly clean glass or a
mirror
> > without problem. I use it on a glass tabletop with my laptop without
> issue.
>
> Why doesn't it work on my monitor?
>
> (I just picked it up put it on the monitor and moved it around...
> eventually I got it to move a few pixels).

Most likely, the light from the monitor is confusing it.




------------------------------

From: "Erik Funkenbusch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: 
comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.lang.java.advocacy
Subject: Re: How Microsoft inhibits competition & innovation
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 17:17:51 -0500

Jon A. Maxwell (JAM) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:8dl3r3$rhb$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Erik Funkenbusch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: (comp.lang.java.advocacy)
>  | Mike Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>  |> Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
>  |> >
>  |> > I did find that patent, but [...] it's describing the optical
>  |> > mouse pad of the more typical form of optical mouse.  Note that
>  |> > it requires [...] a cross hatch pattern of light and dark.
>  |> > That's exactly the design of the normal optical mouse pad.
>
> That's pathetic Funkenbusch.  Shame on you for trying to mislead the
> readers.  The patent states that the mouse

I'm not misleading anyone.  The patent is not the same.  It requires a
surface with contrasting colors, ala an optical mouse pad.  A wood grain
surface works as well (ever used an optical mouse on a wood grained surface?
You'll be surprised to see that it works fairly well)

>     can operate on virtually any substantially planar imperfect
>     surface, especially those having a random surface pattern
>     relatively light and dark areas separated by edges, for example a
>     wood grained surface or any surface that is not completely
>     monochromatic with no image imperfections thereon.
>        -- http://www.patents.ibm.com/details?pn=US04799055__
>
> That is definitely not a standard 'cross hatch pattern'.  Microsoft
> did not invent a new type of mouse.  They apparently used a grid of
> sensors instead of perpendicular lines of sensors -- this is the
> biggest invention Microsoft has produced so far?

A wood grained surface has edges which are of very differing contrasts.
Clearly a mirror is not such a surface.  Additionally, the Microsoft mouse
works on my monochromatic red mousepad.

> And it only took Microsoft 15 years to come up with it.  Clearly the
> courts should not interfere with Microsoft's right to innovate: next
> time it might take *20* years to copy a new idea!  We can't have
> that, now can we?  Seriously, if Microsoft had to invent their way
> out of a paper bag they *might* get out by dumb luck.


>
> Jam (address rot13 encoded)
>



------------------------------

From: jansens_at_ibm_dot_net (Karel Jansens)
Subject: Re: Q: migrate OS/2 to Linux ?
Date: 19 Apr 2000 23:23:12 GMT

Michael Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On 16 Apr 2000 21:34:11 GMT, jansens_at_ibm_dot_net (Karel Jansens)
> wrote:
> 
> >"useD"????
> >
> >Karel Jansens
> >jansens_at_attglobal_dot_net
> 
> Might as well be "useD" Karel, since it looks like IBM
> is backing Linux so it won't need OS/2 for networking
> anymore!  Anyway, OS/2 was just a place for MS to
> learn how to do NT and when they couldn't figure it
> out they bought guys from DEC to, er, borrow VMS
> concepts to do it! :)
> 
> It wouldn't be a bad OS if one could find work programming
> it! I still have Warp 3 on one of my machines mainly through
> inertia. :)
> 

IBM just brought out Warp Sever for e-Business, has announced an 
update of Warp 4 to - effectively - Warp 4.5 and has promised the 
client version of WSeB for September 2000. OS/2 gets pronounced dead 
about every three months, we're used to it <G>.

Microsoft was involved in the development of Warp 1.x, but IBM took 
over and practically rewrote the operating system from version 2.0 
upwards.

Don't get me wrong, I love Linux. There are two operating systems on 
my PC: Warp an Linux, but Warp is still miles ahead of anything Linux 
can produce when it comes to an intuitive, easy and intelligent 
desktop.

Karel Jansens
jansens_at_attglobal_dot_net
========================================================
CIA-bait:

Saddam Hussein Iraq Iran hijack assasinate CIA plutonium
President of the United States thermonuclear device
Windows weapons FBI biohazard Microsoft uranium
submarine kill timer explosives

Have a nice day, guys!
========================================================



------------------------------

From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: intel i810 graphics card
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 22:30:11 GMT

Hello, I've linux redhat 6.1. I've my graphics card intel i810 chipset
which is not supported by redhat fro the time being. However I've installed
its driver from linux from the intel site also I've installed Xfree86 ver
4.0. After successfully installing all these I tried to run the X-windows
by typing startx but each time I got the following error message:

        AGPIOC_ACQUIRE  FAILED

and the X-windows doesn't start.
Do you have any solution or suggestions?
Sincerely


--
Posted via CNET Help.com
http://www.help.com/

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tim Haynes)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.security,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: IPChains
Date: 19 Apr 2000 23:31:32 +0100
Reply-To: "Tim Haynes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

"John Riehl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> H.Bruijn wrote in message ...
> >
> >Rather then using ipchains, you could use the the tcp/ip wrappers.
> >Has the same result, but is easier to use for applications which are
> >compiled to take use of wrappers. It works by editing the
> >/etc/hosts.allow and hosts.deny files.
> 
> Tcp wrappers are not as good for security as ipchains.  

Blargh? Surely this is a carrots-v-oranges statement. Both will give you
vitamin C to varying extent depending on utilisation method, but one's
designed as main course, one for dessert.

(They're right. The brain *does* function better when cold and when
hungry. Excuse me ;)

> They only work with services controlled by the wrappers via inetd.

And portmapper and anything else linked against the relevant library.

> Ports which may be harboring rogue services are not protected.  Further,
> you have to watch out for ip spoofing (presumably, this is taken care of
> by your firewall?).  Tcpwrappers are good for controlling access to
> certain resources, but as a general security system, use ipchains.

That much is more or less true. As above, you can do different things with
them - particularly use ipchains to block off whole ports to varying
degree, but a typical use of tcpd are for spawning actions like finger and
identd back against an incoming connection, optionally mailing the local
sysadmin and all sorts of trigger-type setups.

[]

~Tim
-- 
| Geek Code: GCS dpu s-:+ a-- C++++ UBLUAVHSC++++ P+++ L++ E--- W+++(--) N++ 
| w--- O- M-- V-- PS PGP++ t--- X+(-) b D+ G e++(*) h++(*) r--- y-           
| The sun is melting over the hills,         | http://piglet.is.dreaming.org/
| All our roads are waiting / To be revealed | [EMAIL PROTECTED]

------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.misc) via:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Misc Digest
******************************

Reply via email to