Linux-Misc Digest #291, Volume #24               Thu, 27 Apr 00 11:13:03 EDT

Contents:
  Linux and SCO ("Brian E. Seppanen")
  Re: time setting itself? (Lew Pitcher)
  Re: The commands who, users, finger don't work (Munge)
  Superblock corrupted :( (Nick)
  Re: time setting itself? (David Stutes)
  Re: SuSE 6.0 - 6.4 upgrade and kernel hassels (Ron Zoscak)
  Re: Linux ("Joseph")
  Re: LILO and 1024-Cilinder limit (Michael Kelly)
  Re: XFree86 4.0 rpms (Mogens Kjaer)
  Re: Help/Hilfe suse 6.4 nfs install (Randon Loeb)
  Redhat 6.2 Enterprise Edition (Raven)
  Re: I think I have been HACKED!!! (Kerr Gibson)
  Re: Question about setting an X-only login using xdm/gdm in Slackware... (Scott 
Bishop)
  Directory structure ("Tomaz Leskovsek")
  Re: Linux (Apple Advertising)
  Fly (mitja)
  Re: Security (Leonard Evens)
  suse 6.4 gnome no, kde yes (Randon Loeb)
  Re: Logical Volume Manager for Linux? (George)
  Re: Logical Volume Manager for Linux? (George)
  Re: microsoft word on linux (Penpal International)
  Re: Newbie question on installing linux (Gerald Willmann)
  Realplayer plugin on linux ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: time setting itself? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Security (Leejay Wu)
  Re: How to discard some sequence of strings from a file? (William Park)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: "Brian E. Seppanen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.unix.sco.misc
Subject: Linux and SCO
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 09:16:51 -0400

I have a couple of SCO servers that I periodically have to log into for
administrative tasks, and I'm having a couple of problems relating to
using Linux to do these tasks.

When I log into the SCO machines, I do so in the following way:

xterm -tn scoansi -e telnet xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
xterm -tn ansi -e telnet xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx

I fire up an Xterm and set the environment variable to what I thought was
appropriate.

What I notice when I attach to the SCO machines is that hitting backspace
does not backspace at all, in fact it puts me on a brand new command
line.  In other words I have to insure I've put the command properly
otherwise I have to start from scratch, I cannot edit mistakes.  Not fun
when you don't have any command history and you have to type 'ps -e -o
pcpu,comm,pid,user | grep blah' constantly.

When I try to fire up Scoadmin (A visual administration tool), I get the
following error as well.  

dynamic linker : xm_vtcld : error opening libXm.so

At this point scoadmin goes to a defunct state, and I have to login on a
new session and kill the old one.  Any ideas on what's causing the
problem.  Has anyone gotten this to work.

I'd really appreciate any assistance.

Thanks,


Brian Seppanen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lew Pitcher)
Subject: Re: time setting itself?
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 13:16:27 GMT

On Thu, 27 Apr 2000 13:05:37 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

>Michael Jarrells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Your computer has two clocks.  One is maintained by the OS and one is
>>maintained by the hardware.  The OS clock is initialized and synced with
>>the hardware clock so if you don't update your hardware clock, your OS
>>clock will eventually reset to the hardware clock.  Here is what I do to
>>keep my clock set:
>
>Hi;
>
>Thanks for the response.  I thought of the h/w clock as well and rebooted as one 
>of the earlier tests.  The h/w clock is set correctly.  Somehow, the OS clock keeps
>going back five hours.  This is getting annoying!
>
>Thanks for the response.
>
>Doug

It sounds like a timezone issue to me. Your software clock may be interpreting
the hardware clock as UTC, and decrementing the local time shown by your
timezone offset. Are you by chance in the EST5EDT timezone?


Lew Pitcher
System Consultant
Toronto Dominion Bank Financial Group

(Opinions expressed are my own, not my employers')

------------------------------

From: Munge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: The commands who, users, finger don't work
Date: 27 Apr 2000 13:19:06 GMT

Marcel Nihon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
: <HTML>
: Hi,
: <BR>With Red Hat Linux 6.0, kernel 2.2.5-15, the commands who, users, finger
: don't print any output!
: <BR>Help appreciated. Thanks in advance.

Don't post in frigging MIME or HTML, it just pisses people off.
Check your /etc/inetd.conf file, look for who etc.. and uncomment
them, that is remove the hash. If they aren't there read the
man page to inetd.conf and work it out from there. 


------------------------------

From: Nick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Superblock corrupted :(
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 13:30:03 GMT

  Is there any other way to fix a corrupted linux partition, other
than using fsck? When i was installed Mandrake 7.0 after installation 
proceess directories was corrupt.  I ran fsck on the partition (/dev/hda6) 
but I got the following:

fsck.ext2: Attemp to read block from filesystem resulted in
short read while trying to open /dev/hda6 
Could this be a zero
length partition?

The partition table is fine.
 
I'll try even:

e2fsck -b 8193  

but it isn't work.
Pls help me,i'm DJ and i'll lost all of my records...  :(


--
Posted via CNET Help.com
http://www.help.com/

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Stutes)
Subject: Re: time setting itself?
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 13:39:01 GMT

In article <BWWN4.1746$6B1.106418@elnws01>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Michael Jarrells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Your computer has two clocks.  One is maintained by the OS and one is
>>maintained by the hardware.  The OS clock is initialized and synced with
>>the hardware clock so if you don't update your hardware clock, your OS
>>clock will eventually reset to the hardware clock.  Here is what I do to
>>keep my clock set:
>
>Hi;
>
>Thanks for the response.  I thought of the h/w clock as well and rebooted as
> one 
>of the earlier tests.  The h/w clock is set correctly.  Somehow, the OS clock
> keeps
>going back five hours.  This is getting annoying!
>
>Thanks for the response.
>
>Doug

>
Notice the time stamp in your post is in GMT, the central daylight savings 
time and GMT 5 hours apart.



------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ron Zoscak)
Subject: Re: SuSE 6.0 - 6.4 upgrade and kernel hassels
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 13:39:52 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Stewart Honsberger wrote:
[snip]
>
>This might be related somehow;
>
>On bootup while initializing the serial ports, I get several (dozen) messages
>along the lines of;
>
>/etc/conf.modules is newer than /usr/lib/modules/2.2.14/modules.dep

Have you tried running SuSEconfig?

------------------------------

From: "Joseph" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 09:33:27 -0400

1) System settings are well documented , and easy to read/change - they are
in text files.  Not burried deep in "registries" with no documentation

2) The OS will boot and let you do things so long as a kernel can be loaded
by lilo. Like when some of your partitions are totally destroyed...
     Windows: at the slightest change, it craps it's load.

3) You have a choice as to whether you want the GUI or not : Linux does not
_need_ the gui to get it's work done. various servers ( daemons) will still
run so long as their start up script is called.

4) You have a choice on which GUI you want to work with (Desktops) . And you
can customize the system to your heart's content.

5) Linux is not a "Monkey see monkey do"  OS .  You have to know what you're
doing when messing around with it's internals .     Fortunately for me ,
Linux has proven to be capable enough to boot up and let me fix problems
caused by my own fiddling !

  Windows : don't even go there...

6) Linux : Bugs get found and are fixed sometimes in a matter of hours.
    Windows : Bugs ? What bugs ?... Oh, that! That's a feature, silly!!
7) If linux is your gateway and you are setting up the XWindows system for
the graphics card , you can change settings and restart the windowing system
untill you are happy with the settings, and all the while the 30 or so
people using the gateway are blissfully unaware that you are tinkering with
it : All you have to do is mess with X . The _computer_ is _not_ rebooted

WIndows : "Your changes will not be effective utill the computer is
restarted.Would you like to restart now ? [YES] NO " after each minor
change.  And to hell with the 30 people using this computer as a gateway.

I'm out of time , but I'm sure there are more reasons...

regards,
joseph


















[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message ...
>How is Linux different from Windows?
>
>--
>Posted via CNET Help.com
>http://www.help.com/



------------------------------

From: Michael Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: LILO and 1024-Cilinder limit
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 13:48:34 GMT

On 27 Apr 2000 12:39:29 GMT, "Peter T. Breuer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

>To be exact, it doesn't exist in the new lilo v24.1 IF your bios supports
>certain calls. But then it never existed in any sense that I have been
>able to credit as a stopper anyway. What was the big deal in putting
>the boot image below 1024 cyl, or in using a different loader (e.g. dos)?
>
>Peter

Hi Peter.  I wasn't really aware of this before.  What you're saying
is if I don't want a separate partition inside the 1024 and had like
a FAT32 with Win9x on C: all I have to do is copy the kernel and
some boot files to the FAT32 partition?

My setup is fine and it's not an issue but I'm just curious.
The "boot" and "image" lines for example if Win9x was
on the first EIDE drive on the first primary partition would
be something like
boot=/dev/hda1
image=/vmlinuz

or what?

TIA


Mike

--

"I don't want to belong to any club that would have me as a member."
    -- Groucho Marx

------------------------------

From: Mogens Kjaer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.x
Subject: Re: XFree86 4.0 rpms
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 15:48:02 +0200

Jim Zubb wrote:

> No,  only rpms I could find were from rpmfind.net and they were completely
> fubaredd for me.  Wierd things happened when attempting to install
> XFree-4.0, it tried to copy my entire directory structure to
> /var/state/xkb (not positive on that directory), bizarre stuff.  Gonna
> wait to see if I can ever get into rawhide.redhat.com

This also happened to me - with the rpm's from rawhide...

The easiest thing to do is:

Make copies of /etc/X11 and /usr/X11R6 and store them in a
very, very safe place!

Empty /usr/X11R6, remove /etc/X11/XF86Config

Get the source files: You'll need X400src-[123].tgz. Unpack
them on a directory on a filesystem with plenty of space.

make World
make install

Now you have XFree 4.0 :-)

Mogens

-- 
Mogens Kjaer, Carlsberg Laboratory, Dept. of Chemistry
Gamle Carlsberg Vej 10, DK-2500 Valby, Denmark
Phone: +45 33 27 53 25, Fax: +45 33 27 47 08
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.crc.dk

------------------------------

From: Randon Loeb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: de.comp.os.unix.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Help/Hilfe suse 6.4 nfs install
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 09:47:45 -0400
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Figured it out. Problem was in /etc/exports.  Needed to change rights on
the cdrom share to (ro,no_root_squash) from (ro).

Hab das problem geloest.  es liegt bei /etc/exports, das cdrom teil muss
mit (ro,no_root_squash) deklariert sein, statt (ro).

Randon Loeb wrote:
> 
> Has anyone installed suse 6.4 using yast over nfs? (not yast2). If so,
> please email me, I'd like to ask exactly how you did it.  I am having
> problems with yast not liking disk2.
> It keeps telling me "The given directory does not contain the correct
> CD".  Yes, I do know how to count!
> 
> Hat irgendjemand suse 6.4 ueber nfs installiert? ich versuche mit yast,
> nicht yast2. falls ja, bitte schreiben sie mir ein email, ich wuerde
> gerne wissen genau wie sie das gemacht haben.  ich habe probleme mit
> disk2, "The given directory does not contain the correct CD".  Ja, ich
> kann richtig rechnen, sogar wenn mein deutsch nicht gut ist!
> 
> --
> Randon Loeb - CIO, Technical Director
> CTI Consulting & Training
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 954-971-6888
> DO NOT ADD THIS ADDRESS TO JOKES OR OTHER LISTS

-- 
Randon Loeb - CIO, Technical Director
CTI Consulting & Training
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
954-971-6888
DO NOT ADD THIS ADDRESS TO JOKES OR OTHER LISTS

------------------------------

From: Raven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: redhat.general,linux.redhat.misc
Subject: Redhat 6.2 Enterprise Edition
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 13:45:11 GMT

Hi,

I have a question regrading RedHat 6.2.

 1. Is RH6.2 standard / Professional and the RH 6.2 Enterprise Edition
    is the same ?

 2. RH 6.2 EE has 64 bit file i/o, direct raw i/o, can access more than
    2GB file in size, can process size to 3GB. Is all this feature has
    in RH6.2 standard kernel ?

 3. Is there other distribution has this kind of capability ?

 4. Will RedHat release the above features in their regular
distribution. ?

 5. I think that all this feature is kernel related. Is there where
    I can download such kernel ?

 6. Is there any place where I can download this RH6.2 EE ?

 7. Do RedHat sell this RH6.2 EE without support option.

Basically I have a customer who running Oracle 8i and need the kernel,
but for more that USD3,000.00, I'm not sure wheather to wait for the
other distribution to put the same feature in their distribution or
buy one.


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

------------------------------

From: Kerr Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: uk.comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: I think I have been HACKED!!!
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 10:02:30 -0400

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (brian 
moore) wrote:

> It has nothing to do with gnapster or napster-like protocols, as they
> don't use ftp.

Oh, ok. Like I said, I'm fairly new to all this.

> Most likely you were being probed just like any system online all the 
> time gets. 

Hmmm, would these be some kind of automatic probes or just individuals 
playing around.

> Go through inetd.conf and comment out every line if you don't know what 
> it
> is or why you would run it.  

Yeah, my dist came with everything commented out intially. I have only 
turned on the few things I need for the LAN.

> Then use ipchains to nail it all down past that point and not as critical
> as killing all the junk, but that's more of a black art...  see the
> ipchains HOWTO.

Ok. Hey, thanks a lot for responding. I'm glad there are people like you 
who are willing to take the time.

-- 
Kerr Gibson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

------------------------------

From: Scott Bishop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.help
Subject: Re: Question about setting an X-only login using xdm/gdm in Slackware...
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 09:08:35 -0500

Hey Peter,

"Peter T. Breuer" wrote:
> 
> But this is trivial. If you want to run in graphic login mode, change
> the default init level in /etc/inittab.

Yup... found that out yesterday.  Like I said then, I felt like an idiot
not realizing the obvious sooner. :)

> "Man init" would seem to be obvious. Please make sure that kdm or xdm
> or gdm is installed You will find that slackwares rc.6 script makes a
> nice selection between them!

Actually, pardon me for being anal, but rc.6 is reboot.  rc4 is X login.
:)  And yes, I had gdm installed... though it's a pain and will be
switching to kdm. :)
 
> It's much much much simpler than you apparently think. X initlevel is
> standard on slackware.

... which I found out not a couple of hours after posting the question.
:)  Thanks anyway, though! :)

-- 
--Scott Bishop
WALKER BOLT Manufacturing Co.

(Notice: The opinions stated in this message are not necessarily those
of my employer, nor of any other sane individual for that matter.)

------------------------------

From: "Tomaz Leskovsek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Directory structure
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 16:09:35 +0200

Hi!

Is there any limitation on a directory structure in Linux (Red Hat)?

Would a directory structure of 40 directories of which all would have 40
subdirectories of which all would have 40 subdirectories cause any system
problems?

Thanks for any info.

Tomaz



------------------------------

From: Apple Advertising <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 09:13:40 -0700

I have a Dell OptiPlex GXMT 5200 (200Mhz pentium, 64M ram, 2G hda, 40G
hdb, cd hdc, cdrw hdd), TurboLinux 4.0 Workstation (not particularly
fond of TL, but my wife got it for me; I prefer Slack myself).
Installed, uses the built-in network card (3c509 driver), Sound Blaster
driver, etc. No problems (other than the differences between TL and
Slack). Currently no monitor attached (had to move it to a windows
machine that blew it's monitor), but X windows installed without a
problem.

BTW it's used as a file/print server, dhcp server for a mixed
windows/apple environment. Samba & appletalk services work like a charm
as well.

- Ken

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Does Linux runs on Opti Plex servers?
>
> --
> Posted via CNET Help.com
> http://www.help.com/


------------------------------

From: mitja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Fly
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 16:17:43 +0200
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I have FlyVideo '98 FM TV card but I cannot configured it.
My system: SuSE 6.4, XFree 4.0, KDE 1.1.2, Matrox Mill. G200 AGP.
First I run ./update in /usr/doc/packages/bttv/tools succsessful but kwintv
cannot play any program.
Please help me.
Thanks in advance,

Mitja
 

------------------------------

From: Leonard Evens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Security
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 08:32:49 -0500

ed johnson wrote:
> 
> Could someone please explain if there is a simple way to restruct all users
> except root from being able to ftp then drop back to any directory they
> like. I would like them to only stay within their own ~user area ?????
> 
> Thanks for any advice ... PS I'm using redhat
> 
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Ordinarily, a non-root user can only ftp to a directory for which
that user has appropriate permissions.  That should only include
the user's home directories and various tmp directories.
You could of course change permssions on the tmp directories
so oridnary users could not write there, but that would undoubtedly
disrupt a lot of normal program functions.   And I'm not sure
exactly why you would want to do it.

If users other than root can now write to other directories than
those mentioned above, there is something wrong.
-- 

Leonard Evens      [EMAIL PROTECTED]      847-491-5537
Dept. of Mathematics, Northwestern Univ., Evanston, IL 60208

------------------------------

From: Randon Loeb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: de.comp.os.unix.linux.misc
Subject: suse 6.4 gnome no, kde yes
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 10:20:12 -0400
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


New installation of suse 6.4.  Gnome works fine, at high resolutions and
different desktop sizes. So do fvwm, fvwm2.  But kde dies (screen turns
black) when started.  I am starting them all with startx gnome, startx
fvwm, startx kde, etc...  Any ideas?

Gnome fenstermanager funktioniert perfekt, auch fvwm, fvwm2.  Aber kde
sterbt sofort, also schirm wird schwartz.  alles sind mit startx gnome,
startx fvwm, startx kde. Ideen?

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (George)
Crossposted-To: 
alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.development.apps,linux.redhat.install,linux.redhat.misc
Subject: Re: Logical Volume Manager for Linux?
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 14:27:17 GMT


Thanks Markus.  I looked at the website and some of the command syntax
looks very similar to the HP/UX, so I think at least for me it would
be very easy to configure.

Thanks again.

George


On Wed, 26 Apr 2000 20:08:12 +0200, Markus Kossmann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>George wrote:
>[...]
>> 
>> Bottom line is... Is there such a program that exists for Linux that
>> can do volume management?
>> 
>Have a look at http://linux.msede.com/lvm/


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (George)
Crossposted-To: 
alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.development.apps,linux.redhat.install,linux.redhat.misc
Subject: Re: Logical Volume Manager for Linux?
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 14:27:18 GMT


Thanks Pete, I will look into that as well.

George


On Wed, 26 Apr 2000 20:01:47 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

>George,
>
>I don't know if this satisfies your question, but RH6.1 has built-in
>software RAID support. With this I was able to logically join three
>physical volumes together into one big data space.
>
>Pete
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>In article <390b191d.100746312@home>,
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED] (George) wrote:
>>
>> I'm currently a Unix administrator for a major corporation.  We have
>> an HP9000 running HP/UX using Logical Volume Manager (LVM) to
>> administer multiple hard drives into a single volume.  For example, we
>> have 12 9.1gb hard drives arranged into a single volume group to give
>> us 109.2gb of available space.
>>
>> I also have a Linux machine at home running RedHat v6.1.  I am running
>> a small news server which carries a few newsgroups that I like to
>> read.  What I have installed in this machine is 2 hard drives, 1 2.5gb
>> and 1 6gb.  The 2.5gb hard drive has the Linux OS on it and some
>> available free space and the 6gb hard drive is totally devoted to
>> news.  I would like to combine the 6gb and the 1.5gb remaining from
>> the first drive together to form a single volume.  Now some of you
>> might say, "Why not just buy a larger hard drive?", sure but there
>> could be other times where someone else may need allot more space than
>> I do.  Take the example above of 12 9.1gb hard drives, now if I had
>> these drives on my server at home (I only wish) it would make an
>> awesome news server would it?
>>
>> Bottom line is... Is there such a program that exists for Linux that
>> can do volume management?
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> George
>>
>> P.S.  Sorry for the multiple newsgroup posting, but I wanted to get
>> the message out to a broader area.
>>
>>
>
>
>Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
>Before you buy.


------------------------------

From: Penpal International <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: microsoft word on linux
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 16:28:17 +0200

StarOffice Can handle Microsoft word files. (also excel and maybe some
more). You can also save files as Word documents.
It's free to download. http://www.sun.com/staroffice/ . But if you have
a bad connection you can buy it in the store. It will be about $40,- 
(You can better buy the new Suse 6.4. It's the same price and it has
also plenty of stuff and tools and a complete new kernel.
If you want to download something else quick you can read the other
replies to your message.

(PS. It's very very very very very easy to handle if you compare it to
that weird Ms Office)



Eugenio Rivera wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Is there a program that allows me to view (not necessarily edit)
> a microsoft word document under Linux?
> 
> thanks,
> 
> Eugenio

-- 
Penpal International
http://ppi.searchy.net/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

------------------------------

From: Gerald Willmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Newbie question on installing linux
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 07:21:13 -0700

On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, Al @Work wrote:

> In addtion to Peter's comments, I suggest that if you have the budget
> resources that you install LINUX on a seperate hard drive. That way you
> can play with it all you want to, uninstall, reinstall, try things out,
> etc. without any possible damage to the Win98 system. Plus, when you
> decide to pull the plug on Windows, you can simply pull out the hard
> drive, etc.

why? he already has his existing drive partioned. Just deleting one
partition and using the free space for linux doesn't seem dangerous.
Or can't M$ even copy stuff from one partition to another?
I really don't know - haven't used it in years. 
                                                      Gerald
-- 


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Realplayer plugin on linux
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 14:15:40 GMT

Does any body have realplayer plugin working with Netscape (4.7)
on Red hat linux 6.0 ?
In my case, the plugin is loaded and even the song is downloaded
but it just does not play the song. However the standalone
realplayer (7) works fine.

Any ideas?

Thanks,
Jo


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: time setting itself?
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 14:34:04 GMT

Lew Pitcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>It sounds like a timezone issue to me. Your software clock may be interpreting
>the hardware clock as UTC, and decrementing the local time shown by your
>timezone offset. Are you by chance in the EST5EDT timezone?

OK, that's reasonable.  I'm actually in the Central time zone.  Another post
mentioned that my headers indicate GMT which adds credence to the timezone issue.

I did a man -k zone and found the tzselect command.  After running through that,
it said "America/Chicago" is the correct zone parameter.  I then placed that
in the /etc/sysconfig/clock file.  Is there anything else that I"m supposed to be 
doing?

Thanks for the help.

Doug

-- 
========================
Douglas K. O'Leary
Senior System Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

------------------------------

From: Leejay Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Security
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 10:29:48 -0400

Excerpts from netnews.comp.os.linux.misc: 27-Apr-100 Security by "ed
johnson"@softalk.fre 
> Could someone please explain if there is a simple way to restruct 
> all users except root from being able to ftp then drop back to any
> directory they like. I would like them to only stay within their 
> own ~user area ?????

Check your man pages.  At least w/ wuftpd ftp daemons, 
'man ftpaccess' may interest you -- see the 'guestgroup' 
option.
--
|   [EMAIL PROTECTED]        | the silly student          |
|--------------------------| he writes really bad haiku |
|   #include <stddiscl.h>  | readers all go mad         |

    


------------------------------

From: William Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How to discard some sequence of strings from a file?
Date: 27 Apr 2000 05:29:20 GMT

Young4ert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,

> I have a huge text file that contains the following lines in some places
> (of couse without the tabs and the +++++ lines):

> +++++
>       #
>       # Reinitialization
>       #
>       P=3
> +++++

> If I use `grep -v "pattern" textfile > textfile.tmp; mv textfile.tmp
> textfile`, how can I do that?  How about using "sed"?

> -- 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]

1.  sed -e "/Reinitialization/,/P=3/d" file > file.new
This does not remove the first '#'.

2.  cp file file.new
    vim -c "/Reinitialization/-1,/P=3/d" -c 'wq' file.new

--William

------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.misc) via:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Misc Digest
******************************

Reply via email to