Linux-Misc Digest #818, Volume #24 Wed, 14 Jun 00 22:13:02 EDT
Contents:
does linux support dual/PII PC?
Re: fdisk and dos ("David ..")
Re: does linux support dual/PII PC? ("David ..")
Re: 200 mails to root! (Gerd Pickel)
Re: does linux support dual/PII PC? (Dances With Crows)
where is www.linuxjournel.com?? (Sam Wun)
Re: does linux support dual/PII PC? (Robert Heller)
Kernel bug prompts security alert!! ("David ..")
Re: Kernel bug prompts security alert!! ("David ..")
Re: moving the kernel and modules... ("mrauscher")
Re: ()()()()FLASHIN' SCREEN()()()() ("Tom Hoffmann")
Linux ALPHA glibc 2.1.2-?? (U.V. Ravindra)
Re: reconstruct software RAID 1 (Howard Cokl)
Re: Xserver help (BadAccess error) (Arul)
Re: Fdisk and dos (Leonard Evens)
Re: where is www.linuxjournel.com?? (Hal Burgiss)
Re: Installing Linux past 1024 cylinder (Richard)
Webacm 32 and IPMASQ ("WoNkO")
Re: NT 4.0, DOS, Linux -- Is It Worth It? ("Lonni J. Friedman")
Re: fdisk and dos ("Lonni J. Friedman")
Re: xmms ("Andrew N. McGuire ")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: does linux support dual/PII PC?
Date: 15 Jun 2000 00:20:09 GMT
I plan to buy a dual CPU PC, but I prefer Linux much more than W2K on it.
I know NT&W2K support mutiple processor, I do not know whether linux dos.
Thanks
------------------------------
From: "David .." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: fdisk and dos
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 19:10:02 -0500
paul simdars wrote:
>
> Has anyone used Linux fdisk to partition their dos drive? I have one
> drive which has only dos partitions on it but dos doesn't seem to be
> able to partition it correctly. It keeps adding an extra partition so I
> thought I'd do it with Linux. Anyone had any experience?
> Thanks.
> Paul
This is a newsgroup not a chat room. This is your 4th posting of the
same question within 5 minutes. Relax and give someone time to answer.
--
Registered with the Linux Counter. http://counter.li.org
ID # 123538
------------------------------
From: "David .." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: does linux support dual/PII PC?
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 19:23:22 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I plan to buy a dual CPU PC, but I prefer Linux much more than W2K on it.
>
> I know NT&W2K support mutiple processor, I do not know whether linux dos.
Yes it does!!
--
Registered with the Linux Counter. http://counter.li.org
ID # 123538
------------------------------
From: Gerd Pickel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 200 mails to root!
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 20:12:20 +0200
Gerd Pickel schrieb:
> hello world!
>
> i'm confused: on a hp e60 with a tc-20 (20gb) a cron-job is running
> every day at 11:00pm to backup the hole system with s.u.s.e 6.1.
> (command: find / | cpio -ov > /dev/st0).
> it produces 200 mails, one per minute(!) (per night!): "device is
> busy....".
>
> between these mails, i found the right one which is telling me the
> hole structure of the system, so the backup was successfully, but it
> seems to need 200 trials :-( .
>
> Any idea to solve this ugly problem?
>
>
> thanks,
>
> gerd
so!
i've fixed the problem (i don't know if anyone is interested in).a
little "&" to make cpio a background process and the "backup" runs
perfect. i tested the hole thing on s.u.s.e 6.1 and 6.4.
gerd
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dances With Crows)
Subject: Re: does linux support dual/PII PC?
Date: 14 Jun 2000 20:37:13 EDT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 15 Jun 2000 00:20:09 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<<8i97fp$r9m$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> shouted forth into the ether:
>I plan to buy a dual CPU PC, but I prefer Linux much more than W2K on it.
>
>I know NT&W2K support mutiple processor, I do not know whether linux dos.
SMP support has been in Linux for a long time. RedHat even installs an
SMP kernel by default if you have a uniprocessor machine. Some other
distros may require you to compile your own kernel with SMP support
enabled, but that's not a big task, and a uniprocessor kernel will run
fine on an SMP machine for as long as it takes for you to install a distro
and compile a new kernel.
--
Matt G / Dances With Crows /\ "Man could not stare too long at the face
\----[this space for rent]-----/ \ of the Computer or her children and still
\There is no Darkness in Eternity \ remain as Man." --David Zindell "So did
But only Light too dim for us to see\ they become Gods, or Usenetters?" --/me
------------------------------
From: Sam Wun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: where is www.linuxjournel.com??
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2000 10:39:36 +1000
==============06871147DDB8921FE45329D7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gb2312
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
This website is vanished from the web, has it been changed name lately?
I am just looking for some info about setting up my Oracle8i in Linux.
Someone said that www.linuxjournel.com could help. Is there any other website contains
the similar info about setting Oracle8i in Linux?
Basically the problem is:
bash$ ./runInstaller
Initializing Java Virtual Machine from
/usr/local/jre/bin/jre. Please wait...
Error in CreateOUIProcess(): -1
: Bad address
Thansk
Sam.
--
Sam Wun Firewalls / Security
OneGuard Senior Software Engineer Electronic Commerce
eSec Limited Phone: +61 3 83715376
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] C++/JAVA/UNIX/OOP/OOD
==============06871147DDB8921FE45329D7
Content-Type: text/html; charset=gb2312
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
<pre>This website is vanished from the web, has it been changed name lately?
I am just looking for some info about setting up my Oracle8i in Linux.</pre>
<pre>Someone said that www.linuxjournel.com could help. Is there any other website
contains</pre>
<pre>the similar info about setting Oracle8i in Linux?</pre>
<pre></pre>
<pre>Basically the problem is:</pre>
<pre>bash$ ./runInstaller
Initializing Java Virtual Machine from
/usr/local/jre/bin/jre. Please wait...
Error in CreateOUIProcess(): -1
: Bad address</pre>
<pre>Thansk</pre>
<pre>Sam.</pre>
<pre>--
Sam
Wun
Firewalls / Security
OneGuard Senior Software Engineer Electronic Commerce
eSec
Limited
Phone: +61 3 83715376
<A
HREF="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
C++/JAVA/UNIX/OOP/OOD</pre>
</html>
==============06871147DDB8921FE45329D7==
------------------------------
From: Robert Heller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: does linux support dual/PII PC?
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2000 00:38:39 GMT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
In a message on 15 Jun 2000 00:20:09 GMT, wrote :
> I plan to buy a dual CPU PC, but I prefer Linux much more than W2K on it.
>
> I know NT&W2K support mutiple processor, I do not know whether linux dos.
Linux supports SMP. Has for some time now.
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
>
--
\/
Robert Heller ||InterNet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://vis-www.cs.umass.edu/~heller || [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.deepsoft.com /\FidoNet: 1:321/153
------------------------------
From: "David .." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,alt.linux,redhat.security.general,redhat.general
Subject: Kernel bug prompts security alert!!
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 19:32:49 -0500
The kernel bug affects versions 2.2.15 and earlier, as well as some
2.4.0 versions, and Linux users are advised to upgrade to 2.2.16. The
problem is all the more serious because code that exploits the flaw has
been posted widely on the internet, including on a number of well-known
security sites.
http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2000-06-14-018-04-SC-KN
--
Registered with the Linux Counter. http://counter.li.org
ID # 123538
------------------------------
From: "David .." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,alt.linux,redhat.security.general,redhat.general
Subject: Re: Kernel bug prompts security alert!!
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 19:34:04 -0500
Sorry to cross post but everyone needs to know.
--
Registered with the Linux Counter. http://counter.li.org
ID # 123538
------------------------------
From: "mrauscher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: moving the kernel and modules...
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 17:56:27 -0700
Dances With Crows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
> I've done this is the past like so:
> # make menuconfig
> # make dep bzImage modules
> # mv /lib/modules/KERNELVERSION /lib/modules/KERNELVERSION.old
> # make modules_install
>
> Then the kernel you compiled is in ./arch/i386/boot/bzImage , and the
> modules you compiled are in /lib/modules/KERNELVERSION. "make
> modules_install" merely copies the compiled modules from the kernel source
> tree to the /lib/modules/KERNELVERSION directory.
This answers my question, I think. My concern is that something might be
happening under the covers, but if it's just a matter of copying the
modules, kernel, and system map file; no problem. I was also thinking there
might be a variable I could change that would install the modules and kernel
in a separate tree so that I just make a tarball out of the tree and
wouldn't have to mess with copying things around, but this sounds simple
enough. Thanx.
> There is no rule to
> make target "install" for the kernel... are you thinking of "make
> bzlilo" or "make zdisk"?
>
Maybe I'm misunderstanding your question, but the last command I run before
booting into a new kernel is "make install". It copies the new kernel into
the /boot directory, does some other things I don't understand (did I
mention I'm a newbie :-), and then runs lilo. I'm running RH and the
sequence I've always used to rebuild the kernel through the last 2 releases
is: make mrproper xconfig dep clean bzimage modules modules_install install
> --
> Matt G / Dances With Crows /\ "Man could not stare too long at the
face
> \----[this space for rent]-----/ \ of the Computer or her children and
still
> \There is no Darkness in Eternity \ remain as Man." --David Zindell
"Online
> But only Light too dim for us to see\ gender bending going too far?" --/me
------------------------------
From: "Tom Hoffmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ()()()()FLASHIN' SCREEN()()()()
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 22:44:58 GMT
>> Boot to a command prompt and run XF86Setup or Xconfigurator. It
>> owuld seem from your description that X is not configured correctly
>> for your monitor/video card combination.
>>
>>any trick to configuring that properly or am i gonna just have to find
> out? and......what is the best version of Linux? advance level not an
> issue.
The "trick" is to have the manufacturer specs for your monitor and video
card so you can set up X correctly. As to the "best" distribution of
Linux ... what criteria do you want an answer based upon?
>
>
> --
> Posted via CNET Help.com http://www.help.com/
------------------------------
From: U.V. Ravindra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.alpha,comp.os.linux
Subject: Linux ALPHA glibc 2.1.2-??
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2000 00:55:23 GMT
How does one find out the differences between libc-2.1.2-28
and libc-2.1.2-32?
Advance thanks for all your replies.
-uvr
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
------------------------------
From: Howard Cokl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: reconstruct software RAID 1
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 21:00:35 -0400
Did you partition the new disk before you put it in? I think your first
raidhotadd should be raidhotadd /dev/md0 /dev/sdb1. Don't know for
certain but I had a similar problem when I was building a RAID system
w/Slackware. I don't recall what exactly I did but it could have been
that the disk I was hotadding wasn't fdisk'd right. For / it should be
type fd (RAID autodetect)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I was hoping my first software RAID questions was going to be "how can I
> hotswap", but I guess we'll start here:
>
> I have two 9.1 gig SCSI drive in a RAID-1 setup under RedHat 6.2. I have
> three mounts, /, /home, and my swap partition (md0, md1, and md2). To
> test out my setup I shutdown, removed the second drive, put in a new drive
> and turned the computer back on. I did as I thought I should and ran:
>
> raidhotadd /dev/md0 /dev/sdb
>
> this worked fine, the drives started humming away, I checked
> the /proc/mdstat and it told me that md0 was being recovered, how far it
> was through the recovery, and aproximately how long it would take to
> finish the rebuild. At the end of the rebuild of md0, these two lines
> came up on the screen:
>
> md1: no spare disk to reconstruct array! -- continuing in degraded mode.
> md2: no spare disk to reconstruct array! -- continuing in degraded mode.
>
> then I try to do what would seem to be the next logical step:
>
> raidhotadd /dev/md1 /dev/sdb
>
> this command give me the following error:
>
> trying to Hotadd sdb to md1...
> md error: md_input_device() returned -17
> /dev/md1: cannot hotadd disk: invalid arguement
>
> If anyone has any insight as to why this is happening, please share. I
> can't find a scrap of information online.
>
> Dan
>
> --
> Posted via CNET Help.com
> http://www.help.com/
--
Howard Cokl
Information Systems - Security Administrator
Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute
Detroit, MI 48201
313 833-0715 x2422
------------------------------
From: Arul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Xserver help (BadAccess error)
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2000 01:07:56 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jun 2000 17:19:57 GMT, Arul
> <<8i8era$5s2$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> shouted forth into the ether:
> >The remote client tries to grab mouse button which my X server
> >does not allow.
> >
> >Is there any way to tell my X server to allow this (like
> >startup option or XF86Config parameters).
> [snip]
>
> I had a look through the man page for XF86Config, and found two
options:
>
> AllowNonLocalModInDev (put this in the ServerFlags section)
> AlwaysCore 1 (put this in the Mouse section)
>
> one or both of those may be what you want. However, your client
program
> may be doing something stupid--I've run a lot of X clients on remote
> servers, and never had this problem. What is the name of the client
here,
> and which X server are you using? (SVGA, Mach64, S3...) Also,
> comp.os.linux.x may be a better place; the X gurus hang out there.
Thanks Matt. I am running SVGA on a trident cyber card. It is possible
the client does something stupid but I doubt it. The client is a
process analysis tool from Sun running on a Solaris 2.6 SUN box.
It seem to work fine as a remote X client when I run it on my
X server emulator on NT (ReflectionX), but I hate NT or anything
starts with Win#$@%
I will try the options you have suggested and post this to the
group you have suggested.
Just curious what is AlwaysCore option for?.
Thanks.
-Arul
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
------------------------------
From: Leonard Evens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Fdisk and dos
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 20:14:43 -0500
paul simdars wrote:
>
> Has anyone used Linux fdisk to partition their dos drive? I have one
> drive which has only dos partitions on it but dos doesn't seem to be
> able to partition it correctly. It keeps adding an extra partition so I
> thought I'd do it with Linux. Anyone had any experience?
> Thanks.
> Paul
>
> --
> birdslife.1stConnection.net
>
> -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
> http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
> -----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----
What do you mean by an extra partition? I think that DOS/Windows
can only tolerate a single primary partition. With the DOS
fdisk, if you try to create a second partition, it creates an
extended partition and then puts a logical partition inside it.
Or so I seem to remember.
--
Leonard Evens [EMAIL PROTECTED] 847-491-5537
Dept. of Mathematics, Northwestern Univ., Evanston, IL 60208
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hal Burgiss)
Subject: Re: where is www.linuxjournel.com??
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2000 01:48:18 GMT
On Thu, 15 Jun 2000 10:39:36 +1000, Sam Wun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>This website is vanished from the web, has it been changed name lately?
>I am just looking for some info about setting up my Oracle8i in Linux.
>
>Someone said that www.linuxjournel.com could help. Is there any other
>website contains
Unless you typo'd it, it is linuxjournal.
--
Hal B
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
------------------------------
From: Richard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.redhat
Subject: Re: Installing Linux past 1024 cylinder
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 21:03:31 -0400
On Tue, 13 Jun 2000 01:54:55 GMT, Kevin Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>I am trying to install RedHat Linux 6.2 on a 20 gig drive. I put it on
>the end of the drive past the 1024th out of 2500 cylinders. LILO
>doesn't seem to like booting from here, it locks up halfway through the
>printing of the LILO prompt. I have heard that lilo doesn't work past
>the 1024th cylinder of the drive.
>
>I have tried using PowerQuest BootMagic to boot from that partition, but
>it just locks up.
>
>If someone could tell me how to use LILO on this partition with or
>without BootMagic or some other solution for this problem I would
>appreciate it very much.
>
>Thanks in advance,
>Kevin
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can also look into using Loadlin. It boots linux from windows 98,
which actually works out better than you would think (at least if you
set up a multiconfig autoexec.bat - the icon on the desktop thing just
seems cheesy to me)
------------------------------
From: "WoNkO" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Webacm 32 and IPMASQ
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2000 01:53:19 GMT
Greetings!
Here's my delimma, and I hope someone out there can help me :(... I'm
running a linux box serving as a firewall for my internal network.. on one
of my windoze machines (internal) I am running a webcam program that can
serve up a java utility to let users see live video on a web page. This
software (webcam32) serves up the java on port 8888 (also streams video on
this port).
I have used IPMASQADM to set up the following rule:
ipmasqadm portfw -a -P tcp -L $IP_REAL 8888 -R $TOIP_PC 8888
which SHOULD forward all traffic on port 8888 to my windoze box.... with no
luck :(
I was wondering if I have to REVERSE forward to get this streaming video to
work? If so, how?
Any help is appreciated!
Please reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BTW, I ran nmap, and port 8888 IS open on the internal machine...
------------------------------
From: "Lonni J. Friedman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: NT 4.0, DOS, Linux -- Is It Worth It?
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 20:20:07 -0400
Wayne Watson wrote:
> I just purchased RedHat 6.2. I have a computer with DOS and NT 4.0 installed on it,
>and would like
> to have all three available. I'm beginning to wonder if it's worth the trouble. I
>fired up the RH
> install disk and eventually was confronted with a screen that asks "Where do you
>want to install
> Linux?" and shows the following partitions:
> hda1 500M
> hda5 2G
> hda6 2G
> hda7 2G
> hda8 1.4G
>
> The partitions correspond to my C:, D:, E:, F:, and G: drives. DOS is on C: and NT
>4.0 is on D:.
> They are all partitioned as FAT.
Well that is problem #1. Linux needs an ext2 partition. Would you try
to install NT4 in a FAT32 partition??
>I suspect I want to tell the install program to start Linux at hda6
>
> or drive E:. I decided to call RH install support and they immediately suggested the
>NT How-To or
> using Partition Magic 5.0. The How-To seems unnecessarily complex and I really don't
>want to buy
> more s/w, especially if installing 6.2 with NT 4 .0 is going to be all that
>troublesome. That is,
> this experience does not inspire me to believe I can do the dual (triple?) dance
>without getting
> bit.
THe HOW-TO is complex in order to cover all possibilities. Would you
prefer that it was vague and incomplete? Read the HOW-TO, and then read
it again twice more. If you still have trouble understanding it, ask
specifically about what is confusing you here.
> BTW, why didn't Linux refer to the above partitions as hda1,2,3, ..., etc instead of
>hda1, 5,
> 6...?
Most likely because you have an extended partition which is holding
hda5, 6, 7 & 8. Sounds like you need to become alot better acquainted
with your computer if you are unaware how the HD is currently
partitioned.
> After pondering this for awhile and recalling that I did a similar installation with
>NT 4.0 and
> Linux successfully a few years ago, I almost feel as I can push on with the install
>by simply
> telling the install program to put Linux at hda6. I recall that I ended up with a
>Lilo boot, which
> was fine. Eventually I got killed by creating a new NT partition beyond the Linux
>partition, and
> could never boot Linux again. So for two years, I've stayed away from all this.
>However, the
> computer that I'm attempting to install NT 4.0 and Linux on is not my primary
>computer, so I'm not
> quite as concerned about a disaster over there. .
The only way you'll have a disaster is if you muck around with your
exteneded partition (hda2).
------------------------------
From: "Lonni J. Friedman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: fdisk and dos
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 21:12:24 -0400
"David .." wrote:
>
> paul simdars wrote:
> >
> > Has anyone used Linux fdisk to partition their dos drive? I have one
> > drive which has only dos partitions on it but dos doesn't seem to be
> > able to partition it correctly. It keeps adding an extra partition so I
> > thought I'd do it with Linux. Anyone had any experience?
> > Thanks.
> > Paul
>
> This is a newsgroup not a chat room. This is your 4th posting of the
> same question within 5 minutes. Relax and give someone time to answer.
He did a forth? I kill filed him after #3, as have many others i'd
imagine.
------------------------------
From: "Andrew N. McGuire " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: xmms
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 21:01:01 -0500
On Wed, 14 Jun 2000, Stephen E. Hargrove wrote:
+ "Andrew N. McGuire" wrote:
+
+ > Try it with your regular sound card drivers... I had this same problem
+ > before, what I did to fix it was this.
+ >
+ > 1. Open xmms.
+ > 2. Place your cursor over xmms and press Cntrl+P.
+ > 3. Under the Audio I/O Plugins tab, select MPEG Layer, then click
+ > 'Configure' [ make sure the plugin is enabled as well ].
+ > 4. Try setting decoder resolution to '8 bit'.
+ > 5. Try playing another mp3.
+ >
+ > If the above instructions do not work, you may email me at the address
+ > in my signature. The slowness you speak of is the EXACT same problem
+ > I had before, and the above is what I did to fix it.
+
+ Hi Andrew. Thanks for getting back with me. I tried the above, but it's the
+ same story. I tried it with soundon and also rebooting to the kernel which has
+
+ sound compiled in. I've set the resolution to 8 bits and alternated the sample
+
+ rate to 1:1, 1:2 and 1:4. I'm using the OSS driver for the output plugin. The
+
+ esound plugin moves slightly faster, but not enough to generate any sound.
+
+ Any thoughts you might have would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
Are you using a sound blaster pro/16?
If so try using these:
# Sound Blaster Pro/16 support:
/sbin/modprobe sb io=0x220 irq=5 dma=1 dma16=5 mpu_io=0x300
/sbin/modprobe opl3 io=0x388
/sbin/modprobe v_midi
To set up your sound card with the drivers that come with the kernel.
Also, do you have permissions to access /dev/dsp?
I would check these, if that dont work, let me know what kind of sound
card, and so forth that you have.... In addition to posting here,
feel free to cc me at the address in my signature, so I can give
a quicker response..
Good Luck!
anm
--
/*-------------------------------------------------------.
| Andrew N. McGuire |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
`-------------------------------------------------------*/
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.misc) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Misc Digest
******************************
