Linux-Misc Digest #832, Volume #24               Fri, 16 Jun 00 12:13:02 EDT

Contents:
  Re: hyper terminal on linux (Jose Santiago)
  Re: Linux erased Windows!!!!!!!!!!!! (Patricia)
  Re: installing packages in Redhat ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Redhat 6.x / Mandrake password probs. (Phill Harvey-Smith)
  Re: problem with copy_from_user ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: problem with copy_from_user ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: spontaneous read-only mailbox folders ("Frank Halley")
  Re: Strange telnet behavior from win98 (Dave Rolfe)
  Re: can't mount cd-rom (Tan Chee Sin)
  Re: installing packages in Redhat (Tan Chee Sin)
  xf86config - quantex monitor and intel video card (Ted)
  Re: minimal installation + seg fault at halt ("Peter T. Breuer")
  Re: http-analyze doesn't start ("Peter T. Breuer")
  Unknown HZ error ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: DOS for Linux (Frank Miles)
  Re: How Return to prompt login? (Floyd Davidson)
  Re: Where do I put the setserial command?? (Geoffrey Steeves)
  Re: Alpha vs Intel (JEDIDIAH)
  Re: reconstruct software RAID 1 (Joeri Sebrechts)
  Re: Pseudo terminals and PPP ("jj the bouncing fish")
  Re: Man pages extremely slow in X (Kevin Brown)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Jose Santiago <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: hyper terminal on linux
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 08:14:34 -0500

First of all, configure minicom as root:
        minicom -s
Set the communications parameters:
        9600/8/N/1. Be sure to turn off Hardware flow control.
        Remove the modem initialization string and hangup string.
        Select the proper comm port COM1=/dev/ttyS0 COM2=/dev/ttyS1
        Save this as the default.

Connect the console port on the cisco router to the proper serial port on your
Linux box.

Now when you run minicom you should be connected to the router. Hit enter a few
times to be sure. If the cable and comm port work under hyperterm they will work
under minicom.

You will need the magic key combination to bring up the minicom control console
(You can use this to configure minicom while it is running).
        <CTRL><SHIFT>A
        <SHIFT>Z
To leave configuration mode:
        <ESC>
For instance:
To Quit minicom:
        <CTRL><SHIFT>A <SHIFT>Z X <ESC>
Turn on Line wrap:
        <CTRL><SHIFT>A <SHIFT>Z W <ESC>

The minicom folks may have more information:
http://www.pp.clinet.fi/~walker/minicom.html

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> Is there any method to control a Cisco router on linux?
>

------------------------------

From: Patricia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux erased Windows!!!!!!!!!!!!
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 15:24:10 +0200

On Fri, 16 Jun 2000, Jacek Pop�awski wrote:
>fredrik wrote:
>>When I installed linux it erased windows 98 on my computer.
>
>cool! :-)
>
>>What can I do to get it back? 
>
>please run fdisk, you will see what is on your disk
Jacek
if you installed linux as a server, the whole HD is formatted and assigned to
Linux
this is explained in the manuals.
sorry for you.
Only thing to do is.
Rerun the installation, go to the part diskdruid, erase all the Linuxpartitions.
Start from a windows bootdisk, rerun fdisk, create the partitions (one for
windows, one for Linux)
install Windows, then install Linux (not the server)
install Lilo
 
--
Good Luck
Patricia
ICQ 69588792

http://www.crosswinds.net/~beginnerslinux
http://beginnerslinux.org
Red Hat Linux release 6.0 (Hedwig)
Kernel 2.2.5-15 
  3:28pm  up  2:07,  1 user,  load average: 1.05, 1.28, 1.40
Fri Jun 16 15:28:04 CEST 2000

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: installing packages in Redhat
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 13:22:56 GMT

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Jun 2000 14:15:21 +0800, Tan Chee Sin
> <<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> shouted forth into the ether:
> >I found that I did not install some packages which I need. How do I
> >install them? For example I need to install the gcc compiler.
>
> # rpm -Uvh packagename.rpm
>
> Pay attention to any error messages that you see.  Often, packages
depend
> on other packages which you must install first.
>
> --
> Matt G / Dances With Crows      /\    "Man could not stare too long
at the face
> \----[this space for rent]-----/  \   of the Computer or her children
and still
>  \There is no Darkness in Eternity \  remain as Man." --David
Zindell "So did
> But only Light too dim for us to see\ they become Gods, or
Usenetters?" --/me
>

You can also use gnomerpm or kpackage if you want a more graphical
interface.

gr,
erik


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Phill Harvey-Smith)
Subject: Re: Redhat 6.x / Mandrake password probs.
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 14:07:54 +0000

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dances With Crows) wrote in
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: 

>On Fri, 16 Jun 2000 10:20:24 +0000, Phill Harvey-Smith 
><<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> shouted forth into the ether:
>>I have a Redhat 6.1 system here at work and a Mandrake 6.1 system at
>>home both of which seem to have the same problem related to the
>>changing of passwords. If I have a user who's password filed contains
>>:*: and I try and change the password using the standard passwd program
>>it all apperears to work ok, but when I go back and check the file, the
>>password is still :*: and the user cannot log in. If there is already
>>an encrypted password in the field then the password is changed as
>>expected and the new password is inserted into the password field. 
>
>Feature?  Most of the default accounts that are created with *s in the
>password field are things like "news", "lp", and "daemon", which you
>shouldn't be logging in as anyway.  There's a workaround; merely edit
>the password file using vipw and remove the * for the user(s) you wish
>to change passwords on before running passwd.

By default when I create a user I set their password field to :*: and then 
use passwd to change it. This works on virtually every other *nix system 
that I have used, but seems broken on Redhat 6.x (and derived systems like 
Mandrake).

>>Plesae note I am *NOT* running shadow 
>>passwords, well I told it not to install shadow passwords at install
>>time. 
>
>This wasn't a good idea. 

In your opinion, yes I know the majority of people will think i am insane 
for not using shadow, but I do have my reasons for not doing so.
 
>                                 man pwconv so you can get shadow passwords
>up and running if you care at all about security.  Shadow passwords will
>probably also fix the problem with the passwd command....

I know about shadow passwords but I made a desision not to use them, the 
point is the above IMHO should work anyway, even if not using shadow.

Phill.


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: problem with copy_from_user
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 13:28:13 GMT

I've found the answer to my question...
it was a problem of copy&paste and
read&understand :-( ...

By the way...
what is the meaning of the 4th parameter
in the file_operations-structure in read and write????

struct file_operations {
...
   ssize_t (*read) (struct file *, char *, size_t, loff_t *);
   ssize_t (*write) (struct file *, const char *, size_t, loff_t *);
...
}


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: problem with copy_from_user
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 13:30:55 GMT

I've found the answer to my question...
it was a problem of copy&paste and
read&understand :-( ...

By the way...
what is the meaning of the 4th parameter
in the file_operations-structure in read and write????

struct file_operations {
...
   ssize_t (*read) (struct file *, char *, size_t, loff_t *);
   ssize_t (*write) (struct file *, const char *, size_t, loff_t *);
...
}


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

------------------------------

From: "Frank Halley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.networking
Subject: Re: spontaneous read-only mailbox folders
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2000 00:05:58 +1000

Had a similar problem myself yesterday!  Users (running POP3 clients under
Win95) kept getting the same mail over and over from the linux box.

Turned out to be a full disk partition!  A large file was left in /tmp by
some experiments with gzipping and tarring earlier in the day.  This is with
Redhat 6.0 installed as server (multiply disk partitions created).

Frank Halley

adam jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:8ib1do$luk$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> This morning I was informed that one of my users' inboxes had become read
only
> and she could not delete any of the mail in her box.  I subsequently found
> that all of the users had the same problem, even root.  I looked at the
> permissions of /var/log/spool/mail, and they all look right, though I'm
not
> sure what the higher-up folders permissions should be.  Any insight would
be
> appreciated.  I run RH 5.0 on a P166.
>
> Thanks a bunch,
>
>
> Adam
>



------------------------------

From: Dave Rolfe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Strange telnet behavior from win98
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 10:20:16 -0400

Mark Bratcher wrote:

> Dave Rolfe wrote:
> >
> > I have a win98 machine and start the version of telnet that comes with
> > win98 and connect just fine to a linux machine. But when I try to vi a
> > file I get into trouble. Most things seem to be working but when I go
> > into insert mode and hit enter to create a new line .... I enter the
> > twilight zone. Instead of a new line, I get a sort of truncated copy of
> > the current line! Nothing I do lets me create a new line. So what is
> > going on? Any thoughts?
> >
>
> The Windows telnet program is seriously hosed.
>
> Get PuTTY, it is a lot smarter.
>
> --
> Mark Bratcher
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> Escape from Microsoft's proprietary tentacles: use Linux!

Thanks to everyone for your advise. Windows telnet is seriously hosed????
What a surprise!! :-)

Dave


------------------------------

Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 22:53:22 +0800
From: Tan Chee Sin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: can't mount cd-rom



DeAnn Iwan wrote:

> Tan Chee Sin wrote:
> >
> > Patricia wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 15 Jun 2000, Tan Chee Sin wrote:
> > > >"Lonni J. Friedman" wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> I have no clue what fsconf is, although i'm guessing that its some
> > > >> distro-specific proprietary piece of software.  Why not just mount your
> > > >> drive manually with:
> > > >> mount -t iso9660 /dev/cdrom /mnt/cdrom
> > > >>
> > > >> Tan Chee Sin wrote:
> > > >> > I ran fsconf, selected the entry: /dev/cdrom    /mnt/cdrom    iso9660
> > > >> > clicked on the Mount button, then Yes, it reports "Mount successful",
> > > >> > but the fsconf window doesn't show that it is mounted, and I can't
> > > >> > access the cd-rom still. What's wrong?
> > > >
> > > >Thanks. After I entered the command that you've suggested, I get this
> > > >message:
> > > >mount: /dev/cdrom: can't read superblock
> > > >
> > > >fsconf is the File System Configurator for Redhat Linux, one of things you
> > > >could do with it is to mount file systems like floppy and cd-rom.
> > > >
> > > >Chee Sin
> > > Are you mounting a data CD-ROM?
> > >
> >
> >
>
>     could it be that your are trying to read a RW CD on a CDROM drive
> that cannot read such a CD?  (and so sees no file system on the CD)

I tried both a normal CD and a CD-R CD, it gave the same error. It seems that my
CD-ROM did not exist. But the CD-ROM work when I boot to Winnt.

--
Regards,
Chee Sin



------------------------------

Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 22:54:58 +0800
From: Tan Chee Sin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: installing packages in Redhat

Thank you. I think I need to figure out what packages I'm missing, then install
them.

Dances With Crows wrote:

> On Fri, 16 Jun 2000 14:15:21 +0800, Tan Chee Sin
> <<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> shouted forth into the ether:
> >I found that I did not install some packages which I need. How do I
> >install them? For example I need to install the gcc compiler.
>
> # rpm -Uvh packagename.rpm
>
> Pay attention to any error messages that you see.  Often, packages depend
> on other packages which you must install first.
>
> --
> Matt G / Dances With Crows      /\    "Man could not stare too long at the face
> \----[this space for rent]-----/  \   of the Computer or her children and still
>  \There is no Darkness in Eternity \  remain as Man." --David Zindell "So did
> But only Light too dim for us to see\ they become Gods, or Usenetters?" --/me

--
Regards,
Chee Sin



------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ted)
Subject: xf86config - quantex monitor and intel video card
Date: 16 Jun 2000 14:46:45 GMT

First off I'd like to thank everyone who responded to my last question 
about partitioning with fips.  The answers were very helpful.  

I have successfully installed Debian and am now attempting to run 
xf86config from root to set-up X.  I have run into several problems 
identifying the hardware in my Quantex P3 which I purchased about 5 months 
ago.

1)  This will probably show my newbie-ness, but in the documentation that 
comes with my Quantex XP190A monitor it does not list horizontal or 
vertical sync, although there are values for 'horizont and vertical scan 
frequencies'.  Is this the same as sync?  The number listed are 30KHz to 96 
KHz for horizontal scan and 50Hz to 180Hz for vertical scan.  These numbers 
are quite a bit wider in range than the settings listed in xf86config.  Can 
anyone with some knowledge or a similar monitor tell me if there is a good 
preset to use or should I manually enter the above values?  Given the stern 
warnings that settings an overzealous sync rate can permanently damage my 
monitor, I'm reluctant to try anything without some advice.\

2)  Looking under control panel in Win98 my video card says Quantex XP190 
on Intel810 Chipset Graphics Driver PV2.1.  I assume that Intel810 is the 
model of the card, however I do not see this listed on the list of video 
cards provided with xf86config.  Can anyone suggest how I should proceed?  
Will I be unable to run X because my hardware is not currently supported?  
Anyone with the same card comment?

All responses will be greatly appreciated, as I am (clearly) quite new to 
it all.

Thanks,
Ted Schuman

------------------------------

From: "Peter T. Breuer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: minimal installation + seg fault at halt
Date: 16 Jun 2000 14:59:32 GMT

Greg B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: installation I found ... gnome libs and a few modules that requires it. Then
: I tried Debian 2.1.  In this case I can choose anything, but packages
: although quite stable are a little bit outdated (for example gtk is in
: version 1.1) and I would have to download quite a large number of megabytes

And what's wrong with that? You KNOW you don't need any more.

: over slow modem line to upgrade a few libs and programs to do what I want.
: Maybe some distributions have a "secret key" to allow more flexible
: installation? Or any other way to do that?

Redhat is very bad at allowing control over install.  In my experience
SuSE is very good.  I didn't have any problem installing without X.  But
any RPM based packet manager will have certain difficulties because it
can't really tell the difference between what it is absolutely necessary
to have from a "it works" point of view and what it is absolutely
necessary to have from a "it is sensible" point of view.  (i.e.  it
lacks modalities in its understanding of dependency logic).

And of course, if you want to you can rpm or dpkg the packets
individually, or uninstall them one by one afterwards.  I installed all
of debian that way back a year ago now, when the 2.1 was very beta and
didn't have a working installer.


Peter

------------------------------

From: "Peter T. Breuer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: http-analyze doesn't start
Date: 16 Jun 2000 14:48:49 GMT

Patrick van der Smagt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: # ls -l http-analyze
: -rwxr-xr-x   1 www      www        305294 Apr  2  1998 http-analyze
: # ./http-analyze
: ./http-analyze: Command not found.

Uses a dynamic linker or libc you don't have.

: # file http-analyze
: http-analyze: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1, dynamically
: linked (uses shared libs), not stripped

And what would those be? Try "ldd ./http-analyze".

: # strace http-analyze 
: execve("./http-analyze", ["http-analyze"], [/* 53 vars */]) = 0
: strace: exec: No such file or directory

Yeah. Linked to linker libraries you don't have.

Peter

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Unknown HZ error
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 14:54:04 GMT

I have started to get an error message to the screen when I issue my
system (Slackware v2.2.10) certain commands  (top, lsof, ps, w (but not
who) among others) I get the same message no matter what shell I try.

the error message is:

Unknown HZ value! (14) Assume 100.

the value 14 seems to be incrementing on about a 24 hour period

there is no entry into the syslog or messages file. Now I found an
entry in the /etc/login.defs file setting HZ = 100 but it does not seem
to be reading this file.

As far as I can tell, nobody changed anything on the system

Can anyone point me in the direction as to what HZ is/does and how to
fix this problem?

thanks


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank Miles)
Subject: Re: DOS for Linux
Date: 16 Jun 2000 14:56:53 GMT

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Is there a "comercial" DOS emulator that runs under Linux and is able to
>share data with other applications (cut & paste) under linux.
>
>To switch to Linux, I need some DOS programs to run that do not run
>under DOSEMU.  This is an excellent program, but not perfected enough
>for my needs.
>
>My programs do run under OS/2 DOS emulation.

Have you tried running dosemu with debugging messages routed to a file?
You may be able to find what the problem is, and change the appropriate
configuration values to make it run.  Do a 'man dos' to find out more
about how to do this.

For example, I have a dos config file with conditionals in it, only
allowing those additional ports, DPMI, etc., that a particular application
needs.  You don't want to give dos more than it absolutely needs, or
you will be more vulnerable to one of many dos fragilities!

        -frank


-- 

------------------------------

From: Floyd Davidson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How Return to prompt login?
Date: 16 Jun 2000 06:27:28 -0800

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>  Floyd Davidson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>How I can find bare.i image? This maybe the only possible to me,
>in fact "timeout" in lilo.conf seem to be set equal to zero.
>On the Slackware site is possible to create this diskette via network
>for Slack 4.0, 3.9 or less (I'm not
>sure for the version number I have, however my kernel is
>2.2.4 ?
>Can I create a boot bar.i image from any kernel or distribution as for
>example from Slack 7.0? My experience with in linux is limitted

It is on the distribution CD if you have one or have a friend
who does.  It is also available on sunsite or any mirror ftp
archive of the slackware distribution.  Ftp to sunsite.unc.edu,
cd to directory /pub/linux/distributions/slackware/bootdsks.144
and there it will be.

  Floyd

-- 
Floyd L. Davidson                          [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska)

------------------------------

From: Geoffrey Steeves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Where do I put the setserial command??
Date: 16 Jun 2000 15:33:13 GMT


: /sbin/init.d/boot.local or /etc/rc.d/rc.local is the right location for
: such a command.

I've got /etc/rc0.d all the way up to /etc/rc6.d any suggestions as to which
one I should put the command in?  I'm using Corel's distro.  Thanks again!



             Geoff Steeves // University of Alberta Physics //

                        http://www.ualberta.ca/~gsteeves
===============================================================================

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (JEDIDIAH)
Crossposted-To: 
comp.unix.admin,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix,linux.redhat,comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.help
Subject: Re: Alpha vs Intel
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 15:43:04 GMT

On Fri, 16 Jun 2000 12:49:15 GMT, Ben Chausse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Well, we will have RealServer 7.0, plus about 3000 MP3's to serve to 600
>employee, 3000 static web pages, about 500 php and perl web applications, a
>huge database...

        ...then that sounds like you need a huge database machine and
        a minor file server/shoutcast server and that your web service
        may or may not be fully exploited on such a machine (alpha).

>
>
>Mark Rafn wrote:
>
>> Ben Chausse  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >I build a Intranet WebServer on Linux with Apache 1.3.12, mod_perl 1.49
>> >and PHP4 and I would like to know what will the best between a server
>> >with 2x667 MHZ Alpha Processer and a 4x700 MHZ Xeon Processer ??
>>
>> Lordie!  What are you doing on your intranet that you need such power?
>> Unless you've got a pretty specific task that's very processor-intensive,
>> you'll bottleneck on I/O long before CPU on either of these platforms.
>>
>> In general, for webserving, you'd rather have multiple
>> load-balanced/redundant machines over one monster machine.
>> --
>> Mark Rafn    [EMAIL PROTECTED]    <http://www.dagon.net/>
>


-- 
              ...However it is easier to dumb down a general
interface than to add generality to a limited set of choices,...  
                                                -Leslie Mikes-

                                                                        |||
                                                                       / | \
    
                                      Need sane PPP docs? Try penguin.lvcm.com.

------------------------------

From: Joeri Sebrechts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: reconstruct software RAID 1
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 15:57:29 GMT

sda2 is an extended partition.
You can have at most 4 primary (== bootable) partitions.
But you can make one of those primary partitions extended, so you can
create partitions in the partition (to be able to make more than 4
partitions).
So you'll need to create an extended partition for sda2. And then you'll
need to make logical partitions on sda2 (fdisk should be able to do
this, although I don't remember how, because I rarely use fdisk).
This is all MUCH easier if you have partition magic, and it's fantastic
bootdisk. But, again, fdisk should be able to make logical partitions on
sda2.
The first logical will become sda5, and the second sda6, and so on ...
It's even so that windows98 can only see one primary partition per disk,
and the rest needs to be extended.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> Well, good news and bad news...you were right, it does require you fdisk
> it before and use /dev/sdbX for the reconstruct, but now this is my
> problem:
> 
> I re-installed from scratch (RedHat 6.2) just so I could see the default
> partition structure in fdisk so I could rebuild it if I ever had to, and
> this is what it shows for sda and sdb (for sda, it is /dev/sdaX and visa
> versa, but everything else is the same):
> 
> Device        Boot    Start    End    Blocks      ID    System
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> /dev/sda1      *         1     255   2048256     fd     Linux Raid Array
> /dev/sda2               256    1106  6835657+     5     Extended
> /dev/sda5               256    272    136521     fd     Linux Raid Array
> /dev/sda6               273    1106  6699073     fd     Linux Raid Array
> 
> First of all, what is that partition on sda2?!  how do I make it?  also,
> what does that '+' mean?  also, when creating partitions, fdisk will only
> allow you to creat 1-4 (sdX1 - sdX4), so how do I make 5 and 6 (or does it
> matter)?  I think that covers everything, I hope someone knows what this
> means...
> 
>              Dan
> 
> P.S.  How do you make your scsi card re-scan your scsi devices under linux?
> 
> Howard Cokl wrote:
> >
> > Did you partition the new disk before you put it in?  I think your first
> > raidhotadd should be raidhotadd /dev/md0 /dev/sdb1.  Don't know for
> > certain but I had a similar problem when I was building a RAID system
> > w/Slackware.  I don't recall what exactly I did but it could have been
> > that the disk I was hotadding wasn't fdisk'd right.  For / it should be
> > type fd (RAID autodetect)
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > I was hoping my first software RAID questions was going to be "how can
> I
> > > hotswap", but I guess we'll start here:
> > >
> > > I have two 9.1 gig SCSI drive in a RAID-1 setup under RedHat 6.2.  I
> have
> > > three mounts, /, /home, and my swap partition (md0, md1, and md2).  To
> > > test out my setup I shutdown, removed the second drive, put in a new
> drive
> > > and turned the computer back on.  I did as I thought I should and ran:
> > >
> > > raidhotadd /dev/md0 /dev/sdb
> > >
> > > this worked fine, the drives started humming away, I checked
> > > the /proc/mdstat and it told me that md0 was being recovered, how far
> it
> > > was through the recovery, and aproximately how long it would take to
> > > finish the rebuild.  At the end of the rebuild of md0, these two lines
> > > came up on the screen:
> > >
> > > md1: no spare disk to reconstruct array!  -- continuing in degraded
> mode.
> > > md2: no spare disk to reconstruct array!  -- continuing in degraded
> mode.
> > >
> > > then I try to do what would seem to be the next logical step:
> > >
> > > raidhotadd /dev/md1 /dev/sdb
> > >
> > > this command give me the following error:
> > >
> > > trying to Hotadd  sdb to md1...
> > > md error: md_input_device() returned -17
> > > /dev/md1: cannot hotadd disk: invalid arguement
> > >
> > > If anyone has any insight as to why this is happening, please share.  I
> > > can't find a scrap of information online.
> > >
> > >             Dan
> > >
> > > --
> > > Posted via CNET Help.com
> > > http://www.help.com/
> >
> > --
> > Howard Cokl
> > Information Systems - Security Administrator
> > Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute
> > Detroit, MI 48201
> > 313 833-0715 x2422
> 
> --
> Posted via CNET Help.com
> http://www.help.com/

------------------------------

From: "jj the bouncing fish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Pseudo terminals and PPP
Crossposted-To: 
comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.os.linux.development.apps,comp.os.linux.networking
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 15:58:45 GMT

sounds like you want PPPoe (PPP over Ethernet).  It is used by ADSL users
in Ontario, Canada so bell can control their usage...  I have had two
streams running from the same computer before.

I know there is source out there for it.  

good luck

Craig Allan Jeffree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in article
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...

>         If anyone can offer some suggestions it would be a great help.
> 
> Thanks for your advice

------------------------------

From: Kevin Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.redhat
Subject: Re: Man pages extremely slow in X
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 16:06:40 GMT

When I run on the consoles 1-6, the man pages appear fine, takes no time at all for
them to come up.

Kevin

Adam Schuetze wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> Not long ago, in a galaxy somewhat nearby,  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Kevin Brown wrote:
> >
> > > I'm running RedHat Linux 6.2 on a dual processor Pentium II 266
> > > Intergraph machine.  When I try to do a man page in an xterm, it takes
> > > at least a minute to bring up each individual page, and completely locks
> > > up the entire system, including the mouse.  Control comes back as soon
> > > as the man page is displayed.
> > >
> > > If someone could help me with this I would appreciate it.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Kevin
> >
> > Does this only happen the first time you open each man page? If you reopen
> > the same man page does it still happen?
> >
> > The first time you open a man page, it goes through some extra steps of
> > being formatted, and various other 'generation' type things. This often
> > slows for first opening, but not thereafter.
>
> Yeah, but really now... these extra steps should pose no
> difficulty to the kind of hardware he's talking about.
>
> I've run linux on a lot of low powered systems (ever tried
> running X on a 486 laptop? :>).  Never have I see big
> lags/freezes assocated with loading up man pages.  This is
> most definately not "business as usual."
>
> Out of curiosity, what happens when you jump to a console?  Do
> you have your /etc/inittab configured to have getty's sitting on
> tty1...6?  Do you get the same lags when you load up man pages
> from console?
>
> cheers,
>
> - --
> Adam Schuetze <adam_schuetze at iname dot com> Get my pgp keys
> at http://tirith.me.uvic.ca/~schuetze - rsa f'print B8 80 DA D6 BB CA 80
> 5F C5 68 1C 08 FE 3E 65 1C - dss f'print 46 CB B3 C3 A1 C9 BA 57 7C B4 A1 6A
> BF 8F 2D 95 2B 7A 1D 77 - GE/CS d+(-) s a25 C++(+++)>$ UL/S++>+++ P+>+++ L+++>$
> E(-) W++ N+(++) o+ K- w--- O- M-- V-- PS+(+++) P++ Y++ PGP++ t--- 5-- X+ R !tv
> b+(+++) DI++++ D--- G++ e++>e++++ h! r-- y+
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGP 6.5.2
> Comment: Linux and PGP, get yours today!
>
> iQEVAwUBOUoByupyocWvYyjpAQGv1AgAv3LtV0QQ1N5+WaocDo/+TAQup1DYIji6
> i8ZxDhcm4n7y1KGuwq+9CW2aCgveK3Ly+p5LiT9pAEF/gwz3qulgNGebS9SXkaV6
> fVoatqaltvc9ZkexBPwjlRFGVLVUgTyRFEV++cmmVqgiutSpSM3/b0Ry99BQtu6j
> RS2lMGlr/R+6UImcs+Iq+Qas5JUfSR1Opt44NphMEFmVNQDytivO/XwcQYT9e+n/
> ntER5jEbZxRmZML7tsNXP6a494U6WGuAjTOzVgE6SYFrQHM5Q0gS2rIetUCm1Nqo
> 662AIgD0leiRMIUhQam5Q44qqIfoNrobl8iQAQAsL3M0cXHoGIKl1w==
> =9e/z
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.misc) via:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Misc Digest
******************************

Reply via email to