Linux-Misc Digest #825, Volume #25               Thu, 21 Sep 00 14:13:02 EDT

Contents:
  Re: Making XDM work like startx --bpp16 (Andreas K�h�ri)
  Re: shutting down a process at shutdown (Ralph Churchill)
  Re: Interface eth0 won't come up on boot.... ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: End-User Alternative to Windows ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Encyppt whole Linux system ? (Beggar)
  Re: linux screws up windoze filesystem ? (Andreas K�h�ri)
  URGENT: cksum inconsistency ("visor-palm John")
  Re: Creating a hard link to a directory.... (Grant Edwards)
  Re: linux screws up windoze filesystem ? (Ian Davey)
  kernel debugging courses? (Andrew Broman)
  Re: URGENT: cksum inconsistency (Andreas K�h�ri)
  Re: shutting down a process at shutdown (Andreas K�h�ri)
  HELP:  Printing Problem (Matthew Lybanon)
  What kind of Editor/Browser to read *.sgml files? (Ulrich Brachvogel)
  Re: linux screws up windoze filesystem ? (Florian E.J. Fruth)
  Two network interface = 200 Mbps throughput? (Beggar)
  SCSI tape problems (Malte Starostik)
  Re: Two network interface = 200 Mbps throughput? ("Simon")
  Re: Two network interface = 200 Mbps throughput? (Andreas Schweitzer)
  Re: shutting down a process at shutdown (Malte Starostik)
  Re: Power management in Xfree? (Joshua Baker-LePain)
  Re: shutting down a process at shutdown (Ralph Churchill)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: Making XDM work like startx --bpp16
From: Andreas K�h�ri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 21 Sep 2000 18:27:00 +0100

In article <8qda34$39$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Making XDM work like startx --bpp16
>
>My xdm starts in 8 bit mode. how can I get it to work like startx -
>bpp16??
>
>
>Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
>Before you buy.


Change your /etc/X11/XF86Config from saying "DefaultColorDepth 8" to
saying "DefaultColorDepth 16" in the 'Screen' sections.

/A



-- 
Andreas K�h�ri, <URL:http://hello.to/andkaha/>. Junk mail, no.
========================================================================
What part of "GNU" did you not understand? <URL:http://www.gnu.org/>

------------------------------

From: Ralph Churchill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: shutting down a process at shutdown
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 16:16:24 GMT


> You added e.g. an S90oracle script? Then you should have a K90oracle
> script in the same run-level directories too... Both should be
> symlinks to the script in /etc/rc.d/init.d. I think that's the way it
> works in Red Hat too (I use Debian).
>

Heres' what I've got:

./rc0.d/K00oracle
./rc1.d/K00oracle
./rc2.d/K00oracle
./rc3.d/S99oracle
./rc4.d/S99oracle
./rc5.d/S99oracle
./rc6.d/K00oracle

All symlinks to ./init.d/oracle. Do I need a K00oracle AND an S99oracle
at each run level?

RMC


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Interface eth0 won't come up on boot....
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 16:21:53 GMT

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
  Brian Dotzour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is support for your card built into your kernel or is it loaded via a
> module?
> If it's a module, you want to add "alias eth0 <modulename>" to the
file
> /etc/modules.conf.
> otherwise, hmmm........
>
> Dave Barcelo wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >     I have an RH 6.2 system and I have my nic configured to come up
on
> > boot but it isn't working.  I have the ONBOOT flag set to yes in
> > /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0.  What is the deal.  I can
> > bring it up manualy but can't bring it up on boot.
> >
> > Thanx in advance.
>
>
Is it a laptop? If it is, you have to make sure the PCMCIA service
starts before the network service. I just had that problem


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: End-User Alternative to Windows
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 16:35:22 GMT

In comp.os.linux.misc Brian V. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: Really?  Which ones were those that came with the source code?

BSD
Perhaps the original AT&T UNIX as well?

-- 
   Jeff Gentry  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"You're one of those condescending UNIX users! ...."
"Here's a nickel kid ... get yourself a real computer."

------------------------------

From: Beggar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.security,comp.os.linux.setup,tw.bbs.comp.linux
Subject: Encyppt whole Linux system ?
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 00:28:41 +0800

Hi all,

I am developing a product that base on Linux box. Is there any method
that can
encypt the whole file system that cannot be read by someone who have
access
the machine physically.
At least, I don't want people use other system boot up the machine and
mount the Linux system.

Many thanks for any help!!

Dicky


------------------------------

Subject: Re: linux screws up windoze filesystem ?
From: Andreas K�h�ri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 21 Sep 2000 18:40:53 +0100

In article <8qdb87$ld2$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Florian E.J. Fruth  <fejf@gmx*/dev/null*.de> wrote:
>Andreas K�h�ri wrote:
>
>[cut]
> 
>> One thing you do wrong is that you give the file a name that does not
>> fit into what the specification of the file system on the Windows
>> partition thinks is legal. Don't do that.
>
>don't think so - it's nearly with every filename (e.g. "kernel v2.4.0-test8"
>or isn't this a correct filename?


No, it's an illegal FAT32 file name. When using FAT32 you may only
have 8+3 letters in the file name (see below though).


> 
>> You might also have mounted it as having the wrong file system type.
>> What does Windows say about the file system type of the partition?
>
>what do u mean exacly with this ?
>it's fat32 on a 45gb harddisk...
>fejf


>From the Filesystem HOWTO:

        Windows 95/98 and Windows NT/2000 store long filenames on FAT
        in special directory entries with set attributes ReadOnly,
        Hidden, System and Volume, so if you access FAT volume from
        DOS you don't see these "files". These special entries have
        this mad structure:

        byte              sequence number for slot
        string(10)        first 5 characters in name 
        byte              attribute byte 
        byte              always 0
        byte              checksum for 8.3 alias
        string(12)        6 more characters in name
        word              starting cluster number, 0 in long slots
        string(4)         last 2 characters in name

        Problem occur when you delete or modify file with long name
        from system without VFAT support, because only DOS 8+3 entry
        will be deleted or modified. Scandisk from Windows 95/98 can
        repair this problem.


/A

-- 
Andreas K�h�ri, <URL:http://hello.to/andkaha/>. Junk mail, no.
========================================================================
What part of "GNU" did you not understand? <URL:http://www.gnu.org/>

------------------------------

From: "visor-palm John" <j$ohn$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: URGENT: cksum inconsistency
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 09:40:57 -0700

Here's some unusual behavior of my Linux system:

System:  Pentium
RedHat Linux 6.1, 2.2.12-20 #1 Mon Sep 27 10:25:54 EDT 1999 i586 unknown
glibc:  libc-2.1.2.so
RAM:  160M

I was seeing some serious wierdness when un-tarring files relating to
CHECKSUM issues.
So I took a file from another LINUX box (Box_Good) and moved it to this box
(Box_Bad)
Then did a "cksum" on each file on each machine, here's the output:

Box_Good
$ cksum weblogic510.tar
1137249719 70144000 weblogic.tar
$ cksum weblogic510.tar
1137249719 70144000 weblogic.tar
$ cksum weblogic510.tar
1137249719 70144000 weblogic.tar

Box_Bad
$ cksum weblogic510.tar
1518445659 70144000 weblogic510.tar
$ cksum weblogic510.tar
660226238 70144000 weblogic510.tar
$ cksum weblogic510.tar
699912833 70144000 weblogic510.tar
$ cksum weblogic510.tar
2990202343 70144000 weblogic510.tar

Notice how the cksum's are moving around on Box_Bad but consistent on
Box_Good...any ideas?

John




------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Grant Edwards)
Subject: Re: Creating a hard link to a directory....
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 16:47:36 GMT

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Rob Blomquist wrote:

>I'm trying to make a hard link from a directory in my home directory to
>/mnt/robbo.

AFAIK, ext2 doesn't support hard links to directories.

This is a Good Thing(TM), because hard links to directories
cause all sorts of breakage and misery.  The filesystem
utilities (fsck, du, find, etc.) all assume that a directory is
tree structured (each directory has exactly one parent).

Way back when, SunOS (BSD) used to allow hard links to
directories. I did it once (it's not something anybody ever did
a second time).  All hell breaks loose.  Your filesystem won't
pass fsck and no matter how many times you answer 'y' to the
"fix it?" questions.

Use a symbolic link.  Really.

-- 
Grant Edwards                   grante             Yow!  Edwin Meese made me
                                  at               wear CORDOVANS!!
                               visi.com            

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ian Davey)
Subject: Re: linux screws up windoze filesystem ?
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 16:48:39 GMT

In article <8qdb87$ld2$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Florian E.J. Fruth 
<fejf@gmx*/dev/null*.de> wrote:
>don't think so - it's nearly with every filename (e.g. "kernel v2.4.0-test8"
>or isn't this a correct filename?
> 
>> You might also have mounted it as having the wrong file system type.
>> What does Windows say about the file system type of the partition?
>
>what do u mean exacly with this ?
>it's fat32 on a 45gb harddisk...

It may because NT seems to pretend to do long filenames, whilst still using 
8.3 filenames (i.e. if you go to a directory filled with .html files and do 
del *.htm, it'll delete those files despite them not having a .htm filename). 
It seems to store both a long and short filename for each file.

Maybe the disk doctor utility is just being a little more picky in what it 
will accept.

ian.

 \ /
(@_@)  http://www.eclipse.co.uk/sweetdespise/ (dark literature)
/(&)\  http://www.eclipse.co.uk/sweetdespise/libertycaptions/ (art)
 | |

------------------------------

From: Andrew Broman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.help
Subject: kernel debugging courses?
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 09:42:47 -0700

Does anyone know whether there are short (week-long) courses available
on debugging the Linux kernel? I've done a great deal of searching on
the web, and I've found several courses on device drivers, but none on
kernel debugging.

Thanks,

Andrew Broman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


------------------------------

Subject: Re: URGENT: cksum inconsistency
From: Andreas K�h�ri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 21 Sep 2000 18:59:27 +0100

In article <8qddpc$alk$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
visor-palm John <j$ohn$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Here's some unusual behavior of my Linux system:
>
>System:  Pentium
>RedHat Linux 6.1, 2.2.12-20 #1 Mon Sep 27 10:25:54 EDT 1999 i586 unknown
>glibc:  libc-2.1.2.so
>RAM:  160M
>
>I was seeing some serious wierdness when un-tarring files relating to
>CHECKSUM issues.
>So I took a file from another LINUX box (Box_Good) and moved it to this box
>(Box_Bad)
>Then did a "cksum" on each file on each machine, here's the output:
>
>Box_Good
>$ cksum weblogic510.tar
>1137249719 70144000 weblogic.tar
>$ cksum weblogic510.tar
>1137249719 70144000 weblogic.tar
>$ cksum weblogic510.tar
>1137249719 70144000 weblogic.tar
>
>Box_Bad
>$ cksum weblogic510.tar
>1518445659 70144000 weblogic510.tar
>$ cksum weblogic510.tar
>660226238 70144000 weblogic510.tar
>$ cksum weblogic510.tar
>699912833 70144000 weblogic510.tar
>$ cksum weblogic510.tar
>2990202343 70144000 weblogic510.tar
>
>Notice how the cksum's are moving around on Box_Bad but consistent on
>Box_Good...any ideas?
>
>John


Are you doing this on "Box_Bad" while the file is arriving to the box?
What does 'md5sum' say?

/A


-- 
Andreas K�h�ri, <URL:http://hello.to/andkaha/>. Junk mail, no.
========================================================================
What part of "GNU" did you not understand? <URL:http://www.gnu.org/>

------------------------------

Subject: Re: shutting down a process at shutdown
From: Andreas K�h�ri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 21 Sep 2000 19:03:59 +0100

In article <8qdc80$2tl$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Ralph Churchill  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> You added e.g. an S90oracle script? Then you should have a K90oracle
>> script in the same run-level directories too... Both should be
>> symlinks to the script in /etc/rc.d/init.d. I think that's the way it
>> works in Red Hat too (I use Debian).
>>
>
>Heres' what I've got:
>
>./rc0.d/K00oracle
>./rc1.d/K00oracle
>./rc2.d/K00oracle
>./rc3.d/S99oracle
>./rc4.d/S99oracle
>./rc5.d/S99oracle
>./rc6.d/K00oracle
>
>All symlinks to ./init.d/oracle. Do I need a K00oracle AND an S99oracle
>at each run level?

Did I say that? Yes I did... dumb.

I *think* (I'm very careful now) that there should be a *start* script
in the directory for runlevel 2, not a kill script...

/A

-- 
Andreas K�h�ri, <URL:http://hello.to/andkaha/>. Junk mail, no.
========================================================================
What part of "GNU" did you not understand? <URL:http://www.gnu.org/>

------------------------------

From: Matthew Lybanon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: HELP:  Printing Problem
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 12:10:05 -0500

First, the context:
Linux Mandrake 7.0, 2.2.14-15mdk
i686 processor

For some time I've been wrestling with a printing problem.  Every time
I send a file to the printer, there is a message saying there is no
daemon present.  It is necessary (with root privileges) to stop and
restart /etc/lpd.  Then printing takes place normally, but I have to do
it again the next time.

I had this problem before.  It was cured (apparently) when I found that
the IP address of one of the printers in the /etc/hosts file was
incorrect.  Putting in the right numbers made printing normal (and also
made startup faster).

But after a reboot the "no daemon present" problem returned.  The hosts
file has the correct IP addresses, so the problem is somewhere else.

I can log in as root or a different user, and the problem is still
there.  Whatever it is, it is not local to my user account.  I normally
use Gnome, but switching to KDE makes no difference.

Our overworked systems manager is at a loss.  If anyone can suggest a
place to start looking, it would be a great help.  The problem is just a
nuisance; it doesn't prevent me from printing altogether.  But it would
be good to find the source of the problem.

--
 =================================================================
 | Matthew Lybanon                     | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
 | Mapping, Charting, & Geodesy Branch |                         |
 | Naval Research Laboratory           | (228) 688-5576          |
 | Stennis Space Center, MS 39529      | (228) 688-4853 (fax)    |
 | USA                                 |                         |
 =================================================================




------------------------------

From: Ulrich Brachvogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: What kind of Editor/Browser to read *.sgml files?
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 19:11:39 +0200

Hi,
maybe a dumb question: but I couldn't find anything about the sgml-format.
NetScape / StarOffice refuse to read or  give only text inclusive tags.
TIA TTFN
// <( ) 
//    \______// 
//     \____/    Ulrich Brachvogel 
//       / \     "Save The Curlew!" 

------------------------------

From: Florian E.J. Fruth <fejf@gmx*/dev/null*.de>
Subject: Re: linux screws up windoze filesystem ?
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 19:28:32 +0200

Andreas K�h�ri wrote:

> In article <8qdb87$ld2$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Florian E.J. Fruth  <fejf@gmx*/dev/null*.de> wrote:
> >Andreas K�h�ri wrote:
> >
> >[cut]
> > 
> >> One thing you do wrong is that you give the file a name that does not
> >> fit into what the specification of the file system on the Windows
> >> partition thinks is legal. Don't do that.
> >
> >don't think so - it's nearly with every filename (e.g. "kernel
> >v2.4.0-test8" or isn't this a correct filename?
> 
> 
> No, it's an illegal FAT32 file name. When using FAT32 you may only
> have 8+3 letters in the file name (see below though).
> 
> 
> > 
> >> You might also have mounted it as having the wrong file system type.
> >> What does Windows say about the file system type of the partition?
> >
> >what do u mean exacly with this ?
> >it's fat32 on a 45gb harddisk...
> >fejf
> 
> 
> From the Filesystem HOWTO:
> 
> Windows 95/98 and Windows NT/2000 store long filenames on FAT
> in special directory entries with set attributes ReadOnly,
> Hidden, System and Volume, so if you access FAT volume from
> DOS you don't see these "files". These special entries have
> this mad structure:
> 
> byte              sequence number for slot
> string(10)        first 5 characters in name
> byte              attribute byte
> byte              always 0
> byte              checksum for 8.3 alias
> string(12)        6 more characters in name
> word              starting cluster number, 0 in long slots
> string(4)         last 2 characters in name
> 
> Problem occur when you delete or modify file with long name
> from system without VFAT support, because only DOS 8+3 entry
> will be deleted or modified. Scandisk from Windows 95/98 can
> repair this problem.
> 
> 
> /A

but with vfat linux should support long filenames, or ?
so it shouldn't be a problem on (re-)naming a file to more than 8.3 ?
fejf

-- 
Words u don't want to hear from your sysadmin:
Ooops. Save your work - FAST !

------------------------------

From: Beggar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.setup,tw.bbs.comp.linux
Subject: Two network interface = 200 Mbps throughput?
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 01:24:02 +0800

Hi all,

I want to run a server program that use more than 100Mbps but don't
want to buy a gigabit ethernet. I am considering use two NICs using
the same IP (or different IP) to fully utilize the CPU power.
Is there any exist program or method that can bridging between the
server program and the NICs  ?

I know Windows 2000 have such function. Any expert can help ??

Thanks very much !!

Dicky


------------------------------

From: Malte Starostik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: SCSI tape problems
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 19:27:52 +0200

Hello,

I've got a problem with a SCSI tape (ARCHIVE Python 04106-XXX Rev: 7350).
After some (random) amount of uptime, any communication with the drive 
fails until after the next power cycle. Any attempt to access the drive (mt 
status is enough to trigger it) results in an I/O error and a log like this:

Sep 21 19:23:47 anwalt kernel: st0: Error 26030000 (sugg. bt 0x20, driver 
bt 0x26, host bt 0x3).

What does this mean? Where can I find more info on what Error 26030000 is?
Thanks,
-Malte, hoping this is the correct group for this question

------------------------------

From: "Simon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.setup,tw.bbs.comp.linux
Subject: Re: Two network interface = 200 Mbps throughput?
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 17:37:51 GMT

Checkout "Balance" on http://Freshmeat.net

Simon

"Beggar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi all,
>
> I want to run a server program that use more than 100Mbps but don't
> want to buy a gigabit ethernet. I am considering use two NICs using
> the same IP (or different IP) to fully utilize the CPU power.
> Is there any exist program or method that can bridging between the
> server program and the NICs  ?
>
> I know Windows 2000 have such function. Any expert can help ??
>
> Thanks very much !!
>
> Dicky
>



------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andreas Schweitzer)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.setup,tw.bbs.comp.linux
Subject: Re: Two network interface = 200 Mbps throughput?
Date: 21 Sep 2000 17:39:18 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Beggar wrote:
>want to buy a gigabit ethernet. I am considering use two NICs using
>the same IP (or different IP) to fully utilize the CPU power.
                                       bandwidth ?? ^^^^^^^^^

You need the bonding kernel patch :
http://pdsf.nersc.gov/linux/

It comes from the cluster projects. See
e.g. http://www.beowulf-underground.org/

>I know Windows 2000 have such function. Any expert can help ??

And then get full 90 Mbs ... SCNR ...

Andreas

-- 
                       Andreas Schweitzer
             http://dilbert.physast.uga.edu/~andy/
        This post is brought to you by VIM, slrn and FreeBSD

------------------------------

From: Malte Starostik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: shutting down a process at shutdown
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 19:38:22 +0200

Ralph Churchill wrote:

> 
> > You added e.g. an S90oracle script? Then you should have a K90oracle
> > script in the same run-level directories too... Both should be
> > symlinks to the script in /etc/rc.d/init.d. I think that's the way it
> > works in Red Hat too (I use Debian).
> >
> 
> Heres' what I've got:
> 
> ./rc0.d/K00oracle
> ./rc1.d/K00oracle
> ./rc2.d/K00oracle
> ./rc3.d/S99oracle
> ./rc4.d/S99oracle
> ./rc5.d/S99oracle
> ./rc6.d/K00oracle
> 
> All symlinks to ./init.d/oracle. Do I need a K00oracle AND an S99oracle
> at each run level?
> 

You only need these:

./rc3.d/S99oracle
./rc4.d/S99oracle
./rc5.d/S99oracle

./rc3.d/K01oracle
./rc4.d/K01oracle
./rc5.d/K01oracle

No need for the links in rc[0126].d
It works like this: all the S... links are run when you enter the runlevel 
and the K... links are run when you leave it. So if you've got the above 
links, /etc/rc.d/init.d/oracle start is called when you enter runlevel 3, 4 
or 5 and /etc/rc.d/init.d/oracle stop is called when you leave that 
runlevel and there is no S..oracle link in the dir for the runlevel you 
switch to (like 0 or 6)
-Malte

------------------------------

From: Joshua Baker-LePain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Power management in Xfree?
Date: 21 Sep 2000 17:50:01 GMT

Henrik Elofsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Posted and mailed]

>> I was wandering if I can tune up Xfree to turn my monitor off after some time.
>> Gnome attempts to do it but it doesn't really turn it off, just make the screen 
>black.
>> 
>> Is this possble?
>> 
>> Thanks.

> Sir, yes sir! Use "xset +dpms ; xset dpms xxx yyy zzz" does
> the trick. The xxx is the time for standby, yyy is
> suspend anx zzz is off. The times are given in seconds.

IME, Gnome's settings override an xset placed in ~/.Xclients (or even
in /etc/X11/xinit/xinitrc).  Go into the GNOME panel, and look for a
setting for DPMS.  Set the sliders for Standby and Suspend to 0, and
that for Off to whatever you like.  At least, I think -- I don't
use Gnome.  Good luck.

-- 
Joshua Baker-LePain
Department of Biomedical Engineering
Duke University

------------------------------

From: Ralph Churchill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: shutting down a process at shutdown
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 17:51:09 GMT


> Did I say that? Yes I did... dumb.
>
> I *think* (I'm very careful now) that there should be a *start* script
> in the directory for runlevel 2, not a kill script...
>

Basically, I modelled what httpd is doing... and it has a kill script in
runlevel 2... Should a start script in lvl 2 affect what happens in lvl
6 (that's where shutdown is, right?)

RMC


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.misc) via:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Misc Digest
******************************

Reply via email to