Linux-Misc Digest #928, Volume #25 Tue, 3 Oct 00 03:13:05 EDT
Contents:
Re: A Question (Akira Yamanita)
Re: WTF is up with LinuxConf under RH7?!!??! (Tim)
Superblock corrupt! (NoMadis)
Re: Your RedHat 7.0 impressions? (whippet0)
Re: Help needed with PostgreSQL ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Your RedHat 7.0 impressions? (Hal Burgiss)
Re: Your RedHat 7.0 impressions? (Christopher Browne)
Re: Your RedHat 7.0 impressions? (David Efflandt)
Re: Wierd Lilo problem (John in SD)
Re: lilo conf for dual boot linux box (John in SD)
Re: Your RedHat 7.0 impressions? (Silviu Minut)
Re: lilo.conf (John in SD)
Re: Netscape navigator on linux (Silviu Minut)
Re: CDROM Mount Question for Red Hat (Silviu Minut)
PPP and routing. ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: CD ROM Mount Problem RedHat 6.2 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Help needed with PostgreSQL (Tom Lane)
keystroke filter ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Akira Yamanita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux.mandrake,comp.os.linux.networking,linux.net
Subject: Re: A Question
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 04:13:18 GMT
Anthony Chippendale wrote:
>
> A Question:
>
> Does Linux work with WinGate4 internet connection sharing program??? If yes,
> then what/how do I need to configure my Linux machine (Mandrake7.1) to use
> the WinGate connection cause I cant get it to work. Any help will be much
> appreciated.
Although I use Linux for what you're doing, you just need to set the
default route to the system running WG4.
Edit /etc/sysconfig/network (I believe it's the same as on a RedHat
system) and you should have a line like this:
GATEWAY="192.168.0.1"
That is assuming that your WG4 system has the private IP of
192.168.0.1. Then you should just be able to bring down and
up the interface on the Linux box.
"ifdown eth0" followed by "ifup eth0" should do it.
------------------------------
From: Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.setup,linux.redhat.misc
Subject: Re: WTF is up with LinuxConf under RH7?!!??!
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 04:23:29 GMT
On Mon, 02 Oct 2000 11:51:01 -0700, Chris Leahy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Incidentally, the C compiler is also broken, I hope you werent planning to
>build a custom kernel.
Install kgcc from the first CD.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NoMadis)
Subject: Superblock corrupt!
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 04:30:02 +0000 (UTC)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
some stupid dos program ruined one of my Linux partitions.
As a result I cannot mount it anymore, and I cannot repair it with the
ext2fs utilities.
Does somebody know a program that will allow me to repair it?
(there are some files on it that i need) :(
--
Greetz,
Joop
=======================================================================
Joop Bollen. Nuts & Bolts Department, Nomadis Systems, Holland
We all live under the same sky, but we don't all have the same horizon.
------------------------------
From: whippet0 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Your RedHat 7.0 impressions?
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 04:44:33 GMT
Hi,
I'm a bit confused about the version of the kernel being used in Red Hat
Linux 7.0. According to the Red Hat web page, it says that Red Hat 7.0 is "2.4
kernel ready". I was always under the assumption this meant that it had version
2.4 of the kernel. How is this different from the "real" 2.4 kernel???
Thanks!
George Couch
>
> >RedHat doesn't say on their webpage what kernel version RH7 uses. Anyone
> >know?
>
> A heavily patched 2.2.16 kernel, including the USB backport. This is listed
> at
>
> http://www.redhat.com/products/software/linux/rhl7_new_features.html
>
> which is 2 obvious clicks from the main page.
>
> If you're *really* curious about what they've done to this kernel version,
> install rpm-3.0.5 and you can then install kernel-2.2.16-22.src.rpm and see
> what patches are in /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES.
>
> >I've heard nasty rumours that RH6.2 had a bug in the installer.
>
> Red Hat's bug tracking system is public. You can peruse/search it at
> http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla
>
> Dave Cook
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.lang.java.databases,comp.databases
Subject: Re: Help needed with PostgreSQL
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 12:49:53 +0800
Thanks. This is frustrating.......
Travis Bauer wrote:
> I think this has been an issue with postgresql for a while, and I do
> not believe that there is currently an acceptable workaround. However,
> from the mailing list, I've read that in the CVS there is code to fix this
> problem in future releases.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Travis Bauer | CS Grad Student | IU |www.cs.indiana.edu/~trbauer
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hal Burgiss)
Subject: Re: Your RedHat 7.0 impressions?
Reply-To: Hal Burgiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 04:59:38 GMT
On Tue, 03 Oct 2000 04:44:33 GMT, whippet0 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I'm a bit confused about the version of the kernel being used in Red
>Hat Linux 7.0. According to the Red Hat web page, it says that Red Hat
>7.0 is "2.4 kernel ready". I was always under the assumption this
>meant that it had version 2.4 of the kernel. How is this different from
>the "real" 2.4 kernel???
If it included a 2.4 kernel, it would say "2.4 kernel included". "Ready"
means the other packages and libs are 'ready' should you install a 2.4
kernel. If this were not the case, you need to update certain other
packages for 2.4.
--
Hal B
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christopher Browne)
Subject: Re: Your RedHat 7.0 impressions?
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 05:23:14 GMT
In our last episode (Tue, 03 Oct 2000 04:44:33 GMT),
the artist formerly known as whippet0 said:
>I'm a bit confused about the version of the kernel being used in Red
>Hat Linux 7.0. According to the Red Hat web page, it says that Red Hat
>7.0 is "2.4 kernel ready". I was always under the assumption this meant
>that it had version 2.4 of the kernel. How is this different from the
>"real" 2.4 kernel???
The official 2.4 kernel release has not yet taken place. Testing is
still ongoing, with the finalization of a 2.4.0 version imminent, but
not yet being something that has taken place. (Unless it has been a
busier evening than I was aware of!)
Red Hat may be including one of the "pre-2.4" releases, but that's not
likely the big deal here.
The notion of being "2.4 kernel ready" is about having the latest and
greatest releases of kernel tools such as the kernel module loader,
as well, perhaps, as utilities that will be useful to customize your
configuration of a 2.4 kernel. Hopefully this may include tools to
help you make your system aware of such things as USB devices for which
support is targeted at 2.4.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - <http://www.hex.net/~cbbrowne/>
Always remember that you're unique, just like everyone else.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Efflandt)
Subject: Re: Your RedHat 7.0 impressions?
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 05:31:45 +0000 (UTC)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 02 Oct 2000 01:36:24 -0400, David_C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Silviu Minut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> (I know, as root you can see it with ifconfig).
>
>FWIW, non-root users can also view settings with ifconfig - they just
>can't change anything.
It is also not in the path of users, so they have to include that as
/sbin/ifconfig. However, if someone needs to know their IP, something
could be added to /etc/ppp/ip-up.local to do something useful with it.
--
David Efflandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.de-srv.com/
http://www.autox.chicago.il.us/ http://www.berniesfloral.net/
http://hammer.prohosting.com/~cgi-wiz/ http://cgi-help.virtualave.net/
------------------------------
From: John in SD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Wierd Lilo problem
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 05:32:42 GMT
On Sun, 01 Oct 2000 14:00:53 GMT, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Lilo doesn't seem to like Windows. Now I don't blame it but I do need to
>boot it every so often.
>
>LILO version 21.5-1 and 21.5
>
>Kernel 2.2.17 and 2.2.16
>
>Drive is setup all reiserfs except for the Windows parts. Now I saw
>something about needing notail on / to work but lilo works just fine if I
>comment out the windows sections.
Yes, this changes the size of the map file, which may now be packed.
ReiserFS *must* be mounted 'notail' when lilo is installed: specifically,
/boot/boot.b and any message file; and when /sbin/lilo is run -- since this is
when the /boot/map file is created.
The problem is fixed in ReiserFS 3.6.18 booted with lilo 21.6 (soon to be
released). Until then, use 'notail' with ReiserFS.
--John
>
># LILO configuration created by QuickInst 21 Fri Jul 28 08:15:38 EST 2000
>boot = /dev/hda
>compact
>prompt
>timeout= 30
>delay = 30 # optional, for systems that boot very quickly
>vga = normal # force sane state
>root = current # use "current" root
>image = /boot/vmlinuz
> label = linux
>image = /boot/safe
> label = safe
>#other = /dev/hda1
># table = /dev/hda
># label = windows
>
>I've tried commenting out compact no difference. I've tried all the lilo
>options to no avail. I had the same problem a few months ago but upgrading
>at the time to 21.5 got it to work.
>
>Uncommenting the windows section ends up with:
>
>LILO version 21.5-1, Copyright (C) 1992-1998 Werner Almesberger
>Extensions beyond version 21 Copyright (C) 1999-2000 John Coffman
>Released 24-Aug-2000 and compiled at 16:31:59 on Sep 30 2000.
>
>Reading boot sector from /dev/hda
>Merging with /boot/boot.b
>Secondary loader: 11 sectors.
>Boot image: /boot/vmlinuz
>Setup length is 4 sectors.
>Compaction removed 1119 BIOS calls.
>Mapped 1157 sectors.
>Added linux *
>Boot image: /boot/safe
>Setup length is 4 sectors.
>Compaction removed 1110 BIOS calls.
>Mapped 1147 sectors.
>Added safe
>Boot other: /dev/hda1, on /dev/hda, loader /boot/chain.b
>Compaction removed 0 BIOS calls.
>Fatal: Hole found in map file (alloc_page)
>Removed temporary file /boot/map~
>
>Any help would be great. I guess I could boot windows with a boot disk but
>lilo is much nicer.
>
>Thanks
>Nick
LILO version 21.5.1 (24-Aug-2000) source at
ftp: metalab.unc.edu dir: /pub/Linux/system/boot/lilo
------------------------------
From: John in SD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: lilo conf for dual boot linux box
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 05:35:55 GMT
On Mon, 2 Oct 2000 10:23:00 +0100, "hans eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hello!
>I have a dual boot linux machine. Don't ask why.
>The partition hda2 (approx. 5MB) is mounted as /boot for one Linux-OS. As
>you can imagine the kernel is located there.
>hda6 is " / ".
>Now I added a second Linux on hda3.
>In the LILO howto i read, that I have to copy the kernel of the "second OS"
>to " /boot " (on hda2) as well. I did that.
>Currently I boot the second linux as follows:
>LILO: kernel2 root=/dev/hda3
Excerpt from lilo.conf:
...
read-only
image=/boot/vmlinuz
root=/dev/hda6
label = linux-1
image=/boot/vmlinuz
root=/dev/hda3
label = linux-2
...
This will use the same kernel, but boot with different root partitions.
--John
>
>My question is:
>How can I boot without writing this every time?
>
>Thanxx hans eric
>
LILO version 21.5.1 (24-Aug-2000) source at
ftp: metalab.unc.edu dir: /pub/Linux/system/boot/lilo
------------------------------
From: Silviu Minut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Your RedHat 7.0 impressions?
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 01:32:39 -0400
Stupid me! I just realized that users do have execute permissions to
/sbin. I thought by default they were not supposed to. It's ok then.
David_C wrote:
> Silviu Minut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > (I know, as root you can see it with ifconfig).
>
> FWIW, non-root users can also view settings with ifconfig - they just
> can't change anything.
>
> -- David
------------------------------
From: John in SD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: lilo.conf
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 05:38:03 GMT
DOS will not boot from a secondary partition. It must be installed on a
primary partition. That is why it boots okay from floppy; it can read & write
to secondary partitions fine.
Stupid DOS.
--John
On Mon, 02 Oct 2000 16:01:11 -0500, Chris Marquardt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Peter Bishop wrote:
>
>> please post the contents of your /etc/lilo.conf file
>>
>> Chris Marquardt wrote:
>> >
>> > I just installed RedHat 6.1. I can't seem to get it to boot dos. I
>> > configured /etc/lilo.conf so that it would boot dos, but it gives me
>> > an error telling me the partition does not have a system on it to
>> > boot. It does have an OS on it. It will boot off of a floppy. I just
>> > can't get it to boot from the hard drive.
>> >
>> > Any suggestions?
>> >
>> > Thanks in advance,
>> >
>> > Chris Marquardt
>>
>> --
>> "In a world without walls and fences...
>> Who needs Windows and Gates?"
>
>I'm at work and not at my PC. However, I beleive it looks something like
>this:
>
>boot=/dev/hda
>map=/boot/map
>install=/boot/boot.b
>default=linux
>prompt
>timeout=50
>other=/dev/hda6
> label=dos
>
>
>I often wonder if there is a problem with where the dos partiction lies on
>the 20 Gig disk and or if I need to add
>
>table=/dev/hda
>
>to /etc/lilo.conf
>
>Chris
>
LILO version 21.5.1 (24-Aug-2000) source at
ftp: metalab.unc.edu dir: /pub/Linux/system/boot/lilo
------------------------------
From: Silviu Minut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Netscape navigator on linux
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 01:57:23 -0400
Isn't it on the RH cd?
Insert the cd in the drive,
mount -t iso9660 /dev/cdrom /mnt/cdrom
cd /mnt/cdrom/RedHat/RPMS
ls netscape*
and you'll see. To install,
rpm -Uvh netscape-comm*
Or, you can of course use the gno-rpm thing.
And if it is not on the cd you can always find it at rufus.w3.org.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Anyone know where I can get information on installing the Netscape
> Browser on a Redhat 6.1 system with x windows. I can't find
> any useful information anywere.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> jerbear
------------------------------
From: Silviu Minut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: CDROM Mount Question for Red Hat
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 02:05:12 -0400
First make a link from the actual cdrom device to some directory. The
link is not necessary to mount the cdrom, but some programs search for
/dev/cdrom, so you must fool them. Suppose your cd drive is hdb. Then
ln -s /dev/hdb /dev/cdrom
Then try
mount -t iso9660 /dev/cdrom /mnt/cdrom # man mount, man fstab
How do you know what device your cdrom drive is? Simple:
hda <--> Primary (ide0) master
hdb <--> Primary slave
hdc <--> Secondary (ide1) master
hdd <--> Secondary slave.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm a Linux newbie switching from WinNT to Red Hat 6.2. The Red Hat
> installed perfectly from a CDROM that came with the Osborne book. I
> created the boot disk from the CD ROM on WinNT and then installed the
> Linux 6.2 system.
>
> I can mount floppies, but cannot mont the same (or any other) CD ROM
> to get to the RPMs. I get the message "Wrong medium type" when I try
> to mount the cdrom.
>
> Any ideas or help will be appreciated.
>
> Thanks.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.setup,alt.os.linux
Subject: PPP and routing.
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 05:55:51 GMT
I just installed debian after using Red Hat for 3 years - the only
problem is that the ISP I've been with for over a year I can no longer
connect to. I used to hate it when people asked nebulous questions on
usenet, so I've come armed with as much information as I can. :) I
just can't figure out how to go forward.
I think it is a problem with the routing. What happens is that the modem
dials and connects, pppd comes up, authenticates me (via PAP) with the
remote server, and gets an IP address. After that, I can ping myself,
my gateway, and my netmask. All hostname lookups are failures, as well
as pinging the nameservers of my ISP. When I configured debian, it
brings up a eth0 interface at boot even though it isn't connected to
anything. I tried this both with and without, with the same results, so
I don't think eth0 is interfering any.
If anyone has expertise in the area of routing and can clue me in on
what's going on with this, I would really appreciate it. Yes, I am
using the 'defaultroute' option in my /etc/ppp/peers/myisp file for
pppd. Here's a session of what I'm talking about with routing
information. I read the PPP-howto which had a section on routing, it
seems like the problem is that I don't have a route labeled default
attached to ppp0, but I don't know how to get this.
Here's the log - any suggestions or pointers would be greatly
appreciated.
(Unconnected, right after I boot...)
[root@mothra /root]$ route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
Iface
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0
eth0
0.0.0.0 127.0.0.2 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0
lo
[root@motrha /root]$ pon myisp
...Wait about a minute while the modem does its thing...
[root@mothra /root]$ ifconfig
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:A0:CC:E5:02:0A
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Bcast:127.0.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:33 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
Interrupt:11 Base address:0xe400
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3924 Metric:1
RX packets:84 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:84 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
ppp0 Link encap:Point-to-Point Protocol
inet addr:207.172.61.159 P-t-P:10.65.1.11
Mask:255.255.255.255
UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST MTU:1524 Metric:1
RX packets:9 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:9 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:10
[root@mothra /root]$ ping 10.65.1.11
PING 10.65.1.11 (10.65.1.11): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 10.65.1.11: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=180.9 ms
64 bytes from 10.65.1.11: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=129.9 ms
[root@mothra /root]$ route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
Iface
10.65.1.11 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0
ppp0
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0
eth0
0.0.0.0 127.0.0.2 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0
lo
Here's a syslog of the entire operation:
Oct 2 20:38:46 mothra pppd[279]: pppd 2.3.11 started by root, uid 0
Oct 2 20:38:47 mothra chat[280]: abort on (BUSY)
Oct 2 20:38:47 mothra chat[280]: abort on (NO CARRIER)
Oct 2 20:38:47 mothra chat[280]: abort on (VOICE)
Oct 2 20:38:47 mothra chat[280]: abort on (NO DIALTONE)
Oct 2 20:38:47 mothra chat[280]: abort on (NO DIAL TONE)
Oct 2 20:38:47 mothra chat[280]: abort on (NO ANSWER)
Oct 2 20:38:47 mothra chat[280]: send (ATZ^M)
Oct 2 20:38:47 mothra chat[280]: expect (OK)
Oct 2 20:38:47 mothra chat[280]: ATZ^M^M
Oct 2 20:38:47 mothra chat[280]: OK
Oct 2 20:38:47 mothra chat[280]: -- got it
Oct 2 20:38:47 mothra chat[280]: send (ATDTphone number^M)
Oct 2 20:38:47 mothra chat[280]: expect (CONNECT)
Oct 2 20:38:47 mothra chat[280]: ^M
Oct 2 20:39:12 mothra chat[280]: ATDTphone number^M^M
Oct 2 20:39:12 mothra chat[280]: CONNECT
Oct 2 20:39:12 mothra chat[280]: -- got it
Oct 2 20:39:12 mothra chat[280]: send (\d)
Oct 2 20:39:13 mothra pppd[279]: Serial connection established.
Oct 2 20:39:13 mothra pppd[279]: Using interface ppp0
Oct 2 20:39:13 mothra pppd[279]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS2
Oct 2 20:39:14 mothra pppd[279]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap
0x0> <magic 0x20fc901a> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Oct 2 20:39:15 mothra pppd[279]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 < 00 04 00
00> <mru 1524> <asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth pap> <pcomp> <accomp> < 11 04 05
f4> < 13 09 03 00 c0 7b 72 d0 6b>]
Oct 2 20:39:15 mothra pppd[279]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x1 < 00 04 00
00> < 11 04 05 f4> < 13 09 03 00 c0 7b 72 d0 6b>]
Oct 2 20:39:15 mothra pppd[279]: rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <asyncmap
0x0> <magic 0x20fc901a> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Oct 2 20:39:15 mothra pppd[279]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x2 <mru 1524>
<asyncmap
0xa0000> <auth pap> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Oct 2 20:39:15 mothra pppd[279]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x2 <mru 1524>
<asyncmap
0xa0000> <auth pap> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Oct 2 20:39:15 mothra pppd[279]: sent [LCP EchoReq id=0x0
magic=0x20fc901a]
Oct 2 20:39:15 mothra pppd[279]: sent [PAP AuthReq id=0x1
user="myusername" password=<hidden>]
Oct 2 20:39:15 mothra pppd[279]: rcvd [LCP EchoRep id=0x0 magic=0x0]
Oct 2 20:39:15 mothra pppd[279]: rcvd [PAP AuthAck id=0x1 ""]
Oct 2 20:39:15 mothra pppd[279]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x1 <addr
0.0.0.0> <compOct 2 20:39:15 mothra kernel: PPP BSD Compression module
registered
Oct 2 20:39:15 mothra kernel: PPP Deflate Compression module registered
Oct 2 20:39:15 mothra pppd[279]: sent [CCP ConfReq id=0x1 <deflate 15>
<deflate(old#) 15> <bsd v1 15>]
Oct 2 20:39:15 mothra pppd[279]: rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0x1 <compress VJ
0f 01>
<addr 10.65.1.11>]
Oct 2 20:39:15 mothra pppd[279]: sent [IPCP ConfAck id=0x1 <compress VJ
0f 01>
<addr 10.65.1.11>]
Oct 2 20:39:15 mothra pppd[279]: rcvd [IPCP ConfNak id=0x1 <addr
207.172.61.159>]
Oct 2 20:39:15 mothra pppd[279]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x2 <addr
207.172.61.159> <compress VJ 0f 01>]
Oct 2 20:39:15 mothra pppd[279]: rcvd [LCP ProtRej id=0x3 80 fd 01 01
00 0f 1a
04 78 00 18 04 78 00 15 03 2f]
Oct 2 20:39:15 mothra pppd[279]: rcvd [IPCP ConfAck id=0x2 <addr
207.172.61.159> <compress VJ 0f 01>]
Oct 2 20:39:15 mothra pppd[279]: not replacing existing default route
to lo [127.0.0.2]
Oct 2 20:39:15 mothra pppd[279]: Cannot determine ethernet address for
proxy ARP
Oct 2 20:39:15 mothra pppd[279]: local IP address 207.172.61.159
Oct 2 20:39:15 mothra pppd[279]: remote IP address 10.65.1.11
Oct 2 20:39:15 mothra pppd[279]: Script /etc/ppp/ip-up started (pid
287)
Oct 2 20:39:15 mothra pppd[279]: Script /etc/ppp/ip-up finished (pid
287), status = 0x0
Oct 2 20:39:16 mothra fetchnews[307]: 1.9.9: verbosity level is 0
Oct 2 20:39:45 mothra pppd[279]: sent [LCP EchoReq id=0x1
magic=0x20fc901a]
Oct 2 20:39:45 mothra pppd[279]: rcvd [LCP EchoRep id=0x1 magic=0x0]
Oct 2 20:40:15 mothra pppd[279]: sent [LCP EchoReq id=0x2
magic=0x20fc901a]
Oct 2 20:40:15 mothra pppd[279]: rcvd [LCP EchoRep id=0x2 magic=0x0]
Oct 2 20:40:45 mothra pppd[279]: sent [LCP EchoReq id=0x3
magic=0x20fc901a]
Oct 2 20:40:45 mothra pppd[279]: rcvd [LCP EchoRep id=0x3 magic=0x0]
Oct 2 20:41:15 mothra pppd[279]: sent [LCP EchoReq id=0x4
magic=0x20fc901a]
Oct 2 20:41:15 mothra pppd[279]: rcvd [LCP EchoRep id=0x4 magic=0x0]
Does anybody have any ideas on how to get past this?
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: CD ROM Mount Problem RedHat 6.2
Date: 3 Oct 2000 05:29:21 GMT
Because of your fstab settings, only root may be able to mount the CD (but, it should
not result in the error you are facing !). Login as root and type the following
command :
mount -t iso9660 /dev/hdd /mnt/cdrom
/dev/hdd is the cdrom device and /mnt/cdrom is the mount point - may be different on
your machine, watch out before punching the command. If your CD is iso9660 format CD,
it should mount the CD. If it fails to mount ... I don't know !?
> I'm a Linux newbie switching from WinNT to Red Hat 6.2. The Red Hat
> installed perfectly from a CDROM that came with the Osborne book. I
> created the boot disk from the CD ROM on WinNT and then installed the
> Linux 6.2 system.
>
> I can mount floppies, but cannot mont the same (or any other) CD ROM
> to get to the RPMs. I get the message "Wrong medium type" when I try
> to mount the cdrom.
>
> Any ideas or help will be appreciated.
>
> Thanks.
==================================
Posted via http://nodevice.com
Linux Programmer's Site
------------------------------
From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.lang.java.databases,comp.databases
Subject: Re: Help needed with PostgreSQL
Date: 03 Oct 2000 02:28:05 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I'm encountering a problem when inserting a record larger than 8kb into
> my PostgreSQL v7.0.2.
Postgres currently limits rows to the size of a disk page, which is 8K
by default. Possible workarounds:
1. Increase disk page size (change BLCKSZ constant, recompile, initdb).
However you cannot increase it above 32K.
2. If the problem is a text field, declare it as lztext instead to
get data compression (only works in 7.0.*). This might get you
a factor of 2 or so.
3. Use large objects (BLOBs). Major pain in the neck, but the size
of any one large object is only limited by your disk space.
4. Wait for 7.1, which eliminates the problem (essentially by
automatically, transparently converting oversize fields into
BLOBs). If you're feeling brave or are not working with
mission-critical data, you could try a current development snapshot.
7.1 beta should be out in a few weeks, final before Christmas.
#1 and #2 could be combined to get you up to circa 64K per record.
BTW, I'm not sure whether our JDBC driver copes with rows > 8K;
you might need to tweak it.
regards, tom lane
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: keystroke filter
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 06:45:42 GMT
I'm looking for a way to filter the keystroke stream (in an arbitrary
Linux app) and remap a sequence of keystrokes in real-time to another
sequence as determined by a set of rules created in a config file.
The rules should roughly allow the flexibility of regular expressions.
Any suggestions?
Thanks.
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.misc) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Misc Digest
******************************