Linux-Misc Digest #100, Volume #26 Sat, 21 Oct 00 17:13:02 EDT
Contents:
Re: firewall ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Help me choose the best fileserver OS for a Compaq proliant server. (jpd)
Re: Install eDesktop 2.4 on Windows ME (Dances With Crows)
Re: Controlling several boxes from one place (Mark Post)
Linux firewall software question (mike)
Re: Server crashing ("Luiz Silva")
Re: 2.4 KERNEL USB SUPPORT (Jan Johansson)
Re: telnet on 25 problem (Jean-David Beyer)
Help please! Apache + CGI output + HEAD requests ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: screen shoot during LINUX installation (Rod Smith)
Re: Help me choose the best fileserver OS for a Compaq proliant server. (John Hasler)
newbie question on minicom? (Davis Eric)
Re: need a little hdparm help here, guys... (David Efflandt)
Re: very spooky (David Efflandt)
Re: firewall ("Simon")
WEBEARLY (Damien BRUCKER)
Re: What is SAMBA? (J Sloan)
Re: What is SAMBA? (J Sloan)
mv multiple files w/wildcard (Lance Hoffmeyer)
Re: End-User Alternative to Windows ("Les Mikesell")
X server problem (Minya Liang)
Re: Apache and authenticated logins help please ("Jason Woodrum")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: firewall
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2000 17:04:11 GMT
In article <bZdI5.205$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Simon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> try IPCHAINS
>
>
thanx
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (jpd)
Crossposted-To:
comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.misc
Subject: Re: Help me choose the best fileserver OS for a Compaq proliant server.
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2000 17:36:39 +0000 (UTC)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 21 Oct 2000 03:59:55 GMT, Martin Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>dcs wrote:
>> FreeBSD
>> NetBSD
>> OpenBSD
>> Linux (RedHat or TurboLinux Server 6.x)
>> Windows 2000
>>
>> Windows 2000 is the expensive option, given that I'd need to buy about 200
>> licenses, but I was told money was no object. :)
>>
[SNIP!]
>As for choices you forget a few. You can take a look at Sun Solaris 8
[SNIP!]
indeed, BSDi springs to mind, esp since money is no problem.
i, personally, haven't had the chance yet to play with it.
i heard it's nice tho. i think it's good to check this one out.
heard some bad stories about solaris/x86 and haven't heard anyone yet that
liked SCO (everyone i heard about it, plainly detested SCO)
about the free bsd derivates, rule out netbsd and openbsd.
they both don't support SMP (yet), and are ment for another market anyway.
netbsd isn't particularly fast but runs on a very wide variety of h/w.
openbsd is ment to be as secure as possible, and i take it your server
isn't connected to the 'net, but is a corporate internal-only server.
freebsd is nice, in that it's fast and does support SMP. don't know about
how well on more then 2 processors tho. maybe try it out. :)
vendors usually don't tell if their hardware is supported by *bsd, you
have to look it up in the supported hardware list on the respective *bsd site.
i happen to know there are gigabit NIC's supported by freebsd.
make sure you have 64bit NIC's in 64bit PCI slots tho. (don't know if they
come in 32bit PCI flavour, but this is what someone told me)
>Linux is not known to handle multiple processors very well. In fact, I
>believe anything above two carries with it a performance hit. This has
>apparently been improved in the 2.4.0 kernel series as soon as it is
>released. Linux really shines on lower end hardware (not implying that
>the *BSD's do not), but can take a hit on opposite spectrum specially if
>the drivers have yet to mature.
don't know about these issues.
what i do know, is, RH is nice if you don't want to bother with your system,
but for the more professional i'd check out debian first.
not caring about the many differences of the respective linux distributions,
linux might be interresting to use. here also, check the supported h/w list.
--
j p d (at) d s b (dot) t u d e l f t (dot) n l .
<struct> It's always a long day, 86400 doesn't fit into a short, geeky quote :)
-- seen on #freebsd, ircnet
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dances With Crows)
Subject: Re: Install eDesktop 2.4 on Windows ME
Date: 21 Oct 2000 17:39:51 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 21 Oct 2000 02:09:11 GMT, Gordon Berta wrote:
>How does one accomplish this without losing windows files, and programs...
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I assume you mean Caldera's Linux distribution. This is not too
difficult, except that LoseME can no longer boot up in real DOS mode
(meaning no LOADLIN.EXE) and may not be able to make a DOS boot disk.
So you may want to run the first couple of steps of this process on a
Lose9x machine.
0. Insert blank floppy disk into drive
1. FORMAT A:, SYS A:
2. Copy FIPS.EXE to the floppy from your Caldera distro. It's in the
dosutils directory on the first CD.
3. Read the documentation for FIPS. Or else.
4. Boot LoseME box from the DOS boot disk you just created.
5. Run FIPS, remembering what you read in step 3. If you have a large
disk, shrink the LoseME partition to about 7.8G or so--no larger; if
Linux's kernel is over the 1024-cylinder limit, older versions of LILO
won't be able to boot your kernel!
6. Boot from the first Caldera CD. When it comes time to partition the
disk, leave /dev/hda1 alone (that's your LoseME partition) and kill the
extra partition FIPS made (/dev/hda2, most likely), then create 3 more
partitions (at least): One /boot, can be about 10M (no larger), make sure it's
entirely within the 1024-cylinder limit. One swap, probably about 128M
or so. One /, covering a reasonable amount of space.
7. Continue with the install, but when it comes time to run LILO, put
LILO in the bootsector of the /boot partition, and mark that partition
active using Linux fdisk.
Your manual should have plenty of information on this topic; check it
out. Also look at http://linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/ and
http://linuxnewbie.org/ for a wealth of advice.
--
Matt G|There is no Darkness in Eternity/But only Light too dim for us to see
Brainbench MVP for Linux Admin / Workin' in a code mine, hittin' Ctrl-Alt
http://www.brainbench.com / Workin' in a code mine, whoops!
=============================/ I hit a seg fault....
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Post)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: Controlling several boxes from one place
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2000 17:50:22 GMT
On Sat, 21 Oct 2000 07:46:08 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bo Berglund) wrote:
-snip-
>Question:
>Is there some freeware software for WinNT (still my main work machine)
>that can emulate an X terminal so I can access the Linux boxes via the
>internal network?
>I have tested an eval version of "KEA! X" and it works good, but it is
>not freeware, instead rather expensive. I'd prefer some
>freeware/shareware solution if it can do the job.
Another poster has suggested VNC, which is probably a good choice. Or, you
can go with XWin32, which in demo mode, provides you up to 2 hours of
connection at a time, and then you have to reconnect. You can repeat this
process indefinitely. That works well for me when I want to do work in X.
They're at http://www.starnet.com/
Or, you can go the best low-tech route, and use an Open Source telnet client
called TeraTerm Pro. It won't handle X ,but then I don't spend much time in
X anyway. (Certainly not to administer my machines.) That can be obtained
at http://hp.vector.co.jp/authors/VA002416/teraterm.html
Mark Post
Postmodern Consulting
Information Technology and Systems Management Consulting
To send me email, replace 'nospam' with 'home'.
------------------------------
Subject: Linux firewall software question
From: mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2000 17:54:04 GMT
Is there good firewall software for Linux that will also block Netscape
pop-ups (like when you load somebody's page and some idiotic pop-up comes
onto your screen)?
Thanks...
Mike
--
========================
mhardy@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Auntie Em: Hate you, hate Kansas; took the dog - Dorothy
------------------------------
From: "Luiz Silva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Luiz Silva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Server crashing
Date: 21 Oct 2000 16:06:23 -0200
Edvard Fagerholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I've got 3 NICs in it all eepro100s (it's doing masquarading for
two
>networks).
>
>For example, I can't upload more than about 20mb at once. As that
>computer is running samba and I've got my files there, this kinda
sucks,
>and it crashes daily (sometimes it crashes while listening to
my mp3s
>which are located on a samba share). I'm also hosting my homepage
on it
>and sometimes it crashes while someone with enough bandwidth is
looking
>at it.
take a look at eepro100.c under the kernel source for a variable
called max_interrupt_work, it defaults to 20, put 60 and see if
the server crash continue.
Luiz.
------------------------------
From: Jan Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.help
Subject: Re: 2.4 KERNEL USB SUPPORT
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2000 18:11:08 GMT
>Does anybody know if the 2.4 kernel will give us the opporunity of
>scanning with any USB scaner, or shall we keep on finding on supported
>hardware lists ?
uuuuuh even when the kernel has USB support you will have to have a
driver for each device, so yes, you still need the HCL's.
------------------------------
From: Jean-David Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: telnet on 25 problem
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2000 14:18:04 -0400
Rafael - LumesITSupport wrote:
> I find that it is not related to what smtp server I am using the same
> happen when I use qmail and sendmail.
> When I am connecting using telnet on 25 port I am
> getting
>
> Trying 127.0.0.1...
> Connected to localhost.localdomain (127.0.0.1)
> Escape character is '^]'.
>
> And nothing more, I can waite for ages. Then I have to kill telnet and
> smtpd. What the problem could be. ?????
I never tried talking to sendmail (that listens on my port 25). Perhaps
it is waiting for you to type something into it, such as an e-mail. I do
not know this; I am just guessing.
What do you expect sendmail to do if you telnet to it?
>
> Can anybody help me?
>
> Rafael
--
.~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642.
/V\ Registered Machine 73926.
/( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jersey
^^-^^ 2:15pm up 11 days, 19:52, 3 users, load average: 2.06, 2.23, 2.27
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Help please! Apache + CGI output + HEAD requests
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2000 18:44:37 GMT
Hello All!
I have the Apache 1.3.12 + mod_fastcgi module. I am running the FastCGI
scripts. I have a following problem: if a client does the HEAD request
to some CGI script (FastCGI) and this script responses the small
response that HEAD request is normal - its content length is zero. But
(!!!) if the output of this script is big ( > 40Kb) then a HEAD
response is a random chopped response of a part CGI HTML output. The
HEAD response by RFC standart should be zero length. But the apache
1.3.12 responses more than 0. I suggest that this behaviour is not
right.
Please to response to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
------------------------------
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rod Smith)
Subject: Re: screen shoot during LINUX installation
Crossposted-To: alt.comp.hardware.homebuilt,linux.redhat.install,alt.os.linux
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2000 19:20:23 GMT
[Posted and mailed]
In article <8sr6g8$f1f$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Hi,
> I am wondering if there is any simple hardware that I can use on a
> seperate machine to capture (screenshoot, screen grab, screen dump
> etc...) the video signal from my computer as I install an operating
> system like Red Hat Linux 5.2 through to 7.0?
The best way I know of for doing this is to install Linux in a VMware
session (http://www.vmware.com). You can then capture the VMware screen
using the GIMP, xv, or whatever. This will NOT get any hardware-specific
screens, though, unless it's hardware that VMware happens to emulate.
--
Rod Smith, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.rodsbooks.com
Author of books on Linux & multi-OS configuration
------------------------------
From: John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.misc
Subject: Re: Help me choose the best fileserver OS for a Compaq proliant server.
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2000 18:17:37 GMT
jpd writes:
> indeed, BSDi springs to mind, esp since money is no problem. i,
> personally, haven't had the chance yet to play with it. i heard it's
> nice tho.
I was a BSDi beta tester (at a cost of $1000). I stuck with it through 1.1
and then droppd it for Linux.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, Wisconsin
------------------------------
From: Davis Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: newbie question on minicom?
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2000 19:34:29 GMT
Hi,
I have the following newbie questions on minicom.
1. Due to my ISP, I need to type ppp each time when I want to establish
a ppp conection. But after I type "ppp", my terminal gave me some weird
strings. I know that means the ppp conection has been established. My
question is what should I do at that time in order to continue to
conection but out of the weird strings? In windows, usually press "F7"
will work. What should I do to continue it?
2. If I just establish the telnet connection with my server, I can not
ftp files. I tried the "Send file" and "Receive file" in minicom, but I
can not either send or download. And more, what are the meanings for
the "xmodem, ymodem, zmodem, kermit, ascii" in minicom on this aspect?
3. If I open minicom in one term, and established the connection. How
can I also use this connection in another different term? I tried to
use the network in a different term in which I used minicom, but I can
not ping and telnet to the server. It seems only in the same term as
the minicom is running, the network is usable. But I have the problem
of No. 1. So, I am lost.
4. Where can I find some detailed tutorial or instruction on minicom?
Thanks in advance.
Davis
--
I do not feel shameful if I was and am an idiot; I
will feel shameful if I haven't realized it.
--Myself
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Efflandt)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: need a little hdparm help here, guys...
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2000 19:47:25 +0000 (UTC)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 20 Oct 2000 19:12:56 -0600, Monte Milanuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Okay. Here's the scenario: Dell OptiPlex GX1 PIII-500 circa about June
>1999. Came w/ one Maxtor 10G IDE hd. I presume it is UDMA/33 capable,
>not sure about 66. Using hdparm (doesn't matter what distro, as SuSE,
>RedHat, Mandrake, Storm, Debian, etc. all return similar results on
>these hard drives), this drive (/dev/hda) will jump from about 3-5MB/sec
>to 19-20MB/sec by enabling 32-bit I/O, and DMA. Fiddling w/ any other
>options just makes the speed go down (relative to 20MB/sec, not
>5MB/sec).
>
>The second hard drive (/dev/hdb) is a 17.2G Maxtor, circa December
>1997. Not sure what the rating is on it, but I _think_ it was ATA33.
>This one is the problem child, per se. Straight out of the box, w/ any
>distro I've fiddled w/, this drives transfer rate is btwn 1-2MB/sec.
>Again, the only options that seem to make a significant positive
>difference is the 32-bit I/O, and DMA. But even so, the speed only goes
>up to a blazing 3MB/sec, tops. I've gone thru the hdparm man page,
>tried a bunch of different options, and I've never gotten any better
>than that, which is kind of depressing.
Do any errors show up in /var/log/messages about lost interrupts or read
errors? Even an old P100 box running Evergreen cpu upgrade (K6-2/400)
does this for an old WD 2.1 GB with no dma, just -c1 -m8 (up from 3 MB/sec
with no settings):
# hdparm -Tt /dev/hdc
/dev/hdc:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 4.78 seconds =26.78 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 13.49 seconds = 4.74 MB/sec
My PIII 500 laptop with dma (9 GB IBM):
/dev/hda:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 1.03 seconds =124.27 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 4.90 seconds =13.06 MB/sec
Note: Enabling -c1 -m16 -> 4.89 seconds =13.09 MB/sec
(statistical variation or not enough to worry about?)
--
David Efflandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.de-srv.com/
http://www.autox.chicago.il.us/ http://www.berniesfloral.net/
http://cgi-help.virtualave.net/ http://hammer.prohosting.com/~cgi-wiz/
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Efflandt)
Subject: Re: very spooky
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2000 19:57:21 +0000 (UTC)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 21 Oct 2000 08:33:38 GMT, observer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Tonight I was (as I often am) staring at the command prompt
>
> [*root*] $
>
>when suddenly the following appeared
>
> [*root*] $ hdd: ATAPI 48X CD-ROM drive, 128kB Cache.
>
>as if from nowhere!
>
> This happens to be a correct description of my CD-ROM drive
>(which does not happen to be mounted at the moment) but I did
>not type it in.
>
> After investigating, I notice that this mysterious text is the same as
>the last line I get if I execute dmesg.
>
> Would anyone care to venture a guess as to why this is happening?
Are you by any chance running Gnome or any program that automounts
removable drives? Check /etc/syslog.conf and see what messages it is
configured to send to /dev/console.
--
David Efflandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.de-srv.com/
http://www.autox.chicago.il.us/ http://www.berniesfloral.net/
http://cgi-help.virtualave.net/ http://hammer.prohosting.com/~cgi-wiz/
------------------------------
From: "Simon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: firewall
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2000 20:02:02 GMT
Or if you've got some dosh to spend, try Checkpoint FW1 for Linux...
Simon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:8ssia8$d4g$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> In article <bZdI5.205$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "Simon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > try IPCHAINS
> >
> >
>
>
> thanx
>
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.
------------------------------
From: Damien BRUCKER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: WEBEARLY
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2000 22:11:29 +0200
Hi
Does WEBEARLY exist for Linux?
If so, where could I find it?
Thank you
Damien
------------------------------
From: J Sloan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.admin,comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.questions
Subject: Re: What is SAMBA?
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2000 20:22:56 GMT
Lamar Thomas wrote:
> Is it free,
It's part of every distro of Linux I've ever heard of.
It also comes out of the box with SGI Irix and HP-UX.
I think it ships with FreeBSD too.
> and where do you get it?
Probably in your /usr/bin and /usr/sbin directories, if
you're running Linux. (unless you said "no, I don't
want pc connectivity programs" during install)
# rpm -q samba
samba-2.0.7-4
Yep, there it is.
jjs
------------------------------
From: J Sloan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.admin,comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.questions
Subject: Re: What is SAMBA?
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2000 20:29:07 GMT
Lamar Thomas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am very new to Linux and I just wanted to know what is SAMBA?
It is a suite of pc-to-unix connectivity tools.
> What is it used for?
In short, it is used to allow the resources of Unix systems
to appear in the pc-lan "network neighborhood" and to be
used by pc operating systems. Unlike the older pc-nfs
facitlites, it does not require special client software on
each pc to give it the ability to speak to Unix systems,
it puts the pc-lan protocols on the Unix system, so it
can converse with pcs using their native pc-lan protocol.
On linux systems only, it also allows remote pc disks to
be mounted on the local filesystem.
> Do I install it on a workstation or server?
Either one -
Chances are, it's already installed. If you are running an rpm
based system, just say "rpm -q samba" to see if it's there.
adjust the command to suit if using a non-rpm based system.
jjs
------------------------------
From: Lance Hoffmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: mv multiple files w/wildcard
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2000 20:26:30 GMT
I have a number of subdirectories where I have files with - such as
name - title.txt and I wish to convert them to:
name: title.txt
In bash I tried:
for i in *-*;do mv $i `echo $i | sed -e 's/ - /:/'`'done
but this gives me an error about moving multiple files and needing a
directory
I also tried on e-line perl script
perl -we '($new=$_) =~tr/\s-\s/:\s/ && rename _$,$new'
but I get uninitialized value errors. Any help on either of these
methods to
rename files would be appreciated. Also, how would I use these for
multiple subdirectories at once?
Thanks in advance.
--
Lance Hoffmeyer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
------------------------------
From: "Les Mikesell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: End-User Alternative to Windows
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2000 20:45:10 GMT
"Colin R. Day" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Tony Tribelli wrote:
>
>
> > >
> > > The industry standards and real OS's were around long before DOS for
> > > OC's. IBM had a couple and UNIX was around.
> >
> > Microsoft offered a Unix, XENIX, and users stuck to DOS despite
Microsoft's
> > advocacy for XENIX.
>
> Of course, trying to run UNIX on such computers as were used for
> XENIX would be like trying to drive a Lamborghini in rush-hour
> traffic.
Yes, the most popular in it's day was a Radio Shack box that, if you
powered up the components in the wrong order, was fairly likely
to erase it's disk drives.
Les Mikesell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Minya Liang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: X server problem
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2000 16:55:09 -0400
hi,
i compiled Xf86-4.0.1 on my machine then xfs stopped working. the error
mesg is
>xfs start
Starting X Font Server: xfs: error in loading shared libaries:
libXfont.so.1: cannot open shared object file: no such file or directory
but i DO have a /usr/X11R6/lib/libXfont.so.1 that points to
libXfont.so.1.3 in the same directory.
i tried setting the LD_LIBRARY_PATH to /usr/X11R6/lib, but it doesn't
work.
what's going on?
thanks,
LMY
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Jason Woodrum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Jason Woodrum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Apache and authenticated logins help please
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2000 20:57:21 GMT
I would recommend .htpasswd/.htaccess. For more information on the actual
setup, check out http://www.smart.net/references/how-to/htpasswd.html. You
need to add the first "directory" section to your access.conf file in the
/etc/httpd/conf directory.
Good luck!
-Jason
--
Old timer, n.:
One who remembers when charity was a virtue and not an organization.
"Bill Moseley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> On Fri, 20 Oct 2000 18:55:15 GMT Alvaro Muir ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> remarked...
> > Is there an easy way to have a page prompt for a usrname and password in
> > apache, without javascript? I cant find it in the man or the conf file.
>
> You would be better off asking in a group that discusses Apache, of
> course.
>
> The Apache FAQ pointed to this:
>
> http://www.apacheweek.com/features/userauth
>
>
> --
> Bill Moseley
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.misc) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Misc Digest
******************************
