Linux-Misc Digest #841, Volume #26 Wed, 17 Jan 01 13:13:03 EST
Contents:
Re: Never can upgrade/recompile kernel on RH 6.2/7.0 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: shutdown command (JCA)
linux + fortran : segmentation fault ("Estelle LEFRANCOIS")
Re: finding text within files query (Bob Tennent)
Re: RH7 and APC BackUPS ("Jeff Bracanovich")
Re: tar question? (Old Decrepit Circus Monkey)
Re: Need to reinstall windowsME ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: linux + fortran : segmentation fault (Harold Stevens ** PLEASE SEE SIG **)
Re: Any *easy* way to upgrade to kernel 2.4 ? (Robert Lynch)
Video Card Problems ("Chris")
Re: fax-modem how? (James Richard Tyrer)
Re: linux + fortran : segmentation fault (Christopher W. Aiken)
How to tell which version of Linux (Christopher W. Aiken)
Q: How to stop underlining? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Automatic script to check bad blocks?! (Xavier ROCHE)
Re: Serial Number (Henning Eiben)
Re: shutdown command (Kevin Croxen)
Re: How to tell which version of Linux (Martijn)
Re: make and load a module to kernel (Eggert Ehmke)
Re: finding text within files query (Aldo Pignotti)
Windows Refund Effort in Europe (Salva)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Never can upgrade/recompile kernel on RH 6.2/7.0
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 15:04:26 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Arctic Storm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I heard that RedHat 7 has some bugs regarding the compilation
> collection. You may need to update the bugs before compiling.
> Why not just try the rpm? No need to compile anything.
>
Where I Can find the fix of this bug?
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
------------------------------
From: JCA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: shutdown command
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 07:05:00 -0800
Michael Heiming wrote:
>
> OPTIONS
> -a Use /etc/shutdown.allow.
>
> Seems for me as a reading problem. You have some choice now:
>
> 1. make a script and symlink it to /sbin/shutdown
>
> 2. Create a group which includes the user you want to be able to shutdown
> and make shutdown group executable and belonging to this group.
>
> 3. man sudo
>
Tried that. /etc/shutdown.allow is still ignored.
> Why does some one want to shutdown Linux anyway, despite save electric
> power, save the enviroment...?
>
It runs on my laptop, which is obviously not up continuously.
------------------------------
From: "Estelle LEFRANCOIS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: linux + fortran : segmentation fault
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 16:24:09 +0100
Hi,
Running a well known fortran program (perfectly working on other machines !)
under linux (Redhat 6.2), I've got a kind of random error occuring. My
program crashes leading to the message :
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
My question is : What does it mean and why I've got such a random error ?
Could it be a hardware problem ?
Thanks.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Tennent)
Subject: Re: finding text within files query
Date: 17 Jan 2001 15:28:29 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 17 Jan 2001 11:49:57 +0000, Phil Hodgson wrote:
>I would like a command line to search through all files of type .xyz
>looking for text 'abc123' within those files. ( to get the file names
>back)
find can be used for this, but if you need to do this kind of thing often,
you might want to install glimpse:
Glimpse (which stands for GLobal IMPlicit SEarch) is a very popular UNIX
indexing and query system that allows you to search through a large set
of files very quickly. If you are looking for a needle anywhere in your
file system, all you have to do is say glimpse needle and all lines
containing needle will appear preceded by the file name.
To use glimpse you first need to index your files with glimpseindex. For
example, glimpseindex -o ~ will index everything at or below your home
directory.
Bob T.
------------------------------
From: "Jeff Bracanovich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: RH7 and APC BackUPS
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 15:44:28 GMT
APCUPSD and Powerchute docs list the 940-0020b cable. I heard now that the
940-0023a is the cable most are using. Thanks for the diag. I'll wire-up a
cable (0023a) this afternoon.
That sure makes it difficult to use a UPS on a dual boot machine, doesn't
it?
Again, Thanks.
Jeff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:on796.120$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have an APC simple UPS works great with RH 6.2. Do you have the right
> > cable? You have to use a different cable for it.
> >
> > Different OS different cable.
> > I don't have the cable number reight now.
> > You can check out the APC's website.
>
> I was not aware that you need different cables for different OS's. The
> same ones that work HPUX and Solaris work with Linux at least, so
> maybe NT is different?
>
> I do know that the boxed Powerchute software I get at work has disks
> for HPUX/Solaris/NT, and comes with a cable for BackUPS's and
> SMartUPS's, and you can't switch them. I've never installed Powerchute
> under NT BTW.
>
> For the wiring differences between the SmartUPS and BackUPS cables,
> see:
>
> http://www.buchanan1.net/apc_ups_cables.html
------------------------------
From: Old Decrepit Circus Monkey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.unix.aix,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: tar question?
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 09:45:11 -0600
Look in your manpage for the -L flag.
Antony Mak wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We have a Freebsd unix server as our file server. Everyday users put their
> files on the server name as "yyyymmddxxxxx". When I try to use tar to backup
> the files by month. It failed as follow:
>
> #tar czvf /backup/backup.tgz /data/200012*
> /usr/bin/tar: Argument list too long
>
> Can anyone tell me how can I make daily backup on such large amount files in
> a directory.
> Thanks in advance
>
> Antony
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Need to reinstall windowsME
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 15:51:49 GMT
In article <9447ak$q9k$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Need to reinstall windowsME
>
> I have Redhat 7.0 and WindowsME running on one computer. I has told
that
> I have to reinstall windowsME tonight. Can someone please tell me all
> the steps I have to take to save my redhat 7.0??
>
> Also what steps am I going to have to do after installed WindowsME
> again?
>
> Please email me at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Thanks
>
> Sent via Deja.com
> http://www.deja.com/
>
You Shouldnt have to do much when it comes to reinstalling ME. First, I
assume you hard drive is already partitioned? The next step is going to
be to boot to a Windows Bootdisk (you can download one at
www.bootdisk.com) just make sure if you have one, or make one that it
has FDISK.EXE on it. If it doesnt have FDISK on the disk you can simply
copy it to the disk from your C:\Windows\Command folder. After thats
done follow these steps:
1. Make sure you have a RedHat bootdisk also.
2. Boot your PC with the Windows boot disk in. At the "A:\>" prompt,
enter "FDISK.EXE". This will fire up fdisk (partition program), in the
fdisk program you will have 4 menus, the first menu says "Set a
partition as active". Choose that selection ( I beleive it is the first
selection).
3. Highlight your Windows partition ( it should show it as a fat32
partition) and set it as active. Exit FDISK
4. Remove the boot disk, put the Windows ME cd in (you will be booting
to it) and reboot. Now you will be able to reinstall ME without
affecting RedHat.
5. Last but not least, when you reinstall ME it wants to have the MBR
(Master Bott Record) all to itself. What you will have to do to fix
this is boot your pc with the RedHat bootdisk in and mount the / (root)
partition. At the command line enter "mount -t ext2 /dev/hda# /mnt"
#=the partition # (i.e. /dev/hda4). Now run LILO, you will probably
have to place the full path to it (i.e. /mnt/sbin/lilo). This will
rewrite the MBR with lilo, which will allow you to choose which OS you
want when you reboot.
If you have problems or questions, feel free to drop me an email.
Kyle K
======
Support by Linuxgruven Inc.
www.linuxgruven.com
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Harold Stevens ** PLEASE SEE SIG **)
Subject: Re: linux + fortran : segmentation fault
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 16:45:20 GMT
In <944dd2$v25$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Estelle LEFRANCOIS:
[Snip...]
|> Running a well known fortran program (perfectly working on other machines !)
What kind of fortran code (homegrown? commercial? academic? meteorology? air
pollution modeling? nuclear weapon simulation? f66? f77? f90? f95?), on what
specific hardware (SGI? VAX? PC? Intel? Sparc? MIPS?)?
We're not mindreaders, ya know. :)
You'll probably have better luck with this in comp.lang.fortran (please note
followup line) than a Linux group. Fortran coding is definitely not what the
typical hacker today considers interesting. :)
|> under linux (Redhat 6.2),
Before you go to comp.lang.fortran do "uname -rs" so they know what specific
version of Linux (not distribution) is actually running. It is true RH6.2 as
a rule starts with a particular Linux version, but Usenet is not aware if it
a machine that hasn't had some kernel work done. Especially Linux stuff. :)
Also, if this is g77, try to find out what version of the compiler is used.
|> I've got a kind of random error occuring. My
|> program crashes leading to the message :
|> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
NEED MORE INFO. :)
Especially, any ideas about where it happens and what it's doing. If you are
not using a debugger for this, at least put in some "WRITE" statements along
the way and try to narrow this down for us to try to help. Specific lines of
code and their context are especially helpful, if possible.
|> My question is : What does it mean and why I've got such a random error ?
See above. We can't do any better than you without more precise symptoms.
|> Could it be a hardware problem ?
Very unlikely, but possible. Generally this is a classic bug introduced when
compiler extensions are not consistent between versions and/or vendors and a
code steps on memory it shouldn't. Example: passing an array to a subroutine
as a scalar like X(1) rather than just the array name X. Or something. :)
Seeya in comp.lang.fortran and please bring something else to the party. :)
--
Regards, Weird (Harold Stevens) * IMPORTANT EMAIL INFO FOLLOWS *
Pardon the bogus email domain (dseg etc.) in place for spambots.
Really it's (wyrd) at raytheon, dotted with com. DO NOT SPAM IT.
Standard Disclaimer: These are my opinions not Raytheon Company.
------------------------------
From: Robert Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Any *easy* way to upgrade to kernel 2.4 ?
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 16:56:05 GMT
Michael Heiming wrote:
>
> Arctic Storm wrote:
>
> > I tried upgrading to kernel 2.4 by installing the rpm, but failed.
> > Either the rpm was not for my setup, or something went wrong.
> > Because I have RedHat 7, I'm having trouble compiling the kernel, and I
> > haven't had time to update the bugs in RedHat 7.
> > Will there be an easy, no-brainer, upgrade to 2.4? Where I don't need
> > to hunt down the necessary library files, utilities, scripts, etc.
> > Something that will provide me with everything necessary, so I don't
> > have to go through a check list of things I need to have or do before
> > upgrading.
> > When I installed StarOffice or Netscape 6, I simply ran the binary
> > installer, and that was it. I'm hoping for something that easy for the
> > kernel 2.4 upgrade.
> > --
>
> Hello,
>
> if you don't want to go through the exteme hassle, reading
> Documentation/Changes that comes
> within the 2.4.0 tarball and update the requiert parts of your system, you
> have to wait for a distro
> that comes with 2.4.0.
>
> Sure you wont be able to use those great new features in 2.4.0, but at
> least Linus and the other great guys who made
> it happen, choose the tar format.
>
> I would recommend to try it out with the tarball, you will learn a lot of
> things about Linux if you do.
>
> Michael Heiming
> Sysadmin
> --
> __ __ __ Virtueller Bau-Markt AG
> \ / [__) [__] [ __ Meerbuscher Strasse 64
> \/ [__) | | [_./ 40670 Meerbusch
> www.vbag.de Michael Heiming ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>
> Confucius say: He who play in root, eventually kill tree.
FWIW VA Linux has 2.4 RPMs:
ftp://ftp.valinux.com/pub/kernel/2.4.0-alpha1/
There is no sound support, it seems. I agree that working with a
tarball is harder, but a lot more fun.
Bob L.
--
Robert Lynch-Berkeley CA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Video Card Problems
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 15:58:42 +1100
Hi, I have a 3DLabs 32MB Oxygen VX1 video card
the problem is I can not get the window system to come
up at all. This is strange because durring the installation
the resolution and picture quality of the monitor was perfect.
Tell me if I'm wrong, but if the picture is that good on installation
does'nt that mean that the video card was using a suitable Driver.
How come I recieved no warnings or errors at all and when I reboot
there is no way I can get into KDE or any other windows.
Please Help!!!!
Using Mandrake 7.2
Chris
------------------------------
From: James Richard Tyrer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.redhat
Subject: Re: fax-modem how?
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 17:00:57 GMT
Luben Tuikov wrote:
> Great advice James.
>
> I did that and found out that this winmodem doesn't show an I/O port in
> Linux or WinNT4.0. No listing showed me the I/O port on both Linux and
> WinNT4.0 -- all other information was consistent.
>
AUGH! A Winmodem.
JRT
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christopher W. Aiken)
Subject: Re: linux + fortran : segmentation fault
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 17:05:19 -0000
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 17 Jan 2001 16:24:09 +0100, Estelle LEFRANCOIS wrote:
->Hi,
->Running a well known fortran program (perfectly working on other machines !)
->under linux (Redhat 6.2), I've got a kind of random error occuring. My
->program crashes leading to the message :
->Segmentation fault (core dumped)
->
->My question is : What does it mean and why I've got such a random error ?
->Could it be a hardware problem ?
->
->Thanks.
A segmentation violation usually occurs when data overwrites
machine instuctions. For example, if you have an array dimensioned
to be 5 and you try to zero out the array and accidentally zero
out 50. If the array was in a data area you just zeroed out 45
locations that belong to other data and not your original array.
This will cause a lot of debug work and hair pulling to find out
why your data is incorrect.
If the 45 extra zeroed out locations falls outside of a data area
then you probably zeroed out machine instructions. When you do
that, and the instructions are gone, you get a segmentation violation.
--
---
Christopher W. Aiken, Scenery Hill, Pa, USA
chris at cwaiken dot com, www.cwaiken.com
Current O/S: Debian GNU/Linux 2.2_r2
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christopher W. Aiken)
Subject: How to tell which version of Linux
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 17:13:36 -0000
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there any command that can be run to determine which
"flavor" of Linux is on a machine?
I'm looking for something that will tell me if it has
Slack, RH, SuSE, MD, Caldera, Storm, etc. installed. "uname"
gives kernel version etc. and does not give the information
I need.
-=[cwa]=-
--
---
Christopher W. Aiken, Scenery Hill, Pa, USA
chris at cwaiken dot com, www.cwaiken.com
Current O/S: Debian GNU/Linux 2.2_r2
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Q: How to stop underlining?
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 17:16:15 +0000
Reply-To: no_replyto@oursite
This message has been posted by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dave Ewart)
I use Eterms in Enlightenment, and have configured the text so that my
default text is BOLD WHITE, my bold text is BOLD YELLOW and my
underlined text is BOLD GREEN. However, I don't actually want my
"underlined" text to be underlined, I just want it to be green ... !
Can anyone suggest what to try? Doesn't seem to be anything else in the
Eterm config to change.
I have XFree86 3.3.6, from a RH 6.x installation.
Dave.
P.S. Apologies for the spam-trapped headers, they are munged by my
outgoing news-server and I have no control of them, sorry.
--
Dave Ewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computing Manager
ICRF Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Oxford UK
------------------------------
From: Xavier ROCHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Automatic script to check bad blocks?!
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 18:19:58 +0100
Hi,
This script if supposed to switch to runlevel 1, umount all filesystems,
check for bad blocks / repair automatically, and remount everything.
The problem is that runlevel 1 don't seem to work very well here, how
can the script waits for level 1, and then run e2fsck?
Any idea would be nice, as I didn't find the way to easily check
automatically all disks for bad blocks on Linux
#!/bin/sh
# Filesystem badblocks test
# - Umount all filesystems
# - Check filesystems & bad blocks on all fs
# - Remount all filesystems
# Check all necessary binaries..
if test ! -x /sbin/runlevel; then echo "/sbin/runlevel not found"; exit;
fi
if test ! -x /sbin/init; then echo "/sbin/init not found"; exit; fi
if test ! -x /usr/bin/cut; then echo "/usr/bin/cut not found"; exit; fi
if test ! -x /bin/df; then echo "/bin/df not found"; exit; fi
if test ! -x /bin/grep; then echo "/bin/grep not found"; exit; fi
if test ! -x /bin/sed; then echo "/bin/sed not found"; exit; fi
if test ! -x /bin/umount; then echo "/bin/umount not found"; exit; fi
if test ! -x /sbin/e2fsck; then echo "/sbin/e2fsck not found"; exit; fi
if test ! -x /bin/mount; then echo "/bin/mount not found"; exit; fi
if test ! -x /sbin/init; then echo "/sbin/init not found"; exit; fi
echo "Filesystem badblocks test ..";
# Test if we run in runlevel 2
if test `/sbin/runlevel|cut -c3-4` = 2; then
# Switch to init 1
echo "Switching to runlevel 1 .."
/sbin/init 1
# Test if we are now in runlevel 1
if test `/sbin/runlevel|/usr/bin/cut -c3-4` = 1; then
# Catch drives
DRIVES=`/bin/df -k|/bin/grep -E '^/dev/'|/bin/sed -e
's/\(\/dev\/[a-z,0-9]*\).*/\1/'`
# Umount everything (/ is now read-only)
echo "Umounting filesystems .."
/bin/umount -r -a
echo "Checking filesystems .."
for i in $DRIVES; do
echo "Checking $i .."
/sbin/e2fsck -f -p -c "$i"
done
# Remount
echo "Remounting root filesystem .."
/bin/mount -o remount,rw /
echo "Remounting filesystems .."
/bin/mount -a
else
echo "Error: unable to change current runlevel (to 1) "
fi
# Switch to init 2
echo "Switching to runlevel 2 .."
/sbin/init 2
echo "Done!"
else
echo "Error: bad current runlevel (!= 2) "
fi
------------------------------
From: Henning Eiben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Serial Number
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 17:20:36 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
fred smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Last time I posted this, someone else posted a
perl/awk/python/something
> script 3-5 lines long that does more or less the same thing.
Unfortunately
> I don't seem to have a copy of it anymore.
Oh no ... that perl-script would be cool, because I want to use this sn
in a perl-script.
--
Henning Eiben
Application Engineer busitec GmbH
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kevin Croxen)
Subject: Re: shutdown command
Date: 17 Jan 2001 17:25:10 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, JCA wrote:
>Michael Heiming wrote:
>
>>
>> OPTIONS
>> -a Use /etc/shutdown.allow.
>>
>> Seems for me as a reading problem. You have some choice now:
>>
>> 1. make a script and symlink it to /sbin/shutdown
>>
>> 2. Create a group which includes the user you want to be able to shutdown
>> and make shutdown group executable and belonging to this group.
>>
>> 3. man sudo
>>
>
> Tried that. /etc/shutdown.allow is still ignored.
>
>> Why does some one want to shutdown Linux anyway, despite save electric
>> power, save the enviroment...?
>>
>
> It runs on my laptop, which is obviously not up continuously.
>
>
Since your laptop is not likely a multi-user environment, why not
just chmod 6555 /sbin/shutdown ? Then you can shutdown from your
user acct. either by invoking the full path to the command, or by
adding /sbin to your path or by making a one-line shell script that
contains "/usr/sbin/shutdown -h now" or whatever.
--Kevin
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 18:29:10 +0100
From: Martijn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How to tell which version of Linux
"Christopher W. Aiken" wrote:
> Is there any command that can be run to determine which
> "flavor" of Linux is on a machine?
>
> I'm looking for something that will tell me if it has
> Slack, RH, SuSE, MD, Caldera, Storm, etc. installed. "uname"
> gives kernel version etc. and does not give the information
> I need.
>
try
more /etc/issue
many distribution set their signature in there (although everyone could
override this by stating something else in there)
------------------------------
From: Eggert Ehmke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: make and load a module to kernel
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 18:49:46 +0100
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 17 Jan 2001 14:28:50 +0100, "Jan Vandesompele"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Copy the compile image which you can find in
>/usr/src/linux-xxxx/arch/i386/boot/bzImage
>
>copy it for example to your /boot directory, you can give it any name you
>want.
copy it to /boot/bzImage-2.4.0
>Then edit your /etc/lilo.conf file, and add this entry:
>
>image=/boot/bzImage
> label= linux2.4
> read-only
> root=/dev/hda5
image=/boot/bzImage-2.4.0
would be a good idea. Keep your existing kernel and the corresponding entry
in lilo.conf ! If your new kernel does not work, you can still boot the old
one.
Also copy the generated System.map (in the linux directory) to
/boot/System.map-2.4.0 and create a symlink to it:
ln -s /boot/System.map-2.4.0 /boot/System.map
You may rename the old System.map to /boot/System.map-2.2.16 before.
Good luck
Eggert
--
Eggert Ehmke
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Aldo Pignotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: finding text within files query
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 17:37:36 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I would like a command line to search through all files of type .xyz
> looking for text 'abc123' within those files. ( to get the file names
> back)
>
>
find . -name "*.xyz" -print -exec grep abc123 {} \;
find puts the files it finds inside the curly brackets.
--
It ain't no sin
to be glad you're alive - the boss
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
------------------------------
From: Salva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Windows Refund Effort in Europe
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 17:41:44 GMT
Hi,
Does anybody know if there is something like the Windows Refund project
(http://zork.net/refund and http://linuxmall.com/refund/) in Europe?
has anybody obtained a refund for it's unused Windows license?
Bye!
- Salva
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list by posting to comp.os.linux.misc.
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Misc Digest
******************************
