Linux-Misc Digest #132, Volume #27 Sat, 17 Feb 01 06:13:02 EST
Contents:
Re: netcrap locks me up (Drew Roedersheimer)
Re: Better wait for Linux Kernel 2.4.x (Drew Roedersheimer)
Re: MS to Enforce Registration - or Else ("Peter T. Breuer")
Re: User permissions for vfat mount ("Duane Healing")
Re: Politics (was Re: MS to Enforce Registration - or Else) ("Peter T. Breuer")
Fax server software (Stearns28)
Re: silly networking problem - 2 ethernet cards ("Tauno Voipio")
Re: Fax server software ("Roy B")
linux only know first 8 char of password! (Carfield Yim)
Where can I find rp-pppoe-2.4 ? (Carfield Yim)
Re: MS to Enforce Registration - or Else ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: MS to Enforce Registration - or Else ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Politics (was Re: MS to Enforce Registration - or Else) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: User migrating from winders, to Linux. Need advice on programs.
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: xsane and Segmentation fault (John Thompson)
Re: User migrating from winders, to Linux. Need advice on programs. (John Thompson)
Re: safe rm (Rogier Boon)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Drew Roedersheimer)
Subject: Re: netcrap locks me up
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 08:38:42 GMT
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001 22:32:03 -0800, The Real Bev wrote:
>Drew Roedersheimer wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 16 Feb 2001 18:51:49 -0800, The Real Bev wrote:
>> >Can't remember the details of the adduser problem, just that I got tired of
>> >fighting it. Easier to fight humans...
>>
>> What distro do you use?
>
>SuSE 6.4 with kernel 2.4.test11
>
Try Debian....and just for the record...I've never experienced, nor heard of
this type of problem (and I've used quite a few different distros)...I'm
thinking user error - but of course, I've been wrong before. And upgrade your
kernel - it's old - being the Linux god that you are, I'd assume you can
roll your own - no need for that test crap when you can get 2.4.1 for free.
>> There's always an explanation for these types of
>> things - in most cases, I'm just too damn stubborn to give up the fight
>> without figuring out the problem - plus I learn a bunch along the way.
>
>Oh shit, I bet there's a line about "seeking challenges" on your resume
>too.
>
My only response to an ignorant comment like that - I don't wither under the
pressure of actually trying to solve a problem...and yes, I love challenges -
even simple ones like yourself.
>> BTW, no offense, but you don't seem to lack this same type of obstinate
>> attitude. Sure someone hasn't cracked your root account and replaced
>> adduser? ;-)
>
>Could be, I've not been feeling like myself recently. The other me, of
>course, talks a good game....I think....
>
Doubtful....I haven't heard a reasonable explanation for your silly actions
yet.
>> >"Peter T. Breuer" wrote:
>> >
>> >> Then they are complaining that they don't have a single braincell.
>> >> Netscape is a userspace application. It doesn't care who runs it.
>> >> That's why you CAN run it as root ...
>> >
>> >It comes up frequently in the netscape newsgroups. Never been my problem,
>> >so I never read the messages.
>>
>> Forgive me if I'm mistaken, but my news server doesn't bring up any netscape
>> newsgroups - no matter how I search for them. I've tried *nets*, *navig*,
>> and *commun* - nothing related to netscape that I've seen. I suppose I
>> could have tried *browser* - but now I'm too lazy...
>
>secnews.netscape.com (secure) / Communicator for Unix or
>netscape.communicator.unix
>
>I think you have to get there through some tortuous path on the netscape
>site, but it's been so long I can't remember. I'll check with me when I
>resume consciousness.
>
>Lord. I haven't been to the netscape site for a LONG time, and I'm kind of
>disgusted with what I found. Not the newsgroups, at any rate, or much at
>all about Netscape. Did you know that they'll answer a Netscape question
>for $29? Lots of shopping opportunities. Do people really go to
>Netscape's site to check out the selections at Amazon and Victoria's
>Secret? Makes me almost want to switch to IE, except I know that M$ is
>worse.
>
>Just try adding the secnews.netscape.com (secure) news server. Jeez, it's
>like forgetting the secret handshake.
>
Shame on me...at least I don't visit it as root. :-)
>> >> > Three years and still alive. So far, so good, and way better than win9*.
>> >>
>> >> .. and of course you know why you shouldn't. You really hate those
>> >> 512MB core files all over your system tree don't you!
>> >
>> >Nope, haven't had any of those for a long time. What does not kill me
>> >makes me stronger.
>
>I survived win95, I can survive anything. Or at least she did, we're not
>sure, ourselves.
>
>> That's a pretty bold attitude... Things much worse than huge core files
>> can pop up if you always run as root - I hope you're a better typist than I
>> (most are)...cause a little slip up like `rm -rf / home/user/tmp` will
>
>Heh. Actually, I'm a pretty good typist -- or used to be Way Back When. I
>do try to be extremely careful when doing irrevocable things, though. DOS
>didn't
>have an undo function, as I recall.
>
That's a good practice - I'm always careful when I'm running as root - but
then again, I don't always have to be careful, cause I rarely run as root.
And I try to stay away from that steaming pile called dos....and always have.
>> make you wish you hadn't run everything as root. And believe me, I've heard
>> of (and seen) extremely experienced unix admins do things very similar to this
>> nightmare. Sure, if you keep nightly backups, you can bring the system back
>> up to snuff, but why risk it?
>
>Backups?
>
>:-) OK, thanks for reminding me...
>
Even dogs learn what's good for them...and stick to it.
>> >> And then there
>> >> are the vicious javascript attack pages. Seen the one with the roaring
>> >> bear?
>> >
>> >Nope. More often than not I see java/javascript pages as almost totally
>> >blank, which in many cases is probably a positive boon. Shame that there
>> >are places I have to go that use the stuff.
>
>> And if typing in a measly password so you
>> can do some maintenance is too much work, then you won't last long as a
>> serious sys admin - plus any joe schmo half-whit won't think much of you
>
>Hey, I'm just a hapless user! If I wanted to be a sysadmin I'd run lin...
>er...
>
>> as a serious *nix user. Think of it this way - even NT tries to keep
>> administrators separate from regular users...
>>
>> Enough of my ranting
>
>Not really, your intentions are good :-)
>
>Consider a related problem: You need to put some stuff away, but you don't
>have any place to put the stuff until you clean out the back closet, and
>you can't do that until you find a place to put the closet stuff, and you
>can't do that until you clear out the spare room and that's full of
>hand-built furniture that's too big to get out the door...
>
>--
>Cheers,
>Bev
>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>"Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way, when
> you do criticize him, you'll be a mile away and you'll have his shoes."
> -- Steve Martin
Sounds like you need a tape drive...with some extra tapes. Not to be
offensive here, but you are the most stubborn, unreasonable, and
arguably, the most uninformed Linux user I have ever met...only arguably
because I've met some real idiots on this NG.
sorry to be so raw, but you just can't back up your convictions
-DR
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Drew Roedersheimer)
Subject: Re: Better wait for Linux Kernel 2.4.x
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 08:40:38 GMT
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001 21:52:22 -0800, J.W. Sargent wrote:
>Arctic Storm wrote:
>
>> Anyone else tired of reading about complaints about Linux Kernel 2.4?!
>> I was seriously thinking of upgrading to Linux Kernel 2.4, but I'm not sure
>> anymore. Maybe waiting for 2.4.1, or 2.4.2, or 2.4.x maybe be prudent,
>> considering the problems many people are having with 2.4.
>
>No problems w/2.4 i686 smp and Potato.....
>
Me neither... I run Potato, and I rolled my own kernel with no troubles
- I'm very pleased with the new iptables, among other features.
-DR
------------------------------
From: "Peter T. Breuer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: MS to Enforce Registration - or Else
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 09:20:33 +0100
In comp.os.linux.misc S P Arif Sahari Wibowo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Peter T. Breuer wrote:
>>> This not accurate. Science is based on *consistency*. A theory need not to
>>> be repeatable to be considered science, but it need to be consistent with
>>> other theory and observations.
>>
>>Theories are NOT "repeatable"! Experiments are. The big bang theory has
>>testable consequences.
> Exactly my point. The big bang theory is consistent with known
> 'repeatable' experiments, some other observations, and other theories. So
> the big bang itself cannot be put in experiment. Nobody will ever know if
> big bang exist, since the theory itself will contradict any direct
The big bang is NOT unobservable. Supposing no big bang, we find it
difficult to account for the cooled radiation signal we see in the
universe. We also find it difficult to explain why telescopes show the
galaxies as closer together in the past, and so on. This is on a par
with being able to measure the rate of continental drift .. we can't
start and stop drift, but we can see its consequences. But yes, we
can't (and wouldn't want to) try a new bang right now. The experiments
we can perform are limited to the "autopsy" kind.
> observation of its existance. We can only see that so far what we know is
> consistent with the theory. In the future - as we have more data - will
> that theory still be consistent? Nobody knows, we can only have faith. :-)
No, we can have doubt. The BB theory is subjected to tests the whole
time. If it doesn't pan out, we'll have to abandon it. There are
indications right now that expansion is slowing, and we still have
the problem of what the dark matter is in the universe.
>>> In math and logic, there is only 3 state of any statement: consistent /
>>> absolutely true, inconsistent / absolutely false, or unproven.
>>Well, there are more subtle distinctions too! You forgot to say
>>"relative to what".
> No, I didn't forget. There is no relative. In math & logic, the truth of a
Yes there most certainly is.
> statement is absolute. A complete math statement will not only say the
No it is not.
> relation, but all definition of objects involved in that statement.
Then you are wrong. All mathematics is conducted in the context of a
theory: a set of axioms plus a set of rules of inference.
> Therefore its truth is absolute. Obviously, "a+0=a" is relatif, but it is
a+0=a would normally be expected to have its context in some algebraic
theory like group theory, and it would be an axiom of abelian semigroup
thory. OTOH, if talking about integers, then you'd be in the theory
defined by Peano's postulates. You might be talking about set theory,
and a representation of the cardinals or ordinals, in which case you'd
have to specify which set theory. There are interesting set theories
in which there exist cardinalities that are completely unknowable
and also undeniable (for example, the cardinality of a set-sized model
of set theory; it can not be proved to exist if set-theory is
consistent! Nor proved not to exist). However, a+0=a can be proved
of the unknowable and undeniable "a".
> not a math statement. A math statement will say something like, "for G is
> a group, a is a member of G, + is addition operation of G, 0 is the
> identity element of G, and = signify equality, then a+0=a." Then for each
> word you will have more definition. That's why its truth is absolute.
No, it's relative.
>>hypothethis in itself requires the framework of a theory in order to
>>make sense and be testable. If it tests OK, and refutations fail, then
>>its a fair enough approximation to truth for the moment.
> Read my sentence again. You actually talking about the same thing, but you
> see it from the point of presentation. Yes, predictive power, testable
> consequences, role in humanity, etc. that will make the hypothethis
> interesting to other people, and therefore more people know and talk about
> it. But it doesn't mean a statement that cannot be tested immediately (or
You are confusing the axioms of the theory with the rules of inference
of the theory, and calling them all "hypotheses". I was distinguishing
first order statements ("there was a big bang") from the way we reason
towards other conclusions from them ("a hot body cools by radiation,
so the bang should be cooler now" - physics). It is quite possible
to reject the hypothesis of the big bang and still retain physics.
> ever) is not hypothethis or theory. Many hypothethis lay dormant for years
> until other part of science grown enough to make is possible to test that
> hypothethis.
This is so. Cosmology and subatomic theories are examples.
> Conceptually, predictive power and testable consequences is no other that
> consistency to the other theories and observations.
>>Well, this is true. It's a theory with no testable consequences. I.e.
>>it's consistent with the rest of our theories (which doesn't make it
>>true! Both the continuum hypothesis and the negation of the continuum
>>hypythesis can be shown consistent with all of the rest of set theory,
>>for crissake).
> No it doesn't make it true, it doesn't make it false either. As you said,
> if have no consequences, then it have no role, then we don't even have to
> care at all. Well, that is the question, right? Is there any consequences?
Of the big bang? Yes ;-). But you mean, of the existence of God? None
that I can see, either way, if God doesn't interfere in the universe.
Peter
------------------------------
From: "Duane Healing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: User permissions for vfat mount
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 01:07:50 -0800
Which works but is very insecure. If it's totally a single-user machine
than it's not so bad, but a better solution is to leave the umask alone
and mount it with your UID and GID. Make the options field like this
(substitute your UID & GID values):
defaults,uid=1000,gid=1000
This way only root and the user specified can write to the filesystem,
which is safer.
--
-Duane
-DNAware SoftLabs
> Ralph Miguel Hansen wrote:
>
> /dev/hda5 /Daten vfat defaults,umask=000 0 0
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Peter T. Breuer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Politics (was Re: MS to Enforce Registration - or Else)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 09:26:11 GMT
In comp.os.linux.misc Aaron Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bloody Viking wrote:
>>
>> Walt wrote:
>>
>> : In Los Angeles, thousands of illegal immigrants, along with people in
>> : local cemeteries, registered and voted in recent elections. And of
>> : course, they voted overwhelmingly Democratic.
>>
>> And in Florida, the GOP does the same crap. And we all know about
>> the election debacle that ensued.
> So why did Gore only challenge the counts in [democrat]-controlled
> counties?
Because the democrat countries are where most democrat voters are
and hence where most were lost to election-rigging scams, intentional
or not.
> Is that a sign that not even a Democrat candidate can trust
> a Democrat election board to do things properly?
As the state board was keen to point out, election officials do not
have party biases, just party affiliations. :-).
Peter
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stearns28)
Date: 17 Feb 2001 09:34:20 GMT
Subject: Fax server software
Hi all,
We plan on setting up a fax server on RH 6.2 for our lab? Is mgetty still the
fax server software of choice on Linux? Does anyone know of any such software
(prefereably free, under GPL) with accounting features (such as keeping track
of how many pages and/or bytes an user has sent/received) ?
Thanks for your info.
-stearns
------------------------------
From: "Tauno Voipio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: silly networking problem - 2 ethernet cards
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 10:01:34 GMT
"Bob Griffith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I have installed Mandrake 7.1 on a pc at work. I intend to use it as
> a cache/router.
>
> When I first set it up I only had 1 ethernet card on the machine and
> this set up fine - talked to the lan and to the router on our system.
>
> My next step was to add a 2nd ethernet card. I installed the card and
> it seems to be working ok - using this card I can browse my lan and
> contact my router - but the first card won't do this any more
>
> I must have done something daft or left something out - could someone
> either suggest a solution or point me at a howto/faq somewhere? I
> have looked at the howto at the linux doc project for ethernet but
> this hasn't solved the problem - the hardware is recognised ok. I
> think I've done somethingto the routing but I can't see what.
You can have an I/O address or interrupt conflict between the cards.
Check the report by 'ifconfig'. The I/O ports are in /proc/ioports and the
interrupts seen are logged in /proc/interrupts.
Tauno Voipio
tauno voipio @ iki fi
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Roy B" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Roy B" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Fax server software
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 10:11:48 GMT
Hylafax seems to work very well and does, I believe, all the things you
require.
It is a little bit tedious to set up, but once configured it's solid as a
rock.
Roy
"Stearns28" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi all,
>
> We plan on setting up a fax server on RH 6.2 for our lab? Is mgetty still
the
> fax server software of choice on Linux? Does anyone know of any such
software
> (prefereably free, under GPL) with accounting features (such as keeping
track
> of how many pages and/or bytes an user has sent/received) ?
>
> Thanks for your info.
>
> -stearns
>
------------------------------
From: Carfield Yim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: linux only know first 8 char of password!
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 17:27:20 +0800
I have set the root password of my machine have more than 8 char for
security reason, but I find that everyone can login as root if he know
the first 8 char of root password. How can I tell linux to know all
password?
------------------------------
From: Carfield Yim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.networking
Subject: Where can I find rp-pppoe-2.4 ?
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 17:44:48 +0800
After I upgrade to rp-pppoe-2.8.1, I can browse any web page, and I can
successful connect even if I put the wrong password to the system. I
would like to rollback to use older version, can anybody give me?
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: MS to Enforce Registration - or Else
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 10:09:41 +0000
Steve Mading <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> did eloquently scribble:
> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Robert Surenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> : That's why Materialism is hopelessly flawed. We all know that JFK
> : was shot, but can't repeat the experiment. How do we go about
> : proving a historical event.
> WTF does that have to do with materialism?
I was wondering the same thing. I think he got his words mixed up...
--
______________________________________________________________________________
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | "Are you pondering what I'm pondering Pinky?" |
|Andrew Halliwell BSc(hons)| |
| in | "I think so brain, but this time, you control |
| Computer Science | the Encounter suit, and I'll do the voice..." |
==============================================================================
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: MS to Enforce Registration - or Else
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 10:12:32 +0000
Steve Mading <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> did eloquently scribble:
> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Robert Surenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> : My comments where not being used as a proof. I am bored by Materialist
> : because their phylosophy is so easily shown to be false.
> Nobody's done it yet. WTF are you talking about?
I think we need to help him here... He appears not to know what the word
materialism means...
The goal of materialism is to acquire money and things to improve your
quality of life at the cost of moral/spiritual/whatever health...
--
______________________________________________________________________________
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |
|Andrew Halliwell BSc(hons)| "The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't |
| in | suck is probably the day they start making |
| Computer science | vacuum cleaners" - Ernst Jan Plugge |
==============================================================================
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Politics (was Re: MS to Enforce Registration - or Else)
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 10:15:34 +0000
Aaron Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> did eloquently scribble:
>> I am a Democrat. Please take your politics to a political forum.
>>
> Fuck off, Socialist.
LOL! That's a good one... Calling an american "Democrat" a socialist...
ROTFL! There's no such thing as a socialist in america. (Not in any serious
political position anyway). They're both as bad as each other.
Oh, and fuck off arsehole... Lose that fucking sig!!!!
(how many times have you been told about that now?)
--
=============================================================================
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Windows95 (noun): 32 bit extensions and a |
| | graphical shell for a 16 bit patch to an 8 bit |
|Andrew Halliwell BSc(hons)| operating system originally coded for a 4 bit |
| in |microprocessor, written by a 2 bit company, that|
| Computer Science | can't stand 1 bit of competition. |
=============================================================================
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: User migrating from winders, to Linux. Need advice on programs.
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 10:24:28 +0000
Kevin C. Redden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> did eloquently scribble:
> Hi all: I'm finally making the migration from linux to windows. What I
> need now, is advice on programs. I want to get linux equals of
> programs I use now on windows, and wondering if you can help?
> I'd like to get freeware versions, with the same power, if possible. I
> hate it, cause I bought some packages and can't use them in Linux.
> What I'm using now is as follows:
> Graphics manipulation program: Paint Shop Pro 7, and Adobe Photoshop 5
PhotoPaint from Corel and The GIMP.
> Desktop publishing package, Quark Express.
Nope. Think the only DTP program is FrameMaker by Adobe...
Nothing as powerfull as Quark or PageMaker yet.
> e-mail client: Pegasus Mail
elm, pine, mutt, Kmail, the list goes on and on and on....
> Bulk usenet attachment saver: BinaryBoy. (www.binaryboy.com)
Should be quite a few... It's a fairly simple procedure to automate that.
Look on Freshmeat.net.
> MP3 player: winamp
XMMS
> CD-R(w) burner: Easy CD Creator 4 (data, and audio burning)
Quite a few, I think...
> Graphics Viewers: ACDC 3
Again, see freshmeat.
> Movie viewer: MS Media player 6.4 (sorry :)
Xanim, Xine, Xtheater, Mtv, a few others.
> a file manager: Dragnfile, or Windows explorer
Too many to list.
--
______________________________________________________________________________
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |
|Andrew Halliwell BSc(hons)| "The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't |
| in | suck is probably the day they start making |
| Computer science | vacuum cleaners" - Ernst Jan Plugge |
==============================================================================
------------------------------
From: John Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: xsane and Segmentation fault
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 20:41:31 -0600
Robert Jones wrote:
> I remember reading about this problem in *a* newsgroup or *a* web page
> several months ago. I didn't pay a lot of attention at the time because
> it was before I had a scanner. Can someone give me a clue?
> RH6.0, 2.2.16 kernel, xsane-0.47-2
I haven't seen that problem here with my Epson 636U scanner, but
isn't xsane v0.47-2 fairly dated? I'm using xsane v0.62/kernel
2.2.18 and it works fine for me.
--
-John ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
------------------------------
From: John Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: User migrating from winders, to Linux. Need advice on programs.
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 20:49:48 -0600
"Kevin C. Redden" wrote:
> Hi all: I'm finally making the migration from linux to windows. What I
> need now, is advice on programs. I want to get linux equals of
> programs I use now on windows, and wondering if you can help?
I can't help for some of your requests because I don't use them
in either platform, but here goes...
> I'd like to get freeware versions, with the same power, if possible. I
> hate it, cause I bought some packages and can't use them in Linux.
>
> What I'm using now is as follows:
>
> Graphics manipulation program: Paint Shop Pro 7, and Adobe Photoshop 5
The Gimp (http://www.gimp.org)
> Desktop publishing package, Quark Express.
>
> e-mail client: Pegasus Mail
Plenty to choose from. Check out http://www.freshmeat.net
> Bulk usenet attachment saver: BinaryBoy. (www.binaryboy.com)
>
> MP3 player: winamp
RealPlayer v8
> download manager: Gozillia
wget
> CD-R(w) burner: Easy CD Creator 4 (data, and audio burning)
>
> Graphics Viewers: ACDC 3
>
> Movie viewer: MS Media player 6.4 (sorry :)
Realplayer
> a file manager: Dragnfile, or Windows explorer
Once again, plenty to choose from. Checkout freshmeat again.
--
-John ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
------------------------------
From: Rogier Boon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux,linux.redhat.misc
Subject: Re: safe rm
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 11:37:25 +0100
Have you checked the undelete utillities for ext2 on
http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/Filesystems-HOWTO.html
Perhaps there's an other fs that fits your needs
greetings
Rogier Boon
--
-- Gelul is altijd en overal
-- *ook hier*
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list by posting to comp.os.linux.misc.
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Misc Digest
******************************
