On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 08:11:35PM +0100, Bart Oldeman wrote: > > I don't think that would be the right thing to do. Approximations are only > used if no alternative is available in the real character set. >
What do you mean by the real character set (in terms of the dosemurc options) ? > Did you check what happens if you remove the U_SMALL_LETTER_DOTLESS_I > approximation? As far as I know you'd get a question mark instead then > which is also not what you want. > Yes, it works after removal. Currently internal_char_set is set to cp857, external to iso-8859-9, layout to tr, term_char_set is default (this one gets set to latin1). Actually, DOTLESS_I was the only glitch, the other 8859-9-specific glyphs appear flawlessly. AFAICS, put_character_symbol() handles these via type_alt_num(). Without a latin5 setting for term_char_set, I wonder if this is working by chance or by design. Regards, A. Alper ATICI - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-msdos" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
