Linux-Networking Digest #814, Volume #9 Fri, 8 Jan 99 05:13:35 EST
Contents:
Higher than 115k serial i/o ("Kris Jordan")
please help me!!!!!! ("medecs")
Re: RH5.1 / NetGear FA310TX / @Home / tulip.c 0.89K (Troutman)
Network connection fails after early success ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: cannot ftp from win95 ftp server (Bill Berry)
Re: Possible Red Hat pppd routing poblem ("James Higgins")
Frame capture/analysis software? (DWR)
Re: dynamic addressing w/ Ethernet? (Ryan Stapleton)
Re: PLEASE HELP !!! PLEASE HELP !!! (David Fox)
Re: SEE YA' LATER SUCKERS !!! HAHAHAHA !!! (Iain)
Re: Ethernet card recommendation--urgent (Thomas Klettke)
Re: SEE YA' LATER SUCKERS !!! HAHAHAHA !!! ("Charles Stack")
RH5.2PPP Can anyone decipher this??? /var/log/messages ("Curtis Ross")
Re: SEE YA' LATER SUCKERS !!! HAHAHAHA !!! (Tom Elsesser)
Re: Connection refused from remote X-Windows (David Efflandt)
Re: driver (Mike)
Re: dns newbie (Jan Stifter)
ftp stuff (Eric Melville)
IP masq + mIRC DCC send = broke ?? (Spawn)
Re: cant connect to apache ("Wizard")
cannot ftp from win95 ftp server (Bill Berry)
Masquerading (Ronald Schierer)
Re: need better info on settting up SAMBA (Bob Hauck)
Changing MAC address ("Sander Pilon")
Have a small problem yet an important one ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Kris Jordan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Higher than 115k serial i/o
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 22:16:10 -0800
I'd like to know if there is a isa serial i/o card that would work in linux
at speeds higher than 115kbs. I saw a Telebyte Model 480 Isa:
Dual Port
Data Rate to 460 KBPS
32K Buffers For Tx and Rx 16C650
Selectable Com1-Com4
I only need the one port. But it does not list linux as compatible.
Thank you,
Kris Jordan
begin 666 O Card.url
M6TEN=&5R;F5T4VAO<G1C=71=#0I54DP]:'1T<#HO+W=W=RYT96QE8GET975S
C82YC;VTO8V%T86QO9R]P<F]D=6-T<R\T.# N:'1M#0H`````
`
end
------------------------------
From: "medecs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: please help me!!!!!!
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 14:49:47 +0800
can somebody give me a short briefing how to secure a DNS using BIND
software
------------------------------
From: Troutman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: RH5.1 / NetGear FA310TX / @Home / tulip.c 0.89K
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 11:04:15 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Karl Schuster wrote:
> but, instead use:
>
> gcc -DMODULE -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/net/inet -Wall \
> -Wstrict-prototypes -O6 -c tulip.c \
> `[ -f /usr/include/linux/modversions.h ] && echo -DMODVERSIONS`
>
> It's located in the bottom of the source code of tulip.c in a little
> comment block. Also, this is for a modular kernel, not a monolithic
> kernel. Note: that "-O6" reads "dash-oh-six", _not_ "dash-zero-six."
Thanks for the tips. Will try both versions on card today and get back
to you ;-/
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Network connection fails after early success
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 15:51:29 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am encountering a problem and need help fixing it.
First the particulars of my setup:
Thinkpad 770
3Com 575TX PCMCIA Ethernet card
Redhat Linux 5.1
Kernel upgraded to 2.0.36
Latest PCMCIA package
Connecting to an Ethernet network with a DHCP server somewhere.
The problem: After booting linux, I issue the command:
/etc/rc.d/init.d/network start eth0
as root. Sometimes I get the message that DHCP...failed and
sometimes I get the message that DHCP...OK. In both cases however
it appears that eth0 has been configured and that a default route
appears when I do a netstat -rn. I am able to ping, telnet,
traceroute, do dns lookups, etc. for a couple of minutes. After
approximately 2 to 3 minutes however, network operations fail.
Pings return 100% loss, traceroutes never make the first hop, telnets
hang, and so forth. The network card still looks configured when
I issue an ifconfig eth0. Netstat -rn still returns the necessary
routing information. I am not running any routing daemons (gated or
routed) Stopping the network (/etc/rc.d/init.d/network stop) and
restarting the network will get the network to work again for another
couple of minutes and then I'm back in the same situation.
TCP/IP works when I boot win95 so I do not believe it is hardware
problem or an external network problem.
I am perplexed as to what to try next. I've read the FAQs, HOWTOs and
other documentation, but perhaps I have overlooked something. I
would appreciate any help or points anyone could provide.
Thanks,
Todd
==========================
Todd Bruner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill Berry)
Subject: Re: cannot ftp from win95 ftp server
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 17:07:10 GMT
Never mind, I think I figured it out: Not enough permissions for the user in
the FTP server application.
Thanks
In article <772o4q$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill Berry) wrote:
>I'm using a win95 ftp server (FTP Server Version 0.30 Made by Marc Bergeron
>of TYPSoft) to make StarOffice 5 available to download to myself at home on my
>Linux box. (long story involving getting disconnected from download site yada
>yada yada)
>
>So I set up a little ftp server at the office in the hopes that one user
>connected to one fast machine will let my poor little Linux machine download
>this huge 66 MB file.
>
>But I can't seem to get it to work. Unfortunately, I'm not experienced enough
>with Linux or Unix to figure out why. Can you help? Here's a log of a similar
>attempt from my work machine telneting through a Unix machine:
>
>Connected to xxx.xxx.xx.xx.
>220 ORS
>Name (xxx.xxx.xx.xx:joeuser): logon
>331 Password required for logon.
>Password:
>230 User logon logged in.
>Remote system type is UNIX.
>Using binary mode to transfer files.
>ftp> dir
>200 Port command successful.
>150 Opening data connection for directory list.
>drw-rw-rw- 1 ftp ftp 0 Dec 14 1998 .
>drw-rw-rw- 1 ftp ftp 0 Dec 14 1998 ..
>-rw-rw-rw- 1 ftp ftp 1761739 Dec 23 1998 chim508.zip
>-rwxrwxrwx 1 ftp ftp 466272 Jan 05 11:15 ie5setup.exe
>-rw-rw-rw- 1 ftp ftp 66017280 Jan 05 15:41 so50_01.tar
>-rw-rw-rw- 1 ftp ftp 487 Jan 07 09:12 Expander.exe.lnk
>drw-rw-rw- 1 ftp ftp 0 Jan 05 14:23 Unix ports
>drw-rw-rw- 1 ftp ftp 0 Dec 15 1998 email attachments
>226 File sent ok
>ftp> get so50_01.tar
>200 Port command successful.
>500 Cannot RETR.
>
>Yes, I know I didn't specify a directory, but when I was trying it for real, I
>did. I've tried ncftp, and plain old ftp.
>
>Please email help or for more info
>
>Thanks,
>
>Bill
------------------------------
From: "James Higgins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: linux.redhat.ppp
Subject: Re: Possible Red Hat pppd routing poblem
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1999 02:19:11 -0500
Doug Bryant wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Try removing any gateway entries. I am not sure of the technical details
of
>why, but I think your computer is getting confused between the internet and
>your gateway.
>
>In redhat 5.2 under the Control Panel | Network Configuration | Routing
>remove any entries in the default gateway and default gateway device
>
>Hope this helps
>
>Doug Bryant
There are no entries there. I tried manually running:
route del 0.0.0.0
route add default dev ppp0
after connecting and got nowhere. I also tried the noipdefault option to
pppd. I took a look in my /etc/ppp/ip-up and saw that it ran
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifup-routes and (*I think*) passed it ppp0 as
$1.
the ifup-routes has in it something like:
linuxconf --hints routing "$1" | while read args do;
/sbin/route $args
done
As it turns out if I execute
linuxconf --hints routing "ppp0"
in the shell I get back nothing. Is something broken here or should this not
do anything? Additional information omitted from the original post: I am
not running a local network PPP is my only means of connectivity.
James
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (DWR)
Subject: Frame capture/analysis software?
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1999 06:46:37 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anyone know of any good Linux network monitoring/diagnostic
software that works similar to WinNT's Network Monitor Tools and Agent
and MS Systems Management Server software?
------------------------------
From: Ryan Stapleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: dynamic addressing w/ Ethernet?
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 12:58:08 +0000
Michael Wise wrote:
>
> I'm changing jobs.
>
> Right now, I run Linux 2.0 on an Intel box with a 3Com Ethernet card; I
> have a fixed IP address associated with my machine; our server is
> Netware that my computer largely ignores, while mail and DNS are
> controlled by boxes further upstream. I have had no problems with
> Internet services, and I use these services (telnet specifically) to
> run a 3270 emulator, where I do useful work.
>
> In my future is a firm that has an NT server that dynamically allocates
> IP addresses (all the above info being basically the same). I have used
> dynamically-allocated IP through PPP, but never on an Ethernet network.
> I have looked in the literature, but I have not seen anything to help
> with this: either you're dialing in, and can take whatever address is
> available, or you're physically connected and you have a specific
> address. I can and will ask the company to allocate one or more static
> addresses for me to use, but it seems there should be a way in Linux to
> configure this. Any suggestions?
Yes you will need to install DHCPd, the client. Windows to the best
of my knowledge uses DHCP to do the dynamic allocated ips, I use
DHCP on my linux box to act as a server for windows boxes and it
seems to work great. I hope that helps, it should at least give
you a direction to go in.
Check this site out:
http://metalab.unc.edu/LDP/HOWTO/mini/DHCP.html
-Ryan
--
===============================================================
- Ryan Stapleton | [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
- Amateur Radio Call: KA3WUT | [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
- http://users.penn.com/~raal | [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
===============================================================
------------------------------
From: d s f o x @ c o g s c i . u c s d . e d u (David Fox)
Crossposted-To:
linux.redhat.install,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: PLEASE HELP !!! PLEASE HELP !!!
Date: 07 Jan 1999 09:59:30 -0800
David Shepherd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Whilst this obnoxious person has been winding everyone up, there has
> been mention of what his ISP would think of his antics. Assuming he uses
> an ISP. I just pointed my browser at www.hdtv.com and it turns out to be
> a company called Image Circuits, consulting engineers specializing in
> the design of digital video systems. There is no mention of providing an
> Internet Service, so it would appear that he is an employee. Perhaps
> the management of Image Circuits would be interested?!
Eh. (shrug)
--
David Fox http://hci.ucsd.edu/dsf xoF divaD
UCSD HCI Lab baL ICH DSCU
------------------------------
From: Iain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
linux.redhat.install,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: SEE YA' LATER SUCKERS !!! HAHAHAHA !!!
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 18:03:41 +0000
Total wanker!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> FTP INSTALL FINALLY WORKED THANKS TO CROSSBONES !!!
> Well, except for me and Crossbones, all of you are none more than
> f****** idiots. But it's been fun insulting everyone one of you, who
> were against me, in this newsgroup. In fact, when you look at the
> thread(s), it probably reminds you of Jerry Springer. Now I did not ask
> for this, you all forced me into it, so don't even f****** blame me !!!
> Anyway, it was fun fighting like in the Springer shows but I gotta go
> now, so
> GOOD-BYE TO ALL YOU MENTALLY RETARDED IDIOTS OUT THERE WHO CAN'T BE HELPFUL THE WAY
>I WANT IT !!!
------------------------------
From: Thomas Klettke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
linux.redhat.install,comp.os.linux.hardware,redhat.networking.general,iu.linux
Subject: Re: Ethernet card recommendation--urgent
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 12:08:58 -0600
Clay Bond wrote:
> I need somebody to give
> me an ethernet card recommendation, where we're talking
> about a card that will be recognized immediately by the
> installation program (meaning that it's on the listed
> cards on the installation screen) and works faultlessly
> as soon as the installation is over. No compliling the
> kernel. No weird parameters. A card that is truly
> supported by 5.2, not a card that's going to waste my
> valuable time. And it obviously has to be an ISA card.
I used all kind of cards with 5.1 and 5.2, the easiest I ever installed
were Linksys' NE 2000 clones. When installed during setup (use
Autoprobe) I never had any problems. Setting up the card later (after
Linux is already installed) is not that easy, but still doesn't cause
trouble.
Hope it helped,
Thomas
------------------------------
From: "Charles Stack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
linux.redhat.install,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: SEE YA' LATER SUCKERS !!! HAHAHAHA !!!
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 13:09:09 -0500
He'll be back with another question. Perhaps then, noone will want to help
him.
cjs
------------------------------
From: "Curtis Ross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RH5.2PPP Can anyone decipher this??? /var/log/messages
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 08:33:42 -0800
I have been trying to connect to my isp for days. I think I made progress
this morning as I now have a different error message in var/log/messages.
Can anyone decipher this??? and tell me what I can do to fix this.
Red Hat 5.2 using the PPP network configurator from the control panel set to
debug
the log is as follows in /var/log/messages:
send ATZ^M
expect (ok)
ATZ^M^M
OK
-- got it
send (ATDT4460187^M)
expect (connect)
^M
ATDT4460187^M
CONNECT
-- got it
send (^M)
send <username>
send <password^M>
serial connection established
Using interface ppp0
connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/modem
LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests
Connection Terminated
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Elsesser)
Subject: Re: SEE YA' LATER SUCKERS !!! HAHAHAHA !!!
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 18:40:00 GMT
I guess the recess bell finally rang.
On Thu, 07 Jan 1999 14:05:05 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|>FTP INSTALL FINALLY WORKED THANKS TO
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Efflandt)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Connection refused from remote X-Windows
Date: 8 Jan 1999 07:01:14 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 6 Jan 1999 20:35:56 -0500, Jim Orfanakos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I am using X-Win32 on a Win95 PC trying to connect to a RedHat 5.1 system.
>Whenever I try to start an X application I get connection refused after I
>enter my userid and password. I tried rsh as well as rexec.
>
>If I telnet in, then start the application sending it back to the remote pc
>via "-display" it works. If log in directly to the RedHat 5.1 server and
>send the application back to the remote pc via "-display" it works.
>
>I have open the system up in /etc/securetty and /etc/security/access.conf
>but no luck.
>
>Any Ideas?
You don't mention if you used xhost. See 'man xhost'. Some people
recommend a more secure method, but this should do for a home or office
LAN.
>Thanks.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> Jim Orfanakos
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://home.sprynet.com/sprynet/djo3
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>
--
David Efflandt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.xnet.com/~efflandt/
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 10:45:59 -0500
From: Mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: driver
Joel,
Check out this web site. I have a card with a 21143
and it works great. The web site has the source as well since
you may have to modify the driver a tad to get it to work.
http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/tulip.html
-Mike B.
Joel Lefebvre wrote:
>
> I installed Redhat Linux 5.2 on a Presario 5170. The computer has
> a DEC21143 intergrated lan chip. The Tulip driver doesn't want to
> work with it. Is there a driver out there that will recognize
> the 21143?
>
> Thanks
>
> Joel
--
Mike B.
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 19:53:34 +0100
From: Jan Stifter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: dns newbie
jos wrote:
>
> Hello,
> An question about dns:
> is it possible to setup an own dns-server so that you can make up your
> own domain name using linux.
> And is this domain then accessible from the internet without
> registering it to internic?
> And where to get more info about setting up dns-servers?
> Thx
try out the dns-how-to:
http://metalab.unc.edu/LDP/HOWTO/HOWTO-INDEX-3.html
=====================================================================
| Jan Stifter email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| web: www.htl-bw.ch/~ia95stif |
| meet me: telnet://freechess.org:5000 (nick: nunc) |
=====================================================================
------------------------------
From: Eric Melville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux
Subject: ftp stuff
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1999 07:05:10 GMT
i've got two problems:
1. i've got a home-lan, with one ip... and an ftp server running on one
of the internal computers. so i forward port 921 to the ftp server, and
have the ftp server listen for ftp connections on that port... seems
ok... but i also want ftpserv to accept connections on port 21... so
life is easy on MY side of things. what's the best way to have an ftp
server on two ports? right now i've made a softlink to wu.ftpd, and have
inetd.conf call the softlink for port 921... is there a better way?
2. when coming in on the forwarded port, sometimes i get this "Cannot
build data connection: Connection refused." what's going on here?
-E
------------------------------
From: Spawn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: IP masq + mIRC DCC send = broke ??
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1999 01:02:39 -0600
Ok,
I just got IP masq + dial-on demand working tonight. Here is my config:
kernel 2.2.0-pre4 + pppd 2.3.5
NT 4.0
One problem: I can't seem to get DCC send working with mIRC .
I can receive DCCs just fine. I confirmed that I have the ip_masq_irc
module loaded.
Any ideas anyone ?
Thanks
------------------------------
From: "Wizard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: cant connect to apache
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1999 10:07:29 +0100
Matt,
is your apache started (ps ax)?
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill Berry)
Subject: cannot ftp from win95 ftp server
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 16:42:32 GMT
I'm using a win95 ftp server (FTP Server Version 0.30 Made by Marc Bergeron
of TYPSoft) to make StarOffice 5 available to download to myself at home on my
Linux box. (long story involving getting disconnected from download site yada
yada yada)
So I set up a little ftp server at the office in the hopes that one user
connected to one fast machine will let my poor little Linux machine download
this huge 66 MB file.
But I can't seem to get it to work. Unfortunately, I'm not experienced enough
with Linux or Unix to figure out why. Can you help? Here's a log of a similar
attempt from my work machine telneting through a Unix machine:
Connected to xxx.xxx.xx.xx.
220 ORS
Name (xxx.xxx.xx.xx:joeuser): logon
331 Password required for logon.
Password:
230 User logon logged in.
Remote system type is UNIX.
Using binary mode to transfer files.
ftp> dir
200 Port command successful.
150 Opening data connection for directory list.
drw-rw-rw- 1 ftp ftp 0 Dec 14 1998 .
drw-rw-rw- 1 ftp ftp 0 Dec 14 1998 ..
-rw-rw-rw- 1 ftp ftp 1761739 Dec 23 1998 chim508.zip
-rwxrwxrwx 1 ftp ftp 466272 Jan 05 11:15 ie5setup.exe
-rw-rw-rw- 1 ftp ftp 66017280 Jan 05 15:41 so50_01.tar
-rw-rw-rw- 1 ftp ftp 487 Jan 07 09:12 Expander.exe.lnk
drw-rw-rw- 1 ftp ftp 0 Jan 05 14:23 Unix ports
drw-rw-rw- 1 ftp ftp 0 Dec 15 1998 email attachments
226 File sent ok
ftp> get so50_01.tar
200 Port command successful.
500 Cannot RETR.
Yes, I know I didn't specify a directory, but when I was trying it for real, I
did. I've tried ncftp, and plain old ftp.
Please email help or for more info
Thanks,
Bill
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ronald Schierer)
Subject: Masquerading
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1999 10:18:21 +0100
Hello -
I have some problems with masquerading/firewalling with Suse5.2. I
believe, all settings for the kernel are ok and the kernel is compiled.
But, I got always "403 : access denied" messages if I want to have
access to the internet.
I appreciate your hints and help
Ron
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Hauck)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: need better info on settting up SAMBA
Date: 7 Jan 1999 18:50:48 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeffrey Greer) writes:
> I have the network card recognized and set to eth0, ip address
> 223.223.223.1. The nt box is set to ip 223.223.223.0.
Bad idea. Try 192.168.1.1 and 192.168.1.2 and use 255.255.255.0
netmask on both.
The .0 address is reserved to represent the whole network, you
should not use it for a host. And the 192.168.x.y addresses are
reserved for private networks like yours so you don't need to
worry about a conflict if you hook up to the internet.
> Do I need to run ypserv for dns, what about ypbind?
No, you don't need either. Get everything to work with ip
addresses (e.g ping 192.168.1.1) before worrying about dns or
samba.
--
11:45:00 up 36 days, 19:40, 3 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
------------------------------
From: "Sander Pilon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Changing MAC address
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1999 10:18:34 +0100
Hi,
Is it possible, or will it possible, to change the MAC address in the
outgoing packet on a per-packet basis?
(I'm trying to build a device that's COMPLETELY transparant, so it has
to send out packets with the same MAC address as the incoming packets)
Reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Regards,
Sander
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Have a small problem yet an important one
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1999 09:17:09 GMT
Hi! and a very happy new year. I'm from Chandigarh,India. I'm working on
RedHat 5.0 (kernel 2.0.35) and have got quite busy trying to configure it for
my LAN. I'm using the default kernel shipped with RedHat and have not
recompiled it. I'm using a Compex RL2000 10Mbps ethernet card. The card has
been registered in my /proc/pci as having IRQ=12, I/O 0xe400 and since is the
only card so is identified as eth0. After it got detected in /proc/pci i used
"linux ether=12,0xe400, eth0" at the LILO BOOT prompt since it was not
getting detected at boot. But now even after this i'm getting a message which
says "Delaying eth0 initialization" .What I would also like to inform is that
i have read the Ethernet-HOWTO about 10-times over and if some reference can
be given from that it would be fine.If somebody can help me out with this
i,ll be able to complete one of my new year resolutions and perhaps sleep for
the next night(you know what a pain an inconfigured linux box can be).
Regards Pankaj.
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
