Linux-Networking Digest #874, Volume #9 Thu, 14 Jan 99 01:13:51 EST
Contents:
truncated packets with ppp ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Can't get ppp compression to work! (Jurgen Kramer)
Re: need help with linux authentication of Win95 clients ("Eugene")
IP Aliasing problem ("Alex Tsekhansky")
Re: What does this mean? Please? ("Eugene")
Re: rc.local question ("Eugene")
Re: Do I need a Guru ? ("Alex Tsekhansky")
Re: SSLeay and certificates (Lars Hofhansl)
Re: Help! New user ("Eugene")
Problem: Diskless Boot with NFS (Frank Jacobi)
Re: Win98 - Linux [Which FAST protocol ?] (Tim Gibson)
Re: Telneting as "root" (Lars Hofhansl)
Digiboard PC/Xem cards on Red Hat 5.2 ("Chirstian Schlesier")
Re: Dial-up Setup frustration (Roger Rabbit)
How Do You Setup Two NICS ("Donnie Palmer")
Re: Printing from NT to Laser on Linux Server. (Ger)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: truncated packets with ppp
Date: 13 Jan 1999 20:24:33 GMT
If I dial over ISDN/syncPPP to my provider I get the following
packets (captured with tcpdump):
tcpdump: listening on ippp0
21:03:00.050433 truncated-ip - 27665 bytes missing!0.84.34.245 > 0.0.64.1:
(frag 26426:27743@63512+) [tos 0x6e] [ttl 0]
21:03:00.110433 194.120.238.1 > 193.158.184.58: icmp: echo reply
21:03:01.050433 truncated-ip - 42700 bytes missing!0.84.34.249 > 0.0.64.1:
(frag 0:42794@63512+) [tos 0x54] [ttl 0]
21:03:01.110433 194.120.238.1 > 193.158.184.58: icmp: echo reply
21:03:02.050433 truncated-ip - 42701 bytes missing!0.84.34.253 > 0.0.64.1:
(frag 0:42795@63512+) [tos 0x54] [ttl 0]
21:03:02.110433 194.120.238.1 > 193.158.184.58: icmp: echo reply
the internet connection is working but these packets are causing a big
headache to me :-(
Ralf
------------------------------
From: Jurgen Kramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Can't get ppp compression to work!
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 23:26:36 +0100
I have got a 486 PC with Linux 2.2.0-pre4 and RedHat 5.2 which acts as a
gateway between our local LAN and the Internet. The connection is made
trough a cablemodem and PPP. It al works nicely but it keeps complaining
that it can't load ppp-compress-21, 26 and
24.
I already modified /etc/conf.modules to look like this:
alias ppp-compress-21 bsd-comp
alias ppp-compress-24 ppp-deflate
alias ppp-compress-26 ppp-deflate
alias net-pf-5 off
alias net-pf-4 off
I ran depmod but to no avail. Any ideas? I really like
to get compression working it might get me some extra bandwith.
Thanks,
Jurgen
------------------------------
From: "Eugene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: need help with linux authentication of Win95 clients
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 23:38:49 -0500
edit /etc/smb.conf
add line:
domain logins = yes
users must have account on the Linux box (I think)
see also smbpasswd
Daddy Rabbit wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I'm needing to connect winblows to a linux server. The linux server
>needs to provide security and authentication for winblows clients. I
>have set up other linux servers that use NT for authentication but
>haven't been able to use linux only.
>
>I'm using the Redhat 5.2 distribution w/samba 1.9.3pe (I think). I can
>ping all the hosts and everything in winblows is configured correctly
>(I think) that is to say, it is configured the same way it was for NT
>authentication.
>
>Any suggestions would be appreciated.
>
>Jim
------------------------------
From: "Alex Tsekhansky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: IP Aliasing problem
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 15:38:26 -0800
I have a problem configuring aliasing on RedHat 5.1.
I compiled kernel with aliasing included and when I try to use something
like
ifconfig eth0:0 192.168.0.1
I get an error message
SIOCSIFADDR: Invalid argument
Also if I try to load ip_alias.o with insmod, I get
ip_alias.o: unresolved symbol register_net_alias_type_R9eeab982
ip_alias.o: unresolved symbol ip_rt_dev_Rde10f949
ip_alias.o: unresolved symbol unregister_net_alias_type_R575fb95a
I would appreciate any thoughts and/or comments.
Alex.
------------------------------
From: "Eugene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: What does this mean? Please?
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 23:41:38 -0500
I think netmask is supposed to be 255.0.0.0
see also www.linux.org/help
>dont u think ur using a wrong netmask........????
>just a hint....
that's a very helpful post, isn't it?
------------------------------
From: "Eugene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: rc.local question
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 23:44:19 -0500
/27 is the netmask.
don't worry about it
Scott MacDonald wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Can someone tell me how the last 2 numbers in the example address below
work
>in a network environment?
>
>208.252.222.16/27
>
>The /27 is confusing me. I believe that it identifies what workstations are
>in this network, but I'm not sure how it all works. I am setting up a linux
>box as a gateway to the internet, and this is the setup in the rc.local
>file. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
>
>Scott
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Alex Tsekhansky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Do I need a Guru ?
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 16:18:27 -0800
If I am not mistaken the card you use (I guess it's 3C509) is an ISA
jumperless card. In PCI configuration in BIOS you have to exclude IRQs used
by ISA cards so they cannot be reassigned to other cards by accident. If you
did not do that, it may be a problem (very similar situation happened on my
Linux box). Also try to reconfigure the card to use different IRQ and/or I/O
port.
Alex.
Luca Colombi wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I have two network card in my machine but at boot time only one is
>probed.
>
>I edited the /etc/lilo.conf file and inserted the line ' append =
>"ether=0,0 eth1" to force the second card to be recognised but it didn't
>work !
>
>I've then tried to use ' ehter=5,0x300, eth1' and it didn't work.
>(Always running the command # lilo after each update.)
>
>The card is at IRQ 5, IO 0x300 and it's working if I do remove the other
>from the system.
>
------------------------------
From: Lars Hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: SSLeay and certificates
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 22:13:42 +0100
Arthur Jovellas wrote:
>
> Can anyone answer a few questions about this stuff?
>
> 1. I compiled a SSL Apache and configured the test certificate x509. It
> seems to only work with Netscape. By browsing and accepting this test
> cert does that mean that everything is encrypted? Does it also mean I
> can use it for non-commercial security or do I need something else?
I created my own key and self-signed (i.e. useless) certificate.
With that I was able to connect with netscape (3+4) and IE (4 only,
3 doesn't support "unknown" CAs). I didn't try Apache, though,
but used SSLtcl to connect to my own server (written in TCL).
>
> 2. I want to get a CA to sign a commercial cert request. After that is
> done and installed will I now be able to support other browsers like IE3
> or 4 etc?
The certificate just assignes authentification information to your
RSA key. This certificate is signed by a known authority in order
to ensure that the authentification information is valid.
Thus, it doesn't really matter who signed the certificate.
>
> 3. When I https somewhere, does the fact that the security lock icon on
> netscape being locked mean that all transmissions back & forth are
> encrypted?
Hmm, not sure about this one, seem likely, though.
>
> 4. If I accept visa cards etc can I just write a basic FORM and put it
> in one of my SSL directories? Will that mean that any inffo that was
> filled out got transmitted encrypted?
Yup. The form action must also go to a https page.
>
> 5.When I have a CA sign a cert will I get stronger encryption that 40
> bits or does my request have to be compiled first with stronger
> encryption schemes.
Again, the encryption is independent of the signing authority.
The 40bits are "hardcoded" in all international browsers, due
to the rediculous US-export restrictions
Cheers,
Lars
--
Legal Warning: Anyone sending me unsolicited/commercial email
WILL be charged a $100 proof-reading fee. See US Code Title 47,
Sec.227(a)(2)(B), Sec.227(b)(1)(C) and Sec.227(b)(3)(C).
Linux grows, see http://counter.li.org/ and register.
------------------------------
From: "Eugene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Help! New user
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 23:27:18 -0500
www.linux.org/help
Ziae wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I am new to Linux and need some help! Can anyone can point me in the
>direction where I can find some help connecting a Linux PC to Windows 95
>PC via Ethernet.
>
>Thanks!!!
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank Jacobi)
Subject: Problem: Diskless Boot with NFS
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 07:42:34 GMT
Hello everyone out there in the fast growing linux community!
I have a small problem with my small network. It is the diskless
machine, a old IBM Thinkpad 340 Laptop with a Realtek parallel port
network adapter, that does some strange stuff when booting.
It boots the disk and loads the drivers and starts the negotiation,
then I get the following:
Root-NFS: Got BOOTP answer from 192.168.1.1, my address is 192.168.1.2
Root-NFS: Got filehandle for /tftpboot/192.168.1.2 via RPC
VFS: Mounted root (nfs filesystem)
that is all I get
there is permanent traffic on the network, but nothing real is
transmitted, just some link resolving stuff
Thanks in advance!
Frank Jacobi
------------------------------
From: Tim Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Win98 - Linux [Which FAST protocol ?]
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 04:45:33 +0000
Athan wrote:
>
> Thank you I'll try it
> Netbeui is supported by samba corect ??
> ipx is novel i think
> I'll try them
>
> Thank you Jorge
>
> Athan
>
> Jorge Herrera wrote:
>
> > With Windows '98 and Linux, the best IS TCP/IP, but since you mentioned that
> > is not an option, try using ipx/spx or Netbeui. MARS implements ipx/spx and
> > samba implements Netbeui.
> >
> > -Jorge
> >
> > Athan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > >Hello
> > >
> > >I have a win98 and Linux box with 2 isa 3c509tp cards,
> > >which protocol should I use for fast connections except TCP/IP
> > >
> > >Thank you
> > >Athan
> > >
No NetBEUI support is written into Samba now. And probably will never
be, even thought there is some code out there now. It just isn't stable
and somewhat useless as well/
------------------------------
From: Lars Hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: linux.redhat.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Telneting as "root"
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 22:23:21 +0100
Meindert Sprang wrote:
>
> If you want to play safe, start a telnet session as an ordinary user, then
> issue the 'su' command to change to super user (=root) and enter the
> password for root.
>
> Meindert
That won't help too much. The password and the complete telnet
session is sent in cleartext over the net. It's trivival to capture
the passwords!
> > You will now be able to telnet in as root, but be warned:
> > The reason that root is disabled from telnetting in is to prevent a
> hacker
> > from breaking root's password. With the securetty file implemented, a
> > hacker needs to break TWO passwords.
> >
The reason is that the username root is known on all systems. Normally
a hacker would have to guess the username and the password. If he
already knows an username (root) he only has to guess the password.
Therefore remote root access is disabled. (there're also
other reasons).
Take a look at SSH at
http://www.ssh.fi/sshprotocols2/index.html
Even with ssh it is wise to disable direct root-access, but log in as
ordinary user and then use su. I guess that what's Meindert meant.
Cheers,
Lars
--
Legal Warning: Anyone sending me unsolicited/commercial email
WILL be charged a $100 proof-reading fee. See US Code Title 47,
Sec.227(a)(2)(B), Sec.227(b)(1)(C) and Sec.227(b)(3)(C).
Linux grows, see http://counter.li.org/ and register.
------------------------------
From: "Chirstian Schlesier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Digiboard PC/Xem cards on Red Hat 5.2
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 16:38:27 +1100
Please help!!
Here is a copy of an email I've sent Digi about problems
I'm having running PC/Xem cards on Linux.
I haven't had any response from them, so I'm hoping
someone out there can help.
Here's the saga!!
============================================================================
--
The PC configuration is as follows;
EISA Asus P/E-P55T2P4D Motherboard
(with current Bios rev 0107)
Pentium 200MMX CPU
198 Mb RAM
DPT Raid Assembly
Adaptec 2940W SCSI controller
SCSI Tape Drive
SCSI CDROM
3.2Gb IDE HDD with Red Hat 5.2 (testbed)
DAY 1
Upon receiving these cards we removed the current EISA/Xem
cards from the system (which have worked perfectly under SCO
for years now) and installed the PC/Xem cards.
Using DIGIMMAP we determined the best memory address to
use was D8000. We set the I/O address on board 1 to 104 and
board 2 to 114.
We tested this configuration using UD-RISC and found both
cards passed all diagnostics.
We then downloaded the most current driver (ver 1.3.1) for the
Linux OS from www.digiboard.com, and installed it using digiInstall,
and added;
append="digiepca=E,PC/Xem,D,32,104,D8000" \
digiepca=E,PC/Xem,D,48,114,D8000"
to lilo.conf.
The cards were configured using digiConfig and the kernel re-built.
Running 'digiDload v' after re-booting the system, the cards seemed
to be initialized correctly, however, upon attempting to send data
to a terminal (eg: date > /dev/ttyD9) we recieved this error;
'Operation not supported by device'
We attempted using different memory and I/O configurations without
any success. We were unable, at any point, to receive data at
any of the connected terminals. The kernel refused to recognize the
tty's as valid devices.
DAY 2
The following day we downloaded and installed version 2.2.0-pre6
of the Linux kernel which has a new Digiboard async driver.
(I can't remember the version number)
After re-building the kernel and rebooting the system, digiDload
could not initialize the PC/Xem cards. (The error message
indicated that the card Bios was not accessible).
Without wasting more time attempting the get the internal driver
to work, we installed version 1.3.1 of the digi driver and again
configured the boards using digiConfig. After rebuilding the kernel
and rebooting the system, digiDload was still unable to
initialize the cards.
DAY 3
The next day we downloaded a Beta version of the 1.3.4 driver
from the Digiboard ftp site.
Using digiUpdate we installed the new driver, but during the kernel
rebuild we received an error message informing us that the digi
driver required an earlier version of the PCI driver and that
we should refer to the /usr/src/linux/Documentation/pci.txt
document for more information.
Unable to get the kernel to rebuild, we returned to the 2.0.36
kernel and updated the exisitng digi driver with the Beta version
of 1.3.4 using digiUpdate.
We re-configured the cards, rebuilt the kernel and rebooted the
system.
After rebooting, digiDload successfully initialized the cards and
we were finally receiving data at the terminals. However the
information we were receiving was garbage, so using
ditty 38400 > /dev/ttyD9
we were able to receive readable information.
We still have some unresolved issues though.
At the terminal, there is intermitant echo and there are no
carriage returns, so, a directory listing for example,
is spread all over the screen.
The contents of /etc/inittab for the digi tty's is as follows;
D0:2345:/bin/respawn:mingetty /dev/ttyD0 DT38400
We have attempted using /bin/getty and /bin/agetty with the
same results.
Can you give us some suggestions as to how to obtain a
stable connection to the terminals.
============================================================================
----.
Thanks guys!!
------------------------------
From: Roger Rabbit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,linux.redhat.misc
Subject: Re: Dial-up Setup frustration
Date: 14 Jan 1999 04:00:47 GMT
==============A023B4378D1C02103C393F42
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Just to put things in perspective for you, I've been using Linux for a while
now,
on and off since version 1.X of the kernel, can't remember exactly. I just
threw
RH 5.2 on my system for the hell of it tonight, I usually run SUSE. It took me
about
1 hour to install and configure the entire system, including X, sound, PPP
security, and
news and email. You are correct, that I couldn't have done it in this time
frame when I
first started using Linux, but it is possible. I work with Windows 95 at work
all the time,
and have installed it on many systems. The last time I installed it, I think
it took me a
lot longer to get where I did tonight in an hour, and on top of it rebooted the
computer 15
times... I know, I counted them as I did them. What I'm saying is I feel I
know Win95 and
Linux about equally, actually am slightly better versed in Win95, and I can
already see what
Linux has over Microsoft products.
Not to pick on you, but all I see is people putting posts on here complaining
about how hard
linux is to learn after they have been using it for X days. I can tell you
what I knew about DOS
and Windows after X days ... s*it thats what. If you think you are going to
learn Linux in
a few days you are very mistaken, it takes time and patience, but then so did
all the M$
OS's too.
I see you are into C++ programming, did you find the gcc+ compiler in your
distro? Ask M$ to
give you a free compiler/debugger sometime and see where you get.
Sorry, but I guess I am just venting as well.
Roger
A.G. wrote:
> I have been exposing myself to Linux for about 10 days now. Spent my entire
> winter break on it, and I am largely frustrated. I have ordered RedHat 5.2
> from Cheapbytes in planning to learn how a computer can operate w/o GUI.
>
> Alright, installation of RH is really simple and took me about 20 min. the
> first time. I'm not newbie to computing, so partitioning and device
> management are not a problem.
>
> BUT since I installed RH on my 2 'puters (PII and 486), I haven't been able
> to do anything with it exept for launching XWindow and fooling with its
> applications, of wich I got sick after a day. Alright I installed KDE hoping
> for a smoother operation, but wasn't too thrilled with it either.
>
> Anyways, the most important thing that I was looking for in Linux was
> networking. But for a week I have been trying to configure a PPP connection
> to my ISP, and all in vain. All the beloved FAQs, Howto's and Mini-Howto's
> have different information. "Running Linux" from O'Reilly wasn't of much
> help because it contains some old info. ALL THESE SOURCES OF INFO REFER TO
> DIFFERENT CONFIGURATION FILES!!! I am greatly confused by now and ready to
> give up.
>
> Here you have it: MSWin's advantage of having ONE way to configure smth
> right, and not a million. True, I am new to Linux and ignorant in many of
> its aspects. But I was willing to compare it to Win, and so far - forget it!
> My NT runs v. well on my 96Meg of RAM. I don't have to spend dozens of hours
> trying to configure it. Now that I am going back to college I simply won't
> have the time for this. I haven't tried yet, but I am sure that it won't
> take me more than a couple of hours to get my little home LAN going under
> windows.
>
> What Linux will be able to deliver for me, is practicing in UNIX-like shells
> at home, which is not bad after all - found *some* use for it.
>
> It seems to me that you guys prefer Linux over Windows because it is cool to
> do so. I have all respect in the world for the people envolved in Linux
> development - maybe it will be an alternative I will seriously consider some
> day. But with all MS's bugs and problems (and believe me I am not their fan
> at all, talking of Gates' business practices), it lets me do my work of C++
> and Java programming plus all the publishing features in the world (and FAST
> printing -- Linux's drivers for my good old HP DJ500C made it print at a
> rate of 1 page in 4 minutes in graphical mode).
>
> That's it, I'm done venting steam. But after all it were you guys who made
> me try Linux in the first place, so I thought I would let you know about my
> dissatisfaction.
>
> Sincerely
> A.G.
--
Windows 95!!! Its good for... ummm..... well....
hmmmmm..... ahhhhhhh....ummmmm.... hell, I can't
think of anything its good for.
==============A023B4378D1C02103C393F42
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML>
Just to put things in perspective for you, I've been using Linux for a
while now,
<BR>on and off since version 1.X of the kernel, can't remember exactly.
I just threw
<BR>RH 5.2 on my system for the hell of it tonight, I usually run SUSE.
It took me about
<BR>1 hour to install and configure the entire system, including X, sound,
PPP security, and
<BR>news and email. You are correct, that I couldn't have done
it in this time frame when I
<BR>first started using Linux, but it is possible. I work with Windows
95 at work all the time,
<BR>and have installed it on many systems. The last time I installed
it, I think it took me a
<BR>lot longer to get where I did tonight in an hour, and on top of it
rebooted the computer 15
<BR>times... I know, I counted them as I did them. What I'm
saying is I feel I know Win95 and
<BR>Linux about equally, actually am slightly better versed in Win95,
and I can already see what
<BR>Linux has over Microsoft products.
<P>Not to pick on you, but all I see is people putting posts on here complaining
about how hard
<BR>linux is to learn after they have been using it for X days. I
can tell you what I knew about DOS
<BR>and Windows after X days ... s*it thats what. If you think you
are going to learn Linux in
<BR>a few days you are very mistaken, it takes time and patience, but then
so did all the M$
<BR>OS's too.
<P>I see you are into C++ programming, did you find the gcc+ compiler in
your distro? Ask M$ to
<BR>give you a free compiler/debugger sometime and see where you get.
<P>Sorry, but I guess I am just venting as well.
<P>Roger
<BR>
<BR>
<P>A.G. wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>I have been exposing myself to Linux for about 10
days now. Spent my entire
<BR>winter break on it, and I am largely frustrated. I have ordered RedHat
5.2
<BR>from Cheapbytes in planning to learn how a computer can operate w/o
GUI.
<P>Alright, installation of RH is really simple and took me about 20 min.
the
<BR>first time. I'm not newbie to computing, so partitioning and device
<BR>management are not a problem.
<P>BUT since I installed RH on my 2 'puters (PII and 486), I haven't been
able
<BR>to do anything with it exept for launching XWindow and fooling with
its
<BR>applications, of wich I got sick after a day. Alright I installed KDE
hoping
<BR>for a smoother operation, but wasn't too thrilled with it either.
<P>Anyways, the most important thing that I was looking for in Linux was
<BR>networking. But for a week I have been trying to configure a PPP connection
<BR>to my ISP, and all in vain. All the beloved FAQs, Howto's and Mini-Howto's
<BR>have different information. "Running Linux" from O'Reilly wasn't of
much
<BR>help because it contains some old info. ALL THESE SOURCES OF INFO REFER
TO
<BR>DIFFERENT CONFIGURATION FILES!!! I am greatly confused by now and ready
to
<BR>give up.
<P>Here you have it: MSWin's advantage of having ONE way to configure smth
<BR>right, and not a million. True, I am new to Linux and ignorant in many
of
<BR>its aspects. But I was willing to compare it to Win, and so far - forget
it!
<BR>My NT runs v. well on my 96Meg of RAM. I don't have to spend dozens
of hours
<BR>trying to configure it. Now that I am going back to college I simply
won't
<BR>have the time for this. I haven't tried yet, but I am sure that it
won't
<BR>take me more than a couple of hours to get my little home LAN going
under
<BR>windows.
<P>What Linux will be able to deliver for me, is practicing in UNIX-like
shells
<BR>at home, which is not bad after all - found *some* use for it.
<P>It seems to me that you guys prefer Linux over Windows because it is
cool to
<BR>do so. I have all respect in the world for the people envolved in Linux
<BR>development - maybe it will be an alternative I will seriously consider
some
<BR>day. But with all MS's bugs and problems (and believe me I am not their
fan
<BR>at all, talking of Gates' business practices), it lets me do my work
of C++
<BR>and Java programming plus all the publishing features in the world
(and FAST
<BR>printing -- Linux's drivers for my good old HP DJ500C made it print
at a
<BR>rate of 1 page in 4 minutes in graphical mode).
<P>That's it, I'm done venting steam. But after all it were you guys who
made
<BR>me try Linux in the first place, so I thought I would let you know
about my
<BR>dissatisfaction.
<P>Sincerely
<BR>A.G.</BLOCKQUOTE>
<PRE>--
Windows 95!!! Its good for... ummm..... well....
hmmmmm..... ahhhhhhh....ummmmm.... hell, I can't
think of anything its good for.</PRE>
</HTML>
==============A023B4378D1C02103C393F42==
------------------------------
From: "Donnie Palmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: How Do You Setup Two NICS
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 04:01:29 -0500
Could someone give me some instructions on how to setup two NICS in the same
box. I am having no luck with this process.
------------------------------
From: Ger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Printing from NT to Laser on Linux Server.
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 22:36:16 +0100
Setup the commands like
lpq command
printer command in the smb.conf and you will be able to print like on a local
printer
ger Donners
Andrew Adams wrote:
> My experience was that Idon't have to be logged in to the linux server
> to print from my NT, but I must BE ABLE TO. It was that password
> encryption stuff in NT/95sp1 stuff.
>
> David Barnes wrote:
> >
> > I have an identical setup plus an NT server. I don't recall having to
> > configure much for printing. Make sure have the user set up on the Linux
> > box and make sure the user is logged in to the Linux box. If you don't
> > login first, you will get errors like that one.
> >
> > Barnes
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Jerry Walter wrote:
> >
> > > Linux - RH 5.1 (2.0.35)
> > > Samba - 1.9.18p7
> > > NT - 4.0 sp3
> > >
> > > I get a error message from NT when I try to print to my
> > > Linux LaserJet.
> > >
> > > Something Like :
> > > Error writing to printer XXXXXX. Access is denied.
> > >
> > > Where do I have to define the privledges ? I have looked in all the
> > > HOWTO's (the ones I could find), and they all address the process
> > > of connecting to the print device. This I have already acclomplished.
> > >
> > >
> > > ================================================
> > > Jerry Walter
> > > NetSpace Systems Inc.
> > > A Bentley Strategic Affiliate
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > (937) 332-0053
> > > ================================================
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
