michael jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> my mail gets filtered, so if someone replies to one of my posts, the
> direct reply goes straight to my inbox. the rest gets stored for when
It would be theoretically possible to achieve the same result using a
combination of procmail, formail, sed, grep. That way, you could have
all messages that mention you anywhere in the body of the message
directed straight to your inbox.
My mail gets filtered too. But, when I receive a duplicate Cc'd
message... Whoosh.... straight to /dev/null.
> so, i want people to cc me.
I thought briefly about Cc'ing this message to you. But I just
couldn't do it. I'm a changed man. :-)
> i delete the one in my inbox,
> and there is still a copy in the other folder
Hey, that's what I do. It's just that I delete it before it gets to
the inbox.
> i think my posts have always been cc'd?? anyway, richard adams
> does it, so it must be right. ;) im just kidding, if it is wrong, i will
> stop. but you did ask why we cc, so i told you why i would prefer
> a cc.
I don't know if it is "wrong", it's just seems frightfully
inefficient. You can keep doing it if you want, just be comfortable
with the fact that if you Cc anything from this list to me it will get
deleted. And also that I won't Cc anything from this list to you.
> Steve Youngs wrote:
<Entire Post Deleted>
Pet peeve #2 - Quoting entire messages
> > --
> > ---Regards, Steve Youngs--------Email:-<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>---
> > | If Microsoft is the answer, then all I can say is that |
> > | you are asking the wrong question. |
> > ------------------------------<Don't be a Newbie--Be a Gnu-bie>---
Pet peeve #3 - Quoting signatures
--
---Regards, Steve Youngs--------Email:-<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>---
| If Microsoft is the answer, then all I can say is that |
| you are asking the wrong question. |
------------------------------<Don't be a Newbie--Be a Gnu-bie>---
