On Fri, 2019-10-18 at 13:58 -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > > > +++ b/Documentation/daxctl/movable-options.txt > > @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > + > > +-M:: > > +--no-movable:: > > If --movable is the default I would expect -M to be associated with > --movable. Don't we otherwise get the --no-<option> handling for free > with boolean options? I otherwise don't think we need a short option > for the "no" case.
Yep we get the inverse options for booleans for free, but we can define them either way - i.e. define it as --no-movable, and --movable is implied, or the other way round. But I agree it makes sense to remove the short option here. _______________________________________________ Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
