On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 2:04 PM Verma, Vishal L <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, 2019-10-18 at 13:58 -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > > > > > +++ b/Documentation/daxctl/movable-options.txt > > > @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ > > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > > + > > > +-M:: > > > +--no-movable:: > > > > If --movable is the default I would expect -M to be associated with > > --movable. Don't we otherwise get the --no-<option> handling for free > > with boolean options? I otherwise don't think we need a short option > > for the "no" case. > > Yep we get the inverse options for booleans for free, but we can define > them either way - i.e. define it as --no-movable, and --movable is > implied, or the other way round.
Ah, I missed that we get the inverse flag option either way its defined, cool! _______________________________________________ Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
