Sorry, r1000248 on haswell should be L1D_PEND_MISS.FB_FULL 0,1,2,3 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Yuanfang Chen <cyf...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello > > I am using a haswell box. (E3-1231 v3). HT enabled. > > perf stat -e \{cycles,r148,r1000248,r8d1,r40d1\} -- sleep 1 > > with ubuntu version of perf > > Performance counter stats for 'sleep 1': > > 756066 cycles > 5740 r1000248 > 5516 r8d1 > 9064 r40d1 > 0 r148 > > 1.001770249 seconds time elapsed > > with relatively new tip of perf/core: > > Performance counter stats for 'sleep 1': > > 729403 cycles > 7250 r1000248 > 5628 r8d1 > 9273 r40d1 > <not supported> r148 > > 1.001674174 seconds time elapsed > > from https://download.01.org/perfmon/HSW/ > SMT on > SMT off > cpu_clk_unhalted.thread cycles Fixed counter 2 Fixed counter 2 > ld_blocks.no_sr r803 0,1,2,3 > 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7 > mem_load_uops_retired.l1_miss r8d1 0,1,2,3 0,1,2,3 > mem_load_uops_retired.hit_lfb r40d1 0,1,2,3 0,1,2,3 > l1d_pend_miss.pending r148 2 2 > > Seems these five events couldn't be counting at the same time, > although in terms of hardware they should get along. Is this a bug or > a limitation I should be aware of? Thank you so much. > > Yuanfang -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-perf-users" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html