On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:03:28PM -0500, Yuanfang Chen wrote: > Is this ok?
Sorry for the delay. The patch looks good to me. You may need to resend to [email protected] [email protected] Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <[email protected]> > > > From 47d52ccfae56a8eb702fee6ccf327780265df2cf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Yuanfang Chen <[email protected]> > Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 21:53:53 -0500 > Subject: [PATCH 1/1] perf/x86/intel: make L1D_PEND_MISS.FB_FULL not > constrained on haswell > > Signed-off-by: Yuanfang Chen <[email protected]> > --- > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c > b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c > index f63360b..e2a4300 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c > @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ static struct event_constraint > intel_hsw_event_constraints[] = { > FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x00c0, 0), /* INST_RETIRED.ANY */ > FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x003c, 1), /* CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.CORE */ > FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x0300, 2), /* CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.REF */ > - INTEL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x48, 0x4), /* L1D_PEND_MISS.* */ > + INTEL_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x148, 0x4), /* L1D_PEND_MISS.PENDING */ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-perf-users" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
