John Hasler wrote: > Add the 'passive' option. It tells pppd to try to initiate a connection > when it first comes up, but if it fails to just passively hang around > waiting for an LCP packet instead restarting. > The point is that the modems do not connect without an ATA and ATX3D, so I supose pppd would not be able to communicate anyway. Is there some special configuration for these modems? > Check your modem manual for some sort of a 'dumb' mode, designed for this > sort of use. Leave both modems powered up all the time (it would be > simplest to leave both computers powered up as well). > The AT commands in the manual could not help, and the &L1 &L2 (for leased lines) and /D or %D commands (for dumb) mentioned in the "Leased Line Mini HOTO" are not available. Actually I do not understand exactly what is a dumb modem. I supose it is a device that is always trying to connect, without waiting for a ring, is that right? > You might also want to look into getting a couple of so-called "short-haul" > modems, designed for just this sort of thing. You should be able to do > better than 33600. Well ... I figured that the Sportster were good devices, I have a pair and they are quite expensive now (ISA cards!). If the ideal connection is not possible, problably I'll stick with the not so elegant option of doing a dial-in with another device (already available in both machines) and activating the ppp-on script in the morning, droping the dial-in connection in favor of the private line connection and using the former to kill it at night. Anyway, that still leaves me with the problem of understanding what is a dumb modem. Thanks -- Janvrot IVM [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ppp" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PPP on a bare private line pair (newbie question)
Ivan Vicente Janvrot Miranda Tue, 08 Aug 2000 20:04:00 -0700
- PPP on a bare private line pair (newbie quest... Ivan Vicente Janvrot Miranda
- Re: PPP on a bare private line pair (new... John Hasler
- Re: PPP on a bare private line pair ... Ivan Vicente Janvrot Miranda
- Re: PPP on a bare private line p... John Hasler
- RE: PPP on a bare private line p... Dale W Hodge
- Re: PPP on a bare private li... John Hasler
- RE: PPP on a bare priva... Dale W Hodge
- Re: PPP on a bare priva... Sarel J. Botha
- Re: PPP on a bare p... John Hasler
