On Thu, 4 May 2000, Christopher E. Brown wrote: > On Wed, 3 May 2000, Michael Robinton wrote: > > > The primary limitation is probably the rotational speed of the disks and > > how fast you can rip data off the drives. For instance, the big IBM > > drives (20 - 40 gigs) have a limitation of about 27mbs for both the 7200 > > and 10k rpm models. The Drives to come will have to make trade-offs > > between density and speed, as the technology's in the works have upper > > constraints on one or the other. So... given enough controllers (either > > scsii on disk or ide individual) the limit will be related to the > > bandwidth of the disk interface rather than the speed of the processor > > it's talking too. > > > Not entirely, there is a fair bit more CPU overhead running an > IDE bus than a proper SCSI one. A "fair" bit on a 500mhz+ processor is really negligible. >
- Re: performance limitations... Seth Vidal
- Re: performance limitations... Michael
- Re: performance limitations... Paul Jakma
- Re: performance limitations... Daniel Roesen
- Re: performance limitations... Paul Jakma
- Re: performance limitations... Daniel Roesen
- Re: performance limitations of linux rai... Christopher E. Brown
- Re: performance limitations of linux... Chris Mauritz
- Re: performance limitations of linux... Michael Robinton
- Re: performance limitations of ... Christopher E. Brown
- Re: performance limitations... Michael Robinton
- Re: performance limitations... Christopher E. Brown
- Re: performance limitations... Michael Robinton
- Re: performance limitations... Christopher E. Brown
- Re: performance limitations... Mel Walters
- Re: performance limitations of linux raid Michael Robinton
- RE: performance limitations of linux raid Gregory Leblanc
- Re: performance limitations of linux raid Clay Claiborne
- Re: performance limitations of linux raid Chris Bondy
- Re: performance limitations of linux raid bug1
- Re: performance limitations of linux rai... remo strotkamp