On Thu, 4 May 2000, Michael Robinton wrote:
> >
> > Not entirely, there is a fair bit more CPU overhead running an
> > IDE bus than a proper SCSI one.
>
> A "fair" bit on a 500mhz+ processor is really negligible.
Ehem, a fair bit on a 500Mhz CPU is ~ 30%. I have watched a
*single* UDMA66 drive (with read ahead, multiblock io, 32bit mode, and
dma transfers enabled) on a 2.2.14 + IDE + RAID patched take over 30%
of the CPU during disk activity. The same system with a 4 x 28G RAID0
set running would be < .1% idle during large copies. An exactly
configured system with UltraWide SCSI instead of IDE sits ~ 95% idle
during the same ops.
---
As folks might have suspected, not much survives except roaches,
and they don't carry large enough packets fast enough...
--About the Internet and nuclear war.
- Re: performance limitations... Michael
- Re: performance limitations... Paul Jakma
- Re: performance limitations... Daniel Roesen
- Re: performance limitations... Paul Jakma
- Re: performance limitations... Daniel Roesen
- Re: performance limitations of linux rai... Christopher E. Brown
- Re: performance limitations of linux... Chris Mauritz
- Re: performance limitations of linux... Michael Robinton
- Re: performance limitations of ... Christopher E. Brown
- Re: performance limitations... Michael Robinton
- Re: performance limitations... Christopher E. Brown
- Re: performance limitations... Michael Robinton
- Re: performance limitations... Christopher E. Brown
- Re: performance limitations... Mel Walters
- Re: performance limitations of linux raid Michael Robinton
- RE: performance limitations of linux raid Gregory Leblanc
- Re: performance limitations of linux raid Clay Claiborne
