On Fri, 5 May 2000, Michael Robinton wrote:

> > > > 
> > > >         Not entirely, there is a fair bit more CPU overhead running an
> > > > IDE bus than a proper SCSI one.
> > > 
> > > A "fair" bit on a 500mhz+ processor is really negligible.
> > 
> > 
> >     Ehem, a fair bit on a 500Mhz CPU is ~ 30%.  I have watched a
> > *single* UDMA66 drive (with read ahead, multiblock io, 32bit mode, and
> > dma transfers enabled) on a 2.2.14 + IDE + RAID patched take over 30%
> > of the CPU during disk activity.  The same system with a 4 x 28G RAID0
> > set running would be < .1% idle during large copies.  An exactly
> > configured system with UltraWide SCSI instead of IDE sits ~ 95% idle
> > during the same ops.
> 
> Try turning on DMA

Ahem, try re-reading the above, line 3 first word!


---
As folks might have suspected, not much survives except roaches, 
and they don't carry large enough packets fast enough...
        --About the Internet and nuclear war.


Reply via email to