On Wed, 24 Sep 2025 08:17:45 +0800
Menglong Dong <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 2025/9/24 07:07, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > On Tue, 23 Sep 2025 17:20:00 +0800
> > Menglong Dong <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> > > The fprobe_entry() is used by fgraph_ops, so rename it to
> > > fprobe_fgraph_entry to be more distinctive.
> > 
> > Sorry, NAK. fprobe is based on fgraph by design.
> > So "fprobe_fgraph" sounds redundant.
> 
> Hi, Masami. Did you see my next patch that use ftrace
> for the fprobe to obtain better performance?
> 
> Hmm, it seems that the cover-letter is necessary :/

Yeah, I missed [2/2]. And anyway I think this should be
merged to [2/2].

Thank you,

> 
> Thanks!
> Menglong Dong
> 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > >  kernel/trace/fprobe.c | 8 ++++----
> > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/kernel/trace/fprobe.c b/kernel/trace/fprobe.c
> > > index 6a205903b1ed..1785fba367c9 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/trace/fprobe.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/trace/fprobe.c
> > > @@ -254,8 +254,8 @@ static inline int __fprobe_kprobe_handler(unsigned 
> > > long ip, unsigned long parent
> > >   return ret;
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > -static int fprobe_entry(struct ftrace_graph_ent *trace, struct 
> > > fgraph_ops *gops,
> > > -                 struct ftrace_regs *fregs)
> > > +static int fprobe_fgraph_entry(struct ftrace_graph_ent *trace, struct 
> > > fgraph_ops *gops,
> > > +                        struct ftrace_regs *fregs)
> > >  {
> > >   unsigned long *fgraph_data = NULL;
> > >   unsigned long func = trace->func;
> > > @@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ static int fprobe_entry(struct ftrace_graph_ent 
> > > *trace, struct fgraph_ops *gops,
> > >   /* If any exit_handler is set, data must be used. */
> > >   return used != 0;
> > >  }
> > > -NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(fprobe_entry);
> > > +NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(fprobe_fgraph_entry);
> > >  
> > >  static void fprobe_return(struct ftrace_graph_ret *trace,
> > >                     struct fgraph_ops *gops,
> > > @@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ static void fprobe_return(struct ftrace_graph_ret 
> > > *trace,
> > >  NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(fprobe_return);
> > >  
> > >  static struct fgraph_ops fprobe_graph_ops = {
> > > - .entryfunc      = fprobe_entry,
> > > + .entryfunc      = fprobe_fgraph_entry,
> > >   .retfunc        = fprobe_return,
> > >  };
> > >  static int fprobe_graph_active;
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <[email protected]>

Reply via email to