On Wed, 26 Nov 2025 10:33:51 +0100 Gabriele Monaco <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > No biggy, but I wonder if this would look better as: > > > > > > return retval ? : count; > > > > Unless you really prefer it this way, I would rather not. The first time > > I saw this syntax, it confused the hell out of me. Took me some time > > scratching my head until I figured out that it is a GNU extension. > > > > I prefer to stay with the C standard unless there is major benefit not > > to. > > To be fair, I find it a bit obscure as well, although it's frequently used > within the kernel. > > Let's not change it then. As I said, "No biggy". I personally like that notation better. But that's my own personal choice. I won't push that on other ;-) -- Steve
