On Thu, 12 Mar 2026 11:28:07 -0400 Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Note, Vineeth came up with the naming. I would have done "do" but when I > > saw "invoke" I thought it sounded better. > > It works as long as you don't have a tracing subsystem called > "invoke", then you get into identifier clash territory. True. Perhaps we should do the double underscore trick. Instead of: trace_invoke_foo() use: trace_invoke__foo() Which will make it more visible to what the trace event is. Hmm, we probably should have used: trace__foo() for all tracepoints, as there's still functions that are called trace_foo() that are not tracepoints :-p -- Steve
