On 2026-03-12 11:23, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Thu, 12 Mar 2026 11:12:41 -0400 Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]> wrote:if (trace_foo_enabled() && cond) trace_invoke_foo(args); /* calls __do_trace_foo() directly */FYI, we have a similar concept in LTTng-UST for userspace instrumentation already: if (lttng_ust_tracepoint_enabled(provider, name)) lttng_ust_do_tracepoint(provider, name, ...); Perhaps it can provide some ideas about API naming.I find the word "invoke" sounding more official than "do" ;-) Note, Vineeth came up with the naming. I would have done "do" but when I saw "invoke" I thought it sounded better.
It works as long as you don't have a tracing subsystem called "invoke", then you get into identifier clash territory. Thanks, Mathieu -- Mathieu Desnoyers EfficiOS Inc. https://www.efficios.com
