On Tue, 24 Mar 2026 08:39:03 -0400
Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Tue, 24 Mar 2026 09:47:08 +0100
> Martin Kaiser <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Martin,
> 
> First, please do not send a v2 as a reply to v1. A new version should
> always start a new mail thread.
> 
> > If fprobe_entry does not fill the allocated fgraph_data completely, the
> > unused part does not have to be zeroed.
> > 
> > fgraph_data is a short-lived part of the shadow stack. The preceding
> > length field allows locating the end regardless of the content.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Martin Kaiser <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > v2:
> 
> But to maintain a link to the previous version, I recommend adding here:
> 
> Changes since v1: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]

Ah, this is a good idea for the patch which does not have cover mail.

Thanks :)

> 
> 
> >  - remove the memset instead of fixing the length
> > 
> >  kernel/trace/fprobe.c | 2 --
> >  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/fprobe.c b/kernel/trace/fprobe.c
> > index dcadf1d23b8a..56d145017902 100644
> > --- a/kernel/trace/fprobe.c
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/fprobe.c
> > @@ -450,8 +450,6 @@ static int fprobe_fgraph_entry(struct ftrace_graph_ent 
> > *trace, struct fgraph_ops
> >                             used += FPROBE_HEADER_SIZE_IN_LONG + size_words;
> >             }
> >     }
> > -   if (used < reserved_words)
> > -           memset(fgraph_data + used, 0, reserved_words - used);
> >  
> >     /* If any exit_handler is set, data must be used. */
> >     return used != 0;
> 
> As for the patch,
> 
> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <[email protected]>
> 
> -- Steve
> 


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <[email protected]>

Reply via email to