Gabriele Monaco <[email protected]> writes: > The sched monitor page was linking to Daniel's website which is now > down. The main purpose of the link was to point to a source for the > models from the original author and that can be found also in his > published paper. > > Replace the link with a reference to Daniel's "A thread synchronization > model for the PREEMPT_RT Linux kernel" which can be found online and > includes the models definitions as well as the work behind them (not the > original patches but since they're based on a 5.0 kernel and are mostly > included upstream, there's little value in keeping them in the docs). > > Signed-off-by: Gabriele Monaco <[email protected]> > --- > Documentation/trace/rv/monitor_sched.rst | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/trace/rv/monitor_sched.rst > b/Documentation/trace/rv/monitor_sched.rst > index 0b96d6e147c6..661171bd7c5e 100644 > --- a/Documentation/trace/rv/monitor_sched.rst > +++ b/Documentation/trace/rv/monitor_sched.rst > @@ -365,4 +365,4 @@ constraints when processing the events:: > References > ---------- > > -[1] - https://bristot.me/linux-task-model > +[1] - Daniel Bristot de Oliveira et al.: A thread synchronization model for > the PREEMPT_RT Linux kernel, J. Syst. Archit., 2020.
Since, as you say, it can be found online, is there a reason not to include a link here? jon
