Gabriele Monaco <[email protected]> writes: > On Mon, 2026-04-27 at 03:44 -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote: >> Since, as you say, it can be found online, is there a reason not to >> include a link here? > > Mmh, perhaps being overly cautious for the link not to break again? > > The paper is published so I assume it's always going to be available in > some way. It is currently hosted by the university at [1], which may be > unlikely to change, and can be found via DOI at [2], which should never > change (at least that's what I believe a DOI is for) but brings to the > publisher's website rather than the open-access PDF. > > I think the reference to the paper I included is robust yet easy to use > with any scientific or even general purpose search engine. But if you > believe using either of the two links is more appropriate, I can send a > V2 with the change.
I will defer to others in the end, but to me it seems that we should make life easier for our readers whenever we can. Providing a link seems better than requiring them to search for it themselves. Thanks, jon
