On Thu, May 21, 2026 at 5:45 AM Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> We now expect nop combo with 10 bytes nop instead of 5 bytes nop,
> fixing has_nop_combo to reflect that.
>
> Fixes: 41a5c7df4466 ("libbpf: Add support to detect nop,nop5 instructions 
> combo for usdt probe")
> Reviewed-by: Jakub Sitnicki <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
> ---
>  tools/lib/bpf/usdt.c | 16 ++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/usdt.c b/tools/lib/bpf/usdt.c
> index e3710933fd52..484a4354e82b 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/usdt.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/usdt.c
> @@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ struct usdt_manager *usdt_manager_new(struct bpf_object 
> *obj)
>
>         /*
>          * Detect kernel support for uprobe() syscall, it's presence means we 
> can
> -        * take advantage of faster nop5 uprobe handling.
> +        * take advantage of faster nop10 uprobe handling.
>          * Added in: 56101b69c919 ("uprobes/x86: Add uprobe syscall to speed 
> up uprobe")

Would be nice to add commit that switches nop5 to nop10 (but until it
lands hash is not stable, so, hmmm, maybe we'll land this patch
separately? send it a bit later to bpf-next?)


but otherwise lgtm

Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>

>          */
>         man->has_uprobe_syscall = kernel_supports(obj, FEAT_UPROBE_SYSCALL);
> @@ -596,14 +596,14 @@ static int parse_usdt_spec(struct usdt_spec *spec, 
> const struct usdt_note *note,
>  #if defined(__x86_64__)
>  static bool has_nop_combo(int fd, long off)
>  {
> -       unsigned char nop_combo[6] = {
> -               0x90, 0x0f, 0x1f, 0x44, 0x00, 0x00 /* nop,nop5 */
> +       unsigned char nop_combo[11] = {
> +               0x90, 0x66, 0x2e, 0x0f, 0x1f, 0x84, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 
> 0x00,
>         };
> -       unsigned char buf[6];
> +       unsigned char buf[11];
>
> -       if (pread(fd, buf, 6, off) != 6)
> +       if (pread(fd, buf, 11, off) != 11)
>                 return false;
> -       return memcmp(buf, nop_combo, 6) == 0;
> +       return memcmp(buf, nop_combo, 11) == 0;
>  }
>  #else
>  static bool has_nop_combo(int fd, long off)
> @@ -814,8 +814,8 @@ static int collect_usdt_targets(struct usdt_manager *man, 
> struct elf_fd *elf_fd,
>                 memset(target, 0, sizeof(*target));
>
>                 /*
> -                * We have uprobe syscall and usdt with nop,nop5 instructions 
> combo,
> -                * so we can place the uprobe directly on nop5 (+1) and get 
> this probe
> +                * We have uprobe syscall and usdt with nop,nop10 
> instructions combo,
> +                * so we can place the uprobe directly on nop10 (+1) and get 
> this probe
>                  * optimized.
>                  */
>                 if (man->has_uprobe_syscall && has_nop_combo(elf_fd->fd, 
> usdt_rel_ip)) {
> --
> 2.53.0
>

Reply via email to