On Thu, 6 Aug 2026 09:43:00 +0100 Fuad Tabba <[email protected]> wrote:
> > My ack still stands, but I wonder if we should just not use the include and > > instead s/bool/_Bool/ ? > > I'd prefer to keep the include, if you don't mind. > > As far as I can tell, apart from the typedef itself, the only headers > built into the kernel that use _Bool as a type are a uapi one and > arch/um's user.h when it's built for the host, neither of which has > bool available, plus what looks like a leftover in bcache_ondisk.h > from when it was uapi. > > The include also covers whatever field gets added next. > > Happy to switch if you'd still prefer _Bool. The reason I suggested this is because I'm not sure how much we want to add Linux headers to files built for the hypervisor. If Vincent is good with adding this, then so am I. But I rather have him give an ack before we do. -- Steve
