From: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>

Using kvm_mem_is_private() when populating guest_memfd instead of using an
open coded equivalent.  In addition to simplifying the populate code *now*,
this avoids the need to provide a range-based gmem lookup API in the future
as well.

No functional change intended.

Suggested-by: Xiaoyao Li <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ackerley Tng <[email protected]>
---
 virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c b/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c
index b596486d184ca..a11cf6dc785da 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c
@@ -811,9 +811,7 @@ static long __kvm_gmem_populate(struct kvm *kvm, struct 
kvm_memory_slot *slot,
 
        folio_unlock(folio);
 
-       if (!kvm_range_has_memory_attributes(kvm, gfn, gfn + 1,
-                                            KVM_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTE_PRIVATE,
-                                            KVM_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTE_PRIVATE)) {
+       if (!kvm_mem_is_private(kvm, gfn)) {
                ret = -EINVAL;
                goto out_put_folio;
        }

-- 
2.55.0.654.g21b8a5bc05-goog



Reply via email to