On Wed, 02 Sep 2026, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Sep 02, 2026 at 10:57:44AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Wed, 02 Sep 2026, Greg KH wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Sep 02, 2026 at 09:27:17AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > > > On Tue, 01 Sep 2026, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 1 Sep 2026 13:34:44 +0100 > > > > > Lee Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Could we have this applied to Stable please: > > > > > > > > > > > > 8a5f63637890 ("ring-buffer: Fix subbuf resize race with ring buffer > > > > > > readers") > > > > > > > > > > It's marked for stable so it should automatically be backported (if it > > > > > > > > Where was it marked for Stable? > > > > > > It has: > > > Cc: [email protected] > > > in the patch itself. It is in my queue to get to, along with over 1000+ > > > other patches that people decided to tag for stable and yet wait for the > > > -rc1 merge window to get to Linus. > > > > Am I losing the plot? The patch that I replied to [0] did not Cc: > > Stable. If it had, I wouldn't have made the request. > > > > From: Vincent Donnefort <[email protected]> > > To: [email protected], [email protected], > > [email protected] > > Cc: [email protected], [email protected], > > [email protected], > > Vincent Donnefort <[email protected]> > > Subject: [PATCH v5 06/10] tracing: Fix subbuf resize races with > > trace_pipe_raw readers > > > > [...] > > > > Fixes: bce761d75745 ("ring-buffer: Read and write to ring buffers with > > custom sub buffer size") > > Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <[email protected]> > > > I'm lost, I was referring to the above git id that was asked about, > sorry.
Ah, so Steven must have added it to the commit on application. That makes sense now. As you were! > > > It will get there eventually... > > > > This wasn't an urgent request or a request to expedite. Take your time. > > Back to the never-ending-queue... Enjoy! -- Lee Jones
