On Thursday 09 September 2004 6:17 am, Lothar Wassmann wrote: > Hi David, > > David Brownell writes: > > That's an interesting idea, though I can imagine some chips > > might not fit very smoothly into an OHCI-shaped hole ... :) > > > That's right, but OHCI offers a very stable framework for the whole > hardware independent stuff.
Yes, and it's probably easier to fit into that than create an alternative and fully debug it. > > Have you run this through all the "usbtest" code, and seen > > that it behaves OK for the transfer types you support? (And > > fails cleanly for ISO.) > > > Not yet. I only recently figured out how to use the framework. I'll do > it as soon as I find some time for this and report back here. I updated the webpage for it a while back, but the cron job flushing it from CVS to the websites (and mirrors) doesn't seem to be running lately. - Dave > > > Lothar Wassmann > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. Deadline: Sept. 13. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
