I've already seen people crippling their usb-storage driver with
enabling BLK_DEV_UB - and I doubt the warning in the help text added
after 2.6.9 will fix all such problems.
Is there except for kernel size any good reason for using BLK_DEV_UB
instead of USB_STORAGE?
If not, I'd suggest the patch below to let BLK_DEV_UB depend
on EMBEDDED.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- linux-2.6.10-rc3-mm1-full/drivers/block/Kconfig.old 2004-12-20
00:52:22.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.10-rc3-mm1-full/drivers/block/Kconfig 2004-12-20
00:52:39.000000000 +0100
@@ -303,7 +303,7 @@
config BLK_DEV_UB
tristate "Low Performance USB Block driver"
- depends on USB
+ depends on USB && EMBEDDED
help
This driver supports certain USB attached storage devices
such as flash keys.
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
