Pete Zaitcev wrote:
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 02:35:42 +0100, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


What about a dependency of BLK_DEV_UB on USB_STORAGE=n ?


I have them both as 'm' in my configuration, works like a charm.

ub can work like that, but it makes it darned difficult to use usb-storage like that. ub wants to bind to the devices, not usb-storage, and if ub is unloaded, usb-storage doesn't bind to them. at least that's been my experience with it.

--
~Randy


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to