On Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 04:31:46PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 01:16:44AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > I've already seen people crippling their usb-storage driver with
> > enabling BLK_DEV_UB - and I doubt the warning in the help text added
> > after 2.6.9 will fix all such problems.
> >
> > Is there except for kernel size any good reason for using BLK_DEV_UB
> > instead of USB_STORAGE?
>
> You don't want to use the scsi layer? You like the stability of it at
> times? :)
>...
What about a dependency of BLK_DEV_UB on USB_STORAGE=n ?
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
